[Lessons from the COVID-19-Pandemic : Experiences of critical care nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative explorative study]. / Lehren der COVID-19-Pandemie : Erfahrungen von Intensivpflegefachpersonen während der COVID-19-Pandemie: eine qualitative explorative Studie.

BACKGROUND: When the workload for critical care nurses becomes too high, this can have consequences for both personal health as well as patient care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, critical care nurses were confronted with new and dynamic changes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the experiences of critical care nurses regarding the ad hoc measures taken and the perceived physical and psychological burden experienced during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at two hospitals using an online survey. The open questions addressing the challenges faced during the COVID-19 pandemic were subjected to content analysis according to Mayring. RESULTS: A total of 179 critical care nurses participated in the online survey. From the results, the following four categories were developed: "not meeting one's own quality of care requirements," "uncertainties in everyday professional and private life," "increased responsibility with lack of relief," and "insufficient coping strategies for physical and psychological burden." CONCLUSION: Critical care nurses require structures and processes which support them in situations of high workload. The focus should be on the self-imposed requirements of quality of care as well as potentially relieving measures.

[Patient handover from anaesthesia to postanaesthesia unit: An analysis of the current situation in three Swiss hospitals]. / Patientenübergabe Anästhesie ­ Aufwachraum.

Patient handover from anaesthesia to postanaesthesia unit: An analysis of the current situation in three Swiss hospitals Abstract: Background: Patient handovers carry a risk of inadequate or missing communication of important information that can jeopardize patient safety. To increase patient safety, protocols for processes and contents of a structured patient handover were created. Aim: To assess the current status of patient handovers from anaesthesia staff to recovery room nurses. Method: After a literature search an observation protocol for patient handovers according to the SBAR concept (von Dossow & Zwißler, 2016) was developed. Using this checklist, non-participant observations were conducted in three Swiss hospitals and evaluated with statistical analysis. Results: A total of 98 observations were made. The report receiving person felt integrated into the handover and received the necessary information. Deficiencies in patient identification and a joint control of lines after surgical interventions could be identified. The subjectively rated quality of patient handover did not differ between the three hospitals (X2(2)=,927, p=,629) and also not according to the time of day (X2(2)=3,604, p=,216). There was also no difference between the subjective quality of the handover and the delivering professional group (X2(3)=4,507, p=,212). Conclusions: The subjective quality of patient handover did not differ between the three hospitals. However, the patient handover protocols need to be adapted to ensure that patient identification and a joint assessment including control of lines and drains are performed.

[Measurement of attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration in an operating theatre - a cross-sectional study]. / Messung der Haltung zur interprofessionellen Zusammenarbeit in einer Operationsabteilung ­ eine Querschnittsstudie.

Measurement of attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration in an operating theatre - a cross-sectional study Abstract.Background: Interprofessional cooperation (IC) between healthcare professionals is essential for good treatment outcomes. Surgical departments place special demands on interprofessional cooperation (situational team formation, alterning work environment, coordinative overcrowding of work) within a health organisation. In order to achieve common goals in a team, it is important that those involved have a comparable understanding of and attitude towards interprofessional cooperation, regardless of their profession. Research Question: What is the internal consistency of the German version of the Jefferson Scale of Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Collaboration (JeffSATIC) when applied to personnel in an operating theatre? What is the attitude towards interprofessional cooperation between the various occupational groups in a surgical department of an acute care hospital functioning as a centre and a training establishment? Are there differences between the individual occupational groups and the sexes? Method: The validated JeffSATIC questionnaire was translated back into German and sent to 283 people in a surgical department with eleven operating theatres. The internal consistency of the questionnaire and differences in attitude towards interprofessional cooperation were examined. Findings: The German version of the JeffSATIC questionnaire is a reliable instrument for measuring the attitude of individuals towards interprofessional cooperation. It was used for the first time in the context of a surgical department. In the institution examined, there are no statistically significant differences between the different occupational groups and sexes in relation to the attitude to IC in the dimensions 'work relationship' and 'responsibility' determined by the questionnaire. The medical service anaesthesia shows the greatest divergence in attitude towards interprofessional cooperation within a professional group. Conclusions: In the institution examined, the prerequisites for successful interprofessional cooperation exist. In general, it should be further examined which factors influence the divergence in attitude per occupational group and whether these divergences in attitude are also associated with the quality of the actual cooperation.

A Hospital-wide Outbreak of Serratia marcescens, and Ishikawa's "Fishbone" Analysis to Support Outbreak Control.

A nosocomial outbreak of Serratia marcescens in respiratory samples predominantly from patients in a surgical intensive care unit is reported. Most of these patients were cardiac surgical patients. Initially, a vigorous but inconclusive investigation was implemented on the basis of standardized (according the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) steps of outbreak investigation. Then, a systemic quality management approach with "fishbone" analysis was added. As a consequence, plausible causes for the outbreak were identified: (i) S marcescens was found on the transesophageal echocardiography probe used during cardiac surgery; and (ii) the quality of the surface disinfection was insufficient due to multiple reasons and was completely reengineered. In conclusion, in addition to the standardized steps of outbreak investigation, the complementary use of quality management tools such as the Ishikawa "fishbone" analysis is helpful for outbreak control. The complete reengineering of the disinfectant procurement and logistics is assumed to have been the most effective measure to control the described outbreak.