The Cost Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Versus Best Supportive Care in the Treatment of Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL) After Two or More Lines of Systemic Therapy in Canada.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) received marketing authorisation in Canada for the treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy, and the clinical and economic value of axi-cel to patients and the healthcare system should be examined. The objective of this analysis is to determine, from societal and public healthcare payer perspectives, the cost effectiveness of axi-cel versus best supportive care for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in Canada. METHODS: A pharmacoeconomic model was developed and populated with clinical data derived from the ZUMA-1 and SCHOLAR-1 studies using a propensity score-matched comparison. A partitioned survival mixture-cure modelling approach was taken to characterise the potential curative effect of axi-cel therapy in large B-cell lymphoma. Healthcare resource utilisation and adverse event data were based on results from ZUMA-1, and utility values were derived from ZUMA-1 data supplemented with published literature. Costs (in 2021 Canadian dollars) were taken from publicly available Canadian cost databases and published literature. Benefits and costs were discounted at 1.5% per year, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. RESULTS: In the base case, axi-cel generated an incremental 6.2 life-years compared to best supportive care, corresponding to 4.6 additional quality-adjusted life-years, and was associated with $606,010 in additional costs. The incremental cost-utility ratio was $132,747 per quality-adjusted life-year gained compared with best supportive care from a societal perspective ($106,392 per quality-adjusted life-year gained from a public healthcare payer perspective). Key drivers of the analysis included progression-free survival and overall survival values for axi-cel. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this analysis suggest that axi-cel may be considered a cost-effective allocation of resources compared with best supportive care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in Canada.

The cost-effectiveness of as-needed budesonide-formoterol versus low-dose inhaled corticosteroid maintenance therapy in patients with mild asthma in Canada.

BACKGROUND: The Global Initiative for Asthma recommends the use of as-needed low-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-formoterol as a preferred controller therapy for patients with mild asthma. These recommendations were based, in part, on evidence from the SYGMA 1 and 2 studies of as-needed budesonide-formoterol. This analysis aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of as-needed budesonide-formoterol to low-dose maintenance ICS plus as-needed short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA) in patients with mild asthma. METHODS: A Markov cohort model was designed that included three possible health states (non-exacerbation, severe exacerbation, and death) to compare as-needed budesonide-formoterol 200-6 µg to twice-daily budesonide 200 µg maintenance therapy (low-dose ICS) plus as-needed terbutaline 0.5 mg (SABA). The deterministic base-case analysis used severe exacerbation, adverse event (AE), and healthcare resource use data from SYGMA 2, and was conducted from a Canadian public payer perspective with a 50-year time horizon, and a discount rate of 1.5% per annum. Moderate exacerbation was modelled on data from SYGMA 1 in sensitivity analyses. Utility values were derived from SYGMA 2 quality of life data. All-cause- and asthma-related mortality rates and costs (reported in 2019 Canadian dollars) were based on published data, using Canada-specific values where available. One-way deterministic sensitivity, probabilistic sensitivity, and eight scenario analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of the results. RESULTS: As-needed budesonide-formoterol was the dominant treatment option in the base-case analysis, providing incremental cost savings of $9882 per patient and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains of 0.002 versus low-dose maintenance ICS plus as-needed SABA over a 50-year time horizon. Using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY ($100,000/QALY), as-needed budesonide-formoterol had a 94% (95%) probability of being cost-effective compared with maintenance ICS plus as-needed SABA. Cost-saving was mostly driven by lower overall medication and AE-related costs. As-needed budesonide-formoterol remained the dominant treatment in sensitivity and scenario analyses. CONCLUSIONS: As-needed budesonide-formoterol is a cost-saving option for the treatment of mild asthma from the perspective of the Canadian public payer compared with low-dose maintenance ICS plus as-needed SABA.

The cost-effectiveness of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) causes significant disability and diminished quality-of-life. Delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF; also known as gastro-resistant DMF) is a new oral treatment for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) approved in the US, Australia, Canada, and Europe. OBJECTIVES: A cost-effectiveness model was developed to compare the health economic impact of DMF against other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) as first-line RRMS treatment from a Canadian Ministry of Health perspective. METHODS: A Markov cohort model was developed to simulate patients' progression through health states based on the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) over a life-time horizon. Patients entered the model based on a distribution of baseline EDSS scores, from which they could progress to higher or regress to lower EDSS state, or remain in the same state. Relapses could occur at any EDSS score. Results from a mixed-treatment comparison were used to inform model inputs for disease progression and relapse rates per treatment. Costs included direct medical costs stratified by EDSS score. Utilities were accrued based on time spent in each EDSS state. RESULTS: Compared with glatiramer acetate, DMF yielded 0.528 incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an incremental cost of $23 338 Canadian dollars (CAD), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CAD $44 118/QALY. The ICER for DMF compared with Rebif 44 mcg was CAD $10 672. Results were consistent across a wide range of one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Based on traditional cost-effectiveness thresholds in Canada (CAD $50 000-60 000), DMF can be considered a cost-effective option compared to other first-line DMTs.

Pharmacoeconomics of depot antipsychotics for treating chronic schizophrenia in Sweden.

AIMS: To determine the cost-effectiveness of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics for chronic schizophrenia in Sweden. METHODS: A 1-year decision tree was developed for Sweden using published data and expert opinion. Five treatment strategies lasting 1 year were compared: paliperidone palmitate (PP-LAI), olanzapine pamoate (OLZ-LAI), risperidone (RIS-LAI), haloperidol decanoate (HAL-LAI) and olanzapine tablets (oral-OLZ). Patients intolerant/failing drugs switched to another depot; subsequent failures received clozapine. Resources and employment time lost (indirect costs) were costed in 2011 Swedish kroner (SEK), from standard government lists. The model calculated the average cost/patient and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), which were combined into incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Multivariate and 1-way sensitivity analyses tested model stability. RESULTS: PP-LAI followed by OLZ-LAI had the lowest cost/patient (189,696 SEK) and highest QALYs (0.817), dominating in the base case. OLZ-LAI followed by PP-LAI cost 229,775 SEK (0.812 QALY), RIS-LAI followed by HAL-LAI cost 221,062 SEK (0.804 QALY), HAL-LAI followed by oral-OLZ cost 243,411 SEK (0.776 QALY), and oral-OLZ followed by HAL-LAI cost 249,422 SEK (0.773 QALY). The greatest proportions of costs (52.5-83.8%) were for institutional care; indirect costs were minor (2.4-3.8%). RESULTS were sensitive to adherence and hospitalization rates, but not drug cost. PP-LAI followed by OLZ-LAI dominated OLZ-LAI followed by PP-LAI in 59.4% of simulations, RIS-LAI followed by HAL-LAI in 65.8%, HAL-LAI followed by oral-OLZ in 94.0% and oral-OLZ followed by HAL-LAI in 95.9%; PP-LAI followed by OLZ-LAI was dominated in 1.1% of the 40,000 iterations. CONCLUSION: PP-LAI followed by OLZ-LAI was cost-effective in Sweden for chronic schizophrenia and cost-saving overall to the healthcare system.

Economic burden of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy in the USA.

BACKGROUND: Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) is the most common medical condition during gestation, affecting 50%-90% of women during their first trimester, and many in the second and third trimester. NVP affects women's quality of life and exerts a large economic impact on patients, caregivers and society. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the overall economic burden of illness of NVP in the USA. METHODS: A spreadsheet model was utilized to estimate this burden including direct and indirect costs. Costs are reported in 2012 US dollars and were estimated from the perspective of society. Cost centers included drug treatments for mild to severe NVP and hospitalizations for hyperemesis gravidarum (HG), as well as time lost from work and caregiver time. Clinical, epidemiologic, and economic data were obtained from the literature to populate the model. Rates of drug use were multiplied by unit costs and summed. RESULTS: The estimated total economic burden in 2012 in the USA was $1,778,473,782 which included $1,062,847,276 (60%) in direct costs and $715,626,506 (40%) in indirect costs. Overall, the average cost to manage one woman for NVP was $1827. Costs increased with increasing severity of NVP. The estimates were conservative, as not all applicable costs could be included. CONCLUSIONS: NVP results in a significant economic impact, and hence effective therapy should be sought. Future prospective research should determine in more detail what resources are utilized in the USA to manage women with NVP.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of atypical long-acting antipsychotics for treating chronic schizophrenia in Finland.

OBJECTIVE: In Finland, regional rates of schizophrenia exceed those in most countries, impacting the healthcare burden. This study determined the cost-effectiveness of long-acting antipsychotic (LAI) drugs paliperidone palmitate (PP-LAI), olanzapine pamoate (OLZ-LAI), and risperidone (RIS-LAI) for chronic schizophrenia. METHOD: This study adapted a decision tree analysis from Norway for the Finnish National Health Service. Country-specific data were sought from the literature and public documents, guided by clinical experts. Costs of health services and products were retrieved from literature sources and current price lists. This simulation study estimated average 1-year costs for treating patients with each LAI, average remission days, rates of hospitalization and emergency room visits and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). RESULTS: PP-LAI was dominant. Its estimated annual average cost was €10,380/patient and was associated with 0.817 QALY; OLZ-LAI cost €12,145 with 0.810 QALY; RIS-LAI cost €12,074 with 0.809 QALY. PP-LAI had the lowest rates of hospitalization, emergency room visits, and relapse days. This analysis was robust against most variations in input values except adherence rates. PP-LAI was dominant over OLZ-LAI and RIS-LAI in 77.8% and 85.9% of simulations, respectively. Limitations include the 1-year time horizon (as opposed to lifetime costs), omission of the costs of adverse events, and the assumption of universal accessibility. CONCLUSION: In Finland, PP-LAI dominated the other LAIs as it was associated with a lower cost and better clinical outcomes.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of paliperidone palmitate versus olanzapine pamoate for chronic schizophrenia in Norway.

OBJECTIVE: Paliperidone palmitate long-acting injection (PP-LAI) has recently been approved for treatment of chronic schizophrenia. Its cost-effectiveness has not been established. The objective was to compare direct costs and outcomes between PP-LAI and olanzapine pamoate (OLZ-LAI) in treating chronic schizophrenia in Norway from the perspective of the government payer. METHODS: We used a decision analytic model over a 1-year time horizon. Clinical inputs were derived from the literature and an expert panel; costs were taken from standard lists, adjusted to 2010 Norwegian kroner (NOK). Discounting was not done. Main outcomes included average cost per patient treated, hospitalisations, emergency room (ER) visits and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The pharmacoeconomic outcome was the incremental cost per QALY. Robustness was examined using one-way sensitivity analyses on critical variables and a 5000-iteration probabilistic Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis with all variables included. RESULTS: PP-LAI generated 0.845 QALY at a cost of 151 336 NOK of which 23% was due to drugs; 25% of patients were hospitalised and another 12% required ER visits. OLZ-LAI cost 174 351 NOK (21% due to drugs); patient outcomes included 0.844 QALY, 27% hospitalisations and 14% ER visits. PP-LAI dominated OLZ-LAI in the base case. The analysis was reasonably robust against variations in drug cost but sensitive to small changes in adherence and hospitalisation rates. Overall, PP-LAI was dominant over OLZ-LAI in 54.5% of simulations. Replacing OLZ-LAI with PP-LAI would be cost saving for the Norwegian healthcare system. CONCLUSION: PP-LAI was cost-effective compared with OLZ-LAI in treating patients with chronic schizophrenia in Norway but sensitive to changes in adherence and hospitalisation rates.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of paliperidone palmitate for treating schizophrenia in Greece.

BACKGROUND: Patients having chronic schizophrenia with frequent relapses and hospitalizations represent a great challenge, both clinically and financially. Risperidone long-acting injection (RIS-LAI) has been the main LAI atypical antipsychotic treatment in Greece. Paliperidone palmitate (PP-LAI) has recently been approved. It is dosed monthly, as opposed to biweekly for RIS-LAI, but such advantages have not yet been analysed in terms of economic evaluation. PURPOSE: To compare costs and outcomes of PP-LAI versus RIS-LAI in Greece. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis was performed using a previously validated decision tree to model clinical pathways and costs over 1 year for stable patients started on either medication. Rates were taken from the literature. A local expert panel provided feedback on treatment patterns. All direct costs incurred by the national healthcare system were obtained from the literature and standard price lists; all were inflated to 2011 costs. Patient outcomes analyzed included average days with stable disease, numbers of hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). RESULTS: The total annual healthcare cost with PP-LAI was €3529; patients experienced 325 days in remission and 0.840 QALY; 28% were hospitalized and 15% received emergency room treatment. With RIS-LAI, the cost was €3695, patients experienced 318.6 days in remission and 0.815 QALY; 33% were hospitalized and 17% received emergency room treatment. Thus, PP-LAI dominated RIS-LAI. Results were generally robust in sensitivity analyses with PP-LAI dominating in 74.6% of simulations. Results were sensitive to the price of PP-LAI. CONCLUSIONS: PP-LAI appears to be a cost-effective option for treating chronic schizophrenia in Greece compared with RIS-LAI since it results in savings to the health care system along with better patient outcomes.

The STARRT trial: a cost comparison of optimal vs sub-optimal initiation of dialysis in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Sub-optimal transitioning of patients from chronic kidney disease (CKD) to end stage renal disease (ESRD) may result in poor clinical outcomes and increased healthcare costs. The objectives of this study were to estimate the average total cost per patient who requires initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) stratified by status at initiation; optimal (RRT initiation as an outpatient with an arterio-venous [AV] Fistula, Graft or Peritoneal Dialysis [PD] catheter), and sub-optimal (RRT initiation as an inpatient and/or via central venous catheter [CVC]). METHODS: Data from the Study To Assess Renal Replacement Therapy (STARRT), a Canadian, multi-centre, 6 month retrolective study (n = 339), were used for this analysis. Unit costs for resources were obtained from participating hospitals, the literature, and/or standard costing sources. The analysis was performed from the perspective of healthcare payors and reported in 2011 Canadian Dollars (CAD). A propensity score technique was applied to control for potential confounders between the two groups. RESULTS: Two hundred of the eligible patients for analysis (61.9%) were sub-optimally and 123 (38.1%) were optimally prepared. For this analysis, 106 "matched" pairs were used. The average total cost per patient was estimated to be $63,225 (with a 95% CI ranging from $58,663-$67,958) for the sub-optimally initiated patients, and $39,260 (with a 95% CI ranging from $35,683-$43,007) for the optimally initiated patients (p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: Costs were calculated utilizing a conservative approach, using the cheapest available prices for medications and other resources. Assumptions had to be made for the costing of dialyses. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate, after adjusting for potential confounders, that optimally initiated patients for RRT have significantly lower healthcare-associated costs compared to sub-optimally initiated patients.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A public health issue with economic consequences.

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become endemic worldwide in hospitals, and community-associated MRSA is spreading into the community at large. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the current cost of MRSA in Canada and to assess the magnitude of this public health issue. METHODS: An extensive review of the literature was conducted to gather epidemiology, health care resource utilization and cost data for MRSA in Canadian settings. The current MRSA burden was estimated using available cost data and the most recent epidemiology data. RESULTS: The rate of MRSA in Canadian hospitals increased from 0.46 to 5.90 per 1000 admissions between 1995 and 2004, while community-associated MRSA continued to spread into the community. Patients harbouring MRSA required prolonged hospitalization (average 26 days of isolation per patient), special control measures, expensive treatments and extensive surveillance. Total cost per infected MRSA patient averaged $12,216, with hospitalization being the major cost driver (81%), followed by barrier precautions (13%), antimicrobial therapy (4%) and laboratory investigations (2%). The most recent epidemiological data, combined with available cost data, suggest that direct health care cost attributable to MRSA in Canada, including cost for management of MRSA-infected and-colonized patients and MRSA infrastructure, averaged $82 million in 2004 and could reach $129 million in 2010. CONCLUSION: MRSA is a costly public health issue that needs to be tackled if the growing burden of this disease in Canadian hospitals and in the community is to be limited.

Screening for glaucoma in Canada: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: To provide a recommendation on screening for glaucoma in Canada based on a review of recent evidence available in the literature. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify publications from MEDLINE, EMBASE, HealthSTAR, and Cochrane databases from 1990 to 2005. Relevant articles were categorized as economic studies, epidemiologic and intervention studies, or policy papers. Web sites and publications from provincial, state, national, and international health authorities were reviewed for policy recommendations and guidelines. RESULTS: We identified 39 articles (34 epidemiology and intervention, and 5 economic studies) for the review. From the economic studies, 2 were simple cost analyses and 3 were full economic evaluations (cost-effectiveness). Gaps were observed from these economic studies, where incremental cost-effectiveness analyses of modelled screening programmes were not observed. A large number of alternatives (i.e., screening techniques) and diverse outcome measures were found in the 34 epidemiology and intervention studies. This shows that evidence on the effectiveness of glaucoma screening programmes is available to be used in future modelled analyses. Neutral recommendation made by the Canadian Task Force on Periodic Health Examination regarding glaucoma screening in Canada could be related to the lack of reliable data and models used in past cost-effectiveness analyses. INTERPRETATION: A need exists to reevaluate the cost-effectiveness of a screening programme for glaucoma in Canada with updated efficacy and cost data. Health and monetary benefits could be improved compared with current practice and decision-makers would have the best available data when reevaluating the policy on screening for glaucoma.

Cost-effectiveness of treprostinil versus epoprostenol in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a Canadian analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, exerting a tremendous health and economic impact on patients. In the present study, an economic evaluation of patients with PAH treated with either treprostinil or epoprostenol was performed. METHODS: A cost-minimization analysis (a cost-effectiveness subtype) was performed under the assumption that treprostinil and epoprostenol were clinically equivalent. Two cohorts of 60 patients, treated with treprostinil or epoprostenol, were evaluated over three years by using a dynamic spreadsheet model. The evaluation included both the provincial ministries of health and societal perspectives. Resource valuation data for drugs, medical supplies, consultations, and surgical and diagnostic procedures were obtained from standard lists. Costs of hospitalizations and adverse events were derived from published sources. Additional outpatient costs were considered equivalent and, therefore, were excluded from the analysis. Costs are presented in 2003 Canadian dollars discounted at 3%. Sensitivity analyses were performed testing all uncertainties in the model. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis (over three years), treatment with treprostinil resulted in an expected savings of 2,610,642 US dollars and 2,781,438 US dollars from the ministries of health and societal perspectives, respectively. On a per-patient level, treatment with treprostinil resulted in an average annual savings of 14,504 US dollars and 15,452 US dollars, respectively. The greatest savings with treprostinil came from reduced hospitalizations. Multivariate sensitivity analyses estimated cost savings in greater than 99% of scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: By initiating and continuing treprostinil treatment over a three-year period, the economic burden associated with PAH may be reduced compared with epoprostenol treatment.

Economic evaluation of Avonex (interferon beta-Ia) in patients following a single demyelinating event.

BACKGROUND: Interferon beta-Ia (Avonex) 30 microg, intramuscular (i.m.), once weekly is efficacious in delaying clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS) following a single demyelinating event (SDE). This study determined the cost effectiveness of Avonex compared to current treatment in delaying the onset of CDMS. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and cost-utility analysis (CUA) were performed from Ministry of Health (MoH) and societal perspectives. For CEA, the outcome of interest was time spent in the pre-CDMS state, termed monosymptomatic life years (MLY) gained. For CUA, the outcome was quality-adjusted monosymptomatic life years (QAMLY) gained. A Markov model was developed with transitional probabilities and utilities derived from the literature. Costs were reported in 2002 Canadian dollars. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 5%. The time horizon was 12 years for the CEA, and 15 years for the CUA. All uncertainties were tested via univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: In the CEA, the incremental cost of Avonex per ILYgained was $53110 and $44789 from MoH and societal perspectives, respectively. In the CUA, the incremental cost of Avonex per QAMLY gained was $227586 and $189286 from MoH and societal perspectives, respectively. Both models were sensitive to the probability of progressing to CDMS and the analytical time horizon. The CUA was sensitive to the utilities value. CONCLUSION: Avonex may be considered as a reasonably cost-effective approach to treatment of patients experiencing an SDE In addition, the overall incremental cost-effectiveness profile of Avonex improves if treatment is initiated in pre-CDMS rather than waiting until CDMS.

Association between corneal thickness, mean intraocular pressure, disease stability and severity, and cost of treatment in glaucoma: a Canadian analysis.

PURPOSE: We determined the association between the mean corneal thickness (CT) and visual field mean defect (VF) severity as well as with mean intraocular pressure (IOP), disease stability, and cost of glaucoma therapy in a Canadian setting. METHODS: Data were collected from charts of patients diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). CT measures, VF scores, IOP measurements, physicians' impressions, and resources used (physician visits, diagnostic tests, procedures, and medications) were recorded over a minimum of 2.5 years. CT was compared across the three VF severity levels [mild (0 to < 5 dB), moderate (5 to < 12 dB), and severe (>/= 12 dB)] using a Kruskall-Wallis test. Initial VF was regressed on Age, CT, IOP, and Optic Disc Ratio. Stability and Cost were regressed on IOP. RESULTS: Of the 411 charts, 132 included CT measures. Patients included 50 with mild, 43 with moderate, and 39 with severe disease. The mean CTs of the overall, mild, moderate, and severe groups were 545.9 mum, 554.7 mum, 549.8 mum, and 523.3 mum, respectively. There were statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the CT pp of the mild and severe groups as well as between the moderate and severe groups. Regression analyses suggested that CT may be a predictor of disease severity, but not of cost. It was also found that IOP may be a predictor of disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe VFs tend to be those who have thinner corneas. Further research is warranted, as a result of the limited sample size, to clarify the definitive association among corneal thickness, disease progression, and the cost of therapy.

Association between mean intraocular pressure, disease stability and cost of treating glaucoma in Canada.

PURPOSE: A retrospective analysis determined the association between intraocular pressure (IOP) control levels (mean and last IOP) and disease stability, and the association between IOP and yearly treatment cost in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: Data were collected from POAG patients, referred to a tertiary glaucoma clinic. All IOP measurements, visual field mean deviation (VF) scores, physicians' impressions, and resources used (physician visits, procedures, and medications) were recorded and costed using standard resource unit cost lists from the Ministry of Health's perspective. Patients were categorized by the average VF score of their first three visits [mild (< 5 dB), moderate (> or = 5 dB to < 12 dB) and severe (> or = 12 dB)]. Pearson's r quantified the association between IOP control levels and stability, where stability was defined by the physician's subjective impression of the patient's disease. Spearman's rho was determined to quantify association between mean IOP and yearly treatment cost within VF categories. RESULTS: Four hundred and eleven charts were reviewed of which 265 were acceptable for analysis. A negative relationship was determined between the probability of reaching stability and mean IOP in all three VF severity groups. Pearson's r was -0.68 (p < 0.001), -0.72 (p < 0.001), and -0.52 (p < 0.001) for the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. A similar correlation was determined between the last measured IOP and stability. Pearson's r was -0.49 (p < 0.001), -0.80 (p < 0.001), and -0.65 (p < 0.001) for the mild, moderate and severe groups, respectively. A positive relationship was reported between mean yearly costs and IOP. Spearman's rho between mean yearly costs and mean IOP was 0.11 (p = 0.28), 0.23 (p < 0.05), and 0.26 (p < 0.05) for each respective VF level. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Lower IOP control levels are associated with higher probabilities of stability. In addition, lower IOP control levels are associated with lower costs of managing POAG in patients either with moderate VF loss or with severe VF loss. Economic burden increased with increasing disease severity.

Quality assessment of meta-analyses of RCTs of pharmacotherapy in major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Meta-analyses (MAs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have the potential to provide the highest level of evidence, but the quality of published MAs has not been systematically assessed. Therefore, we determined reliability was significant (kappa = 0.89; p < 0.05). the quality of reporting in MAs of RCTs of pharmacotherapy for major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults (18-65 years) without comorbidities and examine trends over time. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Healthstar, Psychlit and Cochrane databases were searched (1980-2002) by 4 independent reviewers for MAs of RCTs. Articles meeting inclusion criteria were blinded. Inter-rater reliability (kappa) was evaluated using a test-retest strategy on 4 articles. Quality was (p = 0.74) did not detect a difference in quality of assessed using the QUOROM checklist. Time trends were evaluated by calculating Spearman's rho. RESULTS: One hundred articles were identified, 68 were excluded [co-morbidities (9), inappropriate comparator (13), inappropriate outcome (15), article not available (5), inappropriate patient population (15), and inappropriate study design (11)]; 32 were included. Initial kappa was 0.81 (p < 0.05). After resolution of disagreements, the test-retest The mean overall quality score was 50.2% (SD 15.8%, range = 16.7-88.9%). The overall score for Titles was very poor (22%), Abstracts (40%) and Methods (49%) were poor, while overall Results score was minimally acceptable (54%). Good quality scores were found for Introduction (91%) and Discussion (97%). No time trends were identified using Spearman's correlation analysis (rho 0.05; p = 0.79). The Mann-Whitney U test articles published before and after the QUOROM. CONCLUSION: Despite quality guidelines, the average quality of published MAs of antidepressants is barely acceptable (50.2%). A need exists for adherence to standardized reporting and quality guidelines.

Cost of glaucoma in Canada: analyses based on visual field and physician's assessment.

PURPOSE: A longitudinal, retrospective study investigated the cost of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: Patient files from two tertiary care glaucoma practices were reviewed. Patients diagnosed with POAG and >/=2.5 years of follow-up data were included. Data collected included visual field mean deviation, physician's assessment, and resource utilization (physician visits, procedures, and medications). Costs, reported in 2001 Canadian dollars, were compared between groups, based on initial visual field mean deviation, including mild (<5 dB), moderate (5 to <12 dB), and severe (>/=12 dB), and based on physician's assessment, including controlled, uncontrolled, or patients initially uncontrolled for 12 months who become controlled. RESULTS: Of 411 patient charts extracted, 265 were included; 35 were excluded for ocular comorbidities and 111 patients with insufficient follow-up. Mean (standard deviation) yearly costs overall (N = 265) and for mild (n = 90), moderate (n = 91), and severe (n = 84) groups were $508 ($278), $408 ($266), $512 ($288), and $609 ($243), respectively. Differences between mean yearly costs were statistically significant for all three groups (P < 0.05). Costs for controlled (n = 110), uncontrolled (n = 76), and uncontrolled then controlled group (n = 79) were $423 ($243), $594 ($314), and $542 ($256), respectively. The controlled group cost was significantly lower than both of the other groups (P < 0.05). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The cost of treating POAG increases with visual field mean deviation severity and uncontrolled disease. Many patients diagnosed with glaucoma had already progressed to later stages in the disease process. Early disease detection may provide a substantial cost savings to the health care system.