Postoperative Staphylococcus aureus Infections in Patients With and Without Preoperative Colonization.

Importance: Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infections (SSIs) and bloodstream infections (BSIs) are important complications of surgical procedures for which prevention remains suboptimal. Contemporary data on the incidence of and etiologic factors for these infections are needed to support the development of improved preventive strategies. Objectives: To assess the occurrence of postoperative S aureus SSIs and BSIs and quantify its association with patient-related and contextual factors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study assessed surgical patients at 33 hospitals in 10 European countries who were recruited between December 16, 2016, and September 30, 2019 (follow-up through December 30, 2019). Enrolled patients were actively followed up for up to 90 days after surgery to assess the occurrence of S aureus SSIs and BSIs. Data analysis was performed between November 20, 2020, and April 21, 2022. All patients were 18 years or older and had undergone 11 different types of surgical procedures. They were screened for S aureus colonization in the nose, throat, and perineum within 30 days before surgery (source population). Both S aureus carriers and noncarriers were subsequently enrolled in a 2:1 ratio. Exposure: Preoperative S aureus colonization. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was cumulative incidence of S aureus SSIs and BSIs estimated for the source population, using weighted incidence calculation. The independent association of candidate variables was estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: In total, 5004 patients (median [IQR] age, 66 [56-72] years; 2510 [50.2%] female) were enrolled in the study cohort; 3369 (67.3%) were S aureus carriers. One hundred patients developed S aureus SSIs or BSIs within 90 days after surgery. The weighted cumulative incidence of S aureus SSIs or BSIs was 2.55% (95% CI, 2.05%-3.12%) for carriers and 0.52% (95% CI, 0.22%-0.91%) for noncarriers. Preoperative S aureus colonization (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 4.38; 95% CI, 2.19-8.76), having nonremovable implants (AHR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.15-3.49), undergoing mastectomy (AHR, 5.13; 95% CI, 1.87-14.08) or neurosurgery (AHR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.09-5.61) (compared with orthopedic surgery), and body mass index (AHR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08 per unit increase) were independently associated with S aureus SSIs and BSIs. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of surgical patients, S aureus carriage was associated with an increased risk of developing S aureus SSIs and BSIs. Both modifiable and nonmodifiable etiologic factors were associated with this risk and should be addressed in those at increased S aureus SSI and BSI risk.

Comparing a non-removable total contact cast with a non-removable softcast in diabetic foot ulcers: A retrospective study of a prospective database.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are mostly cured by an off-loading cast. Healing ratios of a non-removable Total Contact Softcast (TCS) were compared to a conventional Total Contact Cast (TCC), the latter reporting negative effects on lifestyle and transportation. METHODS: Analysis of prospectively collected data for 2010-2017. Included were patients with a neuropathic DFU. Ischemic ulcers were excluded, as were Charcot arthropathy, non-plantar/non-forefoot ulcer location, and compliance issues. Patients with TCS were compared to TCC. Primary and secondary outcomes were healing ratio and healing time of DFU. RESULTS: 50 patients with 61 cast periods were included. Mean age was 63.7 ± 10.1 years. Overall successful ulcer healing was 71% (43/61). Except for depth of the DFUs, between-group patient characteristics were comparable; deeper DFUs were reported in the TCC group. This group reported 65% healed DFU (22/34), the TCS group 74% (20/27). Mean healing time was 8.4 weeks (95 %CI 5.9-10.8) for TCC and 5.5 weeks (95 %CI 4.2-6.9) for TCS (p = 0.052). Depth of the wound was a confounder. CONCLUSIONS: TCS had a similar DFU healing ratio and a potentially clinically relevant effect (HR 1.47, 95 %CI 0.64-3.38) on healing time (ns). Ulcer depth is important for time to ulcer healing. A randomized study is recommended.

Randomized multicenter trial on percutaneous versus open access in endovascular aneurysm repair (PiERO).

BACKGROUND: In endovascular valve and aortic repair, vascular access through a percutaneous approach has become the competing technique to an open surgical approach. The effect on postoperative complications and surgical site infections (SSIs) has been investigated, but randomized evidence is lacking. The objective was to investigate whether percutaneous access of the common femoral artery (CFA) with a percutaneous closure device would decrease the number of SSIs compared with open surgical access of the CFA in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: Patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm suitable for EVAR were randomized to open or percutaneous access of the main device (MD) through the CFA. Through the contralateral side, access was obtained with the other technique than the one for which the MD was randomized. The primary outcome was number of SSIs. Secondary outcomes were wound complications, visual analog scale for pain scores, and standardized wound assessment scores during follow-up. Preoperative screening culture and groin biopsy specimens were obtained from all patients. RESULTS: Both groups contained 137 groins. SSI rate was 1.5% in the open group vs 0% in the percutaneous group. For MDs only, SSI rate was 3.1% (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-347; P = .34). Wound complications were comparable in both groups. Neither nasal nor groin Staphylococcus aureus carriage had a significant effect on SSIs, Southampton Wound Assessment score, or visual analog scale score. Adjusted pain score was 0.69 lower, in favor of percutaneous access. Wound assessment was better after 2 weeks (odds ratio, 3.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-12.44; P = .046), also in favor of percutaneous access. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous access of the CFA does not reduce the number of SSIs. It does, however, reduce pain and improve wound healing with less inflammation 1 day and 2 weeks after EVAR, respectively.

Covering of an exposed vascular graft in the groin with an external oblique muscle rotational flap.

Abdominal muscles, such as the oblique- and transverse muscles, find their blood supply from multiple segmental pedicles from the iliac artery. Besides its superior vascularization, its release is simple, leaving two abdominal muscles for securing abdominal wall strength. The release of the muscle and coverage of the graft requires partial muscle mobilization and is a minor reconstruction, but extension of the mobilization cranially enables coverage of larger defects. We present a case of an infected vascular graft in the groin successfully preserved through coverage with an external oblique muscle flap.

A comparison of Percutaneous femoral access in Endovascular Repair versus Open femoral access (PiERO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Access for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) is obtained through surgical cutdown or percutaneously. The only devices suitable for percutaneous closure of the 20 French arteriotomies of the common femoral artery (CFA) are the Prostar(™) and Proglide(™) devices (Abbott Vascular). Positive effects of these devices seem to consist of a lower infection rate, and shorter operation time and hospital stay. This conclusion was published in previous reports comparing techniques in patients in two different groups (cohort or randomized). Access techniques were never compared in one and the same patient; this research simplifies comparison because patient characteristics will be similar in both groups. METHODS/DESIGN: Percutaneous access of the CFA is compared to surgical cutdown in a single patient; in EVAR surgery, access is necessary in both groins in each patient. Randomization is performed on the introduction site of the larger main device of the endoprosthesis. The contralateral device of the endoprosthesis is smaller. When we use this type of randomization, both groups will contain a similar number of main and contralateral devices. Preoperative nose cultures and perineal cultures are obtained, to compare colonization with postoperative wound cultures (in case of a surgical site infection). Furthermore, patient comfort will be considered, using VAS-scores (Visual analog scale). Punch biopsies of the groin will be harvested to retrospectively compare skin of patients who suffered a surgical site infection (SSI) to patients who did not have an SSI. DISCUSSION: The PiERO trial is a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial designed to show the consequences of using percutaneous access in EVAR surgery and focuses on the occurrence of surgical site infections. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR4257 10 November 2013, NL44578.042.13.

Cyanoacrylate skin microsealant for preventing surgical site infection after vascular surgery: a discontinued randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) after vascular surgery are related to substantial morbidity. Restriction of bacterial access to the site of surgery with a cyanoacrylate sealant is a new concept. We performed a randomized clinical trial to assess the effect of the sealing of skin with a cyanoacrylate preparation at the site of surgery on the incidence of SSI after arterial reconstruction. METHODS: Patients scheduled for vascular reconstruction in or distal to the groin were randomized into a treatment and a control group. Standard measures for preventing contamination of the surgical field were taken in the control group, whereas cyanoacrylate was used as a skin sealant at the surgical site in the patients in the treatment group. We hypothesized that the incidence of SSI with the use of cyanoacrylate would be two-thirds (67%) lower than that with standard preparation of the surgical site, and performed an interim analysis of 50 patients to assess this. RESULTS: Risk factors among the 50 patients in the study included smoking (28%), hypertension (77%), diabetes mellitus (36%), and hypercholesterolemia (74%). Indications for surgery were invalidating claudication (Fontaine IIb), pain at rest, or tissue necrosis. The overall incidence of SSI was 3/47 (6%), without differences between groups; 9% SSIs in the control group versus 4% SSIs in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: We could not confirm a reduction in the incidence of SSI after inguinal vascular surgery with the use of a cyanoacrylate skin sealant as compared with conventional means for preparing the surgical site.

Emergency endovascular repair of an aortoesophageal fistula caused by a foreign body.

PURPOSE: To report stent-graft treatment of an aortoesophageal fistula caused by a foreign body. CASE REPORT: A 32-year-old man was admitted with massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding 10 days after swallowing a fish bone. Computed tomography demonstrated a fistula from the proximal descending thoracic aorta to the mid esophagus. The bleeding was initially controlled by inflating a Sengstaken-Blakemore tube. A 28-mm x 16-cm Talent stent-graft was delivered transfemorally to repair the aortic defect; the esophageal injury was repaired primarily using a pedicled intercostal muscle flap via a right thoracotomy. Chest radiography at 12 months showed no migration of the stent-graft. Blood parameters of infection were normal; the patient remains well 18 months after stent-graft implantation. CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates stent-graft treatment of a life-threatening hemorrhage from an aortoesophageal fistula.