Managing the animation deformity in breast reconstruction transposing the implant to a partial prepectoral pocket: Early experience and preliminary results with a new technique.

BACKGROUND: Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction remains the most commonly used technique for rebuilding a breast. Subpectoral implant placement minimizes complications, such as capsular contracture, implant visibility, malposition, and extrusion. Nevertheless, it is associated with high animation deformity (AD). Prepectoral reconstruction eliminates AD but is subject to a higher risk of implant extrusion and visibility. In this prospective, single-center study we present a new technique aimed to create a new hybrid pocket in which the upper portion of the implant is placed subcutaneously, whereas its inferior pole is still covered by a pectoralis muscle sling reducing implant lower pole visibility and palpability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In each case, the prosthesis was removed and a new hybrid pocket was created by splitting the muscle into two portions, separating its cranial part from the overlying subcutaneous tissue and anchoring it back to the chest wall. The caudal muscle sling was left adherent to the subcutaneous tissue of the central part of the breast. Patient outcomes were evaluated with a BREAST-Q questionnaire preoperatively and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients with severe postoperative breast animation were enrolled (8 bilateral and 40 unilateral). No major complications occurred. After a 1-year follow-up, the aesthetic and functional satisfaction rate was high and a good implant coverage was achieved. No residual AD of the breast was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Changing the implant placement from the subpectoral to a partially subcutaneous plane, both severe AD and implant extrusion can be avoided, expanding the indications for safe prosthetic breast reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level of evidence IV.

Schwannomas of the sciatic nerve: A rare and neglected diagnosis. A review of the literature with two illustrative cases.

OBJECTIVE: Schwannomas of the sciatic nerve, which is the largest nerve of the human body, are very rare accounting for ≤ 1% of all schwannomas. They often may raise confusion with other more common causes of sciatica, such as lumbar degenerative and inflammatory diseases or spinal tumors, which may often lead to a late correct diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present two cases of sciatic nerve schwannomas that were recently treated at our Institution, and we review the pertinent English literature on this topic over the last 15 years, yielding twenty three cases to analyze. RESULTS: Even if sciatic nerve schwannomas are a rare occurrence, a thorough clinical and radiological evaluation of the sciatic nerve should be considered whenever a sciatic pain is not otherwise explained. A positive Tinel sign and a palpable mass along the course of the sciatic nerve may be strong clues to achieve the diagnosis. Combined morphological and advanced functional MRI imaging may help to differentiate benign from malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, avoiding unnecessary preoperative biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: A standard microsurgical technique guided by ultrasound and neurophysiologic monitoring, allows in most of the cases a safe removal of the tumor and very satisfactory post-operative results for the patients.