Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 16: 101, 2016 05 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27216309

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In a cross-sectional study we examined whether the haemodynamic response to upright posture could be divided into different functional phenotypes, and whether the observed phenotypes were associated with known determinants of cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Volunteers (n = 470) without medication with cardiovascular effects were examined using radial pulse wave analysis, whole-body impedance cardiography, and heart rate variability analysis. Based on the passive head-up tilt induced changes in systemic vascular resistance and cardiac output, the principal determinants of blood pressure, a cluster analysis was performed. RESULTS: The haemodynamic response could be clustered into 3 categories: upright increase in vascular resistance and decrease in cardiac output were greatest in the first (+45 % and -27 %, respectively), smallest in the second (+2 % and -2 %, respectively), and intermediate (+22 % and -13 %, respectively) in the third group. These groups were named as 'constrictor' (n = 109), 'sustainer' (n = 222), and 'intermediate' (n = 139) phenotypes, respectively. The sustainers were characterized by male predominance, higher body mass index, blood pressure, and also by higher pulse wave velocity, an index of large arterial stiffness, than the other groups (p < 0.01 for all). Heart rate variability analysis showed higher supine and upright low frequency/high frequency (LF/HF) ratio in the sustainers than constrictors, indicating increased sympathovagal balance. Upright LF/HF ratio was also higher in the sustainer than intermediate group. In multivariate analysis, independent explanatory factors for higher pulse wave velocity were the sustainer (p < 0.022) and intermediate phenotypes (p < 0.046), age (p < 0.001), body mass index (p < 0.001), and hypertension (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The response to upright posture could be clustered to 3 functional phenotypes. The sustainer phenotype, with smallest upright decrease in cardiac output and highest sympathovagal balance, was independently associated with increased large arterial stiffness. These results indicate an association of the functional haemodynamic phenotype with an acknowledged marker of cardiovascular risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01742702.


Asunto(s)
Sistema Nervioso Autónomo/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/fisiopatología , Sistema Cardiovascular/inervación , Hemodinámica , Postura , Rigidez Vascular , Adaptación Fisiológica , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Gasto Cardíaco , Cardiografía de Impedancia , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Análisis por Conglomerados , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fenotipo , Pletismografía Total , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Análisis de la Onda del Pulso , Pruebas de Mesa Inclinada , Resistencia Vascular , Adulto Joven
2.
Metabolism ; 62(8): 1114-22, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23557592

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the hemodynamic characteristics of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in the absence and presence of hypertension. MATERIALS/METHODS: Altogether 166 subjects without previously diagnosed cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or antihypertensive medication, were allocated to four groups: control, hypertension only, MetS without hypertension, and MetS with hypertension (mean age 44-46 years). Cut-point for hypertension was blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg. Other criteria of MetS were as defined by Alberti et al. 2009. Hemodynamic variables were measured using whole-body impedance cardiography and pulse wave analysis. RESULTS: Pulse wave velocity was higher in hypertensive and normotensive subjects with MetS than controls (p<0.05), and in the hypertensive MetS group than subjects with hypertension only (p<0.05). Aortic pulse pressure was higher in the two hypertensive groups than the two normotensive groups (p<0.05). Systemic vascular resistance index was higher in the hypertensive than normotensive MetS group (p<0.05), and in the group with hypertension alone than in controls (p<0.05). Heart rate was higher in the hypertensive Mets group than in controls and subjects with hypertension only (p<0.05). Cardiac index did not differ, while stroke index was lower in both groups with MetS than groups without MetS. Augmentation pressure was higher in the hypertensive MetS group than in controls and normotensive MetS group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pulse wave velocity, an acknowledged marker of arterial stiffness, was associated with MetS even in the absence of hypertension. This emphasizes the importance of the prevention and treatment of MetS.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Síndrome Metabólico/patología , Rigidez Vascular/fisiología , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Glucemia/metabolismo , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Gasto Cardíaco/fisiología , Cardiografía de Impedancia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , HDL-Colesterol/sangre , Creatinina/sangre , Femenino , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Humanos , Hipertensión/sangre , Modelos Lineales , Lípidos/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de la Onda del Pulso , Triglicéridos/sangre , Circunferencia de la Cintura
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...