VMAT plan quality comparison between Clinac-iX and halcyon treatment delivery systems for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Radiotherapy planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a complex process due to the proximity of critical structures. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can improve the therapeutic ratio. However, multiple treatment delivery systems offer VMAT with varying technical specifications. This study compares the dosimetric plan quality of 2 systems, Clinac-iX and Halcyon in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. We utilized contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) simulation and magnetic resonance (MR) image datasets from thirty patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma to contour target volumes and organs at risk (OARs). Two medical physicists independently performed dosimetric planning for Clinac-iX and Halcyon machines, following standard international dosimetric constraints for OARs. We compared plan quality for dosimetric profiles, indices, and plan complexity parameters from both machines. Dosimetric coverage for target volumes and plan quality indices, such as homogeneity, conformity, and coverage, showed no significant differences between Clinac-iX and Halcyon. However, Halcyon demonstrated significantly better OAR sparing, particularly for the spinal cord, optic chiasm, lenses, eyeballs and lower brain volume integral dose (BVID) (p < 0.05). Complexity parameters showed that both systems used a similar number of arcs, but Halcyon had higher monitor units and lower treatment time per fraction owing to higher dose rate. Our study results favor Halcyon for better plan quality regarding critical organ sparing, low brain volume integral dose, and fast treatment delivery. This study can be used as a reference for selecting an optimal treatment delivery system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients in centres equipped with multiple linear accelerators.

The patient-reported outcome measures in oropharyngeal, laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer patients treated with Volumetric Modulated Arc based simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the change in the quality of life (QOL) in head and neck cancer patients treated with Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) by Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique. METHODS: Thirty patients with localised head and neck cancers (Stage II- IVa) were treated with VMAT and SIB technique. The three-dose levels prescribed were 68.2 Gy at 2.2 Gy/fraction, 62 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction and 55.8 Gy at 1.8 Gy/fraction to the high, intermediate and low-risk volumes respectively. Concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 was administered once in three weeks. Acute toxicities were evaluated and scored according to the RTOG grading system. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQC30 and HN35 questionnaires at baseline and in three instances (immediately, one month and three months after the radiotherapy). RESULTS: Out of the total 30, 80% patients had a complete response (CR) at the median follow up of 12 months, while three patients died because of progression, and the remaining 3 had stable disease. All planning objectives were achieved for organs at risk and planning target volume(PTV). There was a statiscally significant(p value < 0.001) reduction in global quality of life scores at the end of treatment when compared to baseline scores, but by three months, there was the return in the QOL scores in most scales similar to the baseline value. CONCLUSION: VMAT based Simultaneous boost radiotherapy is a feasible and safe strategy in terms of toxicity profile with an acceptable transient change in the quality of life and allows a faster return to baseline quality of life.