Case 270.

History A 54-year-old woman presented with typical chest pain during physical training at the gym. She had a history of hypertension controlled with hydrochlorothiazide, without any other cardiovascular risk factor and with neither personal nor family history of ischemic heart disease. She was postmenopausal and had a long-standing history of migraine headaches without hormonal or drug therapy. The patient had no history of clinically important thoracic trauma or invasive chest interventions. Initial electrocardiography (ECG) showed signs of ongoing anterior ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, and emergent coronary angiography with angioplasty and intravascular US were performed ( Fig 1 ). Maximal level of high-sensitive T troponins was 820 ng/L (normal, <13 ng/L), while echocardiography showed a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, with no apparent regional wall motion abnormalities. General physical examination findings were unremarkable, excluding ligamentous hyperlaxity and joint instability. C-reactive protein, rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibody, cytoplasmic antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, and angiotensin-converting enzyme blood test results were negative. For further evaluation, arterial phase ECG-synchronized CT angiography from the skull base to the pubis symphysis was performed ( Fig 2 ). Figure 1a: Coronary angiography of the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCX) arteries (30° right anterior oblique and 20° caudally angulated projection) and intravascular US of the LCX artery were performed. (a) Initial coronary angiography projection. (b) Coronary angiography projection after LAD stent placement. (c, d) Intravenous US images of the distal (c) and proximal (d) LCX artery obtained after b. Figure 1b: Coronary angiography of the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCX) arteries (30° right anterior oblique and 20° caudally angulated projection) and intravascular US of the LCX artery were performed. (a) Initial coronary angiography projection. (b) Coronary angiography projection after LAD stent placement. (c, d) Intravenous US images of the distal (c) and proximal (d) LCX artery obtained after b. Figure 1c: Coronary angiography of the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCX) arteries (30° right anterior oblique and 20° caudally angulated projection) and intravascular US of the LCX artery were performed. (a) Initial coronary angiography projection. (b) Coronary angiography projection after LAD stent placement. (c, d) Intravenous US images of the distal (c) and proximal (d) LCX artery obtained after b. Figure 1d: Coronary angiography of the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCX) arteries (30° right anterior oblique and 20° caudally angulated projection) and intravascular US of the LCX artery were performed. (a) Initial coronary angiography projection. (b) Coronary angiography projection after LAD stent placement. (c, d) Intravenous US images of the distal (c) and proximal (d) LCX artery obtained after b. Figure 2a: Arterial phase electrocardiography-synchronized CT angiography from the skull base to the pubis symphysis was performed after coronary angiography, subsequent interventional procedures, and intravenous US. (a, b) Axial oblique slab maximum intensity projection image at the level of the left (a) and right (b) renal arteries. (c) Coronal volume-rendering image shows an anterior view of the renal arteries. Figure 2b: Arterial phase electrocardiography-synchronized CT angiography from the skull base to the pubis symphysis was performed after coronary angiography, subsequent interventional procedures, and intravenous US. (a, b) Axial oblique slab maximum intensity projection image at the level of the left (a) and right (b) renal arteries. (c) Coronal volume-rendering image shows an anterior view of the renal arteries. Figure 2c: Arterial phase electrocardiography-synchronized CT angiography from the skull base to the pubis symphysis was performed after coronary angiography, subsequent interventional procedures, and intravenous US. (a, b) Axial oblique slab maximum intensity projection image at the level of the left (a) and right (b) renal arteries. (c) Coronal volume-rendering image shows an anterior view of the renal arteries.

Detection of spleen, kidney and liver infarcts by abdominal computed tomography does not affect the outcome in patients with left-side infective endocarditis.

Extra-cardiac abdominal complications are common in left-side infective endocarditis (LS-IE). The aim of this work was to study whether patients with LS-IE presenting splenic, renal, or liver (SRL) involvement seen in abdominal computed tomography (CT) had different clinical features, therapeutic plans, and outcome than those without these findings on CT.From January 2008 to April 2010, multidisciplinary teams have prospectively collected all consecutive cases of IE, diagnosed according to the Duke criteria, in which abdominal CT was performed.A total of 147 patients with LS-IE had abdominal CT. Fifty (34%) had SRL lesions: 46 splenic, 15 renal, 1 liver infarct, and 2 liver abscesses. Patients with SRL lesions were mainly men (P = .01), had liver disease (P = .001) with natural valve (P = .050) and mitro-aortic valve involvement (P = .042), splenomegaly (P = .001), nonabdominal emboli (P = .001), and a greater number and larger vegetation (>15 mm, P = .049) in the mitro-aortic valves (P = .051) than patients with normal abdominal CT. The site of acquisition, clinical characteristics, microbiology, surgical treatment, days of hospitalization, hospital death, and 1-year mortality were similar in patients with and without SRL emboli on CT. In the stepwise logistic regression analysis, male gender (odds ratio [OR] = 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4-9.1), liver disease (OR = 8.3, 95% CI = 2.1-31.8), and nonabdominal emboli (OR = 5.2, 95% CI = 2.3-11.7) were independently associated with SRL lesions.Male patients with native LS-IE who had liver disease and nonabdominal emboli had more frequent abdominal lesions seen on CT. The presence of SRL infarcts on abdominal CT scan performed on patients with LS-IE seems to have poor practical implications, and as a consequence, its realization should only be considered when there are symptoms or signs that suggest them.