KRD (carfilzomib and lenalidomide plus dexamethasone) for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in the real-life: a retrospective survey in 123 patients.

From April 2016, carfilzomib, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRD), became available for use in the daily practice in Italy for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We performed a retrospective survey at 14 different institutions from Southern Italy in order to evaluate patient characteristics and treatment results from an unselected series of patients treated accordingly so far. One hundred and twenty-three consecutive patients were included, with a median of 2 previous lines of therapy (range 1-9) and a median age of 63 years (range 39-82). At the time of analysis, median number of courses administered is 11 (range 1-34), and all patients are evaluable for response. Overall response rate including complete remission, very good partial remission, and partial remission is 85%. After a median follow-up of 27 months, median overall and progression-free survival are 33 and 23 months, respectively. Sixty-three patients are alive and between them, 45 (37%) are in continuous remission. Sixty patients have died (49%), mainly from progressive disease. There were 6 treatment-related deaths (5% of the whole patient population). Overall, hematological and non-hematological toxicity were manageable, mostly on outpatient basis. Arterial hypertension has been observed in 43 cases (35%) but did not lead to treatment interruption. Our data demonstrate that in real life, KRD is highly effective and well tolerated in the majority of patients with RRMM.

A phase II, single-arm, prospective study of bendamustine plus melphalan conditioning for second autologous stem cell transplantation in de novo multiple myeloma patients through a tandem transplant strategy.

This phase II trial evaluates, for the first time, the safety and efficacy of bendamustine plus high-dose melphalan (HDM) as a conditioning regimen before the second autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM) patients. In total, 32 ASCT patients received HDM (200 mg/m(2)) as conditioning for the first ASCT. After 3-6 months from the first ASCT, responding patients underwent a second ASCT following bendamustine (200 mg/m(2)) and HDM (140 mg/m(2)). High-dose chemotherapy and ASCT were performed with complete neutrophil and platelet recovery in all patients. The median number of days to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 11 (range 9-15) and 12 (range 10-19), respectively. Only one subject experienced grade 3 diarrhea; the rate of mucositis and vomiting was significantly lower with the bendamustine plus HDM regimen compared with the HDM-only regimen (81.2 vs 96.9%, P=0.025 and 78.1 vs 100%, P=0.008). Overall response rate (ORR) was 81.2% after the first transplant, and 90.6% after the second, while complete response rates were 46.8 and 62.5%, respectively (P=0.016). Actuarial 2-year PFS and OS were 79% (95% confidence interval (CI), 60-98) and 97% (95% CI, 91-100), respectively. Bendamustine+HDM is feasible as the conditioning regimen for second ASCT in MM patients. The present study may pave the way for phase III studies specifically aimed at further investigating this combination strategy. The role of this combination in MM for conditioning regimen in a first or single ASCT setting should be also investigated.

A phase 2 study of three low-dose intensity subcutaneous bortezomib regimens in elderly frail patients with untreated multiple myeloma.

This phase 2 trial evaluated three low-dose intensity subcutaneous bortezomib-based treatments in patients ⩾75 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients received subcutaneous bortezomib plus oral prednisone (VP, N=51) or VP plus cyclophosphamide (VCP, N=51) or VP plus melphalan (VMP, N=50), followed by bortezomib maintenance, and half of the patients were frail. Response rate was 64% with VP, 67% with VCP and 86% with VMP, and very good partial response rate or better was 26%, 28.5% and 49%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 14.0, 15.2 and 17.1 months, and 2-year OS was 60%, 70% and 76% in VP, VCP, VMP, respectively. At least one drug-related grade ⩾3 non-hematologic adverse event (AE) occurred in 22% of VP, 37% of VCP and 33% of VMP patients; the discontinuation rate for AEs was 12%, 14% and 20%, and the 6-month rate of toxicity-related deaths was 4%, 4% and 8%, respectively. The most common grade ⩾3 AEs included infections (8-20%), and constitutional (10-14%) and cardiovascular events (4-12%); peripheral neuropathy was limited (4-6%). Bortezomib maintenance was effective and feasible. VP, VCP and VMP regimens demonstrated no substantial difference. Yet, toxicity was higher with VMP, suggesting that a two-drug combination followed by maintenance should be preferred in frail patients.

Alpha 2-interferon in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: clinical response, serum cytokine levels, and immunophenotype modulation.

Fifteen patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) have been treated with alpha 2b-interferon (alpha IFN) for one year (3 mega units subcutaneously three times a week). The hematological response and the modulation of immunophenotype, serum levels of soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) have been monitored. Hematologically 67% of cases were classified as responders, although no complete responses were observed; three cases progressed during treatment, and two patients showed stable disease. Both peripheral lymphocytes and CD24+ cell absolute number significantly decreased after twelve months of IFN treatment (40.7 +/- 17 x 10(9)/l versus 15.8 +/- 6 x 10(9)/l, mean values +/- sd, p < 0.01, and 30.4 +/- 5.5 x 10(9)/l versus 8.1 +/- 2.8 x 10(9)/l, p < 0.05, respectively), while CD24+ cell percentage did not change (72.1% +/- 4.6 versus 67.5% +/- 8.8, p not significant). In the majority of cases myelomonocytic markers (CD11c, CD14, CD11b) transitorily decreased during the treatment. Serum sIL-2R levels, elevated in all cases before IFN treatment, increased in responders. Serum TNF levels decreased in patients showing high values before the treatment. The explanation of these findings and their possible implication are discussed.