Health Insurance Schemes and Their Influences on Healthcare Variation in Asian Countries: A Realist Review and Theory's Testing in Thailand.

BACKGROUND: Various features in health insurance schemes may lead to variation in health care. Unwarranted variations raise concerns about suboptimal quality of care, differing treatments for similar needs, or unnecessary financial burdens on patients and health systems. This realist review aims to explore insurance features that may contribute to health care variation in Asian countries; and to understand influencing mechanisms and contexts. METHODS: We undertook a realist review. First, we developed an initial theory. Second, we conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature in Scopus, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science to produce a middle range theory for Asian countries. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to appraise the methodological quality of included studies. Finally, we tested the theory in Thailand by interviewing nine experts, and further refined the theory. RESULTS: Our systematic search identified 14 empirical studies. We produced a middle range theory in a context-mechanism-outcome configuration (CMOc) which presented seven insurance features: benefit package, cost-sharing policies, beneficiaries, contracted providers, provider payment methods, budget size, and administration and management, that influenced variation through 20 interlinked demand- and supply-side mechanisms. The refined theory for Thailand added eight mechanisms and discarded six mechanisms irrelevant to the local context. CONCLUSION: Our middle range and refined theories provide information about health insurance features associated with health care variation. We encourage policymakers and researchers to test the CMOc in their specific contexts. Appropriately validated, it can help design interventions in health insurance schemes to prevent or mitigate the detrimental effects of unwarranted health care variation.

Procedural fairness in benefit package design: inclusion of pre-exposure prophylaxis of HIV in Universal Coverage Scheme in Thailand.

Since 2002, Thailand's Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS) has adopted a comprehensive benefits package with few exclusions. A positive-list approach has gradually been applied, with pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) of HIV recently being included. Disagreements resulting from competing values and diverging interests necessitate an emphasis on procedural fairness when making any decisions. This qualitative study analyses agenda setting, policy formulation and early implementation of PrEP from a procedural fairness lens. Literature reviews and in-depth interviews with 13 key stakeholders involved in PrEP policy processes were conducted. Civil society organizations (CSOs) and academia piloted PrEP service models and co-produced evidence on programmatic feasibility and outcomes. Through a broad stakeholder representation process, the Department of Disease Control proposed PrEP for inclusion in UCS benefits package in 2017. PrEP was shown to be cost-effective and affordable through rigorous health technology assessment, peer review, use of up-to-date evidence and safe-guards against conflicts of interest. In 2021, Thailand's National Health Security Board decided to include PrEP as a prevention and promotion package, free of charge, for the populations at risk. Favourable conditions for procedural fairness were created by Thailand's legislative provisions that enable responsive governance, notably inclusiveness, transparency, safeguarding public interest and accountable budget allocations; longstanding institutional capacity to generate local evidence; and implementation capacity for realisation of procedural fairness criteria. Multiple stakeholders including CSOs, academia and the government deliberated in the policy process through working groups and sub-committees. However, a key lesson from Thailand's deliberative process concerns a possible 'over interpretation' of conflicts of interest, intended to promote impartial decision-making, which inadvertently limited the voices of key populations represented in the decision processes. Finally, this case study underscores the value of examining the full policy cycle when assessing procedural fairness, since some stages of the process may be more amenable to certain procedural criteria than others.

Definition, Practice, Regulations, and Effects of Balance Billing: A Scoping Review.

Background: Additional billing is commonly and legally practiced in some countries for patients covered by health insurance. However, knowledge and understanding of the additional billings are limited. This study reviews evidence on additional billing practices including definition, scope of practice, regulations and their effects on insured patients. Methods: A systematic search of the full-text papers that provided the details of balance billing for health services, written in English, and published between 2000 and 2021 was carried out in Scopus, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science. Articles were screened independently by at least 2 reviewers for eligibility. Thematic analysis was applied. Results: In total, 94 studies were selected for the final analysis. Most of the included articles (83%) reported findings from the United States (US). Numerous terms of additional billings were used across countries such as balance billing, surprise billing, extra billing, supplements and out-of-pocket (OOP) spending. The range of services incurred these additional bills also varied across countries, insurance plans, and healthcare facilities; the frequently reported were emergency services, surgeries, and specialist consultation. There were a few positive though more studies reported negative effects of the substantial additional bills which undermined universal health coverage (UHC) goals by causing financial hardship and reducing access to care. A range of government measures had been applied to mitigate these adverse effects, but some difficulties still exist. Conclusion: Additional billings varied in terms of terminology, definitions, practices, profiles, regulations, and outcomes. There were a set of policy tools aimed to control substantial billing to insured patients despite some limitations and challenges. Governments should apply multiple policy measures to improve financial risk protection to the insured population.

Universal access to comprehensive COVID-19 services for everyone in Thailand.

Despite Thailand having had universal health coverage (UHC) with comprehensive benefit packages since 2002, services are neither listed nor budget earmarked for COVID-19 responses. Policy decisions were made immediately after the first outbreak in 2020 to fully fund a comprehensive benefit package for COVID-19. The Cabinet approved significant additional budget to respond to the unfolding pandemic. The comprehensive benefit package includes laboratory tests, contact tracing, active case findings, 14-day quarantine measures (including tests, food and lodging), field hospitals, ambulance services for referral, clinical services both at hospitals and in home and community isolation, vaccines and vaccination cost, all without copayment by users. No-fault compensation for adverse events or deaths following vaccination is also provided. Services were purchased from qualified public and private providers using the same rate, terms and conditions. The benefit package applies to everyone living in Thailand including Thai citizens and migrant workers. A standardised and comprehensive COVID-19 benefit package for Thai and non-Thai population without copayment facilitates universal and equitable access to care irrespective of capacity to pay and social status and nationality, all while aiming to supporting pandemic containment. Making essential services available, notably laboratory tests, through the engagement of qualified both public and private sectors boost supply side capacity. These policies and implementations in this paper are useful lessons for other low-income and middle-income countries on how UHC reinforces pandemic containment.

Annual prevalence of unmet healthcare need in Thailand: evidence from national household surveys between 2011 and 2019.

BACKGROUND: Extending Universal Health Coverage (UHC) requires identifying and addressing unmet healthcare need and its causes to improve access to essential health services. Unmet need is a useful monitoring indicator to verify if low incidence of catastrophic health spending is not a result of foregone services due to unmet needs. This study assesses the trend, between 2011 and 2019, of prevalence and reasons of unmet healthcare need and identifies population groups who had unmet needs. METHOD: The unmet healthcare need module in the Health and Welfare Survey (HWS) 2011-2019 was used for analysis. HWS is a nationally representative household survey conducted by the National Statistical Office biennially. There are more than 60,000 respondents in each round of survey. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) standard questions on unmet need and reasons behind were applied for outpatient (OP), inpatient (IP) and dental services in the past 12 months. Data from samples were weighted to represent the Thai population. Univariate analysis was applied to assess unmet need across socioeconomic profiles. RESULTS: The annual prevalence of unmet need between 2011 and 2019 was lower than 3%. The prevalence was 1.3-1.6% for outpatient services, 0.9% - 1.1% for dental services, and lower than 0.2% for inpatient care. A small increasing trend was observed on dental service unmet need, from 0.9% in 2011 to 1.1% in 2019. The poor, the elderly and people living in urban areas had higher unmet needs than their counterparts. Long waiting times was the main reason for unmet need, while cost of treatment was not an issue. CONCLUSION: The low level of unmet need at less than 3% was lower than OECD average (28%), and was the result of UHC since 2002. Regular monitoring using the national representative household survey to estimate annual prevalence and reasons for unmet need can guide policy to sustain and improve access by certain population groups.

Spatial Panel Data Analysis on the Relationship between Provincial Economic Status and Enrolment in the Social Security Scheme amongst Migrant Workers in Thailand, 2015-2018.

BACKGROUND: Thailand has a large flow of migrants from neighbouring countries; however, the relationship between economic status at the provincial level and the insured status of migrants is still vague. This study aimed to examine the association between provincial economy and the coverage of the Social Security Scheme (SSS) for migrants. METHODS: Time-series data were analysed. The units of analysis were 77 provinces during 2015-2018. Data were obtained from the Social Security Office (SSO). Spatiotemporal regression (Spatial Durbin model (SDM)) was applied. RESULTS: Migrant workers were mostly concentrated in Greater Bangkok, the capital city and areas surrounding it, but SSS coverage was less than 50%. However, the ratio of insured migrants to all migrants seemed to have positive relationship with the provincial economy in SDM. The ratio of insured migrants to all migrants was enlarged in all regions outside Greater Bangkok with statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Low enforcement on employment law in some areas, particularly Greater Bangkok, can result in lesser SSS coverage. The provincial economic prosperity did not guarantee large SSS coverage. Interventions to ensure strict insurance enrolment are required.

Financial risk protection of Thailand's universal health coverage: results from series of national household surveys between 1996 and 2015.

BACKGROUND: Thailand, an upper-middle income country, has demonstrated exemplary outcomes of Universal Health Coverage (UHC). The country achieved full population coverage and a high level of financial risk protection since 2002, through implementing three public health insurance schemes. UHC has two explicit goals of improved access to health services and financial protection where use of these services does not create financial hardship. Prior studies in Thailand do not provide evidence of long-term UHC financial risk protection. This study assessed financial risk protection as measured by the incidence of catastrophic health spending and impoverishment in Thai households prior to and after UHC in 2002. METHODS: We used data from a 15-year series of annual national household socioeconomic surveys (SES) between 1996 and 2015, which were conducted by the National Statistic Office (NSO). The survey covered about 52,000 nationally representative households in each round. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the incidence of catastrophic payment as measured by the share of out-of-pocket payment (OOP) for health by households exceeding 10 and 25% of household total consumption expenditure, and the incidence of impoverishment as determined by the additional number of non-poor households falling below the national and international poverty lines after making health payments. RESULTS: Using the 10% threshold, the incidence of catastrophic spending dropped from 6.0% in 1996 to 2% in 2015. This incidence reduced more significantly when the 25% threshold was applied from 1.8 to 0.4% during the same period. The incidence of impoverishment against the national poverty line reduced considerably from 2.2% in 1996 to approximately 0.3% in 2015. When the international poverty line of US$ 3.1 per capita per day was applied, the incidence of impoverishment was 1.4 and 0.4% in 1996 and 2015 respectively; and when US$ 1.9 per day was applied, the incidence was negligibly low. CONCLUSION: The significant decline in the incidence of catastrophic health spending and impoverishment was attributed to the deliberate design of Thailand's UHC, which provides a comprehensive benefits package and zero co-payment at point of services. The well-founded healthcare delivery system and favourable benefits package concertedly support the achievement of UHC goals of access and financial risk protection.

Children and Women's Health in South East Asia: Gap Analysis and Solutions.

In response to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) commitment, eight selected countries in the South East Asia region have made a remarkable reduction in infant and child mortality, while a few have achieved an SDG 3.2 target of 25 and 12 for child and neonatal mortality rate, respectively, well before 2030. Across these eight countries, there is a large variation in the achievement of the nine dimensions of maternal, neonatal, and child health service coverage. The poorest wealth quintiles who reside in rural areas are the most vulnerable and left behind from access to service. The rich rural residents are better off than the poor counterparts as they have financial means for travel and access to health services in urban town. The recent 2019 global Universal Health Coverage (UHC) monitoring produced a UHC service coverage index and an incidence of catastrophic health spending, which classified countries into four quadrants using global average. Countries belonging to a high coverage index and a low incidence of catastrophic spending are good performers. Countries having high coverage but also a high incidence of catastrophic spending need to improve their financial risk protection. Countries having low coverage and a high incidence of catastrophic spending need to boost service provision capacity, as well as expand financial protection. Countries having low coverage and a low incidence of catastrophic spending are the poor performers where both coverage and financial protection need significant improvement. In these countries, poor households who cannot afford to pay for health services may forego required care and instead choose to die at home. This paper recommended countries to spend adequately in the health sector, strengthen primary health care (PHC) and safeguard the poor, mothers and children as a priority in pathways towards UHC.

Legislating for public accountability in universal health coverage, Thailand.

Sustaining universal health coverage requires robust active public participation in policy formation and governance. Thailand's universal coverage scheme was implemented nationwide in 2002, allowing Thailand to achieve full population coverage through three public health insurance schemes and to demonstrate improved health outcomes. Although Thailand's position on the World Bank worldwide governance indicators has deteriorated since 1996, provisions for voice and accountability were embedded in the legislation and design of the universal coverage scheme. We discuss how legislation related to citizens' rights and government accountability has been implemented. Thailand's constitution allowed citizens to submit a draft bill in which provisions on voice and accountability were successfully embedded in the legislative texts and adopted into law. The legislation mandates registration of beneficiaries, a 24/7 helpline, annual public hearings and no-fault financial assistance for patients who have experienced adverse events. Ensuring the right to health services, and that citizens' voices are heard and action taken, requires the institutional capacity to implement legislation. For example, Thailand needed the capacity to register 47 million people and match them with the health-care provider network in the district where they live, and to re-register members who move out of their districts. Annual public hearings need to be inclusive of citizens, health-care providers, civil society organizations and stakeholders such as local governments and patient groups. Subsequent policy and management responses are important for building trust in the process and citizens' ownership of the scheme. Annual public reporting of outcomes and performance of the scheme fosters transparency and increases citizens' trust.

Maintenir la couverture sanitaire universelle exige une forte participation publique à l'élaboration des politiques et à la gouvernance. En Thaïlande, le régime de couverture universelle a été mis en œuvre dans tout le pays en 2002, permettant de couvrir l'ensemble de la population grâce à trois régimes publics d'assurance maladie et d'améliorer les résultats de santé. Bien que la position de la Thaïlande concernant les Indicateurs de gouvernance mondiaux de la Banque mondiale se soit détériorée depuis 1996, des dispositions en matière d'expression et de reddition de comptes ont été intégrées à la législation et à la structure du régime de couverture universelle. Nous discutons ici de la mise en œuvre de la législation relative aux droits des citoyens et à la reddition de comptes du gouvernement. En vertu de la constitution de la Thaïlande, les citoyens ont pu soumettre un projet de loi dont les dispositions en matière d'expression et de reddition de comptes ont été intégrées aux textes législatifs et transposées dans la loi. La législation rend obligatoire l'enregistrement des bénéficiaires, une assistance téléphonique 24h/24 et 7 j/7, des auditions publiques annuelles et une aide financière systématique pour les patients qui ont été victimes d'événements indésirables. Pour garantir le droit à des services de santé, permettre aux citoyens de faire entendre leur voix et s'assurer que des mesures soient prises, les institutions doivent être en mesure d'appliquer la législation. Par exemple, la Thaïlande devait pouvoir enregistrer 47 millions de personnes et les rattacher au réseau de prestataires de soins du district où elles vivaient, et réenregistrer les personnes qui changeaient de district. Les auditions publiques annuelles doivent faire participer les citoyens, les prestataires de soins, les organisations de la société civile et les parties prenantes telles que les collectivités locales et les groupes de patients. Les réponses qui en découlent au point de vue des politiques et de la gestion sont importantes pour instaurer la confiance dans le processus et permettre aux citoyens de se l'approprier. Les rapports annuels publics sur les résultats du régime de couverture permettent d'accroître la transparence et de renforcer la confiance des citoyens.

Para mantener la cobertura sanitaria universal se requiere una sólida participación activa del público en la formulación de políticas y la gobernanza. El plan de cobertura universal de Tailandia se implementó en todo el país en 2002, lo que permitió a Tailandia lograr una cobertura completa de la población a través de tres planes de seguro médico público y demostrar mejores resultados en materia de salud. Aunque la posición de Tailandia respecto de los Indicadores mundiales de gobernanza del Banco Mundial ha disminuido desde 1996, las disposiciones relativas a la voz y la rendición de cuentas estaban incorporadas en la legislación y en el diseño del plan de cobertura universal. Se discute cómo se ha implementado la legislación relacionada con los derechos de los ciudadanos y la rendición de cuentas del gobierno. La Constitución de Tailandia permitía a los ciudadanos presentar un proyecto de ley en el que las disposiciones sobre la voz y la rendición de cuentas se incorporaban con éxito en los textos legislativos y se aprobaban como ley. La legislación exige el registro de los beneficiarios, una línea telefónica de ayuda 24 horas al día los 7 días de la semana, audiencias públicas anuales y asistencia financiera gratuita para los pacientes que han sufrido eventos adversos. Para garantizar el derecho a los servicios de salud y que se escuche la voz de los ciudadanos y se adopten medidas, es necesario contar con la capacidad institucional para aplicar la legislación. Por ejemplo, Tailandia necesitaba la capacidad de inscribir a 47 millones de personas y ponerlas en contacto con la red de proveedores de servicios de salud del distrito en el que viven, y de volver a inscribir a los miembros que se trasladan fuera de sus distritos. Las audiencias públicas anuales deben incluir a los ciudadanos, los proveedores de servicios de salud, las organizaciones de la sociedad civil y las partes interesadas, como los gobiernos locales y los grupos de pacientes. Las respuestas políticas y de gestión subsiguientes son importantes para generar confianza en el proceso y en la apropiación del plan por parte de los ciudadanos. El informe público anual sobre los resultados y el rendimiento del plan fomenta la transparencia y aumenta la confianza de los ciudadanos.

Political economy of Thailand's tax-financed universal coverage scheme.

PROBLEM: The challenge of implementing contributory health insurance among populations in the informal sector was a barrier to achieving universal health coverage (UHC) in Thailand. APPROACH: UHC was a political manifesto of the 2001 election campaign. A contributory system was not a feasible option to honour the political commitment. Given Thailand's fiscal capacity and the moderate amount of additional resources required, the government legislated to use general taxation as the sole source of financing for the universal coverage scheme. LOCAL SETTING: Before 2001, four public health insurance schemes covered only 70% (44.5 million) of the 63.5 million population. The health ministry received the budget and provided medical welfare services for low-income households and publicly subsidized voluntary insurance for the informal sector. The budgets for supply-side financing of these schemes were based on historical figures which were inadequate to respond to health needs. The finance ministry used its discretionary power in budget allocation decisions. RELEVANT CHANGES: Tax became the sole source of financing the universal coverage scheme. Transparency, multistakeholder engagement and use of evidence informed budgetary negotiations. Adequate funding for UHC was achieved, providing access to services and financial protection for vulnerable populations. Out-of-pocket expenditure, medical impoverishment and catastrophic health spending among households decreased between 2000 and 2015. LESSONS LEARNT: Domestic government health expenditure, strong political commitment and historical precedence of the tax-financed medical welfare scheme were key to achieving UHC in Thailand. Using evidence secures adequate resources, promotes transparency and limits discretionary decision-making in budget allocation.

Surveys of knowledge and awareness of antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance in general population: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Currently, various tools exist to evaluate knowledge and awareness of antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and are applied by various organizations. Previous systematic reviews have focused mainly on study findings such as levels of knowledge and AMR awareness. However, the survey procedures and data instruments used ought to be scrutinized as well, since they are important contributors to credible results. This review aims to assess the study methods and procedures of existing population-based surveys and explore key components which determine the general population's levels of knowledge and awareness of antibiotic use and AMR. METHODS: We searched existing literature for population -based surveys which sought knowledge and awareness of antibiotic use or AMR in the general population. Databases searched included Ovid, MEDLINE and EMBASE, PsycINFO and Scopus, domestic journals and gray literature sources. Population-based cross-sectional studies published in English or Thai from January 2000 to December 2018 were included in the review. Quality assessment was conducted using the 'Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies' (AXIS). RESULTS: All 22 studies included in the analysis had clear objectives focusing on assessing people's levels of knowledge, awareness, attitudes and behavior relating to antibiotic use and awareness of AMR. These studies had employed appropriate methodologies for population-based cross-sectional surveys relative to research questions. More than half of studies (14 out of 22) had scientifically soundly designed methodologies which captured the representativeness of the population; whereas the remaining studies had unclear sample size estimations, inappropriate sample frames and selection biases. Half of the studies had tested the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. The common questions used by these surveys were categorized into four themes: behavior related to antibiotic use, knowledge and awareness of antibiotic use, knowledge and awareness of AMR and others such as receiving information about antibiotic use and AMR or cross-cutting issues like self-medication. CONCLUSION: This review identified four key features of good practices in antibiotic use and awareness surveys: a) clear survey objective; b) scientifically sound sampling techniques ensuring representativeness; c) strategies for recruitment of samples and survey administration methods; and d) credible measurement to prevent non-sampling biases. During questionnaire design, the health systems context in terms of access to health services and antibiotics should be taken into account. In conclusion, to maximize the use of surveys, the application of findings in surveys and associated factors related to antibiotic use and AMR should primarily generate public health interventions and target specific groups to make progress in solving AMR problems.

Achieving the targets for universal health coverage: how is Thailand monitoring progress?

Universal health coverage (UHC) is one of the targets within the Sustainable Development Goals that the Member States of the United Nations have pledged to achieve by 2030. Target 3.8 has two monitoring indicators: 3.8.1 for coverage of essential health services, for which a compound index from 16 tracer indicators has recently been developed; and 3.8.2 for catastrophic expenditure on health. The global baseline monitoring of these two indicators in 2017 shows that the progress in many low- and middle-income countries is unlikely to be on track and achieved by 2030. The monitoring and evaluation mechanism for UHC progress is a crucial function to hold governments accountable and guide countries along their paths towards UHC. This paper outlines key monitoring and evaluation tools that Thailand uses to track UHC progress; compares the strengths and limitations of each tool; and discusses monitoring gaps and enabling factors related to development of the tools. Thailand uses several data sources to monitor three UHC dimensions: population coverage; service coverage; and financial risk protection. The four key sources are: (i) national surveys; (ii) health facility and administrative data; (iii) specific disease registries; and (iv) research. Each source provides different advantages and is used concurrently to complement the others. Despite initially being developed to track progress for national health priorities, these tools are able to monitor most of the global UHC indicators. Key enabling factors of Thai monitoring systems are a supportive infrastructure and information system; a policy requirement for routine patient data records; ownership and commitment of the key responsible organizations; multisectoral collaboration; and sustainable in-country capacities. The areas for improvement are monitoring in the non-Thai population; tracking access to essential medicines; and maximizing the use of collected data. Lessons learnt from the Thai experience could be useful for other low- and middle-income countries in developing their UHC monitoring platforms.

Implementation of national action plans on noncommunicable diseases, Bhutan, Cambodia, Indonesia, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Viet Nam.

By 2016, Member States of the World Health Organization (WHO) had developed and implemented national action plans on noncommunicable diseases in line with the Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases (2013-2020). In 2018, we assessed the implementation status of the recommended best-buy noncommunicable diseases interventions in seven Asian countries: Bhutan, Cambodia, Indonesia, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Viet Nam. We gathered data from a range of published reports and directly from health ministries. We included interventions that addressed the use of tobacco and alcohol, inadequate physical activity and high salt intake, as well as health-systems responses, and we identified gaps and proposed solutions. In 2018, progress was uneven across countries. Implementation gaps were largely due to inadequate funding; limited institutional capacity (despite designated noncommunicable diseases units); inadequate action across different sectors within and outside the health system; and a lack of standardized monitoring and evaluation mechanisms to inform policies. To address implementation gaps, governments need to invest more in effective interventions such as the WHO-recommended best-buy interventions, improve action across different sectors, and enhance capacity in monitoring and evaluation and in research. Learning from the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, the WHO and international partners should develop a standardized, comprehensive monitoring tool on alcohol, salt and unhealthy food consumption, physical activity and health-systems response.

En 2016, les États membres de l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé (OMS) avaient élaboré et mis en œuvre des plans d'action nationaux sur les maladies non transmissibles conformément au Plan d'action mondial pour la lutte contre les maladies non transmissibles (2013­2020). En 2018, nous avons évalué l'état de l'application des interventions les plus avantageuses recommandées en matière de maladies non transmissibles dans sept pays asiatiques: le Bhoutan, le Cambodge, l'Indonésie, les Philippines, le Sri Lanka, la Thaïlande et le Viet Nam. Nous avons recueilli des données à partir de toute une série de rapports publiés et directement auprès des ministères de la Santé. Nous avons inclus les interventions qui concernaient la consommation de tabac et d'alcool, une activité physique inadéquate et une consommation de sel élevée, ainsi que les réponses des systèmes de santé, et nous avons identifié les lacunes et proposé des solutions. En 2018, les progrès étaient variables selon les pays. Les lacunes étaient largement dues à un financement inadéquat; des capacités institutionnelles limitées (malgré des unités dédiées aux maladies non transmissibles); une action inadéquate dans les différents secteurs au sein et en dehors du système de santé; et l'absence de mécanismes de suivi et d'évaluation standardisés pour orienter les politiques. Afin de combler ces lacunes, les gouvernements doivent investir davantage dans des interventions efficaces telles que les interventions les plus avantageuses recommandées par l'OMS, améliorer l'action dans les différents secteurs, et renforcer les capacités en matière de suivi et d'évaluation, mais aussi de recherche. En s'inspirant de la Convention-cadre pour la lutte antitabac, l'OMS et ses partenaires internationaux devraient élaborer un outil de suivi complet et standardisé sur la consommation d'alcool, de sel et d'aliments malsains, l'activité physique et la réponse des systèmes de santé.

Para 2016, los Estados miembros de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) habían elaborado y aplicado planes de acción nacionales sobre las enfermedades no contagiosas de acuerdo con el Plan de acción mundial para la prevención y el control de las enfermedades no transmisibles (2013-2020). En 2018, se evaluó el estado de implementación de las intervenciones recomendadas en siete países asiáticos en materia de enfermedades no contagiosas: Bhután, Camboya, Filipinas, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Tailandia y Vietnam. Se recopilaron datos de una serie de informes publicados y directamente de los ministerios de salud. Se incluyeron intervenciones que abordaron el uso del tabaco y el alcohol, la actividad física inadecuada y la ingesta elevada de sal, así como las respuestas de los sistemas de salud, se identificaron las deficiencias y se propusieron soluciones. En 2018, el progreso fue desigual entre los países. Las deficiencias en la aplicación se debieron en gran medida a la falta de financiación, a la limitada capacidad institucional (a pesar de las dependencias designadas para las enfermedades no contagiosas), a la inadecuación de las medidas adoptadas en los diferentes sectores dentro y fuera del sistema de salud y a la falta de mecanismos normalizados de supervisión y evaluación que sirvieran de base a las políticas. Para subsanar las deficiencias en materia de aplicación, los gobiernos deben invertir más en intervenciones eficaces, como las recomendadas por la OMS, mejorar las medidas adoptadas en los distintos sectores y aumentar la capacidad de seguimiento y evaluación y de investigación. A partir de las enseñanzas del Convenio Marco para el Control del Tabaco, la OMS y los asociados internacionales deberían elaborar un instrumento de seguimiento normalizado y completo para el consumo de alcohol, sal y alimentos no saludables, la actividad física y la respuesta de los sistemas de salud.

Improving access to assistive technologies: challenges and solutions in low- and middle-income countries.

Assistive technologies can benefit a wide range of people, including those with disabilities; those with age-related frailties; those affected by noncommunicable diseases; and those requiring rehabilitation. Access to these technologies is limited in low- and middle-income countries but the already-high need will inevitably rise further because of demographic and epidemiological transitions. Four key gaps contribute to limited access. First, although need is high, demand is low, not least because of widespread lack of awareness among potential beneficiaries, their caregivers, and their health-care providers. Second, product designs are insufficiently informed by users' and caregivers' preferences and environments, and transfer of technologies to low-resource settings is limited. Third, barriers to supply include low production quality, financial constraints and a scarcity of trained personnel. Fourth, there is a dearth of high-quality evidence on the effectiveness of different types of technology. Adoption of the World Health Assembly Resolution WHA71.8 in 2018 marked convergence of, commitment to and strengthening of efforts to close these gaps and improve access to assistive devices. The Global Cooperation on Assistive Technology workplan identifies four overarching, interlinked solutions for countries to improve access. First, a national policy framework for assistive technology is needed. Second, product development should be encouraged through incentive schemes that support and promote affordable assistive products. Third, capacity-building of personnel is needed, through undergraduate and in-service training. Fourth, provision needs to be enhanced, especially through integration of services with the health system. These actions need to be underpinned by government leadership, a multisectoral approach and adequate funding.