Current Status and Future Directions of Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Carcinoma.

The growing interest in proton therapy (PT) in recent decades is justified by the evidence that protons dose distribution allows maximal dose release at the tumor depth followed by sharp distal dose fall-off. But, in the holistic management of head and neck cancer (HNC), limiting the potential of PT to a mere dosimetric advantage appears reductive. Indeed, the precise targeting of PT may help evaluate the effectiveness of de-escalation strategies, especially for patients with human papillomavirus associated-oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) and nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). Furthermore, PT could have potentially greater immunogenic effects than conventional photon therapy, possibly enhancing both the radiotherapy (RT) capability to activate anti-tumor immune response and the effectiveness of immunotherapy drugs. Based on these premises, the aim of the present paper is to conduct a narrative review reporting the safety and efficacy of PT compared to photon RT focusing on NPC and OPC. We also provide a snapshot of ongoing clinical trials comparing PT with photon RT for these two clinical scenarios. Finally, we discuss new insights that may further develop clinical research on PT for HNC.

Dosimetric and NTCP analyses for selecting parotid gland cancer patients for proton therapy.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To perform a dosimetric and a normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) comparison between intensity modulated proton therapy and photon volumetric modulated arc therapy in a cohort of patients with parotid gland cancers in a post-operative or radical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 2011 to September 2021, 37 parotid gland cancers patients treated at two institutions were eligible. Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients aged ⩾ 18 years, diagnosis of parotid gland cancers candidate for postoperative radiotherapy or definitive radiotherapy, presence of written informed consent for the use of anonymous data for research purposes. Organs at risk (OARs) were retrospectively contoured. Target coverage goal was defined as D95 > 98%. Six NTCP models were selected. NTCP profiles were calculated for each patient using an internally-developed Python script in RayStation TPS. Average differences in NTCP between photon and proton plans were tested for significance with a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Seventy-four plans were generated. A lower Dmean to the majority of organs at risk (inner ear, cochlea, oral cavity, pharyngeal constrictor muscles, contralateral parotid and submandibular gland) was obtained with intensity modulated proton therapy vs volumetric modulated arc therapy with statistical significance (p < .05). Ten (27%) patients had a difference in NTCP (photon vs proton plans) greater than 10% for hearing loss and tinnitus: among them, seven qualified for both endpoints, two patients for hearing loss only, and one for tinnitus. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, nearly one-third of patients resulted eligible for proton therapy and they were the most likely to benefit in terms of prevention of hearing loss and tinnitus.

Using the gamma-index analysis for inter-fractional comparison of in-beam PET images for head-and-neck treatment monitoring in proton therapy: A Monte Carlo simulation study.

GOAL: In-beam Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a technique for in-vivo non-invasive treatment monitoring for proton therapy. To detect anatomical changes in patients with PET, various analysis methods exist, but their clinical interpretation is problematic. The goal of this work is to investigate whether the gamma-index analysis, widely used for dose comparisons, is an appropriate tool for comparing in-beam PET distributions. Focusing on a head-and-neck patient, we investigate whether the gamma-index map and the passing rate are sensitive to progressive anatomical changes. METHODS/MATERIALS: We simulated a treatment course of a proton therapy patient using FLUKA Monte Carlo simulations. Gradual emptying of the sinonasal cavity was modeled through a series of artificially modified CT scans. The in-beam PET activity distributions from three fields were evaluated, simulating a planar dual head geometry. We applied the 3D-gamma evaluation method to compare the PET images with a reference image without changes. Various tolerance criteria and parameters were tested, and results were compared to the CT-scans. RESULTS: Based on 210 MC simulations we identified appropriate parameters for the gamma-index analysis. Tolerance values of 3 mm/3% and 2 mm/2% were suited for comparison of simulated in-beam PET distributions. The gamma passing rate decreased with increasing volume change for all fields. CONCLUSION: The gamma-index analysis was found to be a useful tool for comparing simulated in-beam PET images, sensitive to sinonasal cavity emptying. Monitoring the gamma passing rate behavior over the treatment course is useful to detect anatomical changes occurring during the treatment course.

Using the photon isoeffective dose formalism to compare and combine BNCT and CIRT in a head and neck tumour.

Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) is a radiotherapy technique based on the enrichment of tumour cells with suitable 10-boron concentration and on subsequent neutron irradiation. Low-energy neutron irradiation produces a localized deposition of radiation dose caused by boron neutron capture reactions. Boron is vehiculated into tumour cells via proper borated formulations, able to accumulate in the malignancy more than in normal tissues. The neutron capture releases two high-LET charged particles (i.e., an alpha particle and a lithium ion), losing their energy in a distance comparable to the average dimension of one cell. Thus BNCT is selective at the cell level and characterized by high biological effectiveness. As the radiation field is due to the interaction of neutrons with the components of biological tissues and with boron, the dosimetry requires a formalism to express the absorbed dose into photon-equivalent units. This work analyzes a clinical case of an adenoid cystic carcinoma treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT), located close to optic nerve and deep-seated as a practical example of how to apply the formalism of BNCT photon isoeffective dose and how to evaluate the BNCT dose distribution against CIRT. The example allows presenting different dosimetrical and radiobiological quantities and drawing conclusions on the potential of BNCT stemming on the clinical result of the CIRT. The patient received CIRT with a dose constraint on the optic nerve, affecting the peripheral part of the Planning Target Volume (PTV). After the treatment, the tumour recurred in this low-dose region. BNCT was simulated for the primary tumour, with the goal to calculate the dose distribution in isoeffective units and a Tumour Control Probability (TCP) to be compared with the one of the original treatment. BNCT was then evaluated for the recurrence in the underdosed region which was not optimally covered by charged particles due to the proximity of the optic nerve. Finally, a combined treatment consisting in BNCT and carbon ion therapy was considered to show the consistency and the potential of the model. For the primary tumour, the photon isoeffective dose distribution due to BNCT was evaluated and the resulted TCP was higher than that obtained for the CIRT. The formalism produced values that are consistent with those of carbon-ion. For the recurrence, BNCT dosimetry produces a similar TCP than that of primary tumour. A combined treatment was finally simulated, showing a TCP comparable to the BNCT-alone with overall dosimetric advantage in the most peripheral parts of the treatment volume. Isoeffective dose formalism is a robust tool to analyze BNCT dosimetry and to compare it with the photon-equivalent dose calculated for carbon-ion treatment. This study introduces for the first time the possibility to combine the dosimetry obtained by two different treatment modalities, showing the potential of exploiting the cellular targeting of BNCT combined with the precision of charged particles in delivering an homogeneous dose distribution in deep-seated tumours.

Curative carbon ion radiotherapy in a head and neck mucosal melanoma series: Facing the future within multidisciplinarity.

PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy and toxicity of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) in locally advanced head and neck mucosal melanoma (HNMM) patients treated at our Institute. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2013 and June 2020, 40 HNMM patients were treated with CIRT. Prescription dose was 65.6-68.8 Gy relative biological effectiveness [RBE] in 16 fractions. Twelve (30%) patients received only biopsy, 28 (70%) surgical resection before CIRT. Immunotherapy was administered before and/or after CIRT in 45% of patients, mainly for distant progression (89%). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 18 months. 2-year Local Relapse Free Survival (LRFS), Overall Survival (OS), Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Distant Metastasis Free Survival (DMFS) were 84.5%, 58.6%, 33.2% and 37.3%, respectively. At univariate analysis, LRFS was significantly better for non-recurrent status, < 2 surgeries before CIRT and treatment started < 9 months from the initial diagnosis, with no significant differences for operated versus unresected patients. After relapse, immunotherapy provided longer median OS (17 months vs 3.6, p-value<0.001). Late toxicity ≥ G3 (graded with CTCAE 5.0 scale) was reported in 10% of patients. CONCLUSION: CIRT in advanced HNMM patients is safe and locally effective. Prospective trials are warranted to assess the role of targeted/immune- systemic therapy to improve OS.

Current management and future challenges in salivary glands cancer.

Salivary gland cancers (SGCs) are rare, accounting for less than 5% of all malignancies of the head and neck region, and are morphologically heterogeneous. The diagnosis is mainly based on histology, with the complementary aid of molecular profiling, which is helpful in recognizing some poorly differentiated, borderline, or atypical lesions. Instrumental imaging defines the diagnosis, representing a remarkable tool in the treatment plan. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance are the most common procedures used to describe the primary tumour. The treatment of SGCs is multimodal and consists of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy; each treatment plan is, however, featured on the patient and disease's characteristics. On 24 June 2022, in the meeting "Current management and future challenges in salivary gland cancers" many experts in this field discussed the state of the art of SGCs research, the future challenges and developments. After the meeting, the same pool of experts maintained close contact to keep these data further updated in the conference proceedings presented here. This review collects the insights and suggestions that emerged from the discussion during and after the meeting per se.

The Role of Carbon Ion Therapy in the Changing Oncology Landscape-A Narrative Review of the Literature and the Decade of Carbon Ion Experience at the Italian National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy.

BACKGROUND: Currently, 13 Asian and European facilities deliver carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for preclinical and clinical activity, and, to date, 55 clinical studies including CIRT for adult and paediatric solid neoplasms have been registered. The National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO) is the only Italian facility able to accelerate both protons and carbon ions for oncological treatment and research. METHODS: To summarise and critically evaluate state-of-the-art knowledge on the application of carbon ion radiotherapy in oncological settings, the authors conducted a literature search till December 2022 in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane. The results of 68 studies are reported using a narrative approach, highlighting CNAO's clinical activity over the last 10 years of CIRT. RESULTS: The ballistic and radiobiological hallmarks of CIRT make it an effective option in several rare, radioresistant, and difficult-to-treat tumours. CNAO has made a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge on CIRT delivery in selected tumour types. CONCLUSIONS: After an initial ramp-up period, CNAO has progressively honed its clinical, technical, and dosimetric skills. Growing engagement with national and international networks and research groups for complex cancers has led to increasingly targeted patient selection for CIRT and lowered barriers to facility access.

Treatment of loco-regional recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a non-endemic area: oncologic outcomes, morbidity, and proposal of a prognostic nomogram.

Introduction: The study assessed outcomes and toxicities of different treatment modalities for local and/or regional recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in a non-endemic area. Methods: Patients treated with curative intent for recurrent NPC with salvage surgery, photon-based radiotherapy, proton therapy (PT), with or without chemotherapy, at different Italian referral centers between 1998 and 2020 were included. Adverse events and complications were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Characteristics of the patients, tumors, treatments, and complications are presented along with uni- and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. A survival predictive nomogram is also provided. Results: A total of 140 patients treated from 1998 to 2020 were retrospectively assessed. Cases with lower age, comorbidity rate, stage, and shorter disease-free interval (DFI) preferentially underwent endoscopic surgery. More advanced cases underwent re-irradiation, fairly distributed between photon-based radiotherapy and PT. Age and DFI were independent factors influencing overall survival. No independent prognostic effect of treatment modality was observed. No significant difference in the morbidity profile of treatments was observed, with 40% of patients experiencing at least one adverse event classified as G3 or higher. Conclusion: Recurrent NPC in a non-endemic area has dissimilar aspects compared to its endemic counterpart, suggesting the need for further studies that can guide the choice of the best treatment modality.

The SINTART 2 Study. A phase II non-randomised controlled trial of induction chemotherapy, photon-, proton- and carbon-ion-based radiotherapy integration in patients with locally advanced unresectable sinonasal tumours.

PURPOSE: Unresectable, locally advanced sinonasal epithelial tumours are rare diseases with poor prognosis. Multimodal approach is widely used, although no standard therapy has been established in prospective trials. This study assessed activity and safety of an innovative integration of multimodality treatment-induction chemotherapy (ICT), surgery and radiotherapy (RT)-modulated by histology and response to ICT. METHODS: Patients with untreated, unresectable sinonasal epithelial tumours with selected histotypes (squamous cell carcinoma, intestinal-type adenocarcinoma, sinonasal undifferentiated and neuroendocrine carcinoma, olfactory neuroblastoma) were enroled in a single-arm, open-label, phase II, multicentre clinical trial. Patients were treated with up to 5 ICT cycles, whose regimen was selected according to histotype. Photon and/or proton/carbon-ion-based RT was employed according to disease site, stage and ICT response. Primary end-point was 5-years progression-free survival (PFS), secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), ICT objective response rate per RECIST 1.1 and safety. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were evaluable for primary end-point. Five-year PFS was 26.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.6-57.1), with a median PFS of 18 months. Five-year OS was 23.8% (95% CI: 9.5-59.3), with a median OS of 27 months. The overall response rate to ICT was 40%. Three-year PFS for patients achieving major volumetric partial response (mPRv) versus non-mPRv was 40% (95% CI: 13.7-100%) versus 23.1% (95% CI: 8.3-64.7%) (P = 0.318) and 3-year OS was 53.3% (95% CI: 21.4-100%) versus 37.7% (95% CI: 20.0-71.0%) (P = 0.114). CONCLUSION: Multimodal combination of ICT and innovative RT did not provide a significant improvement in survival rates with respect to previous experiences. This finding underscores the need for future research in this rare disease, still characterised by a heavy burden and poor prognosis. We observed longer survival in subjects achieving response to ICT. The overall treatment safety is acceptable.

The SINTART 1 study. A phase II non-randomised controlled trial of induction chemotherapy, surgery, photon-, proton- and carbon ion-based radiotherapy integration in patients with locally advanced resectable sinonasal tumours.

PURPOSE: Sinonasal tumours are rare diseases with poor prognosis. Multimodal approach including surgery is widely used, although no standard therapy has been established in prospective trials. This study assessed activity and safety of an innovative integration of multimodality treatment-induction chemotherapy (ICT), surgery and radiotherapy (RT)-modulated by histology and response to ICT. METHODS: Patients with untreated, operable sinonasal tumours with selected histotypes (squamous cell carcinoma, intestinal-type adenocarcinoma, sinonasal undifferentiated and neuroendocrine carcinoma, olfactory neuroblastoma) were enrolled in a single-arm, phase II, multicenter clinical trial. Patients were treated with up to 5 ICT cycles, whose regimen was selected according to histotype, followed either by curative chemo-RT for pts with ≥80% reduction of initial tumour diameter or surgery and adjuvant (chemo)RT. Photon and/or proton/carbon ion-based RT was employed according to the disease site and stage. Primary end-point was 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), ICT objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 and safety. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were evaluable for primary end-point. Fourteen patients (40%) were treated with definitive (CT)RT and 20 (57%) underwent surgery. Five-year PFS was 38% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21-69), with a median PFS of 26 months. Five-year OS was 46% (95% CI, 28-75), with a median OS of 36 months. Three-year PFS-OS for pts achieving PR/CR versus stable disease (SD)/PD to ICT were 49.8-57% versus 43.2-53%, respectively. Three-year PFS for patients achieving major volumetric partial response (≥80% reduction of initial tumour volume, major partial volumetric response [mPRv]) versus non-mPRv were 82% versus 28% and 3-year OS were 92% versus 36% (p value 0.010 and 0.029, respectively). The ORR to ICT was 54% and 60% across all histotypes and in the sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) subpopulation, respectively, with 6/15 SNUCs (40%) achieving mPRv. CONCLUSION: Treatment of advanced sinonasal cancer with histology-driven ICT followed by (CT)RT in responsive patients was feasible. Overall, these findings suggest a possible role of ICT as the primary approach in newly diagnosed, resectable sinonasal tumours-especially SNUC-to select patients with favourable prognosis. Histology heterogeneity limits generalisation of trial results.

Particle Reirradiation of Malignant Epithelial and Neuroectodermal Sinonasal Tumors: A Case Series from CNAO.

Sinonasal cancers (SNCs) are rare and heterogeneous in histology and biological behavior. The prognosis is generally unfavorable, especially in inoperable cases. In recent years, for some histologies, such as undifferentiated sinonasal carcinoma (SNUC), multimodal treatment with a combination of induction chemotherapy, surgery, and chemo/radiotherapy (RT) has improved the prognosis. Nevertheless, still about half of the patients treated incur a recurrence, in most of the cases at the local site. Surgery with and without RT is usually the treatment choice in cases of recurrence after previous RT in combination with systemic therapy or RT in a histology-driven fashion. In the case of inoperable disease or contraindications to surgery, RT is still a valid treatment option. In this context, hadron therapy with protons (PT) or carbon ions (CIRT) is often preferred due to the physical and biological characteristics of charged particles, allowing the administration of high doses to the tumor target while sparing the surrounding healthy tissues and potentially limiting the side effects due to the high cumulative dose. In the absence of a standard of care for the recurrent setting, we aimed to investigate the role of re-RT with PT or CIRT. We retrospectively analysed 15 patients with recurrent, previously irradiated, SNCs treated at our institution between 2013 and 2020. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Acute and late toxicities were scored according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events CTCAE version 5.0. A total of 13 patients received CIRT and 2 patients received PT. The median re-RT dose was 54 GyRBE (range 45-64 GyRBE) delivered in 3 or 4 GyRBE/fr (fraction) for the CIRT, and 2 Gy RBE/fr for the PT schedule. LC was 44% at the 1-year follow-up and 35.2% at the 3-year follow-up. OS at 1 and 3 years were 92.9% and 38.2%, respectively. Fourteen patients developed G1-G2 acute toxicity (dermatitis and mucositis), and no patients developed G3-G5. Regarding late toxicity, 10 patients encountered at maximum G1-2 events, and 4 did not experience any toxicity. Only for one patient G3 late toxicity was reported (dysphagia requiring a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy).

Upper-neck irradiation versus standard whole-neck irradiation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of upper-neck irradiation versus standard whole-neck irradiation in patients with N0-1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS: We conducted a PRISMA guideline based systematic review and meta-analysis. Randomized clinical trials assessing upper-neck irradiation versus whole-neck irradiation with or without chemotherapy in non-metastatic N0-1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients were identified. The studies were searched on the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library up to March 2022. Survival outcomes, including overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival and relapse-free survival, and toxicities rate were evaluated. RESULTS: There were two randomized clinical trials with 747 samples finally included. Upper-neck irradiation had similar overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.69, 95% confidence interval = 0.37-1.30), distant metastasis-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.92, 95% confidence interval = 0.53-1.60) and relapse-free survival (risk ratio = 1.03, 95% confidence interval = 0.69-1.55) compared to whole-neck irradiation. No differences in both acute and late toxicities were recorded between upper-neck irradiation and whole-neck irradiation. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis supports the potential role of upper-neck irradiation in this population of patients. Further research is needed to confirm results.

Exploring the role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and blood chemistry in head and neck adenoid cystic carcinomas treated with carbon ion radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In recent years, there is an emerging interest in the prognostic role of chemistry blood biomarkers in oncological patients but their role in adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACCs) is still unknown. This study aims to assess the prognostic significance of baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and blood chemistry in a series of head and neck ACC patients treated with carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively retrieved the data of 49 consecutive head and neck ACC patients treated with CIRT. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression (Cox-ph) analyses were performed to look for a potential association of NLR, and other blood biomarker values, with disease-free survival (DFS), Local Control (LC), Metastasis Free Survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: No significant association between NLR > 2,5 and DFS, LC, MFS and OS was found with univariable analysis although a trend was reported for DFS (Hazard ratio [HR]: 2,10, 95 % CI: 0,85 - 5,08, p-value = 0,11). Patients with hemoglobin (hb) ≤ 14 g/dL showed significantly better DFS, MFS and OS. Multivariable regression Cox-ph analysis for DFS, adjusted for margin status, clinical target volume and Absolute Number of Monocytes, reported the following statistically significant HRs, for both NLR > 2,5 and hb > 14 g/dL respectively: 4,850 (95 % CI = 1,408 - 16,701, p = 0,012) and 3,032 (95 % CI = 1,095 - 8,393, p = 0,033). Moreover, hb > 14 with HR = 3,69 (95 % CI: 1,23 - 11,07, p-value = 0,02), was a negative independent prognostic predictor for MFS. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-treatment NLR and hb values seem to be independent prognostic predictor for clinical outcomes in head and neck ACC patients. If their role will be validated in a larger prospective cohort, they might be worthwhile for a pre-treatment risk stratification in patients treated with CIRT.

A Patient Selection Approach Based on NTCP Models and DVH Parameters for Definitive Proton Therapy in Locally Advanced Sinonasal Cancer Patients.

(1) Background: In this work, we aim to provide selection criteria based on normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models and additional explanatory dose-volume histogram parameters suitable for identifying locally advanced sinonasal cancer patients with orbital invasion benefitting from proton therapy. (2) Methods: Twenty-two patients were enrolled, and two advanced radiation techniques were compared: intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and photon volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Plans were optimized with a simultaneous integrated boost modality: 70 and 56 Gy(RBE) in 35 fractions were prescribed to the high risk/low risk CTV. Several endpoints were investigated, classified for their severity and used as discriminating paradigms. In particular, when NTCP models were already available, a first selection criterion based on the delta-NTCP was adopted. Additionally, an overall analysis in terms of DVH parameters was performed. Furthermore, a second selection criterion based on a weighted sum of the ΔNTCP and ΔDVH was adopted. (3) Results: Four patients out of 22 (18.2%) were suitable for IMPT due to ΔNTCP > 3% for at least one severe toxicity, 4 (18.2%) due to ΔNTCP > 20% for at least three concurrent intermediate toxicities and 16 (72.7%) due to the mixed sum of ΔNTCP and ΔDVH criterion. Since, for some cases, both criteria were contemporary fulfilled, globally 17/22 patients (77.3%) would benefit from IMPT. (4) Conclusions: For this rare clinical scenario, the use of a strategy including DVH parameters and NTCPs when comparing VMAT and IMPT is feasible. We showed that patients affected by sinonasal cancer could profit from IMPT compared to VMAT in terms of optical and central nervous system organs at risk sparing.

A randomized controlled phase III study comparing hadrontherapy with carbon ions versus conventional radiotherapy - including photon and proton therapy - for the treatment of radioresistant tumors: the ETOILE trial.

BACKGROUND: Some cancers such as sarcomas (bone and soft tissue sarcomas) and adenoid cystic carcinomas are considered as radioresistant to low linear energy transfer radiation (including photons and protons) and may therefore beneficiate from a carbon ion therapy. Despite encouraging results obtained in phase I/II trials compared to historical data with photons, the spread of carbon ions has been limited mainly because of the absence of randomized medical data. The French health authorities stressed the importance of having randomized data for carbon ion therapy. METHODS: The ETOILE study is a multicenter prospective randomized phase III trial comparing carbon ion therapy to either advanced photon or proton radiotherapy for inoperable or macroscopically incompletely resected (R2) radioresistant cancers including sarcomas and adenoid cystic carcinomas. In the experimental arm, carbon ion therapy will be performed at the National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO) in Pavia, Italy. In the control arm, photon or proton radiotherapy will be carried out in referent centers in France. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints are overall survival and local control, toxicity profile, and quality of life. In addition, a prospective health-economic study and a radiobiological analysis will be conducted. To demonstrate an absolute improvement in the 5-year PFS rate of 20% in favor of carbon ion therapy, 250 patients have to be included in the study. DISCUSSION: So far, no clinical study of phase III has demonstrated the superiority of carbon ion therapy compared to conventional radiotherapy, including proton therapy, for the treatment of radioresistant tumors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02838602 . Date of registration: July 20, 2016. The posted information will be updated as needed to reflect protocol amendments and study progress.

Proton Radiation Therapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients: Dosimetric and NTCP Evaluation Supporting Clinical Decision.

(1) Background: we proposed an integrated strategy to support clinical allocation of nasopharyngeal patients between proton and photon radiotherapy. (2) Methods: intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans were optimized for 50 consecutive nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and differences in dose and normal tissue complication probability (ΔNTCPx-p) for 16 models were calculated. Patient eligibility for IMPT was assessed using a model-based selection (MBS) strategy following the results for 7/16 models describing the most clinically relevant endpoints, applying a model-specific ΔNTCPx-p threshold (15% to 5% depending on the severity of the complication) and a composite threshold (35%). In addition, a comprehensive toxicity score (CTS) was defined as the weighted sum of all 16 ΔNTCPx-p, where weights follow a clinical rationale. (3) Results: Dose deviations were in favor of IMPT (ΔDmean ≥ 14% for cord, esophagus, brainstem, and glottic larynx). The risk of toxicity significantly decreased for xerostomia (-12.5%), brain necrosis (-2.3%), mucositis (-3.2%), tinnitus (-8.6%), hypothyroidism (-9.3%), and trismus (-5.4%). There were 40% of the patients that resulted as eligible for IMPT, with a greater advantage for T3-T4 staging. Significantly different CTS were observed in patients qualifying for IMPT. (4) Conclusions: The MBS strategy successfully drives the clinical identification of NPC patients, who are most likely to benefit from IMPT. CTS summarizes well the expected global gain.

Dosimetric and Clinical Risk Factors for the Development of Maxillary Osteoradionecrosis in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma (ACC) Patients Treated With Carbon Ion Radiotherapy.

Background: The present study aims to evaluate dosimetric and clinical risk factors for the development of maxillary osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) patients treated with carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). Methods: Clinical data and treatment plans of ACC patients, consecutively treated from January 2013 to September 2016 within the phase II clinical trial CNAO S9/2012/C, were retrospectively reviewed. ORN and other treatment-related toxicity were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTACE), version 4.0. The maxillary bone was contoured on the planning CT, and only patients receiving more than 10% of the prescription dose at their maxilla were considered for the analysis (67 patients). The volumes of maxilla receiving doses from 10 Gy (RBE) to 60 Gy (RBE) (VD), with an increment of 10 Gy (RBE), and additional clinical factors were correlated to the incidence of ORN with univariate analysis (Chi-square test). The logistic regression model was subsequently applied for multivariate analysis. Treatment plans calculated with a local effect model (LEM)-based optimization were recalculated with the modified microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM), and compared with literature data from the Japanese experience. Results: The median time interval from the start of CIRT to ORN appearance was 24 months (range, 8-54 months). Maxillary ORN was observed in 11 patients (16.4%). Grade 1 ORN was observed in 2 patients (18.1%), G2 in 4 (36.3%), G3 in 4 (36.3%) and G4 in 1 (9.3%). From univariate analysis, the site of the tumor, the presence of teeth within the PTV and acute mucositis correlated with the development of maxillary ORN. VD were significantly higher for all the dose levels tested in patients with maxillary ORN than patients without necrosis, according to both radiobiological models. The multivariate analysis showed that V60 significantly correlated with ORN risk. Conclusion: The volume of maxilla irradiated with high dose values was relevant for ORN development in our cohort of ACC patients. These results are in line with previously published data obtained with a different radiobiological model. Our findings might be helpful to prevent the risk of ORN in patients receiving CIRT.

Ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer with simultaneous boost to the dominant intraprostatic lesion: a plan comparison.

OBJECTIVE: To compare different stereotactic body techniques-intensity-modulated radiotherapy with photons and protons, applied to radiotherapy of prostatic cancer-with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) on the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL). METHODS: Ten patients were selected for this planning study. Dosimetric results were compared between volumetric modulated arc therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and intensity-modulated proton therapy both with two (IMPT 2F) and five fields (IMPT 5F) planning while applying the prescription schemes of 7.25 Gy/fraction to the prostate gland and 7.5 Gy/fraction to the DIL in 5 fractions. RESULTS: Comparison of the coverages of the planning target volumes showed that small differences exist. The IMPT-2F-5F techniques allowed higher doses in the targets; conformal indexes resulted similar; homogeneity was better in the photon techniques (2%-5%). Regarding the organs at risk, all the techniques were able to maintain the dose well below the prescribed constraints: in the rectum, the IMPT-2F-5F and IMRT were more efficient in lowering the intermediate doses; in the bladder, the median dose was significantly better in the case of IMPT (2F-5F). In the urethra, the best sparing was achieved only by IMPT-5F. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic radiotherapy with SIB for localized prostate cancer is feasible with all the investigated techniques. Concerning IMPT, the two-beam technique does not seem to have a greater advantage compared to the standard techniques; the 5-beam technique seems more promising also accounting for the range uncertainty.