Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr ; 243: 40-46.e2, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34929243

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) severity and risk of neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) at 2 years and 5 years corrected age and to examine whether this association changes over time. STUDY DESIGN: This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients with a gestational age <30 weeks surviving to 36 weeks postmenstrual age, divided into groups according to BPD severity. NDI was defined as having cognitive or motor abilities below -1 SD, cerebral palsy, or a hearing or a visual impairment. The association was assessed using a multivariate logistic regression model analysis, adjusting for known confounders for NDI, and mixed-model analysis. RESULTS: Of the 790 surviving infants (15% diagnosed with mild BPD, 9% with moderate BPD, and 10% with severe BPD), 88% and 82% were longitudinally assessed at 2 years and 5 years corrected age, respectively. The mixed-model analysis showed a statistically significant increase in NDI at all levels of BPD severity compared with infants with no BPD, and a 5-fold increased risk in NDI was seen from 2 years to 5 years corrected age in all degrees of BPD severity. The strength of this association between NDI and BPD severity did not change over time. CONCLUSIONS: Increased BPD severity is associated with increased risk of NDI at both 2 years and 5 years corrected age. The absolute incidence of NDI increased significantly from 2 years to 5 years corrected age for all BPD severity categories, but this increased risk was similar at both time points in each category.


Asunto(s)
Displasia Broncopulmonar , Parálisis Cerebral , Displasia Broncopulmonar/complicaciones , Displasia Broncopulmonar/diagnóstico , Displasia Broncopulmonar/epidemiología , Parálisis Cerebral/epidemiología , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Neonatology ; 112(2): 172-179, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28601870

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Restrictive use of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in preterm infants reduces the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Our objective was to determine its effect on neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) at 24 months' corrected age (CA). METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study included all patients with a gestational age <30 weeks born in 2004/2005 (epoch 1) and 2010/2011 (epoch 2). In epoch 2, we introduced a policy of restriction on IMV and liberalized the use of respiratory stimulants in the delivery room and neonatal intensive care. Data on patient characteristics, respiratory management, short-term outcomes, mortality, BPD, and NDI at 24 months' CA were collected. RESULTS: Four hundred and four preterm infants were included. Compared to those in epoch 1, infants in epoch 2 were less likely to be intubated and the duration of IMV was shorter. Other noninvasive adjuvant therapies such as caffeine, doxapram, and nasal ventilation were more often used during epoch 2. There was a trend to less BPD in epoch 2 compared to epoch 1 (17 vs. 23%, adjusted OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.48, 1.16). Mortality did not change over time. The combined outcome death or NDI at 24 months' CA was significantly lower in epoch 2 compared to epoch 1 (24.7 vs. 33.9%, adjusted OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Restricted use of IMV is feasible in preterm infants and might be associated with a reduced risk of the combined outcome death or NDI at 24 months' CA. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.


Asunto(s)
Desarrollo Infantil , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Sistema Nervioso/crecimiento & desarrollo , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/prevención & control , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Factores de Edad , Displasia Broncopulmonar/etiología , Displasia Broncopulmonar/fisiopatología , Displasia Broncopulmonar/prevención & control , Preescolar , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Salas de Parto , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Ventilación de Alta Frecuencia , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Intubación Intratraqueal , Masculino , Países Bajos , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/etiología , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/mortalidad , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/fisiopatología , Ventilación no Invasiva , Surfactantes Pulmonares/uso terapéutico , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Neonatology ; 111(2): 162-171, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27760427

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Apnea of prematurity (AOP) is a common complication of preterm birth, for which caffeine is the first treatment of choice. In case of persistent AOP, doxapram has been advocated as an additional therapy. OBJECTIVE: To identify and appraise all existing evidence regarding efficacy and safety of doxapram use for AOP in infants born before 34 weeks of gestational age. METHODS: All studies reporting on doxapram use for AOP were identified by searching electronic databases, references from relevant studies, and abstracts from the Societies for Pediatric Research. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility and quality, and extracted data on study design, patient characteristics, efficacy and safety outcomes. RESULTS: The randomized controlled trials showed less apnea during doxapram treatment when compared to placebo, but no difference in treatment effect when compared to theophylline. No serious adverse effects were reported. We identified 28 observational studies consisting mainly of cohort studies and case series (n = 1,994). There was considerable heterogeneity in study design and quality. Most studies reported a positive effect of doxapram on apnea rate. A few studies reported on long-term outcomes with conflicting results. A range of possible doxapram-related short-term adverse effects were reported, sometimes associated with the use of higher doses. CONCLUSION: Based on the limited number of studies and level of evidence, no firm conclusions on the efficacy and safety of doxapram in preterm infants can be drawn. For this reason, routine use cannot be recommended. A large multicenter randomized controlled trial is urgently needed to provide more conclusive evidence.


Asunto(s)
Apnea/tratamiento farmacológico , Doxapram/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades del Prematuro/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/uso terapéutico , Cafeína/uso terapéutico , Doxapram/administración & dosificación , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Teofilina/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA