RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: A stoma will cause nutrients loss which could result in impaired growth. Impaired growth can negatively impact long-term development. This study aims to evaluate: (1) the effect of stomas on growth comparing small bowel stoma versus colostomy and (2) if early closure (within 6 weeks), proximal small bowel stoma (within 50 cm of Treitz), major small bowel resection (≥ 30 cm), or adequate sodium supplementation (urinary level ≤ 30 mmol/L) influences growth. METHODS: Young children (≤ 3 years) treated with stomas between 1998 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. Growth was measured with weight-for-age Z-scores. Malnourishment was defined using the World Health Organization's definition. Comparison between changes in Z-scores at creation, closure, and a year following closure was done by Friedman's test with post hoc Wilcoxon's signed rank test or Wilcoxon's rank-sum test when necessary. RESULTS: In the presence of a stoma in 172 children, 61% showed growth decline. Severe malnourishment was seen at the time of stoma closure in 51% of the patients treated by small bowel stoma and 16% of those treated by colostomy. Within a year following stoma closure, 67% showed a positive growth trend. Having a proximal small bowel stoma and undergoing major small bowel resection led to significantly lower Z-scores at closure. Adequate sodium supplementation and early closure did not lead to significant changes in Z-scores. CONCLUSION: Stomas have a negative impact on growth in the majority of children. This impact might be decreased by preventing small bowel stomas when possible, specifically proximal stomas, and limiting small bowel resection. Since stoma closure is essential in reversing the negative effect on growth, we opt that early closure might result in an early shift to catch-up growth.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Rectal cancer is common with a 60% 5-year survival rate. Treatment usually involves surgery with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy. Sphincter saving curative treatment can result in debilitating changes to bowel function known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). There are currently no clear guidelines on the management of LARS with only limited evidence for different treatment modalities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients who have undergone an anterior resection for rectal cancer in the last 10 years will be approached for the study. The feasibility trial will take place in four centres with a 9-month recruitment window and 12 months follow-up period. The primary objective is to assess the feasibility of recruitment to the POLARiS trial which will be achieved through assessment of recruitment, retainment and follow-up rates as well as the prevalence of major LARS.Feasibility outcomes will be analysed descriptively through the estimation of proportions with confidence intervals. Longitudinal patient reported outcome measures will be analysed according to scoring manuals and presented descriptively with reporting graphically over time. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by Wales REC1; Reference 22/WA/0025. The feasibility study is in the process of set up. The results of the feasibility trial will feed into the design of an expanded, international trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CT05319054.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Estudios de Factibilidad , Síndrome de Resección Anterior Baja , Estudios de Cohortes , Tratamiento Conservador , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major complication of colorectal surgery resulting in morbidity, mortality and poorer quality of life. The early diagnosis of AL is challenging due to the poor positive predictive value of tests available and reliance on clinical presentation which may be delayed. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the applicability of peritoneal cytokine levels as an early predictive test of AL in postoperative colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed from inception to January 2021, in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases using MeSH and non-MeSH terms in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All studies evaluating peritoneal cytokines in the context of AL were included in this review. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-two abstracts were screened, 30 full manuscripts evaluated, and 12 prospective studies were included. There were 8 peritoneal cytokines evaluated (interleukin [IL]-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF], tumour necrosis factor alpha [TNF alpha] and matrix metalloproteinase [MMP]2 and MMP9) between AL and non-AL groups on postoperative day 1. Those that included IL-6 (7 studies), IL-10 (4 studies), TNF alpha (6 studies) and MMP9 (2 studies) were included in the meta-analysis. IL-10 was the only cytokine in the meta-analysis that was significantly (p < 0.05) raised in drain fluid on postoperative day 1 in AL patients. CONCLUSIONS: Peritoneal IL-10 was significantly raised on postoperative day 1 in patients who subsequently developed AL. This may be a useful early predictor of AL and aid in an earlier diagnosis for postoperative colorectal patients. The range of cytokines investigated within the literature is limited and from heterogeneous studies which suggests more research is needed.
Asunto(s)
Fuga Anastomótica , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Fuga Anastomótica/diagnóstico , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Citocinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial VascularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little is known about stoma related morbidity in young children. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess major morbidity after stoma formation and stoma closure and its associated risk factors. METHODS: All consecutive young children (age ≤ three years) who received a stoma between 1998 and 2018 at our tertiary referral center were retrospectively included. The incidence of major stoma related morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) was the primary outcome. This was separately analysed for stoma formation alone, stoma closure alone and all stoma interventions combined. Non-stoma related morbidity was excluded. Risk factors for major morbidity were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In total 336 young children were included with a median follow-up of 6 (IQR:2-11) years. Of these young children, 5% (n = 17/336) received a jejunostomy, 57% (n = 192/336) an ileostomy, and 38% (n = 127/336) a colostomy. Following stoma formation, 27% (n = 92/336) of the young children experienced major stoma related morbidity, mainly consisting of high output stoma, prolapse and stoma stenosis. The major morbidity rate was 23% (n = 66/292) following stoma closure, most commonly comprising anastomotic leakage/stenosis, incisional hernia and adhesive obstructions. For combined stoma interventions, major stoma related morbidity was 39% (n = 130/336). Ileostomy was independently associated with a higher risk of developing major morbidity following stoma formation (OR:2.5; 95%-CI:1.3-4.7) as well as following closure (OR:2.7; 95%-CI:1.3-5.8). CONCLUSIONS: Major stoma related morbidity is a frequent and severe clinical problem in young children, both after stoma formation and closure. The risk of morbidity should be considered when deliberating a stoma.
Asunto(s)
Estomas Quirúrgicos , Niño , Preescolar , Colostomía/efectos adversos , Constricción Patológica/etiología , Humanos , Ileostomía/efectos adversos , Morbilidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estomas Quirúrgicos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
AIM: Delayed closure of ileostomy following an anterior resection for rectal cancer in the UK is common. The aims of this study were (i) to investigate the variation in patient pathways between hospitals, (ii) to identify the key learning points from units with the shortest time to closure and (iii) to develop guidance for a pathway to minimize delay in ileostomy closure. METHOD: This was a mixed methods study. Thirty-eight colorectal units in the UK completed a short online survey. Nine colorectal units in Wales filled in an additional, expanded version of the survey. Semi-structured interviews were performed with clinicians from the six best performing units in terms of timely ileostomy closure. The optimal pathway suggested is based on the best evidence available and the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland guidelines. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis revealed that 5% of units (n = 2) have a local target time for ileostomy closure. Of all units, 90% (n = 34) would consider implementing a pathway if guidelines were developed. In-depth interviews highlighted the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, a dedicated coordinator to facilitate timely booking, and consensus on whether closure should be performed before or after adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of national guidance in timing of contrast studies and ileostomy closure. Key aspects to consider are better information at consent regarding stoma closure timing, a dedicated person to track patients and the planning of contrast studies at discharge from initial surgery. With a dedicated approach closure of ileostomy within 10-12 weeks is feasible for most units.
Asunto(s)
Ileostomía , Neoplasias del Recto , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Humanos , Ileostomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Recto/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
AIM: The COVID-19 pandemic led to widespread disruption of colorectal cancer services during 2020. Established cancer referral pathways were modified in response to reduced diagnostic availability. The aim of this paper is to assess the impact of COVID-19 on colorectal cancer referral, presentation and stage. METHODS: This was a single centre, retrospective cohort study performed at a tertiary referral centre. Patients diagnosed and managed with colorectal adenocarcinoma between January and December 2020 were compared with patients from 2018 and 2019 in terms of demographics, mode of presentation and pathological cancer staging. RESULTS: In all, 272 patients were diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma during 2020 compared with 282 in 2019 and 257 in 2018. Patients in all years were comparable for age, gender and tumour location (P > 0.05). There was a significant decrease in urgent suspected cancer referrals, diagnostic colonoscopy and radiological imaging performed between March and June 2020 compared with previous years. More patients presented as emergencies (P = 0.03) with increased rates of large bowel obstruction in 2020 compared with 2018-2019 (P = 0.01). The distribution of TNM grade was similar across the 3 years but more T4 cancers were diagnosed in 2020 versus 2018-2019 (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that a relatively short-term impact on the colorectal cancer referral pathway can have significant consequences on patient presentation leading to higher risk emergency presentation and surgery at a more advanced stage. It is therefore critical that efforts are made to make this pathway more robust to minimize the impact of other future adverse events and to consolidate the benefits of earlier diagnosis and treatment.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Urgencias Médicas , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Previous research using picture/word matching tasks has demonstrated a tendency to incorrectly interpret phrasally stressed strings as compounds. Using event-related potentials, we sought to determine whether this pattern stems from poor perceptual sensitivity to the compound/phrasal stress distinction, or from a post-perceptual bias in behavioral response selection. A secondary aim was to gain insight into the role played by contrastive stress patterns in online sentence comprehension. The behavioral results replicated previous findings of a preference for compounds, but the electrophysiological data suggested a robust sensitivity to both stress patterns. When incongruent with the context, both compound and phrasal stress elicited a sustained left-lateralized negativity. Moreover, incongruent compound stress elicited a centro-parietal negativity (N400), while incongruent phrasal stress elicited a late posterior positivity (P600). We conclude that the previous findings of a preference for compounds are due to response selection bias, and not a lack of perceptual sensitivity. The present results complement previous evidence for the immediate use of meter in semantic processing, as well as evidence for late interactions between prosodic and syntactic information.
Asunto(s)
Potenciales Evocados Auditivos/fisiología , Fonética , Psicolingüística , Semántica , Percepción del Habla/fisiología , Adolescente , Corteza Auditiva/fisiología , Mapeo Encefálico , Electroencefalografía , Potenciales Relacionados con Evento P300/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Lóbulo Parietal/fisiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
This paper investigates the acquisition of compound vs. phrasal stress (hót dog vs. hot dóg) in English. This has previously been shown to be acquired quite late, in contrast to recent research showing that infants both perceive and prefer rhythmic patterns in their own language. Subjects (40 children in four groups the averages ages of which are 5;4, 7;2, 9;3 and 11;6 and 10 adults) were shown pairs of pictures representing a compound word and the corresponding phrase. They heard a prerecorded tape with the names of the items, and were asked to indicate which one they heard. In addition to 9 real compounds and corresponding phrases, 9 novel compounds were presented (rédcup = invented type of flower vs. red cúp). A gradual increase in overall correct scores until age twelve was found along with a significant effect of real vs. novel compounds (p < 0.001), and an overwhelming tendency for the younger children to prefer compounds regardless of stress. We conclude that the results are due to the slow development of the ability to use prosodic information to override a strong lexical bias.