Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Talanta ; 269: 125406, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38008024

RESUMEN

Understanding the role of non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) in tree-level carbon cycling crucially depends on the availability of NSC data in a sufficient temporal resolution covering extreme conditions and seasonal peaks or declines. Chemical analytical methods should therefore get complemented by less extensive retrieval methods. To this end, we explored the potential of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for estimating NSC contents at a set of 180 samples taken from leaves, roots, stems and branches of different tree species in different biogeographic regions. Multiple randomized partitioning in calibration and validation data were performed with near-infrared (NIR) and mid-infrared (MIR) as well as combined data. With derivative spectra, NIR markedly outperformed MIR data for NSC estimation; mean RMSE for outer validation samples equalled 2.58 (in % of dry matter) compared to 2.90, r2 was 0.64 compared to 0.52. We found complementary information related to NSC in both spectral domains, so that a combination with high-level data fusion (model averaging) increased accuracy (RMSE decreased to 2.19, r2 equalled 0.72). Spectral variable selection with the CARS algorithm further improved results slightly (RMSE = 1.97, r2 = 0.78). On the level of tissue types, we found a marked differentiation concerning the appropriateness of datasets and approaches. High-level data fusion was successful for leaves, NIR data (together with CARS) provided the best results for wooden tissues. This suggests further studies with a greater number of samples per tissue type but only for selected (main) tree species to finally judge the sensitivities of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (NIR, MIR) for NSC retrieval.


Asunto(s)
Espectroscopía Infrarroja Corta , Árboles , Espectroscopía Infrarroja Corta/métodos , Calibración , Carbono , Algoritmos , Análisis de los Mínimos Cuadrados
2.
Sensors (Basel) ; 23(2)2023 Jan 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36679480

RESUMEN

Previous studies investigating multi-sensor fusion for the collection of soil information have shown variable improvements, and the underlying prediction mechanisms are not sufficiently understood for spectrally-active and -inactive properties. Our objective was to study prediction mechanisms and benefits of model fusion by measuring mid-infrared (MIR) and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectra, texture, total and labile organic carbon (OC) and nitrogen (N) content, pH, and cation exchange capacity (CEC) for n = 117 soils from an arable field in Germany. Partial least squares regression models underwent a three-fold training/testing procedure using MIR spectra or elemental concentrations derived from XRF spectra. Additionally, two sequential hybrid and two high-level fusion approaches were tested. For the studied field, MIR was superior for organic properties (ratio of prediction to interquartile distance of validation (RPIQV) for total OC = 7.7 and N = 5.0)), while XRF was superior for inorganic properties (RPIQV for clay = 3.4, silt = 3.0, and sand = 1.8). Even the optimal fusion approach brought little to no accuracy improvement for these properties. The high XRF accuracy for clay and silt is explained by the large number of elements with variable importance in the projection scores >1 (Fe ≈ Ni > Si ≈ Al ≈ Mg > Mn ≈ K ≈ Pb (clay only) ≈ Cr) with strong spearman correlations (±0.57 < rs < ±0.90) with clay and silt. For spectrally-inactive properties relying on indirect prediction mechanisms, the relative improvements from the optimal fusion approach compared to the best single spectrometer were marginal for pH (3.2% increase in RPIQV versus MIR alone) but more pronounced for labile OC (9.3% versus MIR) and CEC (12% versus XRF). Dominance of a suboptimal spectrometer in a fusion approach worsened performance compared to the best single spectrometer. Granger-Ramanathan averaging, which weights predictions according to accuracy in training, is therefore recommended as a robust approach to capturing the potential benefits of multiple sensors.


Asunto(s)
Suelo , Suelo/química , Arcilla , Rayos X , Fluorescencia , Alemania
3.
Sensors (Basel) ; 22(7)2022 Apr 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35408363

RESUMEN

Soil spectroscopy in the visible-to-near infrared (VNIR) and mid-infrared (MIR) is a cost-effective method to determine the soil organic carbon content (SOC) based on predictive spectral models calibrated to analytical-determined SOC reference data. The degree to which uncertainty in reference data and spectral measurements contributes to the estimated accuracy of VNIR and MIR predictions, however, is rarely addressed and remains unclear, in particular for current handheld MIR spectrometers. We thus evaluated the reproducibility of both the spectral reflectance measurements with portable VNIR and MIR spectrometers and the analytical dry combustion SOC reference method, with the aim to assess how varying spectral inputs and reference values impact the calibration and validation of predictive VNIR and MIR models. Soil reflectance spectra and SOC were measured in triplicate, the latter by different laboratories, for a set of 75 finely ground soil samples covering a wide range of parent materials and SOC contents. Predictive partial least-squares regression (PLSR) models were evaluated in a repeated, nested cross-validation approach with systematically varied spectral inputs and reference data, respectively. We found that SOC predictions from both VNIR and MIR spectra were equally highly reproducible on average and similar to the dry combustion method, but MIR spectra were more robust to calibration sample variation. The contributions of spectral variation (ΔRMSE < 0.4 g·kg−1) and reference SOC uncertainty (ΔRMSE < 0.3 g·kg−1) to spectral modeling errors were small compared to the difference between the VNIR and MIR spectral ranges (ΔRMSE ~1.4 g·kg−1 in favor of MIR). For reference SOC, uncertainty was limited to the case of biased reference data appearing in either the calibration or validation. Given better predictive accuracy, comparable spectral reproducibility and greater robustness against calibration sample selection, the portable MIR spectrometer was considered overall superior to the VNIR instrument for SOC analysis. Our results further indicate that random errors in SOC reference values are effectively compensated for during model calibration, while biased SOC calibration data propagates errors into model predictions. Reference data uncertainty is thus more likely to negatively impact the estimated validation accuracy in soil spectroscopy studies where archived data, e.g., from soil spectral libraries, are used for model building, but it should be negligible otherwise.


Asunto(s)
Carbono , Suelo , Calibración , Carbono/química , Análisis de los Mínimos Cuadrados , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Suelo/química
4.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 6396, 2019 04 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31015553

RESUMEN

1. Root lignin is a key driver of root decomposition, which in turn is a fundamental component of the terrestrial carbon cycle and increasingly in the focus of ecologists and global climate change research. However, measuring lignin content is labor-intensive and therefore not well-suited to handle the large sample sizes of most ecological studies. To overcome this bottleneck, we explored the applicability of high-throughput near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) measurements to predict fine root lignin content. 2. We measured fine root lignin content in 73 plots of a field biodiversity experiment containing a pool of 60 grassland species using the Acetylbromid (AcBr) method. To predict lignin content, we established NIRS calibration and prediction models based on partial least square regression (PLSR) resulting in moderate prediction accuracies (RPD = 1.96, R2 = 0.74, RMSE = 3.79). 3. In a second step, we combined PLSR with spectral variable selection. This considerably improved model performance (RPD = 2.67, R2 = 0.86, RMSE = 2.78) and enabled us to identify chemically meaningful wavelength regions for lignin prediction. 4. We identified 38 case studies in a literature survey and quantified median model performance parameters from these studies as a benchmark for our results. Our results show that the combination Acetylbromid extracted lignin and NIR spectroscopy is well suited for the rapid analysis of root lignin contents in herbaceous plant species even if the amount of sample is limited.


Asunto(s)
Lignina/análisis , Raíces de Plantas/química , Espectroscopía Infrarroja Corta , Análisis de los Mínimos Cuadrados , Análisis de Regresión
5.
Sensors (Basel) ; 18(4)2018 Mar 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29584664

RESUMEN

Mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy has received widespread interest as a method to complement traditional soil analysis. Recently available portable MIR spectrometers additionally offer potential for on-site applications, given sufficient spectral data quality. We therefore tested the performance of the Agilent 4300 Handheld FTIR (DRIFT spectra) in comparison to a Bruker Tensor 27 bench-top instrument in terms of (i) spectral quality and measurement noise quantified by wavelet analysis; (ii) accuracy of partial least squares (PLS) calibrations for soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (N), pH, clay and sand content with a repeated cross-validation analysis; and (iii) key spectral regions for these soil properties identified with a Monte Carlo spectral variable selection approach. Measurements and multivariate calibrations with the handheld device were as good as or slightly better than Bruker equipped with a DRIFT accessory, but not as accurate as with directional hemispherical reflectance (DHR) data collected with an integrating sphere. Variations in noise did not markedly affect the accuracy of multivariate PLS calibrations. Identified key spectral regions for PLS calibrations provided a good match between Agilent and Bruker DHR data, especially for SOC and N. Our findings suggest that portable FTIR instruments are a viable alternative for MIR measurements in the laboratory and offer great potential for on-site applications.

6.
Sensors (Basel) ; 17(8)2017 Aug 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28800065

RESUMEN

Quantifying the accuracy of remote sensing products is a timely endeavor given the rapid increase in Earth observation missions. A validation site for Sentinel-2 products was hence established in central Germany. Automatic multispectral and hyperspectral sensor systems were installed in parallel with an existing eddy covariance flux tower, providing spectral information of the vegetation present at high temporal resolution. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) values from ground-based hyperspectral and multispectral sensors were compared with NDVI products derived from Sentinel-2A and Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). The influence of different spatial and temporal resolutions was assessed. High correlations and similar phenological patterns between in situ and satellite-based NDVI time series demonstrated the reliability of satellite-based phenological metrics. Sentinel-2-derived metrics showed better agreement with in situ measurements than MODIS-derived metrics. Dynamic filtering with the best index slope extraction algorithm was nevertheless beneficial for Sentinel-2 NDVI time series despite the availability of quality information from the atmospheric correction procedure.


Asunto(s)
Imágenes Satelitales , Algoritmos , Bosques , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...