Outcome predictors in acute surgical admissions for lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

AIM: The BLEED criterion is a triaging model for lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB), which was developed and validated in the USA. We assessed the BLEED criteria in a UK population and aimed to elucidate factors that can be implemented for early risk stratification. METHOD: Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained surgical admission database at a central London teaching hospital. Data were collected on 26 clinical factors available on initial presentation. The primary-outcome end-points included severe bleeding (persistent bleeding within the first 24 h, blood transfusion, a decrease in haematocrit of ≥ 20% or recurrent bleeding after ≥ 24 hours of stability) and adverse outcome (emergency surgery to control bleeding, intensive care unit [ITU] admission or death). RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-four clinical episodes were identified, representing 3% of all surgical referrals. Twelve patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding were excluded. Severe bleeding occurred in 110 (64%) patients. An adverse outcome was recorded in 20 (11.6%) patients, and 10 (5.4%) patients died during admission. The commonest aetiologies were diverticular disease, haemorrhoids and malignancy. Four prognosticators of adverse outcome were identified, these being: creatinine > 150 µm (P = 0.002); age > 60 years (P = 0.001); abnormal haemodynamic parameters on presentation (P = 0.05); persistent bleeding within the first 24 h (P = 0.05); and area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) = 0.79. The BLEED criteria were shown to be nonpredictive (AUC = 0.60). CONCLUSION: The BLEED criterion was not shown to have any predictive value in this patient cohort. Our study has determined an independent set of prognostic factors that could be incorporated into initial triaging of patients presenting with LGIB. This may facilitate the early identification of patients requiring more aggressive resuscitation, admission to a monitored bed and consideration for early radiological or surgical intervention.

Comparison of outcomes of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis with and without previous ileorectal anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: It is reported that previous colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) has no effect on postoperative complications and functional outcomes of secondary proctectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). This retrospective study re-examined the question in a single centre. METHODS: Some 185 patients were grouped by either IPAA as the initial prophylactic surgical procedure (primary IPAA) or IPAA preceded by IRA (secondary IPAA). Data on functional outcomes were available for 104, 83 and 56 patients at years 1, 5 and 10 respectively. RESULTS: The 78 patients who had secondary IPAA were older at the time of operation than the 107 who underwent primary IPAA (35.7 versus 29.2 years; P < 0.001). Six (8 per cent) of the secondary IPAA procedures could not be completed. Otherwise, apart from more wound infections in the secondary IPAA group (9 versus 0.9 per cent in the primary IPAA group; P = 0.012), there were no significant differences in rates of complications, functional outcomes, desmoid disease or pouch failure. CONCLUSION: Conversion from IRA to IPAA may not be possible in patients with FAP. Where conversion is successful, pouch outcomes are similar but wound infections are more frequent.

Strictureplasty vs resection in small bowel Crohn's disease: an evaluation of short-term outcomes and recurrence.

AIM: To compare postoperative adverse events and recurrence following strictureplasty or bowel resection in patients with small bowel Crohn's disease (CD). METHOD: A literature search was performed to identify studies published between 1980 and 2006 comparing outcomes of CD patients undergoing either strictureplasty or bowel resection. Hazard ratios were calculated from Kaplan-Meier plots of cumulative recurrence data. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed. Random-effect meta-analytical techniques were employed. Sensitivity analysis and assessment of heterogeneity were performed. RESULTS: Seven studies comprising 688 CD patients (strictureplasty n = 311, 45%; resection with or without strictureplasty n = 377, 55%) were included. Patients undergoing strictureplasty alone had a lower risk of developing postoperative complications than those who underwent resection (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.31-1.16) although this was not statistically significant (P = 0.13). Surgical recurrence after strictureplasty was more likely than after resection (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 0.96-1.93, P = 0.09). Patients who had a resection had a significantly longer recurrence-free survival than those undergoing strictureplasty alone (HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02-1.15, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients with small bowel CD undergoing strictureplasty alone may have fewer postoperative complications than those undergoing a concomitant bowel resection. However, surgical recurrence maybe higher following strictureplasty alone than with a concomitant small bowel resection. Patients may require appropriate preoperative counselling regarding the pros and cons of each operative technique.