A carbapenem-focused antimicrobial stewardship programme implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic in a setting of high endemicity for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

BACKGROUND: Greece is among the countries characterized by high rates of antimicrobial resistance and high consumption of antibiotics, including carbapenems. OBJECTIVES: To measure the impact of a carbapenem-focused antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) on the antibiotic consumption and patient outcomes in a Greek tertiary hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A quasi-experimental, before-after study, comparing a 12 month pre-intervention period with a 12 month intervention period in which a carbapenem-focused ASP was implemented. RESULTS: A total of 1268 patients were enrolled. The proportion of admitted patients who received carbapenems decreased from 4.1% (842 of 20 629) to 2.3% (426 of 18 245) (-1.8%; P < 0.001). A decrease of -4.9 DDD/100 patient-days (PD) (95% CI -7.3 to -2.6; P = 0.007) in carbapenem use and an increase in the use of piperacillin/tazobactam [+2.1 DDD/100 PD (95% CI 1.0-3.3; P = 0.010)] were observed. Thirty-day mortality following initiation of carbapenem treatment and all-cause in-hospital mortality remained unaltered after ASP implementation. In contrast, length of hospital stay increased (median 17.0 versus 19.0 days; P < 0.001), while the risk of infection-related readmission within 30 days of hospital discharge decreased (24.6% versus 16.8%; P = 0.007). In the post-implementation period, acceptance of the ASP intervention was associated with lower daily hazard of in-hospital death [cause-specific HR (csHR) 0.49; 95% CI 0.30-0.80], lower odds of 30 day mortality (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.18-0.70) and higher rate of treatment success (csHR 2.45; 95% CI 1.59-3.77). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing and maintaining a carbapenem-focused ASP is feasible, effective and safe in settings with high rates of antimicrobial resistance, even during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Antimicrobial Prescribing before and after the Implementation of a Carbapenem-Focused Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in a Greek Tertiary Hospital during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Irrational use of antimicrobials poses a significant risk for public health by aggravating antimicrobial resistance. The aim of this repeated point prevalence survey (PPS) was to evaluate the impact of a carbapenem-focused antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) on overall antimicrobial use and quality of antimicrobial prescribing during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: All adult inpatients in the University Hospital of Heraklion in Greece were audited twice, before and after the implementation of the ASP, in October 2019 and October 2020, respectively. Patient characteristics, indications and diagnoses for antimicrobial administration, antimicrobials prescribed, and compliance with treatment guidelines were recorded. RESULTS: Of 743 adult inpatients on the days of the two surveys, 398 (53.6%) were on antimicrobials for 437 diagnoses. Following implementation of the ASP, there was substantial decrease in the utilization of carbapenems (4.9% of all antibacterials prescribed in the second PPS compared to 10.3% in the first PPS). A significant improvement was observed for all indicators of the quality of antimicrobial prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated a positive impact of an ASP implementation during the first stages of the COVID-19 pandemic on reducing the use of last-line antimicrobials and improving overall quality of antimicrobial prescribing.

Candida spp. isolation from critically ill patients' respiratory tract. Does antifungal treatment affect survival?

INTRODUCTION: Isolation of Candida spp. from bronchial samples of patients on mechanical ventilation is common. Even though it may not always reflect infection, it may induce immunological changes that can facilitate bacterial pneumonia. In this case, antifungal treatment is of uncertain value. This study examined the impact of antifungal treatment on the outcome of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired respiratory tract infection (RTI) of critically ill, immunocompetent patients, with Candida isolation from their respiratory tract. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of adult patients hospitalized in the ICU of the University Hospital of Heraklion, Greece, from 2014 through 2016 with ICU-acquired RTI and Candida spp. isolated from their bronchial secretions. Data regarding medical history, demographics (gender, age), reason for ICU admission, previous antimicrobial use or hospitalization, SOFA and APACHE II score, clinical outcomes (primary clinical outcome: overall mortality during hospitalization; secondary clinical outcome: mortality during the ICU stay and duration of ICU and hospital stay) at the end of their ICU stay and at the end of their hospital stay were recorded and consequently evaluated. A logistic regression analysis model evaluated the effect of the recorded parameters in association with ICU mortality and overall mortality during hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 90 individuals were enrolled. Of them, 47 (52.2%) were treated with antifungals during their hospitalization around the time of Candida isolation. Patients treated with antifungals had higher SOFA and APACHE II scores, longer duration of stay in the ICU, more days on ventilator and higher total mortality during hospitalization. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified antifungal use to be independently associated with total mortality during hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Antifungal use in patients with ICU-acquired RTI was associated with higher overall mortality as compared to those not receiving such agents.