[Costs of anesthetics and other drugs in anesthesia].

INTRODUCTION: Drugs are real and transparent costs of treatment, which are subject to constant monitoring and changes. The study was aimed at measuring and analyzing consumption of anesthetics and other drugs in anesthesia in the Clinical Centre of Serbia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This paper is part of a five-year (2005-2009), academic, pharmacoeconomic retrospective-prospective study (the 4th phase). We calculated the costs of anesthetics and other drugs in all anesthetized patients at the Institute of Anesthesia and Reanimation, Clinical Center of Serbia in 2006. The data, obtained from the Clinical Centre of Serbia Database, were analyzed by descriptive statistical methods using computer program Microsoft Office Excel 2003 and the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows. RESULTS: The amount of money spent for the application of 33,187 general and 16,394 local anesthesia and 20,614 anesthesiology procedures was 83,322,046.36 RSD (Euros 1,054,705.4), which was 5.93% of the funds allocated for all drugs used at the Clinical Center of Serbia. Of the total fund for drugs, 57.8% was spent for anesthetics (local anesthetics 1.20%) and muscle relaxants, whereas 42.2% was spent for other drugs in anesthesia. The highest amount was spent at the Emergency Center (35.8%), then at the Cardio-surgery (11.9%) and the Neurosurgery (10.9%) because of the large number and length of surgical interventions. CONCLUSION: There is no space for rationalizing the costs of anesthetics and other drugs in anesthesia.

[Operating cost analysis of anaesthesia: activity based costing (ABC analysis)].

INTRODUCTION: Cost of anaesthesiology represent defined measures to determine a precise profile of expenditure estimation of surgical treatment, which is important regarding planning of healthcare activities, prices and budget. OBJECTIVE: In order to determine the actual value of anaestesiological services, we started with the analysis of activity based costing (ABC) analysis. METHODS: Retrospectively, in 2005 and 2006, we estimated the direct costs of anestesiological services (salaries, drugs, supplying materials and other: analyses and equipment.) of the Institute of Anaesthesia and Resuscitation of the Clinical Centre of Serbia. The group included all anesthetized patients of both sexes and all ages. We compared direct costs with direct expenditure, "each cost object (service or unit)" of the Republican Healthcare Insurance. The Summary data of the Departments of Anaesthesia documented in the database of the Clinical Centre of Serbia. Numerical data were utilized and the numerical data were estimated and analyzed by computer programs Microsoft Office Excel 2003 and SPSS for Windows. We compared using the linear model of direct costs and unit costs of anaesthesiological services from the Costs List of the Republican Healthcare Insurance. RESULTS: Direct costs showed 40% of costs were spent on salaries, (32% on drugs and supplies, and 28% on other costs, such as analyses and equipment. The correlation of the direct costs of anaestesiological services showed a linear correlation with the unit costs of the Republican Healthcare Insurance. CONCLUSION: During surgery, costs of anaesthesia would increase by 10% the surgical treatment cost of patients. Regarding the actual costs of drugs and supplies, we do not see any possibility of costs reduction. Fixed elements of direct costs provide the possibility of rationalization of resources in anaesthesia.

[Descriptive analysis of work and trends in anaesthesiology from 2005 to 2006: quantitative and qualitative aspects of effects and evaluation of anaesthesia].

INTRODUCTION: In anaesthesiology, economic aspects have been insufficiently studied. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper was the assessment of rational choice of the anaesthesiological services based on the analysis of the scope, distribution, trend and cost. METHODS: The costs of anaesthesiological services were counted based on "unit" prices from the Republic Health Insurance Fund. Data were analysed by methods of descriptive statistics and statistical significance was tested by Student's t-test and chi2-test. RESULTS: The number of general anaesthesia was higher and average time of general anaesthesia was shorter, without statistical significance (t-test, p = 0.436) during 2006 compared to the previous year. Local anaesthesia was significantly higher (chi2-test, p = 0.001) in relation to planned operation in emergency surgery. The analysis of total anaesthesiological procedures revealed that a number of procedures significantly increased in ENT and MFH surgery, and ophthalmology, while some reduction was observed in general surgery, orthopaedics and trauma surgery and cardiovascular surgery (chi2-test, p = 0.000). The number of analgesia was higher than other procedures (chi2-test, p = 0.000). The structure of the cost was 24% in neurosurgery, 16% in digestive (general) surgery,14% in gynaecology and obstetrics, 13% in cardiovascular surgery and 9% in emergency room. Anaesthesiological services costs were the highest in neurosurgery, due to the length anaesthesia, and digestive surgery due to the total number of general anaesthesia performed. CONCLUSION: It is important to implement pharmacoeconomic studies in all departments, and to separate the anaesthesia services for emergency and planned operations. Disproportions between the number of anaesthesia, surgery interventions and the number of patients in surgical departments gives reason to design relation database.