The effect of donor graft type on survival after liver transplantation for hepatoblastoma in children.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) is the only potentially curative option for children with unresectable hepatoblastoma (HBL). Although post-transplant outcomes have improved in the contemporary era, the impact of donor graft type on survival remains unclear. METHODS: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database (02/2002-06/2021), demographics, clinical characteristics, and patient and graft survival were analyzed in children (<18 years) who underwent LT for HBL according to donor graft type. The Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests, and Cox regression modeling were used to evaluate the effect of whole, partial, and split deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) on patient and graft survival. RESULTS: A total of 590 pediatric HBL LT recipients (344 whole graft DDLT; 62 partial graft DDLT; 139 split graft DDLT; 45 LDLT) were included. During 2012-2021 the proportion of LDLTs for HBL decreased to about 5% compared with about 11% during 2002-2011. No significant differences were identified by donor graft type in either patient survival (log-rank test, p = .45) or graft survival (log-rank test, p = .69). The results remained similar during the 2002-2011 era, while during the 2012-2021 era, split graft DDLT was associated with decreased graft loss risk versus whole graft DDLT (hazard ratio: 0.48, 95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.99, p = .046) without any other significant between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing non-whole liver grafts can increase access to LT in children with unresectable HBL while ensuring favorable outcomes. LDLT is underutilized in children with HBL in the United States, and efforts to explore LDLT options should be undertaken.

Modern-era successful liver transplantation outcomes in children with hepatic undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma (HUES) is the third most common primary hepatic malignancy in children. If unresectable, liver transplantation (LT) is the only curative option. Historically, HUES LT outcomes were not favorable; however, modern-era data are lacking. We aimed to describe LT outcomes in children with HUES and compared with LT outcomes in children transplanted for hepatoblastoma (HBL) and non-malignancy indications. METHODS: Children 18 years or younger with HUES who underwent LT from 1987 to 2021 were identified from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. Graft and patient survival were studied in HUES and LT recipients with HBL and non-malignancy indications using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox regression was used to compare patient and graft survival among groups, controlling for confounders. RESULTS: Twenty-one children with HUES underwent LT during the study period with a median age at LT of 10 years (IQR: 8-12 years). One and five-year patient survival for HUES recipients was not significantly different from that of recipients with HBL (p = .3) or non-malignancy diagnoses (p = .6). There were no deaths due to HUES recurrence. In multivariable Cox regression, HUES did not increase risk of either patient or graft loss as compared to HBL (HR 2.36, p = .2) or non-malignancy indications (HR 0.74, p = .7). CONCLUSION: LT outcomes are more favorable in patients with HUES than historically described, and similar to LT outcomes of patients with HBL and non-malignancy indications. Transplant should be considered for HUES patients with unresectable localized tumors.

Early predictors of prolonged intensive care utilization following liver transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Creatinine, bilirubin, and fibrinolysis resistance are associated with multi-organ dysfunction and likely risk factors for prolonged intensive care unit (pICU) stay following liver transplantation (LT). We hypothesize postoperative day-1 (POD-1) labs will predict pICU. METHODS: LT recipients had clinical laboratories and viscoelastic testing with tissue plasminogen activator thrombelastography (tPA TEG) to quantify fibrinolysis resistance (LY30) on POD-1. pICU was defined as one week or longer in the ICU. Logistic regression was used to identify the relationship between POD-1 labs and pICU. RESULTS: Of 304 patients, 50% went to the ICU, with 15% experiencing pICU. Elevated creatinine (OR 6.6, P â€‹< â€‹0.001) and low tPA TEG LY30 (OR 3.7, P â€‹= â€‹0.004) were independent predictors of pICU after controlling for other risk factors. A 9-fold increase in the rate of 90-day graft loss (19% vs 2% p â€‹< â€‹0.001) was observed patients who had these risk factors for pICU. CONCLUSION: Elevated creatine and fibrinolysis resistance are associated with pICU and poor outcomes following LT.

Can non-directed living liver donation help improve access to grafts and correct socioeconomic disparities in pediatric liver transplantation?

BACKGROUND: Each year, children die awaiting LT as the demand for grafts exceeds the available supply. Candidates with public health insurance are significantly less likely to undergo both deceased donor LT and D-LLD LT. ND-LLD is another option to gain access to a graft. The aim of this study was to evaluate if recipient insurance type is associated with likelihood of D-LLD versus ND-LLD LT. METHODS: The SRTR/OPTN database was reviewed for pediatric LDLT performed between January 1, 2014 (Medicaid expansion era) and December 31, 2019 at centers that performed ≥1 ND-LLD LDLT during the study period. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess relationship between type of living donor (directed vs. non-directed) and recipient insurance. RESULTS: Of 299 pediatric LDLT, 46 (15%) were from ND-LLD performed at 18 transplant centers. Fifty-nine percent of ND-LLD recipients had public insurance in comparison to 40% of D-LLD recipients (p = .02). Public insurance was associated with greater odds of ND-LLD in comparison to D-LLD upon multivariable logistic regression (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.23-4.58, p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: ND-LLD allows additional children to receive LTs and may help address some of the socioeconomic disparity in pediatric LDLT, but currently account for only a minority of LDLT and are only performed at a few institutions. Initiatives to improve access to both D-LLD and ND-LLD transplants are needed.

Immediate extubation following pediatric liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Immediate extubation (IE) following pediatric liver transplantation is being increasingly performed. The aim of this study was to characterize the rate of IE at our institution and identify recipient factors predictive of IE. METHODS: All pediatric liver transplants performed at our institution between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020 were reviewed. Retransplants and multi-organ transplants were excluded. IE was defined as extubation in the operating room following transplant. Backward stepwise logistic regression at a p-value threshold of .05 was performed to identify variables associated with IE. RESULTS: IE was achieved in 58 (72%) of the 81 pediatric liver transplants. The IE cohort had significantly shorter ICU length of stay and overall hospital length of stay, though IE was not an independent predictor of posttransplant length of stay. Age <2 years, preoperative mechanical ventilation, and total intraoperative epinephrine and dopamine infusion requirements were significant, independent risk factors against IE. This multivariable model was highly predictive of IE (area under the curve = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: We describe the highest rate of IE postpediatric liver transplantation that has been reported to date and identified significant risk factors against successful IE.

Living Donor Liver Transplant Center Volume Influences Waiting List Survival Among Children Listed for Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains infrequently performed in the United States and localized to a few centers. This study aimed to compare pediatric waiting list and posttransplant outcomes by LDLT center volume. METHODS: The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database was retrospectively reviewed for all pediatric (age <18 y) liver transplant candidates listed between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2019. The average annual number of LDLT, deceased donor partial liver transplant (DDPLT), and overall (ie, LDLT + DDPLT + whole liver transplants) pediatric liver transplants performed by each transplant center during the study period was calculated. RESULTS: Of 88 transplant centers, only 44 (50%) performed at least 1 pediatric LDLT during the study period. LDLT, DDPLT, and overall transplant center volume were all positively correlated. LDLT center volume was protective against waiting list dropout after adjusting for confounding variables (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.97; P = 0.004), whereas DDPLT and overall center volume were not ( P > 0.05); however, DDPLT center volume was significantly protective against both recipient death and graft loss, whereas overall volume was only protective against graft loss and LDLT volume was not protective for either. CONCLUSIONS: High-volume pediatric LDLT center can improve waiting list survival, whereas DDPLT and overall volume are associated with posttransplant survival. Expertise in all types of pediatric liver transplant options is important to optimize outcomes.

Primary vs. salvage liver transplantation for biliary atresia: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Kasai hepatoportoenterostomy is the standard of care for children with biliary atresia, but a majority of patients progress to end-stage liver disease and require a salvage liver transplant. Given the high failure rates of the hepatoportoenterostomy operation, some have advocated for primary liver transplantation as a superior treatment approach. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of pediatric candidates with biliary atresia listed for primary vs. salvage liver transplantation. METHODS: The SRTR/OPTN database was retrospectively reviewed for all children with biliary atresia listed for liver transplant between March 2002 and February 2021. Candidates were categorized as primary liver transplant if they had not undergone previous abdominal surgery prior to listing and salvage liver transplant if they had. Salvage transplants were further categorized as early failure if listed within the first year of life or late failure if listed at an older age. RESULTS: 3438 children with biliary atresia were listed for transplant during the study period, with 15% of them listed for a primary transplant, 17% for salvage transplant after early failure, and 67% after late failure. Recipients of salvage liver transplant with late failure had lower bilirubin levels and were less critically ill as demonstrated by MELD/PELD scores and hospitalization status. Correspondingly, these recipients had higher waiting list and graft survival, though this did not remain statistically significant after adjustment in multivariable models. There were no differences in waiting list, recipient, or graft survival with primary vs. salvage liver transplant after early failure. CONCLUSION: Kasai hepatoportoenterostomy should remain the standard of care in biliary atresia as it may delay need for transplant beyond the first year of life in a subset of recipients and does not jeopardize subsequent transplant outcomes, even with early failure. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study (Level III).

Challenging the Traditional Paradigm of Supply and Demand in Pediatric Liver Transplantation Through Nondirected Living Donation: A Case Series.

A gap exists between the demand for pediatric liver transplantation and the supply of appropriate size-matched donors. We describe our center's experience with pediatric liver transplantation using anonymous nondirected living liver donors (ND-LLD). First-time pediatric liver transplant candidates listed at our center between January 2012 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed and categorized by donor graft type, and recipients of ND-LLD grafts were described. A total of 13 ND-LLD pediatric liver transplantations were performed, including 8 left lateral segments, 4 left lobes, and 1 right lobe. Of the ND-LLD recipients, 5 had no directed living donor evaluated, whereas the remaining 8 (62%) had all potential directed donors ruled out during the evaluation process. Recipient and graft survival were 100% during a median follow-up time of 445 (range, 70-986) days. Of ND-LLDs, 69% were previous living kidney donors, and 1 ND-LLD went on to donate a kidney after liver donation. Of the ND-LLDs, 46% were approved prior to the recipient being listed. Over time, the proportion of living donor transplants performed, specifically from ND-LLDs, increased, and the number of children on the waiting list decreased. The introduction of ND-LLDs to a pediatric liver transplant program can expand the benefit of living donor liver transplantation to children without a suitable directed living donor while achieving excellent outcomes for both the recipients and donors.

The Surge in Deceased Liver Donors Due to the Opioid Epidemic: Is It Time to Split the Difference?

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare trends in use of drug overdose (DO) donors in adult versus pediatric liver transplants and the utilization of split liver transplantation in this donor population. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was reviewed for deceased donor liver transplants from March 2002 to December 2017. Recipients were categorized by donor mechanism of death. Donor splitting criteria was defined as age <40 y, single vasopressor or less, transaminases no >3 times the normal limit, and body mass index ≤ 28 kg/m2. RESULTS: Adult liver transplants from DO donors increased from 2% in 2002 to 15% in 2017, while pediatric liver transplants from DO donors only increased from <1% to 3% in the same time. While 28% of DO donors met splitting criteria, only 3% of those meeting splitting criteria were used as a split graft. Both pediatric and adult recipients of DO donor livers achieved excellent patient and graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: DO donors are underutilized in pediatric liver transplantation. Increased splitting of DO donor livers could significantly decrease, if not eliminate, the pediatric liver waiting list.

Successful non-directed living liver donor transplant for an infant with biliary atresia during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Amidst the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the American Society for Transplant Surgeons has recommended that only urgent liver transplant with deceased donors should occur. However, young pediatric candidates rely on living donors for lifesaving transplant. We present a case of non-directed left lateral lobe living liver donor transplant for a 7-month-old child with biliary atresia experiencing repeated life-threatening episodes of sepsis and cholangitis from infected bile lakes. Using careful preoperative planning among the entire multidisciplinary team, paying meticulous attention to infection control pre- and post-operatively, and taking advantage of robust telehealth technology both in and out of the hospital, a successful transplant was achieved. Amidst the COVID pandemic, non-directed liver transplantation can be safely achieved for pediatric recipients.

Donor preoperative oxygen delivery and post-extubation hypoxia impact donation after circulatory death hypoxic cholangiopathy.

AIM: To evaluate donation after circulatory death (DCD) orthotopic liver transplant outcomes [hypoxic cholangiopathy (HC) and patient/graft survival] and donor risk-conditions. METHODS: From 2003-2013, 45 DCD donor transplants were performed. Predonation physiologic data from UNOS DonorNet included preoperative systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, pH, SpO2, PaO2, FiO2, and hemoglobin. Mean arterial blood pressure was computed from the systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Donor preoperative arterial O2 content was computed as [hemoglobin (gm/dL) × 1.37 (mL O2/gm) × SpO2%) + (0.003 × PaO2)]. The amount of preoperative donor red blood cell transfusions given and vasopressor use during the intensive care unit stay were documented. Donors who were transfused ≥ 1 unit of red-cells or received ≥ 2 vasopressors in the preoperative period were categorized as the red-cell/multi-pressor group. Following withdrawal of life support, donor ischemia time was computed as the number-of-minutes from onset of diastolic blood pressure < 60 mmHg until aortic cross clamping. Donor hypoxemia time was the number-of-minutes from onset of pulse oximetry < 80% until clamping. Donor hypoxia score was (ischemia time + hypoxemia time) ÷ donor preoperative hemoglobin. RESULTS: The 1, 3, and 5 year graft and patient survival rates were 83%, 77%, 60%; and 92%, 84%, and 72%, respectively. HC occurred in 49% with 16% requiring retransplant. HC occurred in donors with increased age (33.0 ± 10.6 years vs 25.6 ± 8.4 years, P = 0.014), less preoperative multiple vasopressors or red-cell transfusion (9.5% vs 54.6%, P = 0.002), lower preoperative hemoglobin (10.7 ± 2.2 gm/dL vs 12.3 ± 2.1 gm/dL, P = 0.017), lower preoperative arterial oxygen content (14.8 ± 2.8 mL O2/100 mL blood vs 16.8 ± 3.3 mL O2/100 mL blood, P = 0.049), greater hypoxia score >2.0 (69.6% vs 25.0%, P = 0.006), and increased preoperative mean arterial pressure (92.7 ± 16.2 mmHg vs 83.8 ± 18.5 mmHg, P = 0.10). HC was independently associated with age, multi-pressor/red-cell transfusion status, arterial oxygen content, hypoxia score, and mean arterial pressure (r(2) = 0.6197). The transplantation rate was greater for the later period with more liberal donor selection [era 2 (7.1/year)], compared to our early experience [era 1 (2.5/year)]. HC occurred in 63.0% during era 2 and in 29.4% during era 1 (P = 0.03). Era 2 donors had longer times for extubation-to-asystole (14.4 ± 4.7 m vs 9.3 ± 4.5 m, P = 0.001), ischemia (13.9 ± 5.9 m vs 9.7 ± 5.6 m, P = 0.03), and hypoxemia (16.0 ± 5.1 m vs 11.1 ± 6.7 m, P = 0.013) and a higher hypoxia score > 2.0 rate (73.1% vs 28.6%, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Easily measured donor indices, including a hypoxia score, provide an objective measure of DCD liver transplantation risk for recipient HC. Donor selection criteria influence HC rates.

Early detection of graft failure using the blood metabolic profile of a liver recipient.

In this case report we describe the blood metabolic profile ("metabolomics") by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and principle component analysis (PCA) from a patient who underwent two consecutive liver transplantations. The first graft from a living-related donor failed and was followed by a second successful transplant from a deceased donor. Using quantitative high-resolution H-NMR spectroscopy, 48 endogenous metabolites were analyzed in whole blood samples at baseline and different time points after each transplantation. From 48 analyzed metabolites, six metabolites were identified by PCA as metabolic markers consistent with a non-functional liver after first transplantation. Importantly, this distinctive metabolic profile was present as early as two hours after first transplant surgery when no other variable or conventional laboratory tests indicated poor graft function. This article reports the potential usefulness of quantitative H-NMR based metabolomics to diagnose early graft dysfunction in liver transplantation.

Pediatric liver transplantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pediatric liver transplantation is a challenging and exciting field for all healthcare providers involved with children who have end-stage liver disease. Graft and patient survival continue to improve due to improvements in medical, surgical, and anesthetic management, organ availability, immunosuppression, and identification and treatment of postoperative complications. This review will describe recent advances in pediatric liver transplantation. RECENT FINDINGS: Although pediatric cases only represent approximately 10% of the total patients on the waiting list, the number of deaths on the waiting list increased from 196 to 1753 between 1988 and 1999. Recently, a new pediatric liver allocation policy was instituted. The utilization of cut down "reduced" livers, split liver grafts, and living-related donors has provided more organs for pediatric patients. Newer immunosuppression regimens, including induction therapy, continue to have a significant impact on graft and patient survival. Excellence in peri-operative management and identification and treatment of complications or infections also has had an impact on graft and patient survival. Finally, investigation and analysis of the postoperative quality of life, for both the patient and parents, is being conducted. SUMMARY: Pediatric liver transplantation is a challenging and rewarding field with continued improvements in patient and graft survival. A multidisciplinary team approach coupled with improvements in organ availability, immunosuppression, and peri-operative management has had a dramatic impact on survival.

Living donor liver transplant for fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma using a deceased donor graft to reconstruct inferior vena cava.

Liver transplantation is now an acceptable treatment for small hepatocellular carcinomas in the setting of cirrhosis. Larger tumors in cirrhotic livers and unresectable tumors in noncirrhotic livers (including fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinomas) may also be indications for transplantation. With the limited number of cadaver grafts available, living donor liver transplant is becoming an option for some of these patients. We describe a method of reconstruction of the recipient inferior vena cava with deceased donor graft in right lobe living donation for fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma.

Different immunosuppressive regimens and recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis after liver transplantation.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is the fourth leading diagnosis in liver transplant recipients in the United States. The disease is known to recur in 15% to 30% of liver transplant recipients. We set out to investigate how different immunosuppression regimens affected natural history of PSC after liver transplantation at our center. We reviewed records of all patients who underwent a liver transplantation at our institution in between 1988 and 2000 and had a diagnosis of PSC at the time of liver transplantation. Primary sclerosing cholangitis recurred in 15 of 71 patients (21.1%) who had complete records and survived more than 30 days after liver transplantation. Although recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis was most often seen (but not statistically significantly so) in patients who received maintenance corticosteroids, the time to recurrence was not significantly different between those who were treated with maintenance, those who were not successfully weaned, and those who successfully weaned off corticosteroids within 3 months after liver transplantation. Orthoclone (OKT3) therapy (Ortho-Biotech, Inc., Raritan, NJ) was associated with a higher risk of primary sclerosing cholangitis recurrence (29% versus 10%, P <.05). Recurrence was not influenced by immunosuppression with either cyclosporine or tacrolimus. Coexistent inflammatory bowel disease was a cause of failure to wean off corticosteroids, was associated with a shorter time to recurrence of sclerosing cholangitis, and was responsible for significant comorbidity (colon cancer in 7.3%). Primary sclerosing cholangitis recurrence is commonly seen after liver transplantation. More immunosuppression seems to be detrimental to the outcome of our patients with sclerosing cholangitis: use of OKT3 was associated with a greater incidence of recurrence. Length of corticosteroid use did not affect timing or risk of recurrence, and because it has been proven that early corticosteroid withdrawal after liver transplantation is beneficial, we continue to recommend this practice.