Prognostic Significance of Pulmonary Multifocal Neuroendocrine Proliferation With Typical Carcinoid.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of multifocal pulmonary neuroendocrine proliferation (MNEP), including tumorlets and pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia, in association with typical carcinoid (TC), is still debated. METHODS: We evaluated a retrospective series of TC with long-term follow-up data prospectively collected from 2 institutions and compared the outcome between TC alone and MNEP plus TC. Several baseline covariates were imbalanced between the MNEP plus TC and TC groups; therefore, we conducted 1:1 propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting in the full sample. In the matched group, the association of clinical, respiratory, and work-related factors with the group was determined through univariable and multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 234 TC patients underwent surgery: 41 MNEP plus TC (17.5%) and 193 TC alone (82.5%). In the MNEP plus TC group, older age (P < .001), peripheral tumors (P = .0032), smaller tumor size (P = .011), and lymph node spread (P = .02) were observed compared with the TC group. Relapses occurred in 8 patients in the MNEP plus TC group (19.5%) and 7 in the TC group (3.6%). After matching, in 36 pairs of patients, a significantly higher 5-year progression-free rate was observed for the TC group (P < .01). Similar results were observed using inverse probability of treatment weighting in the full sample. The odds of being in the MNEP plus TC group was higher for those with work-related exposure to inhalant agents (P = .008), asthma or bronchitis (P = .002), emphysema, fibrosis, and inflammatory status (P = .032), or micronodules on the chest computed tomography scan and respiratory insufficiency (P = .036). CONCLUSIONS: The association with MNEP seems to represent a clinically and prognostic relevant factor in TC. Hence, careful preoperative workup, systematic pathologic evaluation, including nontumorous lung parenchyma, and long-term postoperative follow-up should be recommended in these patients.

Near-infrared mapping with indocyanine green is associated with an increase in oncological margin length in minimally invasive segmentectomy.

BACKGROUND: Near-infrared fluorescence mapping with indocyanine green dye is a recent advancement in minimally invasive segmental resection. This technique has not yet been reproduced, validated, or objectively evaluated in a large prospective case series. We hypothesized that near-infrared fluorescence mapping is associated with an increased oncological margin distance from the tumor, over and above the best judgment of the surgeon. METHODS: This was a phase 2 prospective cohort trial in patients who are undergoing robotic segmentectomy for lung tumors <3 cm. The predicted intersegmental plane was first identified by consensus between 2 thoracic surgeons. The true plane was then mapped by indocyanine green injection. A 7-item binary rating scale was used for the evaluation of feasibility, reproducibility, and added oncological margin distance from the tumor. The margin distance between the tumor and the true plane was compared with the margin distance between the tumor and the predicted plane. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were enrolled between September 2016 and May 2018 and 31 patients (58.4%) received the planned operation with indocyanine green mapping. In 74.2% of cases (23 out of 31), a score of 7 out of 7 was achieved, indicating the true intersegmental plane identified by indocyanine green mapping was different than the predicted plane identified by the surgeon. In 61.2% (19 out of 31) of those cases, the mean additional margin distance from the tumor to the staple line attributable to the indocyanine green mapping was 2.41 ± 1.6 cm. The overall complication rate was 18.5% (10 out of 53) and there were no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Near-infrared fluorescence mapping in robotic segmentectomy is associated with increased oncological margin length, over and above the best judgment of the surgeon, in the majority cases where it is used.

Cost-effectiveness of mediastinal lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of various modes of mediastinal staging in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a single-payer health care system. METHODS: We performed a decision analysis to compare the health outcomes and costs of 4 mediastinal staging strategies: no invasive staging, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), mediastinoscopy, and EBUS-TBNA followed by mediastinoscopy if EBUS-TBNA is negative. We determined incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICER) for all strategies and performed comprehensive deterministic sensitivity analyses using a willingness to pay threshold of $80,000/quality adjusted life year (QALY). RESULTS: Under the base-case scenario, the no invasive mediastinal staging strategy was least effective (QALY, 5.80) and least expensive ($11,863), followed by mediastinoscopy, EBUS-TBNA, and EBUS-TBNA followed by mediastinoscopy with 5.86, 5.87, and 5.88 QALYs, respectively. The ICER was ∼$26,000/QALY for EBUS-TBNA staging and ∼$1,400,000/QALY for EBUS-TBNA followed by mediastinoscopy. The mediastinoscopy strategy was dominated. Once pN2 exceeds 2.5%, EBUS-TBNA staging is cost-effective (∼$80,000/QALY). Once the pN2 reaches 57%, EBUS-TBNA followed by mediastinoscopy is cost-effective (ICER âˆ¼$79,000/QALY). Once EBUS-TBNA sensitivity exceeds 25%, EBUS-TBNA staging is cost-effective (ICER âˆ¼$79,000/QALY). Once pN2 exceeds 25%, confirmatory mediastinoscopy should be added, in cases of EBUS-TBNA sensitivity ≤ 60%. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive mediastinal staging in NSCLC is unlikely to be cost-effective in clinical N0 patients if pN2 <2.5%. In patients with probability of mediastinal metastasis between 2.5% and 57% EBUS-TBNA is cost-effective as the only staging modality. Confirmatory mediastinoscopy should be considered in high-risk patients (pN2 > 57%) in case of negative EBUS-TBNA.