Corneal nerve loss as a surrogate marker for poor pial collaterals in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

In patients with acute ischemic stroke, pial collaterals play a key role in limiting neurological disability by maintaining blood flow to ischemic penumbra. We hypothesized that patient with poor pial collaterals will have greater corneal nerve and endothelial cell abnormalities. In a cross-sectional study, 35 patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion with poor (n = 12) and moderate-good (n = 23) pial collaterals and 35 healthy controls underwent corneal confocal microscopy and quantification of corneal nerve and endothelial cell morphology. In patients with MCA stroke, corneal nerve fibre length (CNFL) (P < 0.001), corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD) (P = 0.025) and corneal nerve branch density (CNBD) (P = 0.002) were lower compared to controls. Age, BMI, cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, systolic blood pressure, NIHSS and endothelial cell parameters did not differ but mRS was higher (p = 0.023) and CNFL (p = 0.026) and CNBD (p = 0.044) were lower in patients with poor compared to moderate-good collaterals. CNFL and CNBD distinguished subjects with poor from moderate-good pial collaterals with an AUC of 72% (95% CI 53-92%) and 71% (95% CI 53-90%), respectively. Corneal nerve loss is greater in patients with poor compared to moderate-good pial collaterals and may act as a surrogate marker for pial collateral status in patients with ischemic stroke.

Progression of stroke deficits in patients presenting with mild symptoms: The underlying etiology determines outcome.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with acute stroke and mild or rapidly improving symptoms frequently show progression. The role of reperfusion treatment in such patients is not clear. We hypothesized that progression was most likely in patients with cortical localization and such patients may benefit from thrombolysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We interrogated Hamad Stroke Database to evaluate 90-days outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted within 4 hours and a NIHSS score of ≤6. Evaluation was based on localization (lacunar or cortical), multi-model imaging abnormalities and whether they received rt-PA. The 90-day mRS was used to determine outcome. RESULTS: During study period 6381 patients were admitted with acute stroke. Mild stroke within 4 hours was diagnosed in 506 [no thrombolysis: 381(lacunar: 213; cortical: 168), thrombolysis: 125 (lacunar: 45; cortical: 80)]. The rt-PA treated patients had significantly higher NIHSS (2.94±3.9 versus 1.28±2.46, p<0.0001), increased rates of complications (16.0% versus 3.9%, p<0.0001) and longer hospital stay (6.05±8.1 versus 3.78±3.6 days; p<0.001). In patients with cortical stroke, intracranial arterial occlusions (11.6% vs 3.9%, p<0.0001) and CTP mismatch (22.2% vs 4.4%, p<0.0001) were more frequent in rt-PA treated patients. Discharge mRS (33.6% versus 13.9%, p<0.001) and 90-days mRS (23.2% versus 11.8%, p = 0.002) was significantly worse in patients with cortical stroke (rt-PA-treated and untreated patients). CONCLUSIONS: The outcome in patients with mild stroke depends on lesion location (lacunar versus cortical) and severity of symptoms. Patients who receive rt-PA have significantly larger deficits, increased imaging abnormalities and higher rates of hospital complication, explaining the poor outcome in such subjects.

The Impact of Diabetes on Outcomes After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Stroke in diabetics may delay recovery and increases the risk of early recurrence of stroke. We compared the outcomes of patients (with and without diabetes) admitted with an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in the state of Qatar. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively compared the clinical presentation, complications, discharge outcome, and stroke recurrence at 90 days in patients with and without diabetes. RESULTS: Five thousand two hundred twenty-eight stroke patients were admitted between January 2014 and December 2017. Two thousand nine hundred sixty-one had confirmed AIS, 1695 (57.2%) had diabetes, 429 (14.5%) had prediabetes and 873 (29.5%) had no diabetes. Comparing diabetic patients to prediabetic and nondiabetics, they were significantly older (58.5 ± 11.9 versus 54.0 ± 12.9 versus 49.5 ± 13.8, P = .0001), had higher rates of hypertension (80.8% versus 67.4% versus 59.2%), previous stroke (18.0% versus 5.4% versus 6.2%), and coronary artery disease (12.9% versus 5.6% versus 5.0%; P = .001 for all). The percentage of patients with modified Rankin scale 3-6 at discharge (39.7% versus 32.6% versus 30.2%; P = .0001) and 90 days (26.7% versus 18.8% versus 21.4%, P = .001); 90-day mortality (6.2% versus 2.2% versus 5.2%; P = .03) and stroke recurrence (4.2% versus .7% versus 2.2%; P = .005) was significantly higher in diabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes and AIS have more in-hospital complications, worse discharge outcomes, higher mortality and stroke recurrence at 90 days, compared to prediabetes and no diabetes.