RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Few US emergency medicine (EM) residency programs have been located in rural states due to program requirements for emergency department (ED) patient volume. Recent revision to the program requirements now permits 'educationally justifiable exceptions' to the patient population requirement, 'such as clinical sites in a rural setting', and some EM residency programs now plan to offer rural ED clinical experiences as a required curricular component. The impact of a required rural EM rotation on the ranking decisions of applicants is important to residency programs seeking to attract the most desirable applicants. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a required rural ED rotation on applicant ranking of an EM residency program in the US National Resident Matching Program (NMRP). METHODS: All applicants to the study's EM residency program completing the interview portion of the application process received a mailed and emailed survey following the release of the 2004 NMRP results. The survey included questions addressing the rural/non-rural classification of the location of the applicants' childhood home, medical school, and anticipated future practice. RESULTS: Of 46 eligible subjects, 32 (69.6%) completed the survey. Of subjects with a rural childhood, 73.3% reported a positive impact on rank order (95% CI 50.9-95.7%) and 26.7% reported no impact (CI 4.3-49.1%); 81.3% of subjects with non-rural backgrounds reported no impact (CI 62.2-100%), 12.5% higher rank (CI 0-28.7%), and 6.3% lower (CI 0-18.2%). If planning a future practice in a rural community, 83.3% reported positive impact (CI 62.2-100%) and 16.7% no impact (CI 0-37.8%); 78.9% of subjects anticipating future practice in non-rural communities reported no impact (CI 60.6-97.3%), 15.8% higher rank (CI 0-32.2%), and 5.3% lower (CI 0-15.4). Of the subjects attending medical school in rural states, 52.2% reported a positive impact (CI 31.8-72.6%) and 47.8% no impact (CI 27.4-68.2%), while 75% of graduates of medical schools in non-rural states reported no impact (CI 32.6-100%) and 25% (CI 0-67.4%) a negative impact. CONCLUSION: The presence of a rural ED rotation did not adversely impact EM residency applicants' ranking of the program.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Selección de Profesión , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Rural , Certificación/normas , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the use and findings of abdominal plain film in acute ischemic bowel disease (AIBD) in different age subsets, and to correlate the clinical findings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-nine radiographically examined patients with AIBD at Malmö University Hospital, Sweden between 1987 and 1996. RESULTS: In 89%, the plain film displayed pathologic signs. Bowel dilatation was more common in the elderly. Of 68 patients aged > or = 71 years, 19 (28%) had colon gas/fluid levels with/without colon dilatation, and of 19 patients > 84 years 16 (84%) had small-bowel dilatation. Of 20 patients aged < 71 years, 1 (5%) had colon gas/fluid levels with/without colon dilatation, and 11 (55%) small-bowel dilatation (P < 0.05; P < 0.05). Gasless abdomen was more common in the younger age group, noted in 5 of 20 (25%) patients aged < 71 years, compared to 2 of 68 (3%) patients aged > or = 71 years (P = 0.001). Of the patients with diarrhea, 13 of 33 (40%) had colon gas/fluid levels with/without colon dilatation compared to 2 of 29 (7%) without (P = 0.003). In the elderly (> or = 71 years), 48 of 53 (91%) patients with bowel dilatation on plain film died, compared to 11 out of 16 (69%) without this finding (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Abdominal plain film findings differed with age. Bowel dilatation was more frequent in the elderly with AIBD, whereas gasless abdomen was more common in younger patients. The radiographic findings were associated with clinical symptoms and mortality.
Asunto(s)
Intestinos/irrigación sanguínea , Intestinos/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dilatación Patológica/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Gases , Humanos , Intestinos/fisiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía Abdominal , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Type 1 vanilloid receptors (VR1) have been identified recently in the brain, in which they serve as yet primarily undetermined purposes. The endocannabinoid anandamide (AEA) and some of its oxidative metabolites are ligands for VR1, and AEA has been shown to afford protection against ouabain-induced in vivo excitotoxicity, in a manner that is only in part dependent on the type 1 cannabinoid (CB1) receptor. In the present study, we assessed whether VR1 is involved in neuroprotection by AEA and by arvanil, a hydrolysis-stable AEA analog that is a ligand for both VR1 and CB1. Furthermore, we assessed the putative involvement of lipoxygenase metabolites of AEA in conveying neuroprotection. Using HPLC and gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy, we demonstrated that rat brain and blood cells converted AEA into 12-hydroxy-N-arachidoylethanolamine (12-HAEA) and 15-hydroxy-N-arachidonoylethanolamine (15-HAEA) and that this conversion was blocked by addition of the lipoxygenase inhibitor nordihydroguaiaretic acid. Using magnetic resonance imaging we show the following: (1) pretreatment with the reduced 12-lipoxygenase metabolite of AEA, 12-HAEA, attenuated cytotoxic edema formation in a CB1 receptor-independent manner in the acute phase after intracranial injection of the Na+/K+-ATPase inhibitor ouabain; (2) the reduced 15-lipoxygenase metabolite, 15-HAEA, enhanced the neuroprotective effect of AEA in the acute phase; (3) modulation of VR1, as tested using arvanil, the VR1 agonist capsaicin, and the antagonist capsazepine, leads to neuroprotective effects in this model, and arvanil is a potent neuroprotectant, acting at both CB1 and VR1; and (4) the in vivo neuroprotective effects of AEA are mediated by CB1 but not by lipoxygenase metabolites or VR1.