Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Euro Surveill ; 25(50)2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33334396

RESUMEN

High coronavirus incidence has prompted the Netherlands to implement a second lockdown. To elucidate the epidemic's development preceding this second wave, we analysed weekly test positivity in public test locations by population subgroup between 1 June and 17 October 2020. Hospitality and public transport workers, driving instructors, hairdressers and aestheticians had higher test positivity compared with a reference group of individuals without a close-contact occupation. Workers in childcare, education and healthcare showed lower test positivity.


Asunto(s)
Distribución por Edad , Prueba de COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Ocupaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevención & control , Niño , Preescolar , Trazado de Contacto , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional , Distanciamiento Físico , Cuarentena , Riesgo , Adulto Joven
2.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 24(12): 2158-2163, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30067176

RESUMEN

Orthohantaviruses are a group of rodentborne viruses with a worldwide distribution. The orthohantavirus Seoul virus (SEOV) can cause hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in humans and is distributed worldwide, like its reservoir host, the rat. Cases of SEOV in wild and pet rats have been described in several countries, and human cases have been reported in the United Kingdom, France, Canada, and the United States. In the Netherlands, SEOV has previously been found in wild brown rats. We describe an autochthonous human case of SEOV infection in the Netherlands. This patient had nonspecific clinical symptoms of an orthohantavirus infection (gastrointestinal symptoms and distinct elevation of liver enzymes). Subsequent source investigation revealed 2 potential sources, the patient's feeder rats and a feeder rat farm. At both sources, a high prevalence of SEOV was found in the rats. The virus closely resembled the Cherwell and Turckheim SEOV strains that were previously found in Europe.


Asunto(s)
Fiebre Hemorrágica con Síndrome Renal/virología , Ratas/virología , Virus Seoul , Adulto , Animales , Fiebre Hemorrágica con Síndrome Renal/diagnóstico , Fiebre Hemorrágica con Síndrome Renal/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Países Bajos , Virus Seoul/clasificación , Virus Seoul/aislamiento & purificación
3.
Euro Surveill ; 23(11)2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29560855

RESUMEN

We evaluated uptake and diagnostic outcomes of voluntary hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) screening offered during routine tuberculosis entry screening to migrants in Gelderland and Amsterdam, the Netherlands, between 2013 and 2015. In Amsterdam, HIV screening was also offered. Overall, 54% (461/859) accepted screening. Prevalence of chronic HBV infection (HBsAg-positive) and HCV exposure (anti-HCV-positive) in Gelderland was 4.48% (9/201; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.37-8.29) and 0.99% (2/203; 95% CI: 0.27-3.52), respectively, all infections were newly diagnosed. Prevalence of chronic HBV infection, HCV exposure and chronic HCV infection (HCV RNA-positive) in Amsterdam was 0.39% (1/256; 95% CI: 0.07-2.18), 1.17% (3/256; 95% CI: 0.40-3.39) and 0.39% (1/256; 95% CI: 0.07-2.18), respectively, with all chronic HBV/HCV infections previously diagnosed. No HIV infections were found. In univariate analyses, newly diagnosed chronic HBV infection was more likely in participants migrating for reasons other than work or study (4.35% vs 0.83%; odds ratio (OR) = 5.45; 95% CI: 1.12-26.60) and was less likely in participants in Amsterdam than Gelderland (0.00% vs 4.48%; OR = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.00-0.69). Regional differences in HBV prevalence might be explained by differences in the populations entering compulsory tuberculosis screening. Prescreening selection of migrants based on risk factors merits further exploration.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Hepatitis B/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Migrantes , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , África/etnología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Asia Sudoriental/etnología , Región del Caribe/etnología , Europa Oriental , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/etnología , Hepatitis B/epidemiología , Hepatitis B/etnología , Antígenos de Superficie de la Hepatitis B/sangre , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Hepatitis C/etnología , Anticuerpos contra la Hepatitis C/sangre , Humanos , América Latina/etnología , Masculino , Región Mediterránea , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Pruebas Serológicas , Tuberculosis/epidemiología , Tuberculosis/etnología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA