Implementing patient-reported outcome measures on an adolescent inpatient psychiatry unit: A feasibility study.

This article examines the feasibility of implementing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures with adolescents on an inpatient psychiatry service. During the study period (March 8, 2021, to June 7, 2022), a total of 154 patient encounters were recorded for adolescents between 12 and 17 years of age. PROs were piloted during the first 3 months of the study period, with a focus on technical implementation. In the 12 months from June 8, 2021, through June 7, 2022, the PRO project moved to full implementation across all patient encounters. Fisher's exact test and independent t tests were conducted to examine the differences between patients who completed the PROs and patients who did not complete them to determine the representativeness of the sample receiving them. During the 3-month pilot period, 31.8% of patients completed the PROs at admission and discharge, while during the 12-month full implementation, 74.5% of patients completed them at both time points. Statistical tests showed no significant diagnostic, sex, or race/ethnicity differences between patients who received and did not receive the outcome measures. Even without funding, small inpatient psychiatry services for adolescents can feasibly implement PROs with completion rates similar to other published studies and capture the majority of the patients served. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Operational Changes on Child and Adolescent Acute Psychiatric Treatment Programs During COVID-19.

This Letter to the Editor examines the operational changes on two child and adolescent acute psychiatric treatment programs during the COVID-19 pandemic. On an inpatient unit with roughly two-thirds of its beds in double-occupancy rooms, we found that average daily census and total admissions were lower in the early pandemic period compared to the pre-pandemic period, whereas length of stay was significantly longer. In contrast, a community-based acute treatment program with only single-occupancy rooms showed an increase in average daily census, and no significant change in admissions or length of stay during the early pandemic period compared to the pre-pandemic period. Recommendations include considering preparedness for infection-related public health emergencies in unit design.

Crisis Preparedness in Acute and Intensive Treatment Settings: Lessons Learned From a Year of COVID-19.

The impact of COVID-19 changed the use and delivery of health care services, requiring an abrupt shift in treatment and staffing models 1,2. This is particularly salient in youth acute and intensive treatment services (AITS), including inpatient psychiatric hospitals (IPH), intensive outpatient programs (IOP), and partial hospitalization programs (PHP), because of challenging issues of maintaining high-quality care and a safe therapeutic milieu during increased demand for acute services,3 all while limiting transmission of COVID-19 on locked units, in close quarters, and for youths traveling back and forth to day-programs. Over the past year, AITS adapted and evolved without the ability to pause services and plan, increase staffing, or allocate additional resources. This article discusses themes of changes made based on more than 20 facilities across the United States through the American Psychological Association Child and Adolescent Psychology Division's Acute, Intensive, and Residential Service Special Interest Group.4 These facilities include psychiatric inpatient units and day-treatment programs. We discuss lessons learned from these changes, the need for evaluating these changes, and application of these lessons in future crises.

Immersion in the Mother: Lacanian Perspectives on Borderline States.

Borderline states have received comparatively little attention in Lacanian psychoanalysis due to the lower incidence of borderline pathology in France as well as Lacanian analysts' dismissal of the diagnosis. As Lacanian analysis has grown in North America, Lacanians have increasingly theorized about borderline states. This article provides a brief review of Lacanian literature on borderline states, emphasizing the works of Lucie Cantin, Raul Moncayo, and Jean-Pierre Lebrun. Their views are contrasted, and the author proposes that a new subjective structure is warranted for cases in which the mother plays a dominating role. This structure is similar to perversion, includes a disavowal of access to the Name-of-the-Father, and may be aptly referred to as "immersion."