Effects of digital psychological interventions on physical symptoms in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of digital psychological interventions to improve physical symptoms (i.e., fatigue, pain, disturbed sleep, and physical well-being) among cancer patients, as well as to evaluate the variables that possibly moderate intervention effects. METHODS: Nine databases were searched for the literature up to February 2023. Two reviewers independently conducted a quality assessment. Effect sizes were reported as the standardized mean difference (Hedge's g) and estimated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 44 randomized clinical trials comprising 7200 adults with cancer. Digital psychological interventions were associated with significant improvements in short-term fatigue (g = -0.33; 95% CI, -0.58 to -0.07) and disturbed sleep (g = -0.36; 95% CI, -0.57 to -0.15), but with non-significant changes in pain (g = -0.23; 95% CI, -0.68 to 0.21) and physical well-being (g = 0.31; 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.80). Additionally, no alleviation in long-term physical symptoms was observed. In subgroup analysis, results suggest that the country significantly moderated the effectiveness of digital psychological interventions in alleviating fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Digital psychological interventions can be effective for improving short-term fatigue and disturbed sleep in patients with cancer. Clinicians could consider digital psychological interventions as a possible and efficient addition to better manage some of the physical symptoms during and after cancer treatment.

Childhood Cancer Survivors' Adherence to Healthcare Recommendations Made Through a Distance-Delivered Survivorship Program.

Purpose: Ongoing survivorship care allows childhood cancer survivors the opportunity to address treatment-related health problems and improve their quality of life. However, many survivors do not adhere to their healthcare professionals' recommendations and the factors supporting their adherence remain unclear. Patients and Methods: Long-term childhood cancer survivors completed the "Re-engage" program, which assessed survivors' heath needs and provided individualised recommendations for health interventions and surveillance developed by an expert multi-disciplinary team (MDT). We measured survivors' recall of, and adherence to, their individualised healthcare recommendations at one and six months post-intervention. We conducted a series of univariate negative binomial regressions to investigate factors associated with the total number of recommendations that were correctly recalled and adhered to. Results: We analysed the data of 25 childhood cancer survivors who participated in Re-engage (mean age = 31.9 years). On average, survivors were provided with 6.6 recommendations (range = 1-11). Survivors accurately recalled receiving 3.0 recommendations at one month post-intervention and 1.9 at six months. Survivors had adhered to an average of 1.3 recommendations by six-month follow-up. In total, 56% of participants reported that they did not adhere to any recommendations. By six-month follow-up, greater adherence to MDT recommendations was associated with having a history of a second cancer (B = 1.391; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.686 to 2.097; p < 0.001) and reporting a greater level of worry about late effects (B = 1.381; 95% CI, 0.494 to 2.269; p = 0.002). Conclusion: Survivors reported sub-optimal levels of adherence and demonstrated limited recall of their healthcare recommendations. Effective communication of recommendations and clear discussion of barriers limiting adherence, coupled with late effects education, may be critical to ensure that survivors engage with their recommendations, to improve their quality of life and health outcomes. Trial Registration Number: ACTRN12618000194268.

Unmet and under-met needs among Indian parents of children with neurological disorders.

BACKGROUND: Parents of children with neurological disorders commonly report having unmet needs related to their child's care. Mixed methods research is needed with parents of children with neurological disorders in India in order to: 1) quantify which needs are unmet and under-met, and 2) qualitatively explore how parents perceive their unmet and under-met needs. METHODS: This concurrent mixed-methods study used a convergence model of triangulation design. Parents of children with neurological disorders receiving treatment in a children's hospital in Hyderabad, India completed questionnaires (n = 205) on unmet/under-met needs. Twenty-five of these parents then completed in-depth interviews exploring experiential aspects of unmet needs. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis suggested that education about the child's illness and medical needs were the most frequent unmet needs. Parents needed their child's condition explained to them (91.7%) and greater continuity of their child's care (85.4%). Qualitative analysis suggested that parents reported struggling to find a specialist who was knowledgeable about their child's condition. Though parents living in rural areas quantitatively reported fewer unmet needs (child's medical care, care coordination, and communication) than parents living in the city (B = 0.92 [95%CI = 0.64,1.20] for medical care needs), the qualitative data showed this may be due to lower expectations from the health system. CONCLUSION: Parents of children with neurological disorders in India frequently report unmet and under-met needs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Community-based interventions coupled with training nurses on information provision could help bridge the gap between what is offered by hospital systems, and what is needed by parents, in terms of information and support.

Camps for Children with Cancer and Their Families: A Systematic Review of Psychosocial and Physical Impacts.

OBJECTIVE: Camps for children with cancer and their families aim to promote positive psychosocial and physical outcomes for attendees. However, evidence for this is inconsistent, and previous reviews have not delineated between camps for children (patient/survivors and siblings) and family camps (including parents/guardians). Such understanding is necessary to understand the evidence-based benefits of each type of camp. Our systematic review summarizes the findings and limitations of the recent literature for children's camps and family camps. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, Social Work Abstracts, and Google Scholar for relevant articles published between 2013 and 2018. RESULTS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol, we included 19 articles (from 15 studies) in the review. Evidence for the impact of camps was mixed. All articles reported positive outcomes, yet 3 quantitative articles also reported nonsignificant changes. Camps for children (representing 2151 children with cancer/survivors) appeared to facilitate social skills, self-esteem, and physical activity. Family camps (representing 96 families) may provide families the opportunity to reconnect. Both types of camp provide attendees with social support and fun/respite. In 2 qualitative articles, some parents attending family camps reported tension between families of children on treatment and bereaved families. The literature is limited by small sample sizes and the lack of multisite, longitudinal, and controlled study designs. CONCLUSION: The recent literature provides evidence for some positive, short-term psychosocial and physical outcomes of camps. Future research should use rigorous quasiexperimental designs and should assess the long-term impact of camp attendance.

Parents' Perspectives on Their Child's Social Experience in the Context of Childhood Chronic Illness: A Qualitative Study.

PURPOSE: Many children suffer from a serious chronic illness. These children have greater risks of developing psychosocial difficulties, associated with school absenteeism and missed social opportunities. Through parents' perspectives, this study aimed to gain a holistic understanding of children's social experience in the context of chronic illness. DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with parents of a child with a serious chronic illness exploring their child's school experience. Two researchers coded social experiences using an iterative process, involving regular team discussions. Theoretical thematic analysis and content analysis were both performed, using the social ecological model as a theoretical framework. RESULTS: Forty-nine parents participated (43 mothers, 6 fathers; child mean age 11.51 years; 21 female children, 28 male children; 6 different chronic illness groups). According to parents, the main facilitators to the social experience of their children involved parents themselves, the school, social networks and peers, as they were all able to provide social support and opportunities for social development. However, peers were also a source of bullying and peer pressure, and sometimes lacked understanding and empathy. CONCLUSIONS: As shown by the social ecological model, social functioning between chronically-ill children and their peers can be influenced by many factors. More specifically, parents have expressed their ability for promoting positive experiences between their children and their peers. Practice Implications Considering the complexity of social functioning, future research and interventions should provide holistic support for children with chronic illnesses.

Talking About Cancer Among Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients and Survivors: A Systematic Review.

Communication plays an essential role in social relationships. Yet it is unclear how young cancer patients and survivors communicate with peers, and whether this contributes to increased rates of social difficulties. We aimed to analyze how childhood cancer patients and survivors communicate about their cancer with family and peers. We systematically searched Medline, Embase and PsycINFO for peer-reviewed studies on cancer-related communication among patients and survivors (any cancer, <25 years at diagnosis). We screened 309 articles, and included 6 qualitative studies. Studies were assessed using a standardized quality assessment tool. Participants were adolescents and young adults, 16-34 years of age at the time of study. Included studies related to different forms of cancer-related communication, benefits, and challenges. We found that cancer-related communication was an individual, complex process, addressing medical, existential, and emotional aspects of cancer. Communication occurred on a spectrum with variation in who information was shared with, as well as differences in the frequency at which information was shared, and the amount and type of information shared. Communication often occurred at uncertain or significant times for participants, or was initiated by others. Communicating about cancer yielded benefits as a coping strategy, prompted social support, and appeared central to significant relationships. Barriers to communication, including fear of stigma and poor peer reactions, hindered willingness to disclose. The number of studies analyzing this topic was limited. Communicating about cancer is a significant yet complex process for young patients and survivors. Further research is needed to complement the existing literature and to establish the evidence base for the development of future effective interventions promoting social and communication skills.