Prevalence and detection of actionable BRAF V600 and NRAS Q61 mutations in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor by droplet digital PCR.

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors ( MPNSTs) are aggressive tumors with poor prognosis that do not typically respond well to standard chemotherapy. Recently, point mutations involving BRAF V600E have been demonstrated in a subset of MPNST, offering the possibility of targeted treatment. However, the reported prevalence of these alterations is variable. Mutations involving NRAS, which is also involved in the MAPK/ERK pathway and amenable to targeted inhibitors, have not been well characterized in MPNST. In this study, we validated droplet digital polymerase chain reaction for the detection of BRAF V600E and NRAS Q61 mutations and evaluate the prevalence of BRAF V600E and NRAS Q61 mutations in 79 cases of MPNST, including 45 sporadic, 27 NF-1 associated, and 7 radiation-associated tumors. We detected actionable BRAF or NRAS mutations in 3 of 44 sporadic MPNSTs (6.8%), including 2 BRAF V600 and 1 NRAS Q61 mutations, as well as 1 NRAS Q61 mutation in a tumor that was ultimately considered to represent melanoma. These 3 cases with positive mutations were exclusively in sporadic, high-grade MPNST (FNCLCC grade 3 of 3), with a prevalence of 11.5% in this group (3.8% NRAS Q61 mutations and 7.7% BRAF V600 mutations). None of the tumors associated with NF-1 or prior radiation had detectable mutations in the genes tested. Overall, the prevalence of these alterations offers the possibility of targeted therapy in this aggressive type of sarcoma and suggests the potential benefit of routine clinical testing.

Fédération Nationale Des Centres de Lutte Contre Le Cancer (FNCLCC) Grading, Margin Status and Tumor Location Associate With Survival Outcomes in Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Histologic grading using the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre Le Cancer (FNCLCC) system is not universally accepted as applicable to malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), as its prognostic value is not well established. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 99 cases of MPNST to investigate any association between the outcomes overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and predictor variables FNCLCC grade, clinical setting, tumor location, and tumor size at diagnosis using multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis. RESULTS: Univariable and multivariable analysis demonstrate a statistically significant association between FNCLCC grade and both OS and PFS when comparing tumors by histologic grade. Of note, no deaths were observed in patients with grade 1 MPNST. Other variables associated with unfavorable outcomes include fragmented resection and primary site, with tumors in the extremities having favorable OS, but not PFS, when compared with those in truncal locations. Tumors in the head and neck had favorable PFS, but not OS, compared with those in the trunk. No statistically significant differences in OS or PFS were observed when comparing patient age and sex, tumor size at diagnosis, clinical setting (primary vs. type-1 neurofibromatosis vs. radiation associated) or history of neoadjuvant therapy. Interobserver agreement for FNCLCC grading of these tumors was considered good (S*=0.77, 95% confidence interval: 0.71-0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Association between FNCLCC grading and survival outcomes in MPNST suggests potential value to routinely grading these neoplasms. However, the subjectivity of the grading system, particularly when assigning a tumor differentiation score, may pose a challenge, especially in low and intermediate grade lesions.

Pancreatic paraganglioma mimicking pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.

Extra-adrenal paragangliomas are rare tumors arising from the chromaffin cells of the autonomic nervous system. Retroperitoneal paragangliomas may present as a pancreatic mass. We present a case of a 61-year-old woman with an incidentally found pancreatic mass (7.2 × 6.5 cm) in the CT scan. EUS- guided FNA result was compatible with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Patient underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and histopathologic assessment revealed the mass was an extra-adrenal paraganglioma. Preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic paragangliomas can be challenging due to imaging and histopathologic similarities with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.