Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pak J Med Sci ; 40(2ICON Suppl): S15-S20, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38328663

RESUMEN

Objective: To evaluate clinical presentation and pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with Covid-19 infection in our local tertiary care from lower middle-income country. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at Obstetrics & Gynecology department, Sheikh Saeed Memorial Hospital (SSMH) of The Indus Hospital and Health Network (IHHN) from March 2020 to August 2021. Data of 422 admitted pregnant women with COVID-19 infection was retrieved for demographic and clinical information, laboratory tests, pregnancy outcome, and neonatal outcomes on RED-Cap and analyzed on SPSS 26. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate odds ratios (OR) for symptomology with categorical variables and feto-maternal outcome. Results: Of the total 422 pregnant women, 24.4% were symptomatic, 74.7% exhibiting mild symptoms. Largely reported symptoms were fever (71.8%), cough (36.9%) and body ache (35.0%); while odds of symptomatic COVID-19 infection was less in educated pregnant women (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1-0.9) compared to uneducated. Amongst maternal comorbidities, odds of having symptomatic COVID-19 infection were 3.8 times (95% CI 1.1-13.0) in women with chronic hypertension and 5.5 times (95% CI 2.9-10.4) in women with diabetes. Symptomatic women had significantly greater incidence of miscarriages (p= 0.009), PPROM (p= 0.001), preterm birth (p= 0.000), preeclampsia (p= 0.000), placental abruption (p= 0.006) and maternal ICU admission (p= 0.000) than asymptomatic patients. Still birth was higher (6.4% vs 1.3%, p-value= 0.013) in symptomatic group. The odds of having severe maternal outcome were higher (OR=3.5; 95% CI 1.9-6.0) in symptomatic pregnant women. Conclusion: Majority of pregnant women were asymptomatic. Symptomatic women with COVID-19 infection had an increased risk of adverse feto-maternal outcome.

2.
Pak J Med Sci ; 36(1): S38-S43, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31933605

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of diabetes in pregnancy (DIP), namely pre-gestational, gestational (GDM) and overt diabetes mellitus (DM) in women registered for delivery. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of antenatal women registered between January 01 to August 31, 2017 was performed. Gestational age, diagnosis of DIP, glucose levels at diagnosis and other relevant data was extracted. The effect of various fasting blood glucose (FBG) thresholds for diagnosis of DIP was assessed. RESULTS: DIP was diagnosed in 21.8% women (pre-gestational: 2%, GDM: 81.2%, overt: DM: 16.8%). In early registrants, 30.2% were detected through screening. However, 55.3% of women registered late. Women with pre-gestational DM were older, had more miscarriages, and greater personal and family history of diabetes versus GDM and overt DM. Raising the diagnostic threshold of FBG from 92 mg/dl to 95 mg/dl missed three women (0.1%) and to 105 mg/dl, missed six women (0.2%). CONCLUSION: We observed a high proportion of overt DM. In early registrants, almost one third of DIP was diagnosed in the first half of pregnancy, an opportunity missed in late registrants. Altering diagnostic thresholds of DIP affected only a small proportion of women.

3.
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad ; 25(1-2): 204-5, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25098096

RESUMEN

Obstetricians should be aware of the possibility of silent rupture of scarred uterus. Ultrasound has an important role in the diagnosis of silent uterine rupture. A case of silent uterine rupture with foetal demise, that remained undiagnosed for many weeks, is described.


Asunto(s)
Amnios , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Hernia/etiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Rotura Uterina/diagnóstico , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Rotura Espontánea
4.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak ; 22(2): 118-9, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22313653

RESUMEN

With the increase in incidence of ectopic pregnancy over the decades, bilateral ectopic pregnancy is also increasing. It is usually associated with assisted reproductive techniques (ART) but in recent years few cases of spontaneous bilateral ectopic pregnancy have been reported. Gynaecologists should be aware of this and that ultrasonography has limitations in diagnosis. In cases of ectopic pregnancy where contralateral adnexa is not clearly identified on ultrasound and fertility needs to be conserved, patient should be managed by experts in well equipped centres. A case of spontaneous bilateral tubal pregnancy that remained undiagnosed till laparotomy, is described.


Asunto(s)
Trompas Uterinas/cirugía , Embarazo Tubario/diagnóstico por imagen , Embarazo Tubario/cirugía , Consejo , Trompas Uterinas/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Laparotomía/métodos , Paridad , Embarazo , Embarazo Ectópico/diagnóstico por imagen , Embarazo Ectópico/cirugía , Embarazo Tubario/patología , Enfermedades Raras , Rotura Espontánea/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura Espontánea/cirugía , Salpingectomía/métodos , Ultrasonografía , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...