Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Mol Psychiatry ; 21(8): 1050-6, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26460229

RESUMEN

Atypical antipsychotic adjunctive therapy to lithium or valproate is effective in treating acute mania. Although continuation of atypical antipsychotic adjunctive therapy after mania remission reduces relapse of mood episodes, the optimal duration is unknown. As many atypical antipsychotics cause weight gain and metabolic syndrome, they should not be continued unless the benefits outweigh the risks. This 52-week double-blind placebo-controlled trial recruited patients with bipolar I disorder (n=159) who recently remitted from a manic episode during treatment with risperidone or olanzapine adjunctive therapy to lithium or valproate. Patients were randomized to one of three conditions: discontinuation of risperidone or olanzapine and substitution with placebo at (i) entry ('0-weeks' group) or (ii) at 24 weeks after entry ('24-weeks' group) or (iii) continuation of risperidone or olanzapine for the full duration of the study ('52-weeks' group). The primary outcome measure was time to relapse of any mood episode. Compared with the 0-weeks group, the time to any mood episode was significantly longer in the 24-weeks group (hazard ratio (HR) 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33, 0.86) and nearly so in the 52-weeks group (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.39, 1.02). The relapse rate was similar in the 52-weeks group compared with the 24-weeks group (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.71, 1.99); however, sub-group analysis showed discordant results between the two antipsychotics (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.17; 1.32 olanzapine patients; HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.00, 3.41 risperidone patients). Average weight gain was 3.2 kg in the 52-weeks group compared with a weight loss of 0.2 kg in the 0-weeks and 0.1 kg in the 24-weeks groups. These findings suggest that risperidone or olanzapine adjunctive therapy for 24 weeks is beneficial but continuation of risperidone beyond this period does not reduce the risk of relapse. Whether continuation of olanzapine beyond this period reduces relapse risk remains unclear but the potential benefit needs to be weighed against an increased risk of weight gain.


Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Risperidona/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antimaníacos/uso terapéutico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Litio/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Olanzapina , Factores de Tiempo , Aumento de Peso
2.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 22(2): 140-6, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20045300

RESUMEN

AIMS: Failure to carry out intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) in cervical carcinoma results in suboptimal chemoradiation and increases the risk of recurrence. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of adjuvant hysterectomy after unsuccessful ICBT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out of all women referred with cervical carcinoma between January 1999 and July 2007 where ICBT insertion was unsuccessful after the initial chemoradiation. The data collected and analysed included histology, stage of disease, causes for unsuccessful ICBT insertion, the response to the initial chemoradiation, subsequent treatment, morbidity, recurrence rates and survival rates. Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank methods were used to analyse recurrence-free and overall survival rates. RESULTS: ICBT insertion was unsuccessful in 19 of 208 (9%) patients. The causes of failure were: inability to dilate the cervix; uterine perforation; vesicovaginal fistula; patient refusal; other problems, including the presence of pyometrium, patient not fit for general anaesthetic, and narrow vagina; and consultant choice with no obvious reason. Fourteen of 19 patients (74%) received further pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) alone; five (26%) patients underwent adjuvant hysterectomy. The median follow-up for all patients was 63 months; 60 months for patients treated with adjuvant hysterectomy (range 31-68 months) and 85 months for patients treated with further EBRT. None of the patients treated with adjuvant hysterectomy developed any significant late toxicity. Seven patients (50%) treated with EBRT have relapsed compared with none in the adjuvant hysterectomy arm (P=0.068). Six patients (43%) in the EBRT arm have subsequently died of recurrent disease compared with none in the adjuvant hysterectomy arm (P=0.152). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant hysterectomy after unsuccessful ICBT does not seem to increase late toxicity and reduces the risk of pelvic recurrence and may improve survival. The role of adjuvant hysterectomy after suboptimal chemoradiation merits further investigation in clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Braquiterapia , Carcinoma de Células Grandes/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Histerectomía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Grandes/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundario , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología
3.
Postgrad Med J ; 84(994): 418-27, 2008 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18832403

RESUMEN

In the UK an aging population is resulting in more people being diagnosed with cancer, and an increasing number of treatment options means that many patients live significantly longer with their disease. It is anticipated therefore that an increasing number of patients will present to primary and secondary care with acute complications of cancer, or the treatment thereof. Many doctors have limited experience in managing patients with cancer and acute oncological emergencies. This article reviews the diagnosis and management of four common oncological emergencies: febrile neutropenia, metastatic spinal cord compression, superior vena cava obstruction, and malignancy associated hypercalcaemia. It is vital to recognise these conditions, as failure to implement immediate and appropriate treatment may result in significant morbidity or death.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento de Urgencia/métodos , Hipercalcemia/etiología , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neutropenia/etiología , Síndrome de la Vena Cava Superior/etiología , Urgencias Médicas , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hipercalcemia/diagnóstico , Hipercalcemia/terapia , Neutropenia/diagnóstico , Neutropenia/terapia , Síndrome de la Vena Cava Superior/diagnóstico , Síndrome de la Vena Cava Superior/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA