Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 28(6): 1224-1228, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35393009

RESUMEN

Contact tracing data of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant cases during December 2021 in Cantabria, Spain, showed increased transmission (secondary attack rate 39%) compared with Delta cases (secondary attack rate 26%), uninfluenced by vaccination status. Incubation and serial interval periods were also reduced. Half of Omicron transmissions happened before symptom onset in the index case-patient.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Periodo de Incubación de Enfermedades Infecciosas , España/epidemiología
2.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 9819, 2021 05 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33972607

RESUMEN

The simplicity and low cost of rapid point-of-care tests greatly facilitate large-scale population testing, which can contribute to controlling the spread of the COVID-19 virus. We evaluated the applicability of a self-testing strategy for SARS-CoV2 in a population-based, cross-sectional study in Cantabria, Spain, between April and May 2020. For the self-testing strategy, participants received the necessary material for the self-collection of blood and performance of a rapid antibody test using lateral flow immunoassay at home without the supervision of healthcare personnel. A total of 1,022 participants were enrolled. Most participants correctly performed the COVID-19 self-test the first time (91.3% [95% CI 89.4-92.9]). Only a minority of the participants (0.7%) needed the help of healthcare personnel, while 6.9% required a second kit delivery, for a total valid test result in 96.9% of the participants. Incorrect use of the self-test was not associated with the educational level, age over 65, or housing area. Prevalence of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV2 for subjects with a valid rapid test result was 3.1% (95% CI 2.2-4.4), similar to the seroprevalence result obtained using a conventional approach carried out by healthcare professionals. In conclusion, COVID-19 self-testing should be considered as a screening tool.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Autoevaluación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/virología , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , España , Adulto Joven
3.
Enferm. infecc. microbiol. clín. (Ed. impr.) ; 36(7): 417-422, ago.-sept. 2018. tab
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-176722

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cumulative susceptibility reports are a valuable tool for the empirical treatment of urinary tract infections, especially in the current context of increasing resistance rates. Our objective was to analyze the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates in urine cultures of pediatric patients during a five-year period. METHODS: Retrospective study of urine cultures from 2011 to 2015. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed using the Vitek-2 system (BioMérieux(R)) and categorized according to EUCAST criteria. Antimicrobial susceptibility data were analyzed by gender and age groups (neonates, 1 month to 5 years, 5-15 years) before being compared with data obtained from patients over the age of 15 years. RESULTS: During the study period, 17164 urine cultures were processed from 7924 patients under 16 years of age. Antimicrobial susceptibility rates in these patients were: ampicillin 36.3%, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 75.3%, cefuroxime 83.2%, co-trimoxazole 68.9%, ciprofloxacin 85.3%, fosfomycin 85.5%, nitrofurantoin 84.4% and 3rd generation cephalosporins 89-91%. Aminoglycosides (>92%) and carbapenems (95%) maintained the highest susceptibility rates. The prevalence of ESBL-producing isolates was significantly lower in children under the age of 16 years (1.5% vs. 4.1%). In patients under the age of 16 years, Escherichia coli isolates in girls were significantly more sensitive (p < 0.0001) to ampicillin (41% vs. 30%) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (82% vs. 72%) than in boys. CONCLUSIONS: The compilation of cumulative susceptibility reports disaggregated by age or gender reveals significant differences. In our setting, cefuroxime may be considered the first-line empirical treatment in pediatric patients


INTRODUCCIÓN: Los informes de sensibilidad acumulada son una herramienta valiosa para guiar el tratamiento empírico de infecciones urinarias, sobre todo en el contexto actual de crecientes tasas de resistencia. Nuestro objetivo es analizar la sensibilidad antimicrobiana de bacterias aisladas de urocultivos de pacientes pediátricos durante un período de 5 años. MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de los urocultivos del período 2011-2015. La identificación y estudios de sensibilidad se realizaron con el sistema Vitek-2 (BioMérieux(R)) y se interpretaron según los criterios de EUCAST. Se analizaron los datos de sensibilidad antimicrobiana según sexo y tramos de edad (neonatos, 1 mes-5 años, 5-15 años) y se compararon con los datos de mayores de 15 años. RESULTADOS: En el período analizado se procesaron 17.164 urocultivos de 7.924 pacientes menores de 16 años. Los porcentajes de sensibilidad en estos pacientes fueron: ampicilina 36,3%; amoxicilina/clavulánico 75,3%; cefuroxima 83,2%; cotrimoxazol 68,9%; ciprofloxacino 85,3%; fosfomicina 85,5%; nitrofurantoína 84,4%, y cefalosporinas de tercera generación 89-91%. Aminoglucósidos (>92%) y carbapenemas (95%) mantienen las mayores tasas de sensibilidad. La prevalencia de aislamientos productores de BLEE fue significativamente menor en niños menores de 16 años (1,5% vs. 4,1%). En menores de 16 años, los aislamientos de Escherichia coli procedentes de mujeres fueron significativamente (p < 0,0001) más sensibles a ampicilina (41% vs. 30%) y amoxicilina-clavulánico (82% vs. 72%) que en varones. CONCLUSIONES: La elaboración de informes de sensibilidad acumulados desglosados por edad o sexo permite detectar importantes diferencias. En nuestra área, cefuroxima puede considerarse como primera opción de tratamiento empírico en pacientes pediátricos


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Bacterias Grampositivas , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28993064

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cumulative susceptibility reports are a valuable tool for the empirical treatment of urinary tract infections, especially in the current context of increasing resistance rates. Our objective was to analyze the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates in urine cultures of pediatric patients during a five-year period. METHODS: Retrospective study of urine cultures from 2011 to 2015. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed using the Vitek-2 system (BioMérieux®) and categorized according to EUCAST criteria. Antimicrobial susceptibility data were analyzed by gender and age groups (neonates, 1 month to 5 years, 5-15 years) before being compared with data obtained from patients over the age of 15 years. RESULTS: During the study period, 17164 urine cultures were processed from 7924 patients under 16 years of age. Antimicrobial susceptibility rates in these patients were: ampicillin 36.3%, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 75.3%, cefuroxime 83.2%, co-trimoxazole 68.9%, ciprofloxacin 85.3%, fosfomycin 85.5%, nitrofurantoin 84.4% and 3rd generation cephalosporins 89-91%. Aminoglycosides (>92%) and carbapenems (95%) maintained the highest susceptibility rates. The prevalence of ESBL-producing isolates was significantly lower in children under the age of 16 years (1.5% vs. 4.1%). In patients under the age of 16 years, Escherichia coli isolates in girls were significantly more sensitive (p<0.0001) to ampicillin (41% vs. 30%) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (82% vs. 72%) than in boys. CONCLUSIONS: The compilation of cumulative susceptibility reports disaggregated by age or gender reveals significant differences. In our setting, cefuroxime may be considered the first-line empirical treatment in pediatric patients.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefuroxima/farmacología , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , España/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología
5.
Int J Cardiol ; 164(2): 193-200, 2013 Apr 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21775001

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Control and reduction of cardiovascular-disease-related readmissions is clinically, logistically and politically challenging. Recent strategies focus on 30-day readmissions. A screening tool for the detection of potential cases is necessary to make further case management more efficient. METHODS: Cohort study. Hospital administrative data were analyzed in order to obtain information about cardiac-related hospitalizations from 2003 to 2009 at a Spanish academic tertiary care center. Predictor-variables of admissions that presented or did not present 30-day cardiac-related readmission were compared. A prediction model was constructed and tested on a validation sample. Model performance was assessed for all cardiac diseases and for 24 main-cardiac-disease-sets. RESULTS: The study sample was 35531 hospital-admissions. The model included 11 predictors: number of previous emergency admission in 180days, residence out of area, no procedure applied during hospitalization, major or minor therapeutic procedure applied during hospitalization, anemia, hypertensive disease, acute coronary syndrome, congestive heart failure, diabetes and renal disease. The performance indicators applied on all cardiac diseases were: C-statistic=0.75, Sensitivity=0.66, Specificity=0.70, Positive predictive value=0.10, Negative predictive value=0.98, Positive likelihood ratio=2.21 and Negative likelihood ratio=0.48. Diseases for discriminative prediction are: stenting, circulatory disorders, acute myocardial infarction and defibrillator and pacemaker implantation. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a prediction model for 30-day cardiac-related diseases based on available administrative data ready to be integrated as a screening tool. It has reasonable validity and can be used to increase the efficiency of case management.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Bases de Datos Factuales/tendencias , Administración Hospitalaria/tendencias , Readmisión del Paciente/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...