RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is an incompletely defined disease process with no known unifying pathophysiological mechanism. OBJECTIVE: To our knowledge, no genetic studies have been performed in a North American population. To summarize genetic findings from previous studies and to comprehensively test for these associations in a novel and diverse, multi-institutional population. METHODS: Cross-sectional, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis was performed in 55 of 121 enrolled patients with DISH. Baseline demographic data were available on 100 patients. Based on allele selection from previous studies and related disease conditions, sequencing was performed on COL11A2, COL6A6, fibroblast growth factor 2 gene, LEMD3, TGFB1, and TLR1 genes and compared with global haplotype rates. RESULTS: Consistent with previous studies, older age (mean 71 years), male sex predominance (80%), a high frequency of type 2 diabetes (54%), and renal disease (17%) were observed. Unique findings included high rates of tobacco use (11% currently smoking, 55% former smoker), a higher predominance of cervical DISH (70%) relative to other locations (30%), and an especially high rate of type 2 diabetes in patients with DISH and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (100%) relative to DISH alone (100% vs 47%, P < .001). Compared with global allele rates, we found higher rates of SNPs in 5 of 9 tested genes ( P < .05). CONCLUSION: We identified 5 SNPs in patients with DISH that occurred more frequently than a global reference. We also identified novel environmental associations. We hypothesize that DISH represents a heterogeneous condition with both multiple genetic and environmental influences.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hiperostosis Esquelética Difusa Idiopática , Humanos , Masculino , Hiperostosis Esquelética Difusa Idiopática/genética , Hiperostosis Esquelética Difusa Idiopática/epidemiología , Alelos , Estudios TransversalesRESUMEN
Ice hockey is a high-speed sport with a high rate of associated injury, including spinal cord injury (SCI). The incidence of hockey-related SCI has increased significantly in more recent years. A comprehensive literature search was conducted with the PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases using the phrases "hockey AND spinal cord injuries" to identify relevant studies pertaining to hockey-related SCIs, equipment use, anatomy, and biomechanics of SCI, injury recognition, and return-to-play guidelines. Fifty-three abstracts and full texts were reviewed and included, ranging from 1983 to 2021. The proportion of catastrophic SCIs is high when compared to other sports. SCIs in hockey occur most commonly from a collision with the boards due to intentional contact resulting in axial compression, as well as flexion-related teardrop fractures that lead to spinal canal compromise and neurologic injury. Public awareness programs, improvements in equipment, and rule changes can all serve to minimize the risk of SCI. Hockey has a relatively high rate of associated SCIs occurring most commonly due to flexion-distraction injuries from intentional contact. Further investigation into equipment and hockey arena characteristics as well as future research into injury recognition and removal from and return to play is necessary.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been described as a unidirectional system with the choroid plexus serving as the primary secretor of CSF and the arachnoid granulations as primary reabsorption site. This theory of neurosurgical forefathers has been universally adopted and taught as dogma. Many neuroscientists have found difficulty reconciling this theory with common pathologies, and recent studies have found that this "classic" hypothesis may not represent the full picture. OBJECTIVE: To review modern CSF dynamic theories and to call for medical education reform. METHODS: We reviewed the literature from January 1990 to December 2020. We searched the PubMed database using key terms "cerebrospinal fluid circulation," "cerebrospinal fluid dynamics," "cerebrospinal fluid physiology," "glymphatic system," and "glymphatic pathway." We selected articles with a primary aim to discuss either CSF dynamics and/or the glymphatic system. RESULTS: The Bulat-Klarica-Oreskovic hypothesis purports that CSF is secreted and reabsorbed throughout the craniospinal axis. CSF demonstrates similar physiology to that of water elsewhere in the body. CSF "circulates" throughout the subarachnoid space in a pulsatile to-and-fro fashion. Osmolarity plays a critical role in CSF dynamics. Aquaporin-4 and the glymphatic system contribute to CSF volume and flow by establishing osmolarity gradients and facilitating CSF movement. Multiple studies demonstrate that the choroid plexus does not play any significant role in CSF circulation. CONCLUSION: We have highlighted major studies to illustrate modern principles of CSF dynamics. Despite these, the medical education system has been slow to reform curricula and update learning resources.
Asunto(s)
Educación Médica , Sistema Glinfático , Acuaporina 4/metabolismo , Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/metabolismo , Plexo Coroideo , Sistema Glinfático/metabolismo , Humanos , Espacio SubaracnoideoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Hannover classification of vestibular schwannomas is designed to stratify tumors based on extrameatal extension and compression of the brainstem. We have previously reported the reliability of the Koos system, but to date, no study has assessed the reliability of the similar Hannover classification. OBJECTIVE: We present an assessment of the intrarater and interrater reliability of the Hannover classification system. METHODS: After institutional review board approval was obtained, a cross-sectional group of the magnetic resonance imaging of 40 patients with vestibular schwannomas varying in size comprised the study sample. Four raters were selected to assign a Hannover grade to 50 total scans. Interrater and intrarater reliability was calculated and reported using Fleiss's kappa, Kendall's W, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Interrater observer reliability was found to be moderate when measured using Fleiss' kappa (0.49), extremely strong using Kendall's W (0.93), and excellent as calculated by ICC (0.88). The results were all statistically significant (P < 0.05). Intrarater reliability for Hannover grade ranged from 0.77 to 1.00 (substantial to perfect). By Kendall's W and ICC, all raters had near perfect or excellent agreement. The results were all statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The Hannover classification is a reliable system for grading the size of vestibular schwannomas. This supports its continued use and previously published results of the literature in studies relying on this classification. Further studies are needed to evaluate its validity and determine its role in preoperative counseling and determining microsurgery and radiosurgery outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Neuroma Acústico , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neuroma Acústico/diagnóstico por imagen , Neuroma Acústico/cirugía , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Koos classification of vestibular schwannomas is designed to stratify tumors based on extrameatal extension and compression of the brainstem. Our prior study demonstrated excellent reliability. No study has yet assessed its validity. OBJECTIVE: To present a retrospective study designed to assess the validity of the Koos grading system with respect to facial nerve function following treatment of 81 acoustic schwannomas. METHODS: We collected data retrospectively from 81 patients with acoustic schwannomas of various Koos grades who were treated with microsurgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery. House-Brackmann (HB) scores were used to assess facial nerve function and obtained at various time points following treatment. We generated Spearman's rho and Kendall's tau correlation coefficients along with a logistic regression curve. RESULTS: We found no significant difference in the presence or absence of facial dysfunction by Koos classification when looking at all patients. There was a positive but fairly weak correlation between HB score and Koos classification, which was only significant at the first postoperative clinic appointment. There was a statistically significant difference in the presence or absence of facial dysfunction between patients treated with surgery vs radiation, which we expected. We found no statistically significant difference when comparing surgical approaches. Logistic regression modeling demonstrated a poor ability of the Koos grading system to predict facial nerve dysfunction following treatment. CONCLUSION: The Koos grading system did not predict the presence of absence of facial nerve dysfunction in our study population. There were trends within subgroups that require further exploration.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Nervio Facial/clasificación , Traumatismos del Nervio Facial/cirugía , Neuroma Acústico/clasificación , Neuroma Acústico/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Nervio Facial/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Radiocirugia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Loss of consciousness (LOC) at presentation with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) has been associated with early brain injury and poor functional outcome. The impact of LOC on the clinical course after aSAH deserves further exploration. A retrospective analysis of 149 aSAH patients who were prospectively enrolled in the Cerebral Aneurysm Renin Angiotensin Study (CARAS) between 2012 and 2015 was performed. The impact of LOC was analyzed with emphasis on patients presenting in excellent or good neurological condition (Hunt and Hess 1 and 2). A total of 50/149 aSAH patients (33.6%) experienced LOC at presentation. Loss of consciousness was associated with severity of neurological condition upon admission (Hunt and Hess, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) grade), hemorrhage burden on initial head CT (Fisher CT grade), acute hydrocephalus, cardiac instability, and nosocomial infection. Of Hunt and Hess grade 1 and 2 patients, 21/84 (25.0%) suffered LOC at presentation. Cardiac instability and nosocomial infection were significantly more frequent in these patients. In multivariable analysis, LOC was the predominant predictor of cardiac instability and nosocomial infection. Loss of consciousness at presentation with aSAH is associated with an increased rate of complications, even in good-grade patients. The presence of LOC may identify good-grade patients at risk for complications such as cardiac instability and nosocomial infection.
Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/complicaciones , Inconsciencia/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Infección Hospitalaria/complicaciones , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Cardiopatías/complicaciones , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Humanos , Hidrocefalia/complicaciones , Hidrocefalia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/etiología , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/epidemiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inconsciencia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
The bulk of a resident's daily work is patient care related; however, other aspects of residency training are vital both to a resident's education and to the advancement of the field. Basic science and clinical research are the more common academic activities in which residents participate after completion of daily patient care objectives. Less frequently, residents participate in a process vital to the delivery of efficient, cost-effective, and safe patient care: hospital policy development. Two policies were identified as outdated or absent: (1) the process for the declaration of brain death and (2) a policy for the use of hypertonic saline in the Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit. The policies were rewritten after review of the existing policy (when applicable), other institutions' examples, national guidelines, and state and federal laws. Once written, proposals were reviewed by department leadership, hospital ethics, legal counsel, ad hoc specialty committees, the Medical Directors Council, and the Medical Executive Committee. After multiple revisions, each proposal was endorsed by the above bodies and ratified as hospital policy. Residents may make a substantial impact on patient care through active participation in the authorship and implementation of hospital policy. The inclusion of residents in policy development has improved the process for declaring brain death and management of patients with devastating neurological pathology. Resident involvement in hospital policy initiatives can be successful, valuable to the institution, and beneficial to patient care. Resident involvement is predicated on faculty and institutional support of such endeavors.
Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos/tendencias , Internado y Residencia/tendencias , Liderazgo , Neurocirugia/educación , Neurocirugia/tendencias , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/tendencias , Centros Médicos Académicos/métodos , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Neurocirugia/métodos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Desarrollo de ProgramaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neurosciences intensive care units (NICUs) provide institutional centers for specialized care. Despite a demonstrable reduction in morbidity and mortality, NICUs may experience significant capacity strain with resulting supraoptimal utilization and diseconomies of scale. We present an implementation study in the recognition and management of capacity strain within a large NICU in the United States. Excessive resource demand in an NICU creates significant operational issues. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a Reserved Bed Pilot Program (RBPP), implemented to maximize economies of scale, to reduce transfer declines due to lack of capacity, and to increase transfer volume for the neurosciences service-line. METHODS: Key performance indicators (KPIs) were created to evaluate RBPP efficacy with respect to primary (strategic) objectives. Operational KPIs were established to evaluate changes in operational throughput for the neurosciences and other service-lines. For each KPI, pilot-period data were compared to the previous fiscal year. RESULTS: RBPP implementation resulted in a significant increase in accepted transfer volume to the neurosciences service-line (P = .02). Transfer declines due to capacity decreased significantly (P = .01). Unit utilization significantly improved across service-line units relative to theoretical optima (P < .03). Care regionalization was achieved through a significant reduction in "off-service" patient placement (P = .01). Negative externalities were minimized, with no significant negative impact in the operational KPIs of other evaluated service-lines (P = .11). CONCLUSION: Capacity strain is a significant issue for hospital units. Reducing capacity strain can increase unit efficiency, improve resource utilization, and augment service-line throughput. RBPP implementation resulted in a significant improvement in service-line operations, regional access to care, and resource efficiency, with minimal externalities at the institutional level.
Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos/tendencias , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/tendencias , Neurociencias/tendencias , Centros Médicos Académicos/normas , Femenino , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales/normas , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Neurociencias/normas , Proyectos PilotoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the last 20 yr, the rate of neurosurgical guideline publication has increased. However, despite the higher volume and increasing emphasis on quality there remains no reliable means of measuring the overall impact of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). OBJECTIVE: To utilize citation analysis to evaluate the dispersion of neurosurgical CPGs. METHODS: A list of neurosurgical guidelines was compiled by performing electronic searches using the Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands) and National Guideline Clearinghouse databases. The Scopus database was queried to obtain current publication and citation data for all included documents and categorized based upon recognized neurosurgical specialties. The h-index, R-index, h2-index, i10-index, and dissemination index (D-Index) were manually calculated for each subspecialty. RESULTS: After applying screening criteria the search yielded 372 neurosurgical CPGs, which were included for bibliometric analysis. The overall calculated h-index for neurosurgery was 56. When broken down by subspecialty trauma/critical care had the highest value at 35, followed by spine and peripheral nerve at 30, cerebrovascular at 28, tumor at 16, pediatrics at 14, miscellaneous at 11, and functional/stereotactic/pain at 6. Cerebrovascular neurosurgery was noted to have the highest D-Index at 3.4. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive framework is useful for guideline impact analysis. Bibliometric data provides a novel and adequate means of evaluating the successful dissemination of neurosurgical guidelines. There remains a paucity of data regarding implementation and clinical outcomes of individual guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Bibliometría , Neurocirugia/normas , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Humanos , Países BajosRESUMEN
The authors believe that the standardized and systematic study of immobilization techniques, diagnostic modalities, medical and surgical treatment strategies, and ultimately outcomes and outcome measurement after cervical spinal trauma and cervical spinal fracture injuries, if performed using well-designed medical evidence-based comparative investigations with meaningful follow-up, has both merit and the remarkable potential to identify optimal strategies for assessment, characterization, and clinical management. However, they recognize that there is inherent difficulty in attempting to apply evidence-based medicine (EBM) to identify ideal treatment strategies for individual cervical fracture injuries. First, there is almost no medical evidence reported in the literature for the management of specific isolated cervical fracture subtypes; specific treatment strategies for specific fracture injuries have not been routinely studied in a rigorous, comparative way. One of the vulnerabilities of an evidenced-based scientific review in spinal cord injury (SCI) is the lack of studies in comparative populations and scientific evidence on a given topic or fracture pattern providing level II evidence or higher. Second, many modest fracture injuries are not associated with vascular or neural injury or spinal instability. The application of the science of EBM to the care of patients with traumatic cervical spine injuries and SCIs is invaluable and necessary. The dedicated multispecialty author groups involved in the production and publication of the two iterations of evidence-based guidelines on the management of acute cervical spine and spinal cord injuries have provided strategic guidance in the care of patients with SCIs. This dedicated service to the specialty has been carried out to provide neurosurgical colleagues with a qualitative review of the evidence supporting various aspects of care of these patients. It is important to state and essential to understand that the science of EBM and its rigorous application is important to medicine and to the specialty of neurosurgery. It should be embraced and used to drive and shape investigations of the management and treatment strategies offered patients. It should not be abandoned because it is not convenient or it does not support popular practice bias or patterns. It is the authors' view that the science of EBM is essential and necessary and, furthermore, that it has great potential as clinician scientists treat and study the many variations and complexities of patients who sustain acute cervical spine fracture injuries.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/lesiones , Traumatismos Vertebrales/terapia , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) has high fatality and permanent disability rates due to the severe damage to brain cells and inflammation. The SERPINE1 gene that encodes PAI-1 for the regulation of tissue plasminogen activator is considered an important therapeutic target for aSAH. METHODS: Six SNPs in the SERPINE1 gene (in order of rs2227631, rs1799889, rs6092, rs6090, rs2227684, rs7242) were investigated. Blood samples were genotyped with Taqman genotyping assays and pyrosequencing. The experiment-wide statistically significant threshold for single marker analysis was set at p < 0.01 after evaluation of independent markers. Haplotype analysis was performed in Haplo.stats package with permutation tests. Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison in dominant, additive, and recessive model was applied. RESULTS: A total of 146 aSAH patients and 49 control subjects were involved in this study. The rs2227631 G allele is significant (p = 0.01) for aSAH compared to control. In aSAH group, haplotype analysis showed that G5GGGT homozygotes in recessive model were associated with delayed cerebral ischemia (p < 0.01, Odds Ratio = 5.14, 95% CI = 1.45-18.18), clinical vasospasm (p = 0.01, Odds Ratio = 4.58, 95% CI = 1.30-16.13), and longer intensive care unit stay (p = 0.01). By contrast, the G5GGAG carriers were associated with less incidence of cerebral edema (p < 0.01) and higher Glasgow Coma Scale (p < 0.01). The A4GGGT carriers were associated with less incidence of severe hypertension (>140/90) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The results suggested an important regulatory role of the SERPINE1 gene polymorphism in clinical outcomes of aSAH.
Asunto(s)
Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Haplotipos , Inhibidor 1 de Activador Plasminogénico/genética , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/genética , Alelos , Edema Encefálico/epidemiología , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Genotipo , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Hipertensión , Incidencia , Oportunidad Relativa , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/epidemiología , Activador de Tejido PlasminógenoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dysphagia is one of the most common complications of anterior cervical spine surgery, and there is a need to establish that the means of testing for it are reliable and valid. The objective of this study was to measure observer variability of the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) test, specifically when used for evaluation of dysphagia in patients undergoing revisionary anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: Images from patients undergoing revision ACDF at a single institution were collected from May 1, 2010, through July 1, 2014. Two senior certified speech pathologists independently evaluated the swallowing function of patients preoperatively and at 2 weeks postoperatively. Their numeric evaluations of the Rosenbeck Penetration-Aspiration Scale and the Swallowing Performance Scale during the FEES were then compared for interrater reliability. RESULTS: Positive agreement between raters was 94% for the preoperative Penetration-Aspiration Scale (prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted κ, 0.77). The postoperative Penetration-Aspiration Scale showed reliability coefficients for κ, Kendall's W, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.34 (fair agreement), 0.70 (extremely strong agreement), and 0.35 (poor agreement), respectively. The preoperative Swallowing Performance Scale showed strong agreement, with a Kendall's W coefficient of 0.68, and fair reliability, with an ICC of 0.40. The postoperative Swallowing Performance Scale indicated extremely strong agreement between raters, with a Kendall's W of 0.82, and good agreement, with an ICC of 0.53. CONCLUSIONS: The FEES test appears to be a reliable assessor of dysphagia in patients undergoing ACDF and may be a useful measure for exploring outcomes in this population.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Deglución/fisiología , Discectomía/normas , Tecnología de Fibra Óptica/normas , Neuroendoscopía/normas , Fusión Vertebral/normas , Estudios de Cohortes , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/normas , Discectomía/métodos , Femenino , Tecnología de Fibra Óptica/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neuroendoscopía/métodos , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Reoperación/métodos , Reoperación/normas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Fusión Vertebral/métodosRESUMEN
The objective of the study was to establish how patient satisfaction with surgical treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) has been previously measured, determine whether an ideal patient satisfaction instrument exists, and to define the dimensions of care that determine patient satisfaction with the surgical treatment of PD. A systematic search of four online databases, unpublished sources, and citations was undertaken to identify 15 studies reporting patient satisfaction with the surgical treatment of PD. Manuscripts were reviewed and instruments were categorized by content and method axes. One study was found to utilize two distinct patient satisfaction instruments, which brought the total number of satisfaction instruments assessed to 16. Major factors influencing patient satisfaction were identified and served as a structure to define the dimensions of patient satisfaction in the surgical treatment of PD. Studies used predominantly multidimensional (10/16), rather than global (6/16) satisfaction instruments. Generic (12/16) rather than disease-specific (4/16) instruments were utilized more frequently. Every study reported on satisfaction with outcome and four studies reported on satisfaction with outcome and care. Six dimensions of patient status, outcome and care experience affecting patient satisfaction were identified: motor function, patient-specific health characteristics, programming/long-term care, surgical considerations, device/hardware, and functional independence. At present, no patient satisfaction instrument exists that is disease-specific and covers all dimensions of patient satisfaction in surgery for PD. For quality improvement, such a disease-specific, comprehensive patient satisfaction instrument should be designed, and, if demonstrated to be reliable and valid, widely implemented.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: No widely accepted gold standard for diagnosis of shunt infection exists, with definitions variable among clinicians and publications. This article summarizes the utility of commonly used diagnostic tools and provides a comprehensive review of optimal measures for diagnosis. METHODS: A query of PubMed was performed extracting articles related to shunt infection in children. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed, resulting in 1756 articles related to shunt infection, 49 of which ultimately met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Of the 49 articles included in the analysis, 9 did not define infection, 9 used culture alone, 9 used cultures and/or symptomatology, and 4 used a combination of cultures, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis and symptomatology. The remainder of the studies used definitions from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (n = 2) and the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network (n = 2) or borrowed elements from these definitions. Variation in definition stems from the lack of sensitivity and specificity of commonly used signs, symptoms, and tests. Shunt tap alone is considered half as sensitive as hardware culture. Fever upon presentation was present in 16% to 42% of cases. CSF pleocytosis combined with fever has a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 99%. CSF eosinophilia, lactic acid, serum anti-Staphylococcus epidermidis titer, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein are non-specific and their utility is not well established. CONCLUSIONS: The definition of shunt infection is variable across studies, with CSF culture and/or symptomatology being the most commonly utilized parameters.
Asunto(s)
Derivaciones del Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/efectos adversos , Infecciones/diagnóstico , Infecciones/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Hidrocefalia/cirugía , MasculinoRESUMEN
Case-control (case-control, case-controlled) studies are beginning to appear more frequently in the neurosurgical literature. They can be more robust, if well designed, than the typical case series or even cohort study to determine or refine treatment algorithms. The purpose of this review is to define and explore the differences between case-control studies and other so-called nonexperimental, quasiexperimental, or observational studies in determining preferred treatments for neurosurgical patients.