[A model to predict the recurrence of middle-high risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on preoperative fibrinogen and peripheral blood inflammatory indexes].

Objective: At present, the modified NIH classification commonly used in clinical practice is still insufficient for assessing the risk of postoperative recurrence in some patients with intermediate-high risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Through exploring risk factors for recurrence of intermediate-high risk GIST, this study establishes a predictive model for recurrence with more convenience and more precision in order to guide adjuvant therapy for intermediate-high risk GIST patients. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was carried out. Clinical and pathological data of 432 GIST patients who did not receive preoperative targeted treatment, underwent complete resection in the Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from January 2005 to June 2018, and were diagnosed as intermediate- or high-risk based on modified NIH classification by postopertive pathology, were retrospectively analyzed. Cox regression model was used to idenitify independent risk factors of recurrence, and a recurrence risk scoring model was established. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), consistency index (C-index) and calibration curve were used to evaluate the accuracy of the scoring model in predicting the recurrence of moderate-risk and high-risk GIST patients. Results: Among 432 GIST patients, 332 were diagnosed as high-risk and 100 as moderate-risk; 237 were males and 195 females with average age of (57.4±12.4) years. Of 432 patients, 211 cases (48.8%) had fibrinogen (FIB) >3.5 g/L; 85 cases (19.7%) had platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR)>272.5; 122 cases (28.2%) had neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 4.2; 102 cases (23.6%) had systemic inflammatory reaction index (SIRI)> 2.7; 198 cases (45.8%) had tumor long diameter >8 cm and 108 cases (25.0%) had mitotic counts > 8/50 HPF. Cox multivariable analysis showed that FIB (HR=1.789, 95% CI: 1.058-3.027, P=0.030), PLR (HR=1.862, 95% CI: 1.067-3.249, P=0.029), SIRI (HR=1.790, 95% CI: 1.039-3.084, P=0.036), tumor long diameter (HR=1.970, 95% CI: 1.105-2.925, P=0.017) and mitotic counts (HR=2.187, 95% CI:1.211-3.950, P=0.009) were independent risk factors for recurrence in patients with middle-risk and high-risk GIST. These 5 factors were included in the risk scoring model, which was given a weight score of 58 points, 62 points, 58 points, 63 points, and 78 points, respectively. Patients with a total score of ≤ 78 points were classified as moderate-risk recurrence (group I), those of 78 to 136 points as high-risk recurrence (group II) and those of >136 points as very high-risk recurrence (group III). ROC curve showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of the scoring model was 0.730 and the C-index was 0.724 (95% CI:0.687-0.787). The calibration curves and the Kaplan-Meier curves of patients in the three groups revealed that this model had a good predictive accuracy. Conclusions: For intermediate-risk and high-risk GIST patients, the preoperative FIB >3.5 g/L, PLR > 272.5 and SIRI > 2.7 are independent risk factors of recurrence after surgery. The recurrence risk scoring model established by combining tumor long diameter, mitotic counts, FIB, PLR and SIRI can effectively predict the risk of postoperative recurrence and metastasis in moderate-risk and high-risk GIST patients.

[Analysis of imatinib trough concentration at steady state in adjuvant therapy of patients with high risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor].

Objective: To explore the features of imatinib mesylate (IM) plasma concentration during adjuvant therapy and clinical factors associated with IM plasma concentration in patients with high risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), and to determine whether IM plasma concentration <1100 µg/L influences the efficacy of adjuvant therapy. Methods: A retrospective case control study method was used. Case inclusion criteria: (1) complete resection of lesion and GIST confirmed by pathology; (2) high risk classified according to modified National Institutes of Health classification system (2008); (3) administration of IM 400 mg/d for at least 1 month; (4) not taking the medication likely affecting IM pharmacokinetic, such as rifampicin, dilantin, and carbamazepine, within 1 month before blood collection. Data of GIST patients who visited GIST Disease - Oriented Outpatient, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology between January 2015 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. After taking IM for 22-26 hours, 5 ml of peripheral venous blood was collected into EDTA anticoagulant tube. IM plasma concentration was detected by using high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Patients were divided into <1100 µg/L group and ≥1100 µg/L group according to plasma concentration. Linear regression was used to analyze the relevance between clinical features and IM plasma concentration. Parameters with normal distribution were analyzed by Pearson correlation coefficient, and parameters with non-normal distribution were analyzed by Spearman correlation. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and COX regression model were used for survival analysis. Results: Among the 85 patients enrolled in the study, 49 patients (57.6%) were male and 36 (42.4%) were female, with mean age of (51.9±11.0) years. The body mass index was (22.5±2.9) kg/m(2) and body surface area was (1.6±0.2) m(2). Thirty patients received gene test, including 23 patients with c-Kit exon 11 mutation, 4 with c-Kit exon 9 mutation, 1 with c-Kit exon 11 and 17 mutation and 2 without c-Kit or PDGFRA gene mutation. The mean IM plasma concentration was (1391.4±631.3) µg/L, and there were 32 patients with plasma concentration <1100 µg/L and 53 patients with plasma concentration ≥1100 µg/L. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in gender, age, body mass index, body surface area, hematological examination (white blood cells, albumin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and serum creatinine), tumor location, tumor size, mitotic counts, duration of adjuvant therapy and methods of operation (all P>0.05). Positive correlation between IM plasma concentration and serum creatinine was observed in linear regression analysis (r=0.297, P=0.007), but there were no correlations between IM plasma concentration and age (r=0.044, P=0.686), body mass index (r=0.066, P=0.547), body surface area (r=-0.010, P=0.924), white blood cells (r=-0.080, P=0.478), albumin (r=-0.065, P=0.563), alanine aminotransferase (r=0.114, P=0.308), aspartate aminotransferase (r=0.170, P=0.127) and duration of adjuvant therapy (ρ=0.060, P=0.586). There was no statistically significant difference in IM plasma concentration between patients with different genders (t=0.336, P=0.738) and patients with different surgical methods (F=0.888, P=0.451). Up to March 1, 2019. the median follow-up time was 30 (range 4-49) months. Tumor recurrence was detected in two patients with plasma concentration <1100 µg/L and two with plasma concentration ≥1100 µg/L. One recurrent patient with plasma concentration <1100 µg/L was detected to harbor c-Kit exon 11 and exon 17 mutations, and the other did not receive gene detection. Two recurrent patients with plasma concentration ≥1100 µg/L were both detected to harbor c-Kit exon 9 mutation. The 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 96.4% in the cohort, 96.2% in patients with plasma concentration <1100 µg/L, and 96.6% in patients with plasma concentration ≥1100 µg/L. No significant difference in relapse-free survival was observed between the two groups (P=0.204). Univariate Cox analysis showed that IM plasma concentration <1100 µg/L was not a risk factor for patients with high risk GIST (HR=0.238, 95% CI: 0.022-2.637, P=0.242). Conclusions: IM plasma concentration of adjuvant therapy in patients with high risk GIST varies with individual. Patients with higher level of serum creatinine are more likely to have a higher plasma concentration. A blood drug concentration standard of less than 1100 µg/L for advanced GIST patients may not influence the prognosis of patients with high risk GIST.

[Laparoscopic versus open surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors in unfavorable location: a propensity score-matching analysis].

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and feasibility of laparoscopic resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in unfavorable location by comparing with open surgery. Methods: Clinicopathological and follow-up data of 176 patients with gastric GIST in unfavorable location admitted at Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology from January 2005 to December 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 94 males and 82 females, aging of (57.4±12.7) years (range: 20-90 years). Of the 176 patients, 64 underwent laparoscopic surgery (laparoscopic group) and 112 underwent open surgery (open group). One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the covariance between laparoscopic group and open surgery group. Before PSM, the differences between the two group in tumor size and modified National Institutes of Health risk classification were significant. After PSM, there were 63 pairs (63 cases in laparoscopic group and 63 cases in open group) and the baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups(P>0.05). The difference of short-term outcome between the two groups were compared using t test, χ(2) test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The survival curve was established by Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-rank test was used to compare the survival of the two groups. Results: The operation time of laparoscopic group was shorter ((141.6±100.6) minutes vs. (100.4±67.7) minutes, t=2.681, P=0.008), the hospitalization cost was higher ((5.2±0.7) ten thousand yuan vs. (4.2±0.8) ten thousand yuan, t=7.357, P=0.000) than open group. The time to first flatus ((49.1±8.2) hours vs. (71.0±4.6) hours, t=-18.482, P=0.000) and preoperative hospital stay ((10.3±6.0) days vs. (14.8±7.6) days, t=-3.717, P=0.000) was shorter in laparoscopic group. With a median follow-up time of 44 months (range: 10 to 154 months), the 1-, 3-, 5-year relapse-free survival rates in the laparoscopic group and open group were 98.3%, 92.1%, 92.1% and 100%, 86.3%, 83.2%, respectively (χ(2)=0.696, P=0.404). The 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival rates in the laparoscopic group and open group were 96.6%, 94.7%, 94.7% and 100%, 91.1%, 81.4%, respectively (χ(2)=0.366, P=0.545). Conclusions: In experienced medical centers, laparoscopic resection is safe and feasible for GIST in unfavorable location. Compared to open surgery, laparoscopic resection achieves a faster postoperative recovery and a similar long-term prognosis.