RESUMEN
The pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis (SSC) fibrosis involves the rapid proliferation of skin fibroblasts, and current anti-fibrotic treatments are limited. This study investigated the relationship between ferroptosis and SSC skin fibroblasts. We observed that erastin-induced ferroptosis was suppressed in SSC fibroblasts. RSL3, a direct inhibitor of Glutathione Peroxidase 4 (GPX4), significantly reduced the viability of the fibroblasts, and upregulation of GPX4 in the SSC fibroblasts contributed to ferroptosis resistance. Furthermore, we demonstrated that transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) was a crucial transporter for iron deposition in the fibroblasts. Collectively, our results highlight that GPX4 inhibition could enhance the sensitivity to ferroptosis by SSC fibroblasts, which showed distinct characteristics of iron metabolism that were not observed in normal fibroblasts in this study. Taken together, these results suggest that targeting ferroptosis could be a therapeutic strategy for the treatment of SSC.
Asunto(s)
Ferroptosis , Fibroblastos , Fosfolípido Hidroperóxido Glutatión Peroxidasa , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Piel , Femenino , Humanos , Antígenos CD/metabolismo , Antígenos CD/genética , Carbolinas , Células Cultivadas , Ferroptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Fibroblastos/patología , Fibroblastos/efectos de los fármacos , Hierro/metabolismo , Fenantridinas/farmacología , Fosfolípido Hidroperóxido Glutatión Peroxidasa/metabolismo , Fosfolípido Hidroperóxido Glutatión Peroxidasa/genética , Piperazinas , Receptores de Transferrina/metabolismo , Receptores de Transferrina/genética , Esclerodermia Sistémica/patología , Esclerodermia Sistémica/metabolismo , Esclerodermia Sistémica/genética , Piel/patología , Piel/metabolismo , Regulación hacia ArribaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In the complex panorama of autoimmune diseases, the characterisation of pivotal contributing autoantibodies that are involved in disease progression remains challenging. This study aimed to employ a global antibody profiling strategy to identify novel antibodies and investigate their association with systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: We implemented this strategy by conducting immunoprecipitation (IP) following on-bead digestion with the sera of patients with SSc or healthy donors, using antigen pools derived from cell lysates. The enriched antigen-antibody complex was proceeded with mass spectrometry (MS)-based quantitative proteomics and over-represented by bioinformatics analysis. The candidate antibodies were then orthogonally validated in two independent groups of patients with SSc. Mice were immunised with the target antigen, which was subsequently evaluated by histological examination and RNA sequencing. RESULTS: The IP-MS analysis, followed by validation in patients with SSc, revealed a significant elevation in anti-PRMT5 antibodies among patients with SSc. These antibodies exhibited robust diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing SSc from healthy controls and other autoimmune conditions, including systemic lupus erythematosus and Sjögren's syndrome, with an area under the curve ranging from 0.900 to 0.988. The elevation of anti-PRMT5 antibodies was verified in a subsequent independent group with SSc using an additional method, microarray. Notably, 31.11% of patients with SSc exhibited seropositivity for anti-PRMT5 antibodies. Furthermore, the titres of anti-PRMT5 antibodies demonstrated a correlation with the progression or regression trajectory in SSc. PRMT5 immunisation displayed significant inflammation and fibrosis in both the skin and lungs of mice. This was concomitant with the upregulation of multiple proinflammatory and profibrotic pathways, thereby underscoring a potentially pivotal role of anti-PRMT5 antibodies in SSc. CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified anti-PRMT5 antibodies as a novel biomarker for SSc.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immunometabolism is involved in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The aim of this study was to repurpose metformin, an anti-diabetic drug that regulates systemic and cellular metabolism, and assess its effects in Chinese patients with SLE without diabetes. METHODS: We did a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in three hospitals in Shanghai, China. We enrolled adult patients with SLE, without diabetes, who had Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) scores no higher than 6; with no A score or no more than one B score on the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) scale at screening; who had had at least one lupus flare; and were treated with prednisone (≥20 mg per day) within the preceding 12 months. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) in blocks of four by a computer algorithm to add metformin tablets (250 mg per tablet with a target dose of 0·5 g three times per day; metformin group) or placebo tablets (placebo group) to their standard therapy, for a maximum of 12 months. Patients, assessment staff, and statisticians were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was a composite index of major or mild-to-moderate disease flares (SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index) at 12 months. The full analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug using the χ2 test. Adverse events were recorded during the 12-month follow-up. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02741960. FINDINGS: Between May 24, 2016, and Dec 13, 2017, 180 patients were screened, of whom 140 (78%) of them were enrolled. 31 (17%) did not meet the inclusion criteria and nine (5%) withdrew informed consent without treatment after randomisation. 67 patients were assigned to the metformin group and 73 to the placebo group. By 12 months of follow-up, there was no significant difference in the incidence of lupus flares, which occurred in 14 (21%) patients in the metformin group versus 25 (34%) in the placebo group (relative risk 0·68, 0·42-1·04, p=0·078). Patients receiving metformin experienced more gastrointestinal adverse events (three [4%] discontinued for this reason vs one [1%] for placebo; overall 26 [39%] vs 11 [15%], p=0·0015), but the incidence of non-flare serious adverse events was similar between groups (one [1%] vs three [4%], p=0·35). The frequency of infection events was significantly lower in patients in the metformin group than in the placebo group (17 [25%] vs 32 [44%], p=0·022). No patients died as a result of treatment. INTERPRETATION: This trial was underpowered to draw a sound conclusion on the efficacy of metformin to reduce disease flares as an add-on treatment to standard care in patients with SLE. Nonetheless, metformin had a favourable safety profile and our data present a basis for larger trials to investigate its potential effect on reducing the frequency of flares for patients with SLE with low-grade disease activity who are at risk of relapse. FUNDING: Shanghai Shenkang Promoting Project and the National Key Research and Development Program of China.