MU variability in CBCT-guided online adaptive radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: CBCT-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy (oART) systems have been made possible by using artificial intelligence and automation to substantially reduce treatment planning time during on-couch adaptive sessions. Evaluating plans generated during an adaptive session presents significant challenges to the clinical team as the planning process gets compressed into a shorter window than offline planning. We identified MU variations up to 30% difference between the adaptive plan and the reference plan in several oART sessions that caused the clinical team to question the accuracy of the oART dose calculation. We investigated the cause of MU variation and the overall accuracy of the dose delivered when MU variations appear unnecessarily large. METHODS: Dosimetric and adaptive plan data from 604 adaptive sessions of 19 patients undergoing CBCT-guided oART were collected. The analysis included total MU per fraction, planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) volumes, changes in PTV-OAR overlap, and DVH curves. Sessions with MU greater than two standard deviations from the mean were reoptimized offline, verified by an independent calculation system, and measured using a detector array. RESULTS: MU variations relative to the reference plan were normally distributed with a mean of -1.0% and a standard deviation of 11.0%. No significant correlation was found between MU variation and anatomic changes. Offline reoptimization did not reliably reproduce either reference or on-couch total MUs, suggesting that stochastic effects within the oART optimizer are likely causing the variations. Independent dose calculation and detector array measurements resulted in acceptable agreement with the planned dose. CONCLUSIONS: MU variations observed between oART plans were not caused by any errors within the oART workflow. Providers should refrain from using MU variability as a way to express their confidence in the treatment planning accuracy. Clinical decisions during on-couch adaptive sessions should rely on validated secondary dose calculations to ensure optimal plan selection.

Case study with dosimetric analysis: Total body irradiation to a patient with a left ventricular assist device.

Key Clinical Message: A patient presented with cardiogenic shock, requiring the implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), and acute myeloblastic leukemia. This necessitated total body irradiation (TBI) while balancing dose reduction to the LVAD components to avoid potential radiation damage. Here we outline our treatment approach and dose estimates to the LVAD. Abstract: This case report discusses the delivery of TBI to a patient with an LVAD. This treatment required radiation-dose determinations and consequential reductions for the heart, LVAD, and an external controller connected to the LVAD. The patient was treated using a traditional 16MV anterior posterior (AP)/posterior anterior (PA) technique at a source-to-surface-distance of 515 cm for 400 cGy in two fractions. A 3 cm thick Cerrobend block was placed on the beam spoiler to reduce dose to the heart and LVAD to 150 cGy. The external controller was placed in a 1 cm thick acrylic box to reduce neutron dose and positioned as far from the treatment fields as achievable. In vivo measurements were made using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) placed inside the box at distances of 2 cm, 8.5 cm, and 14 cm from the field edge, and on the patient along the central axis and centered behind the LVAD block. Further ion chamber measurements were made using a solid water phantom to more accurately estimate the dose delivered to the LVAD. Neutron dose measurements were also conducted. The total estimated dose to the controller ranged from 135.3 cGy to 91.5 cGy. The LVAD block reduced the surface dose to the patient to 271.6 cGy (68.1%). The block transmission factors of the 3 cm Cerrobend block measured in the phantom were 45% at 1 cm depth and decreased asymptotically to around 30% at 3 cm depth. Applying these transmission factors to the in vivo measurements yielded a dose of 120 cGy to the implanted device. The neutron dose the LVAD region is estimated around 0.46 cGy. Physical limitations of the controller made it impossible to completely avoid dose. Shielding is recommended. The block had limited dose reduction to the surface, due to secondary particles, but appropriately reduced the dose at 3 cm and beyond. More research on LVADs dose limits would be beneficial.

A quick guide on implementing and quality assuring 3D printing in radiation oncology.

As three-dimensional (3D) printing becomes increasingly common in radiation oncology, proper implementation, usage, and ongoing quality assurance (QA) are essential. While there have been many reports on various clinical investigations and several review articles, there is a lack of literature on the general considerations of implementing 3D printing in radiation oncology departments, including comprehensive process establishment and proper ongoing QA. This review aims to guide radiation oncology departments in effectively using 3D printing technology for routine clinical applications and future developments. We attempt to provide recommendations on 3D printing equipment, software, workflow, and QA, based on existing literature and our experience. Specifically, we focus on three main applications: patient-specific bolus, high-dose-rate (HDR) surface brachytherapy applicators, and phantoms. Additionally, cost considerations are briefly discussed. This review focuses on point-of-care (POC) printing in house, and briefly touches on outsourcing printing via mail-order services.

Influence of air mapping errors on the dosimetric accuracy of prostate CBCT-guided online adaptive radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: CBCT-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) plans presently utilize daily synthetic CTs (sCT) that are automatically generated using deformable registration algorithms. These algorithms may have poor performance at reproducing variable volumes of gas present during treatment. Therefore, we have analyzed the air mapping error between the daily CBCTs and the corresponding sCT and explored its dosimetric effect on oART plan calculation. METHODS: Abdominopelvic air volume was contoured on both the daily CBCT images and the corresponding synthetic images for 207 online adaptive pelvic treatments. Air mapping errors were tracked over all fractions. For two case studies representing worst case scenarios, dosimetric effects of air mapping errors were corrected in the sCT images using the daily CBCT air contours, then recalculating dose. Dose volume histogram statistics and 3D gamma passing rates were used to compare the original and air-corrected sCT-based dose calculations. RESULTS: All analyzed patients showed observable air pocket contour differences between the sCT and the CBCT images. The largest air volume difference observed in daily CBCT images for a given patient was 276.3 cc, a difference of more than 386% compared to the sCT. For the two case studies, the largest observed change in DVH metrics was a 2.6% reduction in minimum PTV dose, with all other metrics varying by less than 1.5%. 3D gamma passing rates using 1%/1 mm criteria were above 90% when comparing the uncorrected and corrected dose distributions. CONCLUSION: Current CBCT-based oART workflow can lead to inaccuracies in the mapping of abdominopelvic air pockets from daily CBCT to the sCT images used for the optimization and calculation of the adaptive plan. Despite the large observed mapping errors, the dosimetric effects of such differences on the accuracy of the adapted plan dose calculation are unlikely to cause differences greater than 3% for prostate treatments.

MRI of radiation chemistry: First images and investigation of potential mechanisms.

BACKGROUND: Paramagnetic species such as O2 and free radicals can enhance T1 and T2 relaxation times. If the change in relaxation time is sufficiently large, the contrast will be generated in magnetic resonance images. Since radiation is known to be capable of altering the concentration of O2 and free radicals during water radiolysis, it may be possible for radiation to induce MR signal change. PURPOSE: We present the first reported instance of x-ray-induced MR signal changes in water phantoms and investigate potential paramagnetic relaxation enhancement mechanisms associated with radiation chemistry changes in oxygen and free radical concentrations. METHODS: Images of water and 10 mM coumarin phantoms were acquired on a 0.35 T MR-linac before, during, and after a dose delivery of 80 Gy using an inversion-recovery dual-echo sequence with water nullified. Radiation chemistry simulations of these conditions were performed to calculate changes in oxygen and free radical concentrations. Published relaxivity values were then applied to calculate the resulting T1 change, and analytical MR signal equations were used to calculate the associated signal change. RESULTS: Compared to pre-irradiation reference images, water phantom images taken during and after irradiation showed little to no change, while coumarin phantom images showed a small signal loss in the irradiated region with a contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of 1.0-2.5. Radiation chemistry simulations found oxygen depletion of -11 µM in water and -31 µM in coumarin, resulting in a T1 lengthening of 24 ms and 68 ms respectively, and a simulated CNR of 1.0 and 2.8 respectively. This change was consistent with observations in both direction and magnitude. Steady-state superoxide, hydroxyl, hydroperoxyl, and hydrogen radical concentrations were found to contribute less than 1 ms of T1 change. CONCLUSION: Observed radiation-induced MR signal changes were dominated by an oxygen depletion mechanism. Free radicals were concluded to play a minor secondary role under steady-state conditions. Future applications may include in vivo FLASH treatment verification but would require an MR sequence with a better signal-to-noise ratio and higher temporal resolution than the one used in this study.