Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
2.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 21(4): 558-566, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37820835

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether early direct patient notification in addition to an existing multistage recommendation-tracking system (Backstop) increases follow-up completion rates for actionable incidental findings (AIFs). Patient attitudes toward early notification were also assessed. METHODS: This prospective, randomized controlled trial recruited patients with AIFs requiring follow-up being enrolled into the Backstop system. Patients were randomized into four groups: those receiving additional early direct notification in a mailed letter (group 1, similar to Pennsylvania Act 112), by phone (group 2), or in an electronic portal message (group 3) and a control group (group 4) without additional notifications added to the existing Backstop system. Differences in follow-up completion rates among these groups were determined using χ2 tests. Patients were surveyed on binary yes/no and Likert-type scale questions, and descriptive statistics are reported. RESULTS: Data from 2,548 randomized patients were analyzed for the study, including 593 patients notified by letter, 637 notified by phone, 701 notified by portal, and 617 control patients. Group 3 demonstrated the lowest rate of follow-up completion within 1 month of the follow-up due date at 36.4%, compared with 58.7% for group 1, 60.4% for group 2, and 53.2% for group 4 (P < .0001 for all). Group 2 was the only group to have a significantly higher completion rate than group 4 (P = .014). Patients responded positively regarding early notification and preferred electronic portal communication. CONCLUSIONS: Early direct notification had a mixed impact on follow-up completion rates on the basis of communication modality but was positively received by patients and may have health care benefits when implemented within a recommendation-tracking system.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Radiología , Humanos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 20(3): 369-376, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36922112

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The ACR Learning Network was established to test the viability of the learning network model in radiology. In this report, the authors review the learning network concept, introduce the ACR Learning Network and its components, and report progress to date and plans for the future. METHODS: Patterned after institutional programs developed by the principal investigator, the ACR Learning Network was composed of four distinct improvement collaboratives. Initial participating sites were solicited through broad program advertisement. Candidate programs were selected on the basis of assessments of local leadership support, experience with quality improvement initiatives, intraorganizational relationships, and access to data and analytic support. Participation began with completing a 27-week formal quality improvement training and project support program, with local teams reporting weekly progress on a common performance measure. RESULTS: Four improvement collaborative topics were chosen for the initial cohort with the following numbers of participating sites: mammography positioning (6), prostate MR image quality (6), lung cancer screening (6), and follow-up on recommendations for management of incidental findings (4). To date, all sites have remained actively engaged and have progressed in an expected fashion. A detailed report of the results of the improvement phase will be provided in a future publication. CONCLUSIONS: To date, the ACR Learning Network has successfully achieved planned milestones outlined in the program's plan, with preparation under way for the second and third cohorts. By providing a shared platform for improvement training and knowledge sharing, the authors are optimistic that the network may facilitate widespread performance improvement in radiology on a number of topics for years to come.


Asunto(s)
Prácticas Interdisciplinarias , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Aprendizaje , Mamografía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad
4.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 209(5): 970-975, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28742377

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a multistage tracking system could improve communication between health care providers, reducing the risk of delay in diagnosis related to inconsistent communication and tracking of radiology follow-up recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Unconditional recommendations for imaging follow-up of all diagnostic imaging modalities excluding mammography (n = 589) were entered into a database and tracked through a multistage tracking system for 13 months. Tracking interventions were performed for patients for whom completion of recommended follow-up imaging could not be identified 1 month after the recommendation due date. Postintervention compliance with the follow-up recommendation required examination completion or clinical closure (i.e., biopsy, limited life expectancy or death, or subspecialist referral). RESULTS: Baseline radiology information system checks performed 1 month after the recommendation due date revealed timely completion of 43.1% of recommended imaging studies at our institution before intervention. Three separate tracking interventions were studied, showing effectiveness between 29.0% and 57.8%. The multistage tracking system increased the examination completion rate to 70.5% (a 52% increase) and reduced the rate of unknown follow-up compliance and the associated risk of delay in diagnosis to 13.9% (a 74% decrease). Examinations completed after tracking intervention generated revenue of 4.1 times greater than the labor cost. CONCLUSION: Performing sequential radiology recommendation tracking interventions can substantially reduce the rate of unknown follow-up compliance and add value to the health system. Unknown follow-up compliance is a risk factor for delay in diagnosis, a form of preventable medical error commonly identified in malpractice claims involving radiologists and office-based practitioners.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Diagnóstico Tardío/prevención & control , Atención Primaria de Salud , Sistemas de Información Radiológica , Derivación y Consulta , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Humanos , Cooperación del Paciente
5.
J Clin Imaging Sci ; 1: 52, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22184545

RESUMEN

Primary solid neoplasms of the extratesticular tissues are rare. The reported prevalence rate of paratesticular neoplasms is between 3% and 16% of all patients referred for scrotal ultrasonography. A plasmacytoma is a discrete, solitary mass of malignant monoclonal plasma cells that can arise in any part of the body. In this report, we present a case of a paratesticular solid mass detected in an 80-year-old patient that proved to be primary extraosseous plasmacytoma on surgery, and discuss its sonographic features.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...