A urine extracellular vesicle lncRNA classifier for high-grade prostate cancer and increased risk of progression: A multi-center study.

To construct a urine extracellular vesicle long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) classifier that can detect high-grade prostate cancer (PCa) of grade group 2 or greater and estimate the risk of progression during active surveillance, we identify high-grade PCa-specific lncRNAs by combined analyses of cohorts from TAHSY, TCGA, and the GEO database. We develop and validate a 3-lncRNA diagnostic model (Clnc, being made of AC015987.1, CTD-2589M5.4, RP11-363E6.3) that can detect high-grade PCa. Clnc shows higher accuracy than prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3), multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and two risk calculators (Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial [PCPT]-RC 2.0 and European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer [ERSPC]-RC) in the training cohort (n = 350), two independent cohorts (n = 232; n = 251), and TCGA cohort (n = 499). In the prospective active surveillance cohort (n = 182), Clnc at diagnosis remains a powerful independent predictor for overall active surveillance progression. Thus, Clnc is a potential biomarker for high-grade PCa and can also serve as a biomarker for improved selection of candidates for active surveillance.

Plasma extracellular vesicle circRNA signature and resistance to abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop and validate a plasma extracellular vesicle circular RNA (circRNA)-based signature that can predict overall survival (OS) in first-line abiraterone therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. METHODS: In total, 582 mCRPC patients undergoing first-line abiraterone therapy from four institutions were sorted by three phases. In the discovery phase, 30 plasma samples from 30 case-matched patients with or without early progression were obtained to generate circRNA expression profiles using RNA sequencing. In the training phase, differentially expressed circRNAs were examined using digital droplet PCR in a training cohort (n = 203). The circRNA signature was constructed using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression to predict OS. In the validation phase, the prognostic ability of this signature was prospectively validated in two external cohorts (Cohort I, n = 183; Cohort II, n = 166). RESULTS: We developed a five-circRNA signature, based on circCEP112, circFAM13A, circBRWD1, circVPS13C and circMACROD2, which successfully stratified patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. The prognostic ability of this signature was prospectively validated in two external cohorts (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001). Patients with high-risk scores had shorter OS than patients with low-risk scores. CONCLUSION: This five-circRNA signature is a reliable predictor of OS for mCRPC patients undergoing abiraterone.

CircSCAF8 promotes growth and metastasis of prostate cancer through the circSCAF8-miR-140-3p/miR-335-LIF pathway.

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have been increasingly linked to cancer progression. However, the detailed biological functions of circRNAs in prostate cancer (PCa) remain unclear. Using high-throughput circRNA sequencing, we previously identified 18 urine extracellular vesicle circRNAs that were increased in patients with PCa compared with those with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Spearman correlation analysis of the expression levels of the 18 circRNAs between the tumor tissue and matched urine extracellular vesicles in 30 PCa patients showed that circSCAF8 had the highest R2 (R2 = 0.635, P < 0.001). The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate the effect of circSCAF8 on progression-free survival. The in vitro and in vivo functional experiments were implemented to investigate the effects of circSCAF8 on the phenotype of PCa. We found that the knockdown of circSCAF8 in PCa cells suppressed the proliferation, migration, and invasion ability, while overexpression of circSCAF8 had the opposite effects. Similar results were observed in vivo. In a cohort of 85 patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy, circSCAF8 expression in PCa tissues was a powerful predictor of progression-free survival (HR = 2.14, P = 0.022). Mechanistically, circSCAF8 can function by binding to both miR-140-3p and miR-335 to regulate LIF expression and activate the LIF-STAT3 pathway that leads to the growth and metastasis of PCa. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that circSCAF8 contributes to PCa progression through the circSCAF8-miR-140-3p/miR-335-LIF pathway.

A urine extracellular vesicle circRNA classifier for detection of high-grade prostate cancer in patients with prostate-specific antigen 2-10 ng/mL at initial biopsy.

The aim of this study was to identify a urine extracellular vesicle circular RNA (circRNA) classifier that could detect high-grade prostate cancer (PCa) of Grade Group (GG) 2 or greater. For this purpose, we used RNA sequencing to identify candidate circRNAs from urinary extracellular vesicles from 11 patients with high-grade PCa and 11 case-matched patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Using ddPCR in a training cohort (n = 263), we built a urine extracellular vesicle circRNA classifier (Ccirc, containing circPDLIM5, circSCAF8, circPLXDC2, circSCAMP1, and circCCNT2), which was evaluated in two independent cohorts (n = 497, n = 505). Ccirc showed higher accuracy than two standard of care risk calculators (RCs) (PCPT-RC 2.0 and ERSPC-RC) in both the training cohort and the validation cohorts. In all three cohorts, this novel urine extracellular vesicle circRNA classifier plus RCs was statistically more predictive than RCs alone for predicting ≥ GG2 PCa. This assay, which does not require precollection digital rectal examination nor special handling, is repeatable, noninvasive, and can be easily implemented as part of the basic clinical workflow.

[Efficacy and safety of aranidipine in Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of aranidipine versus retard-released felodipine in Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo and active antihypertensive drug parallel-controlled study. After 2 weeks of placebo run-in period, 315 patients at 6 centers with diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 95 to 109 mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) while systolic blood pressure (SBP) below 180 mm Hg were randomized to receive aranidipine 5-20 mg/d (n = 126) or retard-released felodipine 5-10 mg/d (n = 126) for 12 weeks. Others (n = 63) received placebo for 4 weeks. Their blood pressures were evaluated at baseline and the end of Weeks 4, 8 and 12. RESULTS: After a 12-week treatment, SBP decreased from 148.8 ± 10.7 mm Hg to (132.8 ± 11.2) mm Hg while DBP dropped from ( 98.4 ± 2.8) mm Hg to (83.9 ± 7.5) mm Hg. There were significant differences with the baseline values (P < 0.0001). After a 4-week treatment, the reductions of SBP in aranidipine and retard-released felodipine groups were (12.1 ± 11.0) mm Hg and (12.2 ± 11.2) mm Hg while the reductions of DBP in two groups (11.8 ± 6.9) mm Hg and (12.1 ± 7.9) mm Hg respectively. The reductions of SBP and DBP in two groups were (2.3 ± 8.4) mm Hg and (4.0 ± 5.1) mm Hg and they were significantly superior to that in placebo group (P < 0.0001). But no significant difference existed between aranidipine and retard-released felodipine groups. Also no significant differences were found between these two antihypertensive therapy groups at the end of Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the reduction of blood pressure, total response rate and blood pressure control rate. But 20 mg daily aranidipine was significantly superior to 10 mg daily retard-released felodipine in the control rates of SBP and DBP. Adverse events occurred at 24.22% and 29.92% in aranidipine and retard-released felodipine groups respectively (P = 0.305). CONCLUSION: Administration of aranidipine 5-20 mg/d can effectively control blood pressure and is not inferior to retard-released felodipine 5-10 mg/d. The efficacy of 20 mg/d aranidipine is superior to that of retard-released felodipine 5-10 mg/d. And the effectiveness and safety of aranidipine are similar to those of retard-released felodipine.