Prognosis prediction and risk stratification of breast cancer patients based on a mitochondria-related gene signature.

As the malignancy with the highest global incidence, breast cancer represents a significant threat to women's health. Recent advances have shed light on the importance of mitochondrial function in cancer, particularly in metabolic reprogramming within tumors. Recognizing this, we developed a novel risk signature based on mitochondrial-related genes to improve prognosis prediction and risk stratification in breast cancer patients. In this study, transcriptome data and clinical features of breast cancer samples were extracted from two sources: the TCGA, serving as the training set, and the METABRIC, used as the independent validation set. We developed the signature using LASSO-Cox regression and assessed its prognostic efficacy via ROC curves. Furthermore, the signature was integrated with clinical features to create a Nomogram model, whose accuracy was validated through clinical calibration curves and decision curve analysis. To further elucidate prognostic variations between high and low-risk groups, we conducted functional enrichment and immune infiltration analyses. Additionally, the study encompassed a comparison of mutation landscapes and drug sensitivity, providing a comprehensive understanding of the differing characteristics in these groups. Conclusively, we established a risk signature comprising 8 mitochondrial-related genes-ACSL1, ALDH2, MTHFD2, MRPL13, TP53AIP1, SLC1A1, ME3, and BCL2A1. This signature was identified as an independent risk predictor for breast cancer patient survival, exhibiting a significant high hazard ratio (HR = 3.028, 95%CI 2.038-4.499, P < 0.001). Patients in the low-risk group showed a more favorable prognosis, with enhanced immune infiltration, distinct mutation landscapes, and greater sensitivity to anti-tumor drugs. In contrast, the high-risk group exhibited an adverse trend in these aspects. This risk signature represents a novel and effective prognostic indicator, suggesting valuable insights for patient stratification in breast cancer.

Differences in clinical characteristics and prognosis between breast neuroendocrine carcinoma and breast invasive ductal carcinoma: A multicentre population-based study from China.

AIM: We constructed a multicentre cohort in China to analyse the differences in clinical characteristics, treatment strategies and prognoses between breast neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast. METHODS: All patients with early-stage breast cancer who attended three hospitals in Beijing from 2000 to 2018 were included in the study. We used propensity score matching to make a 1:3 match between NEC and IDC. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 153 patients with IDC and 51 patients with NEC were analysed. Multivariate Cox regression showed that compared to patients with IDC, patients with NEC had a worse disease-free survival (HR = 2.94, 95% CI: 1.69-5.12, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: NEC patients have a worse disease-free survival than IDC patients.

Prognostic factors and adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with HER2-positive T1N0 breast cancer: evidence from a real-world study with long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: The optimal adjuvant systemic treatment and potential prognostic factors for patients with T1N0 HER2-positive breast cancer are still unclear. We conducted a real-world study in this relatively low-risk population to identify the clinical-pathological factors of potential prognostic value and to compare the efficacy of different adjuvant strategies. METHODS: We included patients with HER2-positive T1N0 breast cancer of infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) histology treated at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from April 2010 to April 2017. We performed Cox multivariate analysis to identify the potential prognostic factors for invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). We also compared survival outcomes of (1) patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy alone, or chemotherapy plus trastuzumab, or observation; (2) patients receiving adjuvant anthracycline-based and non-anthracycline regimens, both combined with trastuzumab. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) propensity score was used to reduce selection bias. RESULTS: Overall, 692 consecutive patients were included, with a median follow-up of 78.0 months for IDFS. Age ≤ 40, T1c, ER + PR + , and adjuvant trastuzumab were identified as independent prognostic factors. For adjuvant treatment, compared with observation and chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy plus trastuzumab could significantly benefit patients (HR = 2.70, P = 0.034; HR = 3.95, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, compared with observation, chemotherapy alone did not significantly benefit patients (HR = 1.37, P = 0.424). For the comparison of anthracycline-based versus non-anthracycline regimens when combined with trastuzumab, patients in both groups had similar IDFS (HR = 1.74, P = 0.242). CONCLUSIONS: HER2-positive T1N0 IDC patients could benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab. Age ≤ 40, T1c, ER + PR + , and adjuvant trastuzumab are independent prognostic factors for this population.

Prognostic factors of primary neuroendocrine breast cancer: A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Primary neuroendocrine breast carcinomas (NEBCs) are an extremely rare and underrecognized subtype of mammalian carcinoma. The prognostic factors for NEBCs remain controversial. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, the prognostic factors for patients with primary NEBCs who underwent surgery and had a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of neuroendocrine carcinoma in China and the United States were examined. The endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 51 Chinese patients and 98 US patients were included. In the Chinese cohort, tumor grade and Ki-67 levels were prognostic factors for DFS in univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.11 [1.67-15.60], p = 0.004; HR = 57.70 [6.36-523.40], p < 0.001, respectively) and multivariate analysis (HR = 100.52 [1.33-7570.21], p = 0.037; HR = 31.47 [1.05-945.82], p = 0.047, respectively). In the US cohort, age was an important prognostic factor for OS in univariate analysis (HR = 1.09 [1.04-1.15], p = 0.001). The random effects model for the combined cohorts revealed age and positive expression of estrogen receptor (ER) as potential prognostic factors for OS (HR = 1.08 [1.01-1.14], p = 0.015; HR = 0.10 [0.02-0.44], p = 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor grade and Ki-67 levels are important prognostic factors for DFS of patients with primary NEBCs. Age and ER status are important prognostic factors for OS of patients with primary NEBCs.

Miliarial gout: Clinical case and a brief review.

Miliarial gout is a rare clinical variant of chronic tophaceous gout characterised by tiny milia-like papules containing chalky tophaceous material. In this report, we present a case of miliarial gout in a patient with known history of gouty arthritis and review the reported cases of miliarial gout in the literature to discuss its characteristics, diagnosis and treatment.

Evaluation of a beneficial effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage I triple-negative breast cancer: a population-based study using the SEER 18 database.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on improving the prognosis of patients with stage I triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: TNBC patients diagnosed in the SEER 18 database from 2010 to 2015 were included. Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests were used to compare the differences in breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) between subgroups of variables. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the prognostic factors affecting BCSS and OS. RESULTS: A total of 9256 patients were enrolled in this study. Among these patients, 380 died from breast cancer, and 703 died from all causes. Patients who received chemotherapy had significantly better BCSS and OS than those who did not receive chemotherapy for stage T1cN0M0 (BCSS, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-0.90; OS, HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.44-0.67) and stage IB (BCSS, HR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.95; OS, HR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.19-0.87) disease. Patients who received chemotherapy did not have significantly better BCSS or OS than those who did not receive chemotherapy for stage T1aN0M0 or T1bN0M0 disease. The patients who received chemotherapy in the poorly differentiated and undifferentiated groups had better BCSS (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.88) and OS (HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.44-0.66) than the patients who did not receive chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: According to current clinical guidelines, patients with stage T1bN0M0 TNBC are probably overtreated. The prognosis of these patients with stage T1aN0M0 or T1bN0M0 disease is good enough that adjuvant chemotherapy cannot improve it further.

Screening-based and Risk-based Strategy for the Prevention of Early-onset Group B Streptococcus/Non-group B Streptococcus Sepsis in the Neonate: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Screening-based and risk-based strategies are the 2 strategies for preventing group B streptococcus (GBS) diseases in neonates. We aimed to compare the effects of these 2 strategies in reducing the incidence of early-onset GBS sepsis (GBS-EOS) and their effects on the incidence of non-GBS sepsis. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for the period from January 1, 1996, to December 31, 2018. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that compared the effects of risk-based and screening-based strategies were eligible for the meta-analysis. The I statistic was used for assessing the statistical heterogeneity across studies. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random effects model. RESULTS: There were 18 cohort studies comparing the incidence of GBS-EOS between the 2 strategies, involving a total of 604,869 newborns and 791 GBS-EOS cases. The heterogeneity across studies was moderate (I = 45%), and the pooled analysis yielded a 55% decreased risk of GBS-EOS for screening-based versus risk-based strategy (RR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.34-0.59). For total early onset non-GBS sepsis (non-GBS-EOS), 7 studies with low heterogeneity (I = 18%) had a pooled RR of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.74-1.11), whereas for ampicillin resistant Escherichia coli-EOS, a subgroup of non-GBS-EOS, 3 studies with very low heterogeneity (I = 0%) had a pooled RR of 1.28 (95% CI: 0.74-2.21) for screening-based strategy compared with risk-based strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with risk-based strategy, screening-based prophylaxis was associated with a reduced risk of GBS-EOS.

A rare case of acral persistent papular mucinosis.

In patients with asymptomatic papules of hands and feet, a clinical differential of acral persistent papular mucinosis should be thought of.

Should we biopsy melanonychia striata in Asian children? A retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Melanonychia striata is common in children of darker-skinned Asian races, while subungual melanoma is extremely rare and it is difficult to make a diagnosis clinically. However, performing nail unit biopsies in children is particularly challenging and can result in permanent nail dystrophy. The aim of this study was to review the clinical and histologic characteristics of melanonychia striata in pediatric patients of Asian descent to aid in the clinical decision regarding nail biopsy. METHODS: Sixty-two pediatric patients presenting with melanonychia striata involving single or multiple nails at two tertiary pediatric dermatology clinics in Singapore between 2005 and 2015 were reviewed. Clinical and histopathological data were analyzed, including age at onset, age at presentation, location, color, width, presence of Hutchinson's sign, pseudo-Hutchinson's sign, nail dystrophy, length of follow-up, and clinical evolution. Histopathological assessment was performed by three senior dermatopathologists independently for cases that underwent a nail biopsy. RESULTS: No cases of subungual melanoma were detected in our series. Solitary melanonychia of the thumbnail with a single uniform color was the most common presentation. Pseudo-Hutchinson's sign was commonly observed. Consensus in histological diagnosis emerged amongst all three dermatopathologists in only half of the cases biopsied. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of melanoma in Asian children presenting with melanonychia is extremely rare. We recommend clinical follow-up and anticipatory guidance for these patients and nail unit biopsy only in the presence of high-risk clinical features.