HHLA2 predicts improved prognosis of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in patients with melanoma.

Background: As a recognized highly immunogenic tumor, immune checkpoint blockades (ICB) have been widely used as a systemic treatment option for melanoma. However, only about half of treated patients could benefit from it in Caucasians, and only about 15% in Chinese melanoma patients. Robust predictive biomarkers are needed. HHLA2, a new-found member of B7 family, is generally expressed in kinds of tumors, such as melanoma. This study focuses on illustrating the prognostic value of HHLA2 in melanoma immunotherapy and its association with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Methods: HHLA2 expression in pan-cancer and the association with prognosis and immune microenvironment were identified by analyzing gene expression profiles from TCGA database with selected bioinformatics tools and methods. Tumor tissues from 81 cases with advanced and unresectable melanoma were collected for detecting HHLA2 and CD8 levels by immunohistochemistry. Results: HHLA2 was found to be ubiquitously expressed in pan-cancer with high level and correlate with the prognosis of patients. Further comprehensive analysis from TCGA database demonstrated that the highly expressed HHLA2 was remarkably correlated with better prognosis, high infiltration status of various immune-active cells and immune activated pathways in skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM). Moreover, immunohistochemistry (IHC) analyses of FFPE tissue from melanoma patients revealed that HHLA2 high expression was strongly related to improved response to ICB and indicated a longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Besides, HHLA2 expression was found to have a positive association with the density of CD8+ TILs. Conclusion: Our findings revealed that high expression of HHLA2 has important values in predicting the response to ICB and indicating improved PFS and OS in patients with advanced and unresectable melanoma, suggesting that HHLA2 may serve as a costimulatory ligand in melanoma, which renders it as an ideal biomarker for immunotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 inhibitor combined with nab-paclitaxel in Chinese patients with refractory melanoma.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the combined effect of anti-PD-1 inhibitor and nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel for refractory melanoma among Chinese patients. METHODS: Data from January 2018 to March 2021 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Sixty-four patients were eligible for analysis from a single Chinese cancer center. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 16.0 months at data cutoff. The objective response rate (ORR) was 29.7%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 67.2% in all patients. Treatment-naïve patients had significantly higher ORR than pretreated patients (42.9% vs 13.8%, p = 0.011). Cutaneous melanoma patients with NRAS gene mutation benefited more than non-mutated patients (DCR of 100% vs. 54.5%) (p = 0.030). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of all patients was 5.2 months and the duration of response was 10.8 months. Median duration of disease control was 7.7 months. Prior treatment-naïve patients had significantly longer PFS than those who accepted prior treatments (7.2 vs. 5.1 months, p = 0.024). Patients with abnormally high LDH level had shorter mPFS (3.6 months vs. 6.6 months, p = 0.020). Median overall survival was not reached in this study. Most patients experienced adverse events (AEs), but only 17.2% of patients experienced grade 3 severe AEs. The most common AEs were alopecia (89.1%), neutropenia (18.8%), pruritus (15.6%), and arthralgia (14.1%). Some patients had immune related AEs (irAEs). No grade 4 or 5 AEs were observed. Patients with ≥ 3 AEs or with irAEs had longer mPFS (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Nab-paclitaxel combined with PD-1 antibody is a well-tolerated and effective regimen for Chinese patients with refractory melanoma.

Safety and Tolerability of BRAF Inhibitor and BRAF Inhibitor-Based Combination Therapy in Chinese Patients With Advanced Melanoma: A Real World Study.

The toxicity spectrum between Chinese and Caucasian patients with melanoma who were treated with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) may differ. The purpose of the present study was to assess the safety and tolerability of BRAFi and BRAFi-based combination therapies [MEK inhibitors (MEKi) or anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody] in Chinese patients with BRAF V600E/K mutation-positive metastatic melanoma. We also investigated whether treatment-related adverse events (AEs) correlated with the prognosis. This retrospective study collected data from 43 patients with BRAF V600E/K mutation-positive metastatic melanoma from a single Chinese cancer center. Of the 43 patients, 12 patients received BRAFi monotherapy, 12 patients received BRAFi+MEKi, and 19 patients received BRAFi combined with the anti-PD-1 antibody. The median follow-up time was 19 months. In the BRAFi group, the most common AEs were rashes, palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia, and arthralgia. Four out of 12 (30%) patients experienced grade 3-4 treatment-related AEs. All grades of AEs in the BRAFi+MEKi group were similar to the BRAFi group, except for higher pyrexia (58.3%) and fewer cutaneous AEs. Three out of 12 (25%) patients experienced grade 3-4 AEs, especially pyrexia (16.7%). In the BRAFi+anti-PD-1 antibody group, AEs were similar to the BRAFi group, except for an increased aminotransferase level (36.8%), increased bilirubin (31.6%), and hypothyroidism (15.8%). Eleven out of 19 (57.9%) patients experienced grade 3-4 AEs and four out of 19 (21%) patients discontinued the therapy due to AEs. Treatment-related hepatotoxicity (trHE), defined as an increase in either alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), or bilirubin levels, was the only AE identified as a significant poor-prognosis indicator in this study. The median progression-free survival of patients with trHE (41.9%) was 8 months, whereas it was 18 months for those without trHE [p = 0.046, hazard ratio (HR) = 2.116]. Moreover, this association was independent of medication regimens (p = 0.014, HR = 2.971). The overall response rate of patients with trHE was significantly lower than those without trHE (44.4 vs. 60.0%, p = 0.024), and we observed a similar trend in patients treated with BRAFi, BRAFi+MEKi, and BRAFi+anti-PD-1 antibody. In conclusion, BRAFi and BRAFi-based combination therapies were tolerable with reversible AEs in Chinese patients with melanoma. The trHE in patients receiving BRAFi and BRAFi-based regimens might indicate a poor therapy-related prognosis.