RESUMEN
Significance: Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are the most common venous disease, mainly presenting as open skin lesions on the legs or feet and are an important concern in clinical care settings. Recent Advances: Comprehensive tactics were employed to search electronic databases PubMed, Embase, guideline databases, and society websites were searched for Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) on VLU care. The basic information, recommendations for the VLUs, methodological quality, and reporting quality of VLU's CPGs were extracted and captured in Excel. The quality of each CPG was independently assessed by four researchers using AGREE II instrument and the RIGHT checklist. Critical Issues: This study included 19 CPGs with a combined 23 recommendations. The assessment of VLUs was summarized based on the recommendations of VLUs in 11 major items; six on VLU's diagnosis and six on therapeutic strategies of VLUs. The identified CPGs were of mixed quality, and the highest score based on the scope and purpose was 82.85 ± 11.66, whereas the lowest mean score based on the editorial independence by AGREE II was 59.93 ± 21.50. Regarding the RIGHT checklist, field one (basic information) had the highest reporting rate (84.33%), whereas field five (review and quality assurance) had the lowest quality of CPGs (41.11%). Future Directions: This evidence map provided new perspectives in the presentation of evidence. In addition, the evidence map collected and evaluated the characteristics of published CPGs. Thus, the evidence map enhances our knowledge and promotes the development of trustworthy CPGs for VLUs.
Asunto(s)
Úlcera Varicosa , Humanos , Úlcera Varicosa/terapia , Pie , Bases de Datos FactualesRESUMEN
CONTEXT: The safety and efficacy of nutritional management for pressure injuries (PIs) have been the subjects of ongoing interest. Some evidence demonstrated that nutrition is essential for skin and tissue viability, supporting tissue repair for healing the pressure injury. OBJECTIVE: This investigation aimed to systematically review clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the nutritional management of PIs and furnish an evidence map to assess research trends and CPG gaps. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and guidelines databases, and society websites were searched for CPGs for the nutritional management of PIs. The basic recommendations for the nutritional management of PIs, method quality, and reporting CPGs quality were identified and imported into Excel. Four researchers independently elucidated each CPG's quality via the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument and the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) checklist. All bubble charts were generated using Excel software. RESULTS: This review included 12 CPGs with a combined 23 recommendations. The nutrition screening and assessment were summarized on the basis of the PI recommendations for 6 major items, 12 items on nutrition management, and 3 on PI education. The assessed CPGs had mixed quality, and the highest score ± standard deviation based on the clarity of presentation was 83.46 ± 7.62, whereas the lowest mean score based on AGREE II applicability was 53.31 ± 16.90. Field 1 (basic information) in the RIGHT checklist had the greatest reporting rate (68.06%), whereas field 5 (review and quality assurance) had the lowest CPGs quality (41.67%). CONCLUSION: This investigation furnishes an evidence map and provides new perspectives on the CPGs for the nutritional management of PIs. However, the CPGs included still need improvement, especially in the applicability and editorial independence domains.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cancer-related fatigue is a widely prevalent global public health concern with serious consequences. Increasing evidence suggests the effectiveness of exercise intervention in treating cancer-related fatigue, but there is a lack of a summary of relevant literature on the same to help reach a clear consensus. OBJECTIVE: To summarize evidence regarding the efficacy of exercise interventions to reduce cancer fatigue, as determined in systematic reviews (SRs) and/or meta-analyses (MAs). METHOD: From inception to September 2022, PubMed (1948-2022), Embase (1974-2022), Cochrane Library (1993-2022), CINAHL (1937-2022), Web of Science (1997-2022), China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database (1999-2022), Wanfang Database (1993-2022), and Chinese Biomedical Database (1994-2022) were searched for inclusion to the study. Two reviewers independently extracted the data from the included articles. AMSTAR II was to evaluate the methodological quality of the reviews. RESULTS: A total of 46 systematic reviews were assessed for data on exercise intervention in reducing cancer-related fatigue among cancer patients. In addition, some studies have reported adverse events during the exercise intervention period. The quality of the included systematic review was found to be low or critically low. CONCLUSIONS: The present systematic review of systematic reviews supports exercise intervention for reducing cancer-related fatigue. Further higher-quality studies are warranted to improve the level of evidence for exercise interventions for application in the treatment of cancer-related fatigue.