Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Radiother Oncol ; 196: 110326, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735536

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The oxygen depletion hypothesis has been proposed as a rationale to explain the observed phenomenon of FLASH-radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) sparing normal tissues while simultaneously maintaining tumor control. In this study we examined the distribution of DNA Damage Response (DDR) markers in irradiated 3D multicellular spheroids to explore the relationship between FLASH-RT protection and radiolytic-oxygen-consumption (ROC) in tissues. METHODS: Studies were performed using a Varian Truebeam linear accelerator delivering 10 MeV electrons with an average dose rate above 50 Gy/s. Irradiations were carried out on 3D spheroids maintained under a range of O2 and temperature conditions to control O2 consumption and create gradients representative of in vivo tissues. RESULTS: Staining for pDNA-PK (Ser2056) produced a linear radiation dose response whereas γH2AX (Ser139) showed saturation with increasing dose. Using the pDNA-PK staining, radiation response was then characterised for FLASH compared to standard-dose-rates as a function of depth into the spheroids. At 4 °C, chosen to minimize the development of metabolic oxygen gradients within the tissues, FLASH protection could be observed at all distances under oxygen conditions of 0.3-1 % O2. Whereas at 37 °C a FLASH-protective effect was limited to the outer cell layers of tissues, an effect only observed at 3 % O2. Modelling of changes in the pDNA-PK-based oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) yielded a tissue ROC g0-value estimate of 0.73 ± 0.25 µM/Gy with a km of 5.4 µM at FLASH dose rates. CONCLUSIONS: DNA damage response markers are sensitive to the effects of transient oxygen depletion during FLASH radiotherapy. Findings support the rationale that well-oxygenated tissues would benefit more from FLASH-dose-rate protection relative to poorly-oxygenated tissues.


Asunto(s)
Daño del ADN , Esferoides Celulares , Daño del ADN/efectos de la radiación , Humanos , Esferoides Celulares/efectos de la radiación , Histonas/metabolismo , Histonas/análisis , Consumo de Oxígeno/efectos de la radiación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos
2.
Mol Cancer Ther ; 2024 May 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38781104

RESUMEN

Inhibitors of DNA-PK sensitize cancers to radiotherapy and DNA-damaging chemotherapies, with candidates in clinical trials. However, the degree to which DNA-PK inhibitors also sensitize normal tissues remains poorly characterized. In this study we compare tumor growth control and normal tissue sensitization following DNA-PK inhibitors in combination with radiation and etoposide. FaDu tumor xenografts implanted in mice were treated with 10 - 15Gy irradiation ± 3 - 100 mg/kg AZD7648. A dose-dependent increase in time to tumor volume doubling following AZD7648 was proportional to an increase in toxicity scores of the overlying skin. Similar effects were seen in the intestinal jejunum, tongue and FaDu tumor xenografts of mice assessed for proliferation rates at 3.5 days after treatment with etoposide or 5Gy whole body irradiation ± DNA-PK inhibitors AZD7648 or peposertib (M3814). Additional organs were examined for sensitivity to DNA-PK inhibitor activity in ATM-deficient mice, where DNA-PK activity is indicated by surrogate marker γH2AX. Inhibition was observed in heart, brain, pancreas, thymus, tongue and salivary glands of ATM-deficient mice treated with the DNA-PK inhibitors relative to radiation alone. Similar reductions are also seen in ATM-deficient FaDu tumor xenografts where both pDNA-PK and γH2AX staining could be performed. Conclusions: DNA-PK inhibitor-mediated sensitization to radiation and DNA-damaging chemotherapy is not limited to tumor tissues, but also extends to normal tissues sustaining DNA damage. These data are useful for interpretation of the sensitizing effects of DNA damage repair inhibitors, where a therapeutic index showing greater cell-killing effects on cancer cells is crucial for optimal clinical translation.

3.
DNA Repair (Amst) ; 139: 103689, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749239

RESUMEN

The effectiveness of radiotherapy depends on the sensitivities of 'normal' and cancer cells to the administered radiation dose. Increasing the radiosensitivity of cancers by inhibiting DNA damage repair is a goal of much current research, however success depends on avoiding concomitant sensitization of normal tissues inevitably irradiated during therapy. In this study we investigated the mechanisms of radiosensitization for DNA-PK and PARP inhibitors by examining the impacts on proliferating vs quiescent cell populations. Experiments were performed in BRCA1/2null and wild-type parental cancer models in vitro and in vivo. Overall AZD7648 has greater radiosensitizing activity relative to Olaparib, with BRCA2-deficient models showing the greatest sensitivity. However, DNA-PK inhibitor AZD7648 also produced greater toxicity in all irradiated mice. While both DNA-PK and PARP inhibition sensitizes wild type tumor cells to radiation, in BRCA1/2 deficient cells PARP inhibition by Olaparib had limited radiosensitization capacity. Quiescent cells are more radioresistant than proliferating cells, and these were also effectively sensitized by AZD7648 while Olaparib was unable to increase radiation-induced cell kill, even in BRCA1/2null cells. These findings underscore the distinct mechanisms of radiosensitization for DNA-PK and PARP inhibitors. While DNA-PK inhibitors are able to target both proliferating and non-proliferating tumor cells for greater overall anti-cancer benefit, their application is limited by exacerbation of normal tissue toxicities. Conversely, PARP inhibitors exhibit selective activity for proliferating cells, providing a mechanism for targeting activity to cancers, but due to poor activity in non-proliferating cells they have an overall reduced impact on tumor growth control. This study highlights the importance of creating a therapeutic ratio with DNA damage repair inhibition radiation sensitizing strategies.


Asunto(s)
Proteína BRCA1 , Proteína BRCA2 , Proteína Quinasa Activada por ADN , Ftalazinas , Piperazinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Fármacos Sensibilizantes a Radiaciones , Ftalazinas/farmacología , Piperazinas/farmacología , Fármacos Sensibilizantes a Radiaciones/farmacología , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacología , Animales , Humanos , Proteína BRCA1/metabolismo , Proteína Quinasa Activada por ADN/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteína Quinasa Activada por ADN/metabolismo , Ratones , Línea Celular Tumoral , Femenino , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Tolerancia a Radiación/efectos de los fármacos , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto
4.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 12429, 2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37528151

RESUMEN

Type II topoisomerase (Top2) poisoning therapy is used to treat a broad range of cancers via induction of double strand breaks (DSBs) in cells undergoing replication and transcription. Preventing the repair of DSBs via inhibition of DNA-PK, an inhibitor of non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), increases cell kill with Top2 poisons and has led to the initiation of several clinical trials. To elucidate the cellular mechanisms leading to synergistic activity of dual DNA-PK/Top2 inhibition we looked at their effects in cycling versus non-cycling cells, in 3D spheroids and in xenograft models. Combined DNA-PK/Top2 inhibition was found to not only increase the cell kill in proliferating cells, the cell population that is typically most vulnerable to Top2 poisoning, but also in non-proliferative but transcriptionally active cells. This effect was observed in both cancer and normal tissue models, killing more cells than high concentrations of etoposide alone. The combination treatment delayed tumor growth in mice compared to Top2 poisoning alone, but also led to increased toxicity. These findings demonstrate sensitization of Top2ß-expressing, non-cycling cells to Top2 poisoning by DNA-PK inhibition. Expansion of the target cell population of Top2 poison treatment to include non-proliferating cells via combination with DNA damage repair inhibitors has implications for efficacy and toxicity of these combinations, including for inhibitors of DNA-PK currently in clinical trial.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Unión al ADN , Neoplasias , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/genética , ADN-Topoisomerasas de Tipo II/metabolismo , Roturas del ADN de Doble Cadena , Reparación del ADN , Etopósido/farmacología , Isomerasas/genética , Proteína Quinasa Activada por ADN/genética , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , ADN , Inhibidores de Topoisomerasa II/farmacología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...