Lipid Testing and Statin Dosing After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidelines recommend high-intensity statins for patients after myocardial infarction (MI) rather than treating to a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal, as the previous ATP III (Adult Treatment Panel third report) guidelines had advised. METHODS AND RESULTS: To evaluate the frequency of postdischarge lipid testing and high-intensity statin use among MI patients discharged on a statin during the ATP III guidelines era, we linked ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network) Registry data to Medicare claims for 11 046 MI patients aged ≥65 years who were discharged alive on a statin from 347 hospitals (2007-2009). Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the association between lipid testing and 1-year high-intensity statin use. Only 21% of MI patients were discharged on a high-intensity statin. By 90 days after MI, 44% of patients discharged on a statin underwent lipid testing (43% on low- or moderate-intensity statins and 49% on high-intensity statins; P=0.001). Follow-up lipid testing rates were 47% among patients with in-hospital low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥100 mg/dL and 47% among newly prescribed statin recipients. By 1 year, only 14% of patients were on high-intensity statins. Only 4% of patients discharged on low- or moderate-dose statin were uptitrated to high intensity; postdischarge lipid testing was associated with a slightly higher likelihood of high-intensity statin use by 1 year (5.4% versus 2.9%, adjusted odds ratio: 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.52-2.41). CONCLUSIONS: Previous guidelines recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal-directed statin therapy, but lipid testing and high-intensity statin use were infrequent after MI. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines may promote more intensive cardiovascular risk reduction by eliminating treatment dependence on lipid testing.

A review of sex-specific benefits and risks of antithrombotic therapy in acute coronary syndrome.

Over the past decade, more men than women have shown improved outcomes from antithrombotic therapies after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), which raises the question of whether there are sex-specific differences in treatment patterns and response to therapy. Differences in presenting clinical characteristics, pathophysiologic profile, and disparities in treatment may contribute to this outcomes discrepancy. Analyses of large trials and registry data suggest that male and female ACS patients experience similar benefits from antithrombotic therapy without significant difference in treatment utilization rates, yet women are consistently at higher risk of bleeding than men. Bleeding may result in antithrombotic treatment disruption, which increases the risk of long-term thrombotic events. Additionally, female ACS patients are more likely to receive suboptimal medication dosing and have lower rates of long-term medication adherence. These differences have significant clinical implications for women, indicating the need for strategies that will optimize initial treatment and long-term management attuned to these recognized sex-specific gaps.