Prediction of recurrence risk in early breast cancer using human epidermal growth factor 2 and cyclin A2.

BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) is one of the most important prediction factors, but only 25% - 30% of breast cancer patients HER2 are positive. It is unknown whether there are other molecular markers that could be used to predict prognosis and recurrence in HER2 negative patients. This study investigated correlations of cyclin A2 and HER2 levels with clinical outcomes in 281 patients with invasive breast cancer in order to identify whether cyclin A2 can serve as a prognostic factor in HER2 negative patients. METHODS: Immunohistochemical staining was used to detect cyclin A2 and HER2 expression in 281 patients. Cyclin A2 and HER2 gene amplifications were analyzed using gene analysis and RT-PCR in 12 patients. Risk and survival estimates were analyzed using Log-rank, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analysis; cyclin A2 and HER2 consistency with survival were analyzed using Kappa analysis. RESULTS: Patients with higher cyclin A2 and HER2 expressions had significantly shorter disease-free survival periods (P = 0.047 and P = 0.05, respectively). Kappa analysis performed that cyclin A2 and HER2 showed a low Kappa index (kappa = 0.37), allowing us to conclude that cyclin A2 and HER2 detect different pathologies. Gene analysis and RT-PCR showed that cyclin A2 was upregulated in patients with early relapse; the average increase was 3.69 - 2.74 fold. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclin A2 and HER2 are associated with proliferation and high recurrence, particularly when combined. Cyclin A2 is easily detected by nuclear staining and might be a useful biomarker for recurrence risk in HER2 negative patients.

[Clinical study of aromatase inhibitors in advanced breast cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the antitumor activity and safety of aromatase inhibitors in advanced breast cancer. METHODS: Fifty-two advanced and female breast cancer patients with measurable and /or bone valuable tumor lesions were observed from June 2003 to September 2006. They were treated by aromatase inhibitors for at least 24 weeks, of whom 11 were treated less than 24 weeks because of disease progress; their age range was from 37 to 75 years (median 58); 8 patients were pre-menopausal, 6 with ovarian ablation and 2 with Goserelin to suppress ovarian function. Thirty-six patients were treated with exemestane, 13 with anastrozole and 3 with letrozole. Major items were observed including objective response rate (ORR=CR+PR), clinical benefit rate (CBR=CR+PR+SD>or=24 weeks), time to progress (TTP), time to failure (TTF), safety and toxicity. RESULTS: CR were 6 cases (11.5%) , with 1 case going on for 152 weeks, 1 case for 96 weeks, and other 4 cases for longer than 60 weeks; PR were 19 cases (36.5%), lasting 32-96 weeks; 16 cases obtained SD>or=24 weeks(30.8%); and 11 cases PD (progress of disease)+SD<24 weeks (21.2%). ORR were 48%, CBR 78.8%, and TTP 78.87 weeks (95% CI 61.13%-96.61%); although the patients who did not achieve objective response (group B) were treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy or another kind of aromatase inhibitor, but their survival time was significantly different from that of the patients who achieved objective response (group A) when defined by Kaplan-Meier survival estimate. The over survival was 92% in group A, and 81.5% in group B when patients follow up more than 24 weeks [Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) analysis, chi2=3.85, P=0.047]; side effects were observed such as arthralgia, sweating, hot flash, and 2 patients developed heart failure with uncertain related drug before recovery. CONCLUSION: The single agent effective rate of aromatase inhibitor was 48%. The patients had long term survival if they obtained CR or PR, and the side effects were well tolerated.

[Observation and clinical significance of adjuvant chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea in premenopausal breast cancer patients].

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective analysis of 160 pre-menopausal breast cancer patients was carried out to elucidate the the menstrual outcome in those cases who had undergone adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery, and evaluate the relationship between chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (CIA) and recurrence of the disease. METHODS: 160 pre-menopausal breast cancer patients were collected, 62/159 (39.0%) of them were node positive, 91/158 (57.6%) were ER positive, and 95/155 (61.3%) were PR positive. 111 cases had infiltrative ductal carcinoma, 26 cases had infiltrative lobular carcinoma, and 22 cases with others. In 152 cases data were collected by face-to-face interview and 8 cases by phone conversation. Types and cycles of chemotherapy regimen as well as menstrual abnormalities were recorded before, during, and after chemotherapy completion. Follow up duration was 12-72 months after chemotherapy completion for all patients. RESULTS: 107 (66.9%) developed CIA, 24 cases returned to normal menses (22.4%), 83 cases continued CIA during more than 12-month follow up (77.6%). The rate of CIA increased with age (P < 0.01). During the follow up, disease free survival (DFS) rate was 85.9% in CIA group and 79.2% in non-CIA group, with no statistically significant difference. But in hormonal receptor positive patients, DFS was 80.0% in non-CIA and 90.1% in CIA, respectively (P = 0.04), showing a significant difference. Because of the small number of died cases, no analysis of the overall outcome was carried out. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy causes ovarian function suppression, and may further leading to amenorrhoea. Women who experienced amenorrhoea after chemotherapy had a significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) rate showed by univariate analysis than women who continued normal menstruation. Chemotherapy is insufficient therapy for very young patients who are in high risk with hormone responsive disease, particularly when chemotherapy fails to induce amenorrhea. Further research is needed to evaluate interventional chemotherapy to improve the quality of life in women with early stage breast cancer who experienced ovarian toxicity. The post-chemotherapy menstruation status is a clinically valuable, objective and salient marker for sufficient endocrine effect of chemotherapy in ER/PR-positive premenopausal patients.