Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 160(3): 101-106, febrero 2023. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-215517

RESUMEN

Introducción y objetivos: Existe poca literatura sobre el uso de la mascarilla en la realización de una prueba de esfuerzo (PE) durante la pandemia de COVID-19. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar el impacto del uso de la mascarilla durante la realización de una PE en un grupo de pacientes que han realizado al menos una PE con y sin mascarilla.MétodosEstudio observacional retrospectivo unicéntrico de pacientes sometidos a una PE con tapiz rodante. El criterio de inclusión fue tener más de 16años y haber realizado al menos una PE en época prepandemia (sin mascarilla) y pospandemia (con mascarilla).ResultadosUn total de 1.655 pacientes fueron incluidos en el estudio; 935 (56,5%) eran varones y 720 (43,5%) eran mujeres. La edad media fue de 57,3±14,9 años y el tiempo medio de seguimiento fue de 15,4 meses. El 53% de los pacientes presentaron antecedentes personales de hipertensión arterial; el 20%, dislipemia; el 12%, diabetes mellitus; el 8%, hábito tabáquico; el 19%, cardiopatía isquémica; el 5%, EPOC; el 8%, asma bronquial, y el 8%, fibrilación auricular. En la casi totalidad de las variables estudiadas en la PE, incluida la aparición de arritmias ventriculares, no se evidenciaron diferencias significativas, ni por edad ni por sexo, salvo la existencia de una muy leve disminución en la capacidad de ejercicio con el uso de mascarilla en los pacientes de mayor edad (>65años).ConclusionesEl uso de mascarillas quirúrgicas o FFP2 durante la PE no afectó a la capacidad funcional, a la presión arterial, a la frecuencia cardiaca ni incrementó las arritmias ventriculares. (AU)


Introduction and objective: There is little literature on the use of face masks in a treadmill test (TMT) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of this study is to analyze the impact of face masks during a TMT performed during the prepandemic (without face mask) and postpandemic (with face mask) era.MethodsRetrospective observational unicentric study of patients undergoing TMT. The inclusion criterion were being over 16years old and having performed at least one TMT in the prepandemic and postpandemic period.ResultsOne thousand six hundred fifty-five patients were included in the study. Nine hundred thirty-five (56.5%) were men and 720 (43.5%) women. The mean age was 57.3±14.9 and the mean follow-up time was 15.4 months. Fifty-three percent patients had arterial hypertension, 20% dyslipidemia, 12% diabetes mellitus, 8% smoking habit, 19% personal history of ischemic heart disease, 5% COPD, 8% bronchial asthma, and 8% atrial fibrillation. In almost all the variables studied in PE, including the appearance of ventricular arrhythmias, no significant differences were found, neither by age nor sex, except for the existence of a very slight decrease in exercise capacity with mask use in older patients (>65years).ConclusionsThe use of surgical or FFP2 face masks during the TMT did not affect functional capacity, blood pressure, heart rate, or increased ventricular arrhythmias. (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Coronavirus Relacionado al Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Severo , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Ejercicio Físico , Máscaras , Pandemias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 160(3): 101-106, 2023 02 10.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35760609

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: There is little literature on the use of face masks in a treadmill test (TMT) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of this study is to analyze the impact of face masks during a TMT performed during the prepandemic (without face mask) and postpandemic (with face mask) era. METHODS: Retrospective observational unicentric study of patients undergoing TMT. The inclusion criterion were being over 16years old and having performed at least one TMT in the prepandemic and postpandemic period. RESULTS: One thousand six hundred fifty-five patients were included in the study. Nine hundred thirty-five (56.5%) were men and 720 (43.5%) women. The mean age was 57.3±14.9 and the mean follow-up time was 15.4 months. Fifty-three percent patients had arterial hypertension, 20% dyslipidemia, 12% diabetes mellitus, 8% smoking habit, 19% personal history of ischemic heart disease, 5% COPD, 8% bronchial asthma, and 8% atrial fibrillation. In almost all the variables studied in PE, including the appearance of ventricular arrhythmias, no significant differences were found, neither by age nor sex, except for the existence of a very slight decrease in exercise capacity with mask use in older patients (>65years). CONCLUSIONS: The use of surgical or FFP2 face masks during the TMT did not affect functional capacity, blood pressure, heart rate, or increased ventricular arrhythmias.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Máscaras , Pandemias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Rev. esp. cardiol. (Ed. impr.) ; 71(3): 185-191, mar. 2018. ilus, tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-172201

RESUMEN

Introducción y objetivos: La taquicardia ventricular polimórfica catecolaminérgica (TVPC) es una enfermedad hereditaria caracterizada por arritmias ventriculares (AV) polimórficas o bidireccionales desencadenadas por estrés físico o emocional en jóvenes con corazón estructuralmente normal. El pilar del tratamiento son los bloqueadores beta y recientemente se ha incorporado la flecainida al arsenal terapéutico. El objetivo de este trabajo es exponer nuestra experiencia con su uso. Métodos: De un total de 174 pacientes pertenecientes a 7 familias afectadas de TVPC con genotipo positivo, se analizó a los que tomaron flecainida. Se valoraron la indicación, los efectos secundarios, la dosificación, los eventos clínicos, las AV y la ventana arrítmica en las pruebas de esfuerzo y las descargas del desfibrilador automático (DAI). Resultados: Recibieron flecainida 18 pacientes (10,4%); 17 en combinación con bloqueadores beta y 1 como tratamiento único por intolerancia al bloqueador beta. Ningún paciente sufrió efectos secundarios. La indicación fue la persistencia de AV complejas en la prueba de esfuerzo en 13 pacientes (72,2%) y descargas frecuentes del DAI en los otros 5 (27,8%). En el 66,7% de la familia 1, la puntuación cuantitativa de AV en la prueba de esfuerzo se redujo más de un 50% (32,76 ± 84,06 frente a 74,38 ± 153,86 lpm; p = 0,018). La ventana arrítmica fue menor (5,8 ± 11,9 frente a 19,69 ± 21,27 lpm; p = 0,007) y 4 de los 5 pacientes con descargas apropiadas del DAI no sufrieron más descargas. Conclusiones: En pacientes con TVPC, la flecainida reduce los eventos clínicos, las AV, la ventana arrítmica y las descargas del DAI y los pacientes la toleran bien (AU)


Introduction and objectives: Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is an inherited disease characterized by polymorphic or bidirectional ventricular arrhythmias (VA) triggered by physical or emotional stress in young people with a structurally normal heart. Beta-blockers are the cornerstone of treatment, while flecainide has recently been incorporated into the therapeutic arsenal. The aim of this study was to report our experience with this drug. Methods: The cohort included 174 genotype-positive CPVT-patients from 7 families. We collected data from patients who were receiving flecainide and analyzed the indications, adverse effects and dosage, clinical events, VA and arrhythmic window during exercise testing, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks during follow-up. Results: Eighteen patients (10.4%) received flecainide; 17 patients in combination with beta-blockers, and 1 patient as monotherapy due to beta-blocker intolerance. None of the patients presented side effects. In 13 patients (72.2%) the indication was the persistence of exercise-induced VA and in 5 patients (27.7%) persistent ICD-shocks, despite on beta-blockers. After flecainide initiation, the exercise-induced VA quantitative score was reduced by more than 50% in 66.7% of the members of family 1 (32.76 ± 84.06 vs 74.38 ± 153.86; P = .018). The arrhythmic window was reduced (5.8 ± 11.9 bpm vs 19.69 ± 21.27 bpm; P = .007), and 4 of 5 patients with appropriate ICD shocks experienced no further shocks in the follow-up. Conclusions: In CPVT-patients flecainide reduces clinical events, exercise-induced VA, the arrhythmic window, and ICD shocks, with good tolerance (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico por imagen , Arritmias Cardíacas/tratamiento farmacológico , Taquicardia Ventricular/complicaciones , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico por imagen , Desfibriladores Implantables , Electrocardiografía , Frecuencia Cardíaca , 28599
4.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) ; 71(3): 185-191, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28789916

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is an inherited disease characterized by polymorphic or bidirectional ventricular arrhythmias (VA) triggered by physical or emotional stress in young people with a structurally normal heart. Beta-blockers are the cornerstone of treatment, while flecainide has recently been incorporated into the therapeutic arsenal. The aim of this study was to report our experience with this drug. METHODS: The cohort included 174 genotype-positive CPVT-patients from 7 families. We collected data from patients who were receiving flecainide and analyzed the indications, adverse effects and dosage, clinical events, VA and arrhythmic window during exercise testing, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks during follow-up. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (10.4%) received flecainide; 17 patients in combination with beta-blockers, and 1 patient as monotherapy due to beta-blocker intolerance. None of the patients presented side effects. In 13 patients (72.2%) the indication was the persistence of exercise-induced VA and in 5 patients (27.7%) persistent ICD-shocks, despite on beta-blockers. After flecainide initiation, the exercise-induced VA quantitative score was reduced by more than 50% in 66.7% of the members of family 1 (32.76 ± 84.06 vs 74.38 ± 153.86; P = .018). The arrhythmic window was reduced (5.8 ± 11.9 bpm vs 19.69 ± 21.27 bpm; P = .007), and 4 of 5 patients with appropriate ICD shocks experienced no further shocks in the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In CPVT-patients flecainide reduces clinical events, exercise-induced VA, the arrhythmic window, and ICD shocks, with good tolerance.


Asunto(s)
Flecainida/uso terapéutico , Mutación , Canal Liberador de Calcio Receptor de Rianodina/genética , Taquicardia Ventricular/genética , Adulto , Antiarrítmicos/administración & dosificación , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiología , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Genotipo , Humanos , Masculino , Canal Liberador de Calcio Receptor de Rianodina/metabolismo , Taquicardia Ventricular/metabolismo , Taquicardia Ventricular/mortalidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...