Evaluation of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Teleconsultation During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To describe which variables were collected by rheumatologists to monitor patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during teleconsultation and identify which ones have more impact on clinician intervention. METHODS: Retrospective monocentric, routine care cross-sectional study including patients with RA seen in teleconsultation between March and September 2020. Available variables assessing disease status were collected in teleconsultation files. Clinician intervention was defined by treatment escalation and/or the need for a rapid face-to-face consultation or day hospitalization. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three patients with RA were included (116 females, mean age of 58 [SD 16] yrs, mean disease duration of 14 [SD 11] yrs). The presence or absence of patient self-reported RA flares was mentioned in all medical files, followed by the presence and/or the number of tender joints (76%), the duration of morning stiffness (66%), the number of pain-related nocturnal awakenings (66%) and the C-reactive protein (CRP) value (54%). Teleconsultation led to a clinician intervention in 22/143 patients (15%), representing 51% of patients with self-reported flares (22/43 patients). Therapeutic escalation was necessary in 13 patients and/or face-to-face consultation or day hospitalization were organized for 10 patients. Multivariate analysis identified RA flares (odds ratio [OR] 15.6, 95% CI 3.37-68.28) and CRP values > 10 mg/L (OR 3.32, 95% CI % 1.12-13.27) as the variables independently associated with clinician intervention. CONCLUSION: Our study identified patient-reported RA flares and increased CRP values as 2 red flags in teleconsultation, independently associated with therapeutic modification and/or the need for a rapid face-to-face consultation. These indicators may help clinicians' decision making in teleconsultation.

Risk of liver fibrosis induced by methotrexate and other rheumatoid arthritis medications according to the Fibrosis-4 Index.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to estimate the amount of scarring in the liver with the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with special interest in methotrexate (MTX) influence. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional monocentric study including successive RA patients recruited for a 12-month period. Data on liver function, disease activity, hepatotoxic and cardiovascular risk factors were systematically collected. The FIB-4 index was calculated according the following formula: (age(years)× AST(U/L)/platelet (PLT) (109/L)×√ALT(U/L)). RESULTS: We included 170 patients with established RA: 141 (83%) were women with a mean age of 59±12 years and mean disease duration of 15±11 years. The FIB-4 was low and not significantly different between patients receiving MTX (n=102), patients previously treated with MTX (n=39) and patients never treated with MTX (n=29). No correlation was observed between FIB-4 values and cumulative MTX dose (r=0.09, p=0.271). No relationship was observed between FIB-4 and MTX treatment duration. The FIB-4 index was found significantly increased in patients receiving leflunomide (n=24), (median (range) 1.58 (0.46-3.16) vs. 1.18 (0.54-3.40), p=0.019) and tocilizumab (n=14), (median (range) 1.82 (0.75-3.73) vs. 1.18 (0.54-3.40), p=0.005) compared to patients not receiving DMARDs (n=29). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed an independent association between increased FIB-4 (>1.45) and male gender, low disease activity, and treatment with leflunomide and tocilizumab. CONCLUSIONS: RA patients with long-term maintenance MTX therapy have low FIB-4 values suggesting that MTX is not associated with an increased risk of advanced liver fibrosis. Increased FIB-4 values have been detected in leflunomide- and tocilizumab-treated patients, which will deserve dedicated further investigations.

Systematic assessment of the humoral response against SARS-CoV-2 in a French cohort of 283 patients with rheumatic diseases.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with rheumatic diseases and to specify the proportion of asymptomatic and symptomatic forms of COVID-19. METHODS: We screened for SARS-CoV-2 infection among spondyloarthritis (SpA, n=143) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA, n=140) patients in our outpatient clinic at Cochin Hospital in Paris between June and August 2020. We performed a qualitative SARS-CoV-2 serological test which detects IgG directed against the N nucleocapsid protein (anti-N) and, for some patients, against the Spike protein (anti-S). Descriptive analyses were managed. RESULTS: During June-August 2020, the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence rate in our population was 2.83% (8/283 patients) without significant difference between RA and SpA patients (2.14% and 3.5%, respectively). We report 11 out of 283 patients (3.8%) with a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among these 11 patients, 1 patient was asymptomatic (9%) with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 by anti-S serology. Of the 283 patients, 85% were under bDMARDs, mainly on rituximab (RTX) (n=44) and infliximab (IFX) (n=136). CONCLUSIONS: The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with rheumatic diseases, mainly under bDMARDs treatments, was 2.83%. Among infected patients, 9% were asymptomatic. Detecting SARS-CoV-2 infections could be based on the strategy using patients' interview and anti-N serology.