Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 150(3): 487-493, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30037492

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Patient reported outcomes (PRO) relating to treatment toxicities have been demonstrated to reliably evaluate adverse events in clinical trials. We assessed the user satisfaction of implementing a focused PRO questionnaire for patients with gynecologic cancers undergoing chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with gynecologic cancers undergoing chemotherapy were prospectively identified after IRB approval from April 2017 to August 2017. We administered a 24-symptom questionnaire, adapted from the validated PRO version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event, to enrolled participants at the beginning of two outpatient visits. Patient and provider satisfaction with use of PRO was assessed afterwards. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were enrolled. Patients were racially diverse: 52% Caucasian, 18% African-American, 9% Asian, and 20% other; 27% were of Hispanic origin. The majority of patients had ovarian cancer (54%), followed by uterine (29%) and cervical cancer (15%). Ninety-five percent of patient and 97% of provider satisfaction survey responses indicated the PRO questionnaire addressed important symptoms. Nearly all patient and provider responses indicated the PRO questionnaire was easy to use. Sixty-nine percent of patient and 97% of provider responses indicated the questionnaire positively impacted clinical care; 85% of patients wished to use a similar questionnaire throughout treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that incorporating a focused patient-reported symptom questionnaire into routine outpatient care of gynecological oncology patients undergoing chemotherapy was met with a high degree of patient and provider satisfaction regarding questionnaire content, feasibility, and perception of care improvement.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/tratamiento farmacológico , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Evaluación de Síntomas
2.
Pediatr Clin North Am ; 60(6): 1393-406, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24237978

RESUMEN

Red blood cell transfusions are increasingly used in the management of various anemias, including thalassemia and sickle cell disease. Because the body lacks physiologic mechanisms for removing excess iron, transfusional iron overload is a common complication in children receiving regular transfusions. Iron chelation is necessary to remove the excess iron that causes injury to the heart, liver, and endocrine organs. Three chelators, deferoxamine, deferasirox, and deferiprone, are currently available in the United States. When choosing a chelator regimen, patients, parents, and providers may consider a variety of factors, including the severity of iron overload, administration schedule, and adverse effect profile.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión de Eritrocitos/efectos adversos , Quelantes del Hierro/uso terapéutico , Sobrecarga de Hierro/diagnóstico , Sobrecarga de Hierro/tratamiento farmacológico , Hierro/sangre , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Quelantes del Hierro/efectos adversos , Sobrecarga de Hierro/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA