Monitoring mosaic biotopes in a marine conservation zone by autonomous underwater vehicle.

The number of marine protected areas (MPAs) has increased dramatically in the last decade and poses a major logistic challenge for conservation practitioners in terms of spatial extent and the multiplicity of habitats and biotopes that now require assessment. Photographic assessment by autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) enables the consistent description of multiple habitats, in our case including mosaics of rock and sediment. As a case study, we used this method to survey the Greater Haig Fras marine conservation zone (Celtic Sea, northeast Atlantic). We distinguished 7 biotopes, detected statistically significant variations in standing stocks, species density, species diversity, and faunal composition, and identified significant indicator species for each habitat. Our results demonstrate that AUV-based photography can produce robust data for ecological research and practical marine conservation. Standardizing to a minimum number of individuals per sampling unit, rather than to a fixed seafloor area, may be a valuable means of defining an ecologically appropriate sampling unit. Although composite sampling represents a change in standard practice, other users should consider the potential benefits of this approach in conservation studies. It is broadly applicable in the marine environment and has been successfully implemented in deep-sea conservation and environmental impact studies. Without a cost-effective method, applicable across habitats, it will be difficult to further a coherent classification of biotopes or to routinely assess their conservation status in the rapidly expanding global extent of MPAs.

Monitoreo de Mosaicos de Biotopos en una Zona Marina de Conservación por medio de un Vehículo Submarino Autónomo Resumen El número de áreas marinas protegidas (AMP) ha incrementado dramáticamente en la última década y ahora presenta un gran reto logístico para quienes practican la conservación en términos de extensión espacial y la multitud de hábitats y biotopos que ahora requieren ser evaluados. La evaluación fotográfica por medio de vehículos submarinos autónomos (VSA) habilita la descripción constante de múltiples hábitats, y en nuestro caso incluso mosaicos de rocas y sedimento. Como estudio de caso usamos este método para censar la zona marina de conservación de Greater Haig Fras (Mar Celta, noreste del Atlántico). En él distinguimos siete biotopos; detectamos variaciones estadísticamente significativas en el stock permanente, la densidad de especies, la diversidad de especies y la composición faunística; e identificamos especies indicadoras significativas para cada hábitat. Nuestros resultados demuestran que la fotografía basada en VSA puede producir datos sólidos para la investigación ecológica y la conservación marina práctica. La estandarización a un número mínimo de individuos por unidad de muestreo, en lugar de a un área fija del fondo marino, puede ser un recurso valioso para definir una unidad de muestreo ecológicamente adecuada. Aunque el muestreo compuesto representa un cambio en la práctica habitual, otros usuarios deberían considerar los beneficios potenciales de esta estrategia en los estudios de conservación. Este método puede aplicarse de manera generalizada en el ambiente marino y ha sido implementado exitosamente en la conservación y en estudios de impacto ambiental en mares profundos. Si no existe un método rentable, aplicable en todos los hábitats, será difícil avanzar hacia una clasificación coherente de los biotopos o hacia una evaluación rutinaria de su estado de conservación en la extensión mundial de rápida expansión de las AMP.

Can the benefits of physical seabed restoration justify the costs? An assessment of a disused aggregate extraction site off the Thames Estuary, UK.

Physical and biological seabed impacts can persist long after the cessation of marine aggregate dredging. Whilst small-scale experimental studies have shown that it may be possible to mitigate such impacts, it is unclear whether the costs of restoration are justified on an industrial scale. Here we explore this question using a case study off the Thames Estuary, UK. By understanding the nature and scale of persistent impacts, we identify possible techniques to restore the physical properties of the seabed, and the costs and the likelihood of success. An analysis of the ecosystem services and goods/benefits produced by the site is used to determine whether intervention is justified. Whilst a comparison of costs and benefits at this site suggests restoration would not be warranted, the analysis is site-specific. We emphasise the need to better define what is, and is not, an acceptable seabed condition post-dredging.

Impact and recovery associated with the deposition of capital dredgings at UK disposal sites: lessons for future licensing and monitoring.

The majority of studies relating to impacts and recovery at dredgings disposal sites have concentrated on areas subject to regular and frequent disposals of maintenance dredgings over relatively long time periods. In comparison less is known regarding the significance of impacts and the recovery processes associated with the disposal of capital dredgings that commonly involves the infrequent deposition of heterogenous material over relatively restricted time periods. Impacts and recovery processes are likely to be different to those associated with the disposal of maintenance dredgings. For example, findings suggest that capital dredgings deposited at both the Roughs Tower and Barrow-in-Furness result in the occurrence of persistent changes to seafloor substrata within the license area and this subsequently effects the composition of associated faunal communities present. Moreover, whilst the two disposal sites are geographically distinct similar species are identified as being particularly sensitive to capital disposal activities in both areas.