OpenHands: An Open-Source Statistical Shape Model of the Finger Bones.

This paper presents statistical shape models of the four fingers of the hand, with an emphasis on anatomic analysis of the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints. A multi-body statistical shape modelling pipeline was implemented on an exemplar training dataset of computed tomography (CT) scans of 10 right hands (5F:5M, 27-37 years, free from disease or injury) imaged at 0.3 mm resolution, segmented, meshed and aligned. Model generated included pose neutralisation to remove joint angle variation during imaging. Repositioning was successful; no joint flexion variation was observed in the resulting model. The first principal component (PC) of morphological variation represented phalanx size in all fingers. Subsequent PCs showed variation in position along the palmar-dorsal axis, and bone breadth: length ratio. Finally, the models were interrogated to provide gross measures of bone lengths and joint spaces. These models have been published for open use to support wider community efforts in hand biomechanical analysis, providing bony anatomy descriptions whilst preserving the security of the underlying imaging data and privacy of the participants. The model describes a small, homogeneous population, and assumptions cannot be made about how it represents individuals outside the training dataset. However, it supplements anthropometric datasets with additional shape information, and may be useful for investigating factors such as joint morphology and design of hand-interfacing devices and products. The model has been shared as an open-source repository ( https://github.com/abel-research/OpenHands ), and we encourage the community to use and contribute to it.

Case Presentation: Functional Assessment of a CASR Variant Identified in a Patient with Hypercalcaemia Confirms Familial Hypocalciuric Hypercalcaemia in the Patient and a Sister Previously Misdiagnosed with Primary Hyperparathyroidism.

Background: Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) and familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia (FHH) are common causes of hypercalcaemia. Patients are mostly asymptomatic in the case of FHH and often so in the case of PHPT. In addition, biochemical parameters show considerable overlap, making differential diagnosis difficult. Genetic screening for inactivating variants in the calcium-sensing receptor (CASR) gene that are causative of FHH assists with the diagnosis since such variants are not generally associated with PHPT. However, novel CASR variants must undergo functional assessment before they can be definitively assigned a causative role in FHH. Case Presentations. We describe a 73-year-old female (patient A) who presented with mild parathyroid hormone (PTH)-dependent hypercalcaemia and a history of osteoporosis. Family history revealed that her sister (patient B) had presented a decade earlier with symptoms of PHPT including a history of mild hypercalcaemia and multiple renal calculi, prompting parathyroid surgery. However, a subtotal parathyroidectomy did not resolve her hypercalcaemia long term. On this basis, genetic screening was performed on patient A. This identified a heterozygous variant in the CASR, NM_000388.4:c.T101C: p.Leu34Pro (L34P). Functional analysis showed that the L34P variant was unable to produce mature, dimerized receptor and did not respond to Ca++ ions. Adopting American College of Medical Genetics-based guidelines, the variant was classified as 'Pathogenic (II)'. Patient B was subsequently found to carry the L34P variant heterozygously, confirming a diagnosis of FHH, not PHPT. Conclusion: This study shows the importance of examining patient's family history in providing clues to the diagnosis in isolated cases of hypercalcaemia. In this case, history of a sister's unsuccessful parathyroidectomy prompted genetic screening in a patient who might otherwise have undergone inappropriate parathyroid surgery. Screening detected an inactivating CASR variant, firming up a diagnosis of FHH. These studies reaffirm the requirement for functionally assessing novel CASR variants prior to assigning causality to FHH.

A novel collagenase from Vibrio Alginolyticus: experimental study for Dupuytren's disease.

OBJECTIVE: Dupuytren contracture (DC) is a highly prevalent hand affection in which contracted fingers compromise hand function. It is a benign fibroproliferative condition affecting the hand palmar fascia with a deposition of excess matrix proteins in the extracellular space of the palmar aponeurosis. In particular type III over type I collagen V. Alginolyticus collagenase (CVA), is a new enzyme that is fully active on the collagen filaments and inactive on other components of the dermal extracellular matrix. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an intra-lesional injection of CVA on an animal model of subcutaneous fibrosis mimicking the pathological anatomy of the cord of Dupuytren's disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an in vivo study on 27 rats that were randomized into four groups, and we evaluated macroscopic and microscopic analysis examining the inflamed cell population and the extracellular matrix. RESULTS: In all cases, no skin necrosis, skin tears or wound dehiscence were recorded, demonstrating the safety of the CVA in contrast to group D which had full-thickness skin necrosis, and this is confirmed by the microscopic analysis of the samples treated with CVA, where no hematomas are found around the fibrotic area with the absence of leukocyte infiltrates and macrophages. CONCLUSIONS: CVA is confirmed to be selective for collagens I and III, reducing the risk of vascular lesions or skin ulcerations.

Randomized Assessment of the Optimal Time Interval Between Programmed Intermittent Epidural Boluses When Combined With the Dural Puncture Epidural Technique for Labor Analgesia.

BACKGROUND: The dural puncture epidural (DPE) and programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) techniques are recent advances in neuraxial labor analgesia. Previous studies have investigated the PIEB optimal interval for effective analgesia when a standard epidural technique is used to initiate labor analgesia. However, it is unknown whether these findings are applicable when DPE is used. METHODS: Patients were randomized into 1 of 5 groups with PIEB intervals of 35, 40, 45, 50, or 55 minutes. Labor analgesia was initiated on request with a DPE technique by epidural injection over 2 minutes of 15 mL of ropivacaine 0.1% with sufentanil 0.5 µg/mL after a dural puncture with a 25-gauge Whitacre needle. Effective analgesia was defined as no additional requirement for a patient-controlled bolus during the first stage of labor. The PIEB interval that was effective in 50% of patients (EI50) and 90% of patients (EI90) was estimated using probit regression. RESULTS: One hundred laboring parturients received the DPE technique of whom 93 proceeded to have analgesia maintained with PIEB using 10 mL boluses of ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.5 µg/mL. Totals of 89.5% (17/19), 84.2% (16/19), 82.4% (14/17), 52.6% (11/19), and 36.8% (7/19) of patients in groups 35, 40, 45, 50, and 55, respectively, received effective PIEB analgesia. The estimated values for EI50 and EI90 were 52.5 (95% CI, 48.4-62.6) minutes and 37.0 (95% CI, 28.4-40.9) minutes, respectively. CONCLUSION: The estimate of the PIEB optimal interval for effective analgesia after the DPE technique was comparable to that reported in previous studies when analgesia was initiated using a conventional epidural technique.

Comparative dose-response study of hyperbaric ropivacaine for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in singleton versus twin pregnancies.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: It is controversial whether local anesthetic dose requirement for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery differs between patients with singleton and patients with multiple gestation pregnancies. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the ED50 and ED90 for hyperbaric ropivacaine used for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in patients with singleton pregnancies versus patients with twin pregnancies. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, comparative dose-finding study. SETTING: Operating room, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. PATIENTS: 100 patients with singleton pregnancies (Group S) and 100 patients with twin pregnancies (Group T) presenting for scheduled cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients in Group S or Group T were randomly allocated to receive 9.5, 11, 12.5, 14 or 15.5 mg of hyperbaric ropivacaine intrathecally. A dose was considered effective when it achieved a bilateral sensory block level at the T6 dermatome or above within 10 min after intrathecal injection, there was no numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score ≥ 3 intraoperatively, and there was no requirement for epidural supplementation at any time during anesthesia and operation. Values for ED50 and ED90 for ropivacaine were determined using probit regression. The difference in ropivacaine dose requirement between patients with singleton pregnancies and patients with twin pregnancies was assessed by calculating relative median potency. MEASUREMENTS: Success rates for different intrathecal doses of ropivacaine, side effects and neonatal outcomes were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: The estimated (95% confidence interval) values for ED50 and ED90 of intrathecal ropivacaine in patients with singleton pregnancies were 11.2 (10.2 to 12.0) mg and 15.7 (14.4 to 18.3) mg, respectively. The values for ED50 and ED90 in patients with twin pregnancies were 10.5 (9.5 to 11.3) mg and 14.8 mg (13.6 to 17.0) mg, respectively. The estimate of relative median potency for ropivacaine between patients with singleton and twin pregnancies was 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.83 to 1.04). CONCLUSION: Patients with singleton and twin pregnancies have similar dose requirement for hyperbaric ropivacaine used for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in the setting of combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia, no opioids, low weight cohort, insertion with the patients in the right lateral position, and norepinephrine boluses.

Norepinephrine or phenylephrine during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: a randomised double-blind pragmatic non-inferiority study of neonatal outcome.

BACKGROUND: Norepinephrine is an effective vasopressor during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery. However, before it can be fully recommended, possible adverse effects on neonatal outcome should be excluded. We aimed to test the hypothesis that umbilical arterial cord pH is at least as good (non-inferior) when norepinephrine is used compared with phenylephrine for treatment of hypotension. METHODS: We enrolled 668 subjects having elective and non-elective Caesarean delivery under spinal or combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia in this randomised, double-blind, two-arm parallel, non-inferiority clinical trial. Arterial blood pressure was maintained using norepinephrine 6 µg ml-1 or phenylephrine 100 µg ml-1 according to the practice of the anaesthetist, either prophylactically or therapeutically, as an infusion or bolus. The primary outcome was umbilical arterial pH with a chosen non-inferiority margin of 0.01 units. RESULTS: Of 664 subjects (531 elective and 133 non-elective) who completed the study, umbilical arterial cord blood was analysed for 351 samples from 332 subjects in the norepinephrine group and 343 samples from 332 subjects in the phenylephrine group. Umbilical arterial pH was non-inferior in the norepinephrine group (mean, 7.289; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.284-7.294) compared with the phenylephrine group (mean, 7.287; 95% CI, 7.281-7.292) (mean difference between groups, 0.002; 95% CI, -0.005 to 0.009; P=0.017). Subgroup analysis confirmed the non-inferiority of norepinephrine for elective cases but was inconclusive for non-elective cases. CONCLUSIONS: Norepinephrine was non-inferior to phenylephrine for neonatal outcome assessed by umbilical arterial pH. These results provide high-quality evidence supporting the fetal safety of norepinephrine in obstetric anaesthesia. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR-IPR-15006235.

Quantifying Soft Tissue Artefacts and Imaging Variability in Motion Capture of the Fingers.

This study assessed the accuracy of marker-based kinematic analysis of the fingers, considering soft tissue artefacts (STA) and marker imaging uncertainty. We collected CT images of the hand from healthy volunteers with fingers in full extension, mid- and full-flexion, including motion capture markers. Bones and markers were segmented and meshed. The bone meshes for each volunteer's scans were aligned using the proximal phalanx to study the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP), and using the middle phalanx to study the distal interphalangeal joint (DIP). The angle changes between positions were extracted. The HAWK protocol was used to calculate PIP and DIP joint flexion angles in each position based on the marker centroids. Finally the marker locations were 'corrected' relative to the underlying bones, and the flexion angles recalculated. Static and dynamic marker imaging uncertainty was evaluated using a wand. A strong positive correlation was observed between marker- and CT-based joint angle changes with 0.980 and 0.892 regression slopes for PIP and DIP, respectively, and Root Mean Squared Errors below 4°. Notably for the PIP joint, correlation was worsened by STA correction. The 95% imaging uncertainty interval was < ± 1° for joints, and < ± 0.25 mm for segment lengths. In summary, the HAWK marker set's accuracy was characterised for finger joint flexion angle changes in a small group of healthy individuals and static poses, and was found to benefit from skin movements during flexion.

A randomised double-blind dose-response study of weight-adjusted infusions of norepinephrine for preventing hypotension during combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery.

BACKGROUND: Norepinephrine infusion has been suggested as an effective method for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery. However, optimal dosing regimens for norepinephrine have not been well established. This study aimed to determine the dose-response characteristics of a weight-adjusted fixed-rate infusion of norepinephrine to prevent hypotension during neuraxial anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomised controlled trial, 80 parturients having elective Caesarean delivery received a prophylactic norepinephrine infusion at 0.025 µg kg-1 min-1 (Group N1), 0.05 µg kg-1 min-1 (Group N2), 0.075 µg kg-1 min-1 (Group N3), or 0.10 µg kg-1 min-1 (Group N4), starting immediately after induction of combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. The primary outcome was non-occurrence of hypotension, defined as a decrease in systolic arterial pressure ≥20% below baseline value or to ≤90 mm Hg, before delivery. Values for 50% effective dose (ED50) and ED90 were calculated using probit regression. RESULTS: The incidence of hypotension was 11/20 (55%), 6/20 (30%), 2/20 (10%), and 1/20 (5%) in Groups N1, N2, N3, and N4, respectively (P<0.0001). The ED50 and ED90 (95% confidence interval) of norepinephrine infusions for preventing hypotension were 0.029 (-0.002 to 0.043) and 0.080 (0.065-0.116) µg kg-1 min-1, respectively. The incidence of reactive hypertension increased with increasing norepinephrine dose (P=0.002). Other adverse effects were similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, an infusion of norepinephrine 0.08 µg kg-1 min-1 was effective for preventing hypotension in 90% of patients. This information should provide a guide for initiating norepinephrine infusions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1900022322 at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn/enindex.aspx).

Dose-Response Study of 4 Weight-Based Phenylephrine Infusion Regimens for Preventing Hypotension During Cesarean Delivery Under Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic IV infusion of phenylephrine has been recommended to prevent hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. However, the optimal infusion dose is unknown. This study aimed to determine the infusion dose of phenylephrine that would be effective in preventing hypotension in 50% (ED50) and 90% (ED90) of patients when administered as a prophylactic infusion at a fixed rate based on the individual body weight. METHODS: Eighty parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were randomly allocated to receive IV infusion of prophylactic phenylephrine at 0.25, 0.375, 0.5, or 0.625 µg/kg/min (n = 20 per group) started immediately after intrathecal injection of 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 5 µg sufentanil using a combined spinal-epidural technique. An effective dose was defined by the occurrence of no hypotension (defined as a decrease in systolic blood pressure by ≥20% below baseline and to <90 mm Hg) during the interval from the initiation of spinal anesthesia to delivery of the infant. Values for ED50 and ED90 of prophylactic phenylephrine were calculated using probit analysis. RESULTS: Hypotension occurred in 13/20, 8/20, 2/20, and 1/20 patients in the groups that received phenylephrine infusion at 0.25, 0.375, 0.5, or 0.625 µg/kg/min, respectively. The calculated values for ED50 and ED90 were 0.31 (95% CI, 0.24-0.36) and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.46-0.76) µg/kg/min, respectively. No difference was found in the incidence of adverse effects and neonatal outcomes among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, when phenylephrine was given as a fixed-rate prophylactic infusion during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery to prevent hypotension, the values for ED50 and ED90 were 0.31 (95% CI, 0.24-0.36) and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.46-0.76) µg/kg/min, respectively.

Vasopressor drugs for the prevention and treatment of hypotension during neuraxial anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of fetal and maternal outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The optimal choice of vasopressor drugs for managing hypotension during neuraxial anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery is unclear. Although phenylephrine was recently recommended as a consensus choice, direct comparison of phenylephrine with vasopressors used in other healthcare settings is largely lacking. Therefore, we assessed this indirectly by collating data from relevant studies in this comprehensive network meta-analysis. Here, we provide the possible rank orders for these vasopressor agents in relation to clinically important fetal and maternal outcomes. METHODS: RCTs were independently searched in MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and clinicaltrials.gov (updated January 31, 2019). The primary outcome assessed was umbilical arterial base excess. Secondary fetal outcomes were umbilical arterial pH and Pco2. Maternal outcomes were incidences of nausea, vomiting, and bradycardia. RESULTS: We included 52 RCTs with a total of 4126 patients. Our Bayesian network meta-analysis showed the likelihood that norepinephrine, metaraminol, and mephentermine had the lowest probability of adversely affecting the fetal acid-base status as assessed by their effect on umbilical arterial base excess (probability rank order: norepinephrine > mephentermine > metaraminol > phenylephrine > ephedrine). This rank order largely held true for umbilical arterial pH and Pco2. With the exception of maternal bradycardia, ephedrine had the highest probability of being the worst agent for all assessed outcomes. Because of the inherent imprecision when collating direct/indirect comparisons, the rank orders suggested are possibilities rather than absolute ranks. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests the possibility that norepinephrine and metaraminol are less likely than phenylephrine to be associated with adverse fetal acid-base status during Caesarean delivery. Our results, therefore, lay the scientific foundation for focused trials to enable direct comparisons between these agents and phenylephrine.

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study of the Effect of Intravenous Ondansetron on the Effective Dose in 50% of Subjects of Prophylactic Phenylephrine Infusions for Preventing Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension During Cesarean Delivery.

BACKGROUND: Ondansetron has been shown to reduce the incidence of hypotension and vasopressor requirement during spinal anesthesia for obstetric and nonobstetric surgery. However, the magnitude of this effect has not been fully quantified. In this parallel-group, randomized, double-blinded study, we determined the effective dose in 50% of subjects (ED50) of a prophylactic phenylephrine infusion for preventing hypotension in patients who received a single dose of intravenous ondansetron 4 mg or saline control before combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. ED50 values obtained were compared to estimate the effect of ondansetron versus placebo on vasopressor requirement. METHODS: Sixty parturients were randomly assigned to receive ondansetron (group O) or saline control (group C) 10 minutes before positioning for induction of spinal anesthesia. A prophylactic phenylephrine infusion was used to prevent hypotension. The first patient in each group received a phenylephrine infusion at the rate of 0.5 µg/kg/min. The infusion rate for each subsequent patient was varied with increments or decrements of 0.05 µg/kg/min based on the response of the previous patient, and the effective dose of the phenylephrine infusion for preventing hypotension in 50% of patients (ED50) was calculated for each group and compared using up-down sequential analysis. Probit regression was applied as a backup and sensitivity analysis was used to compare ED50 values for phenylephrine between groups by comparing calculated relative mean potency. RESULTS: The ED50 (mean [95% confidence interval (CI)]) of the rate of phenylephrine infusion was lower in group O (0.24 µg/kg/min [0.10-0.38 µg/kg/min]) compared with group C (0.32 µg/kg/min [0.14-0.47 µg/kg/min]) (P < .001). The total consumption of phenylephrine (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) until delivery was lower in group O (316.5 ± 25.9 µg) than in group C (387.7 ± 14.7 µg, P = .02). The estimate of relative median potency for phenylephrine for group O versus group C was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.37-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, intravenous ondansetron 4 mg reduced the ED50 of a prophylactic phenylephrine infusion by approximately 26% in patients undergoing cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.

Prophylactic Norepinephrine Infusion for Preventing Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery.

BACKGROUND: The use of norepinephrine for maintaining blood pressure (BP) during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery has been described recently. However, its administration by titrated manually controlled infusion in this context has not been evaluated. METHODS: In a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, 110 healthy women having spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups. In group 1, patients received an infusion of 5 µg/mL norepinephrine that was started at 30 mL/h (2.5 µg/min) immediately after intrathecal injection and then manually adjusted within the range 0-60 mL/h (0-5 µg/min), according to values of systolic BP measured noninvasively at 1-minute intervals until delivery, with the objective of maintaining values near baseline. In group 2, no prophylactic vasopressor was given, and a bolus of 1 mL norepinephrine 5 µg/mL (5 µg) was given whenever systolic BP decreased to <80% of the baseline value. The study protocol was continued until delivery. The primary outcomes of the study were the incidence of hypotension and the overall stability of systolic BP control versus baseline compared using performance error calculations. In addition, the incidence and timing of hypotension were further compared using survival analysis. RESULTS: Three patients were excluded from the analysis. Nine patients (17%) in group 1 had 1 or more episodes of hypotension versus 35 (66%) in group 2 (P < .001). Performance error calculations showed that on average, systolic BP was maintained closer to baseline (P < .001) in group 1. Survival curve analysis showed a significant difference between groups (log-rank test P < .001). Four patients in each group had a recorded heart rate <60 beats/min (P = .98). Despite a much greater rate of administration of norepinephrine in group 1 (median, 61.0 [interquartile range, 47.0-72.5] µg) versus group 2 (5.0 [0-18.1] µg) (P < .001), there was no difference in neonatal outcome as assessed by Apgar scores and umbilical cord blood gas analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients having spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery, a manually titrated infusion of 5 µg/mL of norepinephrine was effective for maintaining BP and decreasing the incidence of hypotension, with no detectable detrimental effect on neonatal outcome. Further investigation of the use of dilute norepinephrine infusions for routine use in obstetric patients is suggested.

Dose-Response Curves for Intrathecal Bupivacaine, Levobupivacaine, and Ropivacaine Given for Labor Analgesia in Nulliparous Women.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine are often given intrathecally for labor analgesia, but limited data are available for their dose-response properties in this context. The objective of this study was to describe the dose-response curves of these local anesthetics when given intrathecally for labor analgesia, to determine values for D50 (dose producing a 50% response) and to compare the calculated values of D50 for levobupivacaine and ropivacaine with those for bupivacaine. METHODS: With ethics approval and written consent, we randomized 270 nulliparous laboring patients requesting neuraxial analgesia at 5-cm cervical dilation or less to receive a single dose of intrathecal local anesthetic without opioid as part of a combined spinal-epidural technique. Patients received either bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, or ropivacaine at a dose of 0.625, 1.0, 1.5, 2.5, 4.0, or 6.25 mg (n = 15 per group). Visual analog scale pain scores were measured for 15 minutes, after which further analgesia and management were at the clinician's discretion. The primary end point was percentage reduction of pain score at 15 minutes. Logistic sigmoidal dose-response curves were fitted to the data using nonlinear regression, and D50 values were calculated for each drug. RESULTS: Data were analyzed from 270 patients. Patient characteristics were similar between groups. The calculated D50 and 95% confidence interval values were as follows: bupivacaine, 1.56 mg (1.25-1.94 mg); ropivacaine, 1.95 mg (1.57-2.43 mg); and levobupivacaine, 2.20 mg (1.76-2.73 mg). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support previous work showing that intrathecal levobupivacaine and ropivacaine are less potent than bupivacaine. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (identifier: ChiCTR-TRC-09000773) and Centre of Clinical Trials Clinical Registry of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (identifier: CUHK_CCT00245).

A Random-allocation Graded Dose-Response Study of Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine for Treating Hypotension during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery.

BACKGROUND: Norepinephrine has been investigated as a potential alterative to phenylephrine for maintaining blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery with the advantage of less depression of maternal heart rate and cardiac output. However, the relative potencies of these two vasopressors have not been fully determined in this context. METHODS: In a random-allocation, graded dose-response study, 180 healthy patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery received a single bolus of norepinephrine in one of six different doses ranging from 4 to 12 µg or phenylephrine in one of six different doses ranging from 60 to 200 µg to treat the first episode of hypotension. The magnitude of response was measured as the percentage of full restoration of systolic blood pressure to the baseline value. Dose-response analysis was performed using nonlinear regression to derive four-parameter logistic dose-response curves, which were compared to determine relative potency. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 180 patients. The estimated ED50 values (dose giving a 50% response) were norepinephrine 10 µg (95% CI, 6 to 17 µg) and phenylephrine 137 µg (95% CI, 79 to 236 µg). The estimated relative potency ratio for the two drugs was 13.1 µg (95% CI, 10.4 to 15.8 µg). CONCLUSIONS: Comparative dose-response analysis was completed for norepinephrine and phenylephrine given as a bolus to treat the first episode of hypotension in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. The estimated dose equivalent to phenylephrine 100 µg was norepinephrine 8 µg (95% CI, 6 to 10 µg). These results may be useful to inform the design of future comparative studies.

Dupuytren's disease: my personal view.

Dupuytren's disease is a heterogenous condition for which a palette of treatment options is required. Randomized control trial evidence is sparse; design challenges, such as validated outcome measures, blinding, equipoise, funding and assessment of recurrence, may limit further data accrual. Recurrence has different significance with different treatments and so rates are not directly comparable. The risk of any treatment is a function of both the chance of a complication and the clinical sequelae of that complication. The patient must be intimately involved in choosing treatment and is often trading rapid recovery for a higher chance of recurrence. Health economies are strained and as custodians of healthcare, surgeons should consider whether many patients even need treatment. To minimize the chance of complex, hazardous and expensive revision surgery, a low threshold for primary skin grafting should be applied, especially for those who are young, have dense disease or vulnerable genes.

Closed-Loop Feedback Computer-Controlled Phenylephrine for Maintenance of Blood Pressure During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial Comparing Automated Boluses Versus Infusion.

BACKGROUND: We previously described the use of closed-loop feedback computer-controlled infusion of phenylephrine for maintaining blood pressure (BP) during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. In this study, we report a modified system in which phenylephrine is delivered by intermittent boluses rather than infusion. We hypothesized that the use of computer-controlled boluses would result in more precise control of BP compared with infusions. METHODS: Two hundred fourteen healthy patients having spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery were randomized to have their systolic BP maintained by phenylephrine administered by computer-controlled continuous infusion or computer-controlled intermittent boluses. From induction of anesthesia until the time of uterine incision, a noninvasive BP monitor was set to cycle at 1-minute intervals. In the infusion group, the infusion rate was automatically adjusted after each BP measurement using a previously described algorithm. In the bolus group, the algorithm was modified so that the mass of drug that would have been delivered over 1 minute was instead injected as a rapid intravenous bolus after each BP measurement. The precision of BP control was assessed using performance error calculations and compared between groups, with the primary outcome defined as median absolute performance error, and the latter being a measure of inaccuracy showing an average of the magnitudes of the differences of measured BP values above or below the target values. RESULTS: The precision of BP control was greater, as shown by smaller values for median absolute performance error, in the bolus group (median 4.38 [quartiles 3.22, 6.25] %) versus the infusion group (5.39 [4.12, 7.04] %, P = .008). In the bolus group, phenylephrine consumption was smaller; this was associated with smaller values for median performance error compared with the continuous infusion group (P < .001), which indicates that values for systolic BP, averaged over time, were slightly lower in the bolus group. There were no differences in cardiac output, nausea or vomiting, or neonatal outcome between groups. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed the hypothesis that BP control was more precise when computer-controlled phenylephrine was delivered using intermittent boluses rather than continuous infusion. However, the difference between groups was small and was not associated with any difference in clinical outcomes. In the infusion group, greater doses of phenylephrine were delivered, which was related to the time taken for the noninvasive BP monitor to complete measurements. The use of intermittent boluses may be a useful alternative in the design of closed-loop vasopressor systems.