Early Clostridioides difficile infection characterizations, risks, and outcomes in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) frequently complicates allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (allo-HCT) and solid organ transplantation (SOT). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed risk factors and outcomes of CDI occurring within 30 days of transplant. RESULTS: Between March 2010 and June 2015, 466 allo-HCT and 1454 SOT were performed. The CDI cumulative incidence (95% CI) was 10% (8-13) and 4% (3-5), following allo-HCT and SOT, respectively (p < .01), occurring at a median (range) 7.5 days (1-30) and 11 (1-30), respectively (p = .18). In multivariate analysis, fluoroquinolones use within 14 days pre-transplantation was a risk factor for CDI following allo-HCT (HR 4.06 [95% CI 1.31-12.63], p = .02), and thoracic organ(s) transplantation was a risk factor for CDI following SOT (HR 3.03 [95% CI 1.31-6.98]) for lung and 3.90 (1.58-9.63) for heart and heart/kidney transplant, p = .02. Compared with no-CDI patients, the length of stay (LOS) was prolonged in both allo-HCT (35 days [19-141] vs. 29 [13-164], p < .01) and SOT with CDI (16.5 [4-101] vs. 7 [0-159], p < .01), though not directly attributed to CDI. In allo-HCT, severe acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) occurred more frequently in patients with CDI (33.3% vs. 15.8% without CDI, p = .01) and most aGVHD (87.5%) followed CDI. Non-relapse mortality or overall survival, not attributed to CDI, were also similar in both allo-HCT and SOT. CONCLUSIONS: Early post-transplant CDI is frequent, associated with fluoroquinolones use in allo-HCT and the transplanted organ in SOT, and is associated with longer LOS in both the groups without difference in survival but with increased aGVHD in allo-HCT.

Triple Aberrant Prostate Cancer (TAPC) - Aggregate role of aberrations in TP53, PTEN and RB1 on ETS gene fusions and prognosis in metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Aberrations in TP53, PTEN and RB1 are key drivers of therapy resistance in prostate cancer. Up to 50% of prostate cancers harbor ETS gene rearrangements, a potentially compounding aggressive biological event. Little is known about the impact of aggregate aberrations and gene fusion events in prostate cancer. METHODS: Using cBioportal for Cancer Genomics, an open-access resource for exploration of multidimensional cancer genomics data, we integrate whole-exome sequencing, gene expression, and histopathology with longitudinal clinical outcomes. Subsets of prostate tumors with aberrations in all three genes TP53, PTEN and RB1 were identified and correlated with prevalence of gene fusions. Prostate tumors with aberrations in TP53, PTEN, and RB1 were termed "triple aberrant prostate cancer" (TAPC). RESULTS: Of 479 metastatic prostate tumors, 195 (40.7%) were TAPC, versus 21 of 594 (3.5%) of primary prostate tumors. Patients with metastatic TAPC showed a trend toward poorer overall survival than patients harboring 0, 1 or 2 of these aberrations. Twenty-five distinct fusions were identified, all involving ETS transcription factors. Both primary and metastatic prostate cancers with ETS fusions were significantly more likely to be TAPC than those without ETS fusions. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a unique molecular signature consisting of combined aberrations in TP53, PTEN and RB1 that is associated with poorer overall survival, as well as increasing prevalence of ETS gene fusions and differential gene expression patterns favoring aggressive disease and tumor progression. Identification of this subset of patients could inform prognostic decisions and provide a rationale for more aggressive or unique therapeutic approaches.

Life-Threatening Hypertriglyceridemia in a Patient on Ruxolitinib and Sirolimus for Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease.

Ruxolitinib is an oral selective Janus-associated kinase 1 (JAK1) and JAK2 inhibitor that was initially approved by the FDA in 2014 for treatment of myelofibrosis. In preclinical and retrospective clinical studies, use of ruxolitinib was shown to reduce graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) in allograft recipients with moderate/severe corticosteroid-dependent or refractory chronic GVHD. While the exact mechanism for action in GVHD is not yet fully understood, prospective studies are ongoing and some patients are receiving ruxolitinib in the setting of steroid refractory GVHD. Although ruxolitinib is generally well tolerated, here we describe a case involving a 50-year-old man with acute myeloid leukemia and chronic GVHD who experienced life-threatening hypertriglyceridemia associated with concomitant use of sirolimus and ruxolitinib for GVHD. This case report highlights the importance of vigilance for severe side effects in novel immunosuppressive drug combinations.

A pilot study evaluating chemotherapy tolerability for breast cancer patients who have received prior treatment and chest radiation for Hodgkin Lymphoma.

MICROABSTRACT: Women treated with chest radiation for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) have significantly higher risk of developing breast cancer, and little is known about how these patients tolerate chemotherapy for breast cancer. This small retrospective study identified 15 patients, noting that these patients tolerate proposed chemotherapy regimens for breast cancer in rates similar to those without prior HL and therapeutic radiation. PURPOSE: Women treated for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) with chest radiation have significantly higher risk of developing breast cancer, and little is known about how these patients tolerate chemotherapy for breast cancer. METHODS: Women with breast cancer diagnosed from 1986-2015 after radiation for HL were identified from hospitals and clinics in St. Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota. Patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, and clinical outcomes were abstracted from medical records and summarized using descriptive statistics. Chemotherapy was defined as tolerated if all scheduled doses and cycles were completed without deviation from the initial plan, with lack of grade 3 or higher toxicity attributable to chemotherapy in categories including blood, cardiac, gastrointestinal, fatigue and pain. RESULTS: Forty-two patients with breast cancer and prior radiation for HL were identified, 15 of which received chemotherapy for breast cancer. We noted 75% tolerability of taxane-based and 100% tolerability of anthracycline-based chemotherapy, suggesting that most patients with prior radiation for HL tolerate chemotherapy for breast cancer. A subset of patients (N = 7) in this study were also treated with chemotherapy for HL prior to breast cancer diagnosis, and 86% (6 of 7) also tolerated chemotherapy for breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of breast cancer is strongly influenced by prior treatment of HL. Although this study was small and did not meet statistical significance, the data suggest that these patients tolerate proposed chemotherapy regimens for breast cancer in rates similar to those without prior HL and therapeutic radiation. Larger studies comparing specific chemotherapy dosing schedules are needed to address this complicated population.

Multiple functions of sushi domain containing 2 (SUSD2) in breast tumorigenesis.

Routinely used therapies are not adequate to treat the heterogeneity of breast cancer, and consequently, more therapeutic targets are desperately needed. To identify novel targets, we generated a breast cancer cDNA library enriched for genes that encode membrane and secreted proteins. From this library we identified SUSD2 (Sushi Domain Containing 2), which encodes an 822-amino acid protein containing a transmembrane domain and functional domains inherent to adhesion molecules. Previous studies describe the mouse homolog, Susd2, but there are no studies on the human gene associated with breast cancer. Immunohistochemical analysis of human breast tissues showed weak or no expression of SUSD2 in normal epithelial cells, with the endothelial lining of vessels staining positive for SUSD2. However, staining was observed in pathologic breast lesions and in lobular and ductal carcinomas. SUSD2 interacts with galectin-1 (Gal-1), a 14-kDa secreted protein that is synthesized by carcinoma cells and promotes tumor immune evasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Interestingly, we found that localization of Gal-1 on the surface of cells is dependent on the presence of SUSD2. Various phenotype assays indicate that SUSD2 increases the invasion of breast cancer cells and contributes to a potential immune evasion mechanism through induction of apoptosis of Jurkat T cells. Using a syngeneic mouse model, we observed accelerated tumor formation and decreased survival in mice with tumors expressing Susd2. We found significantly fewer CD4 tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in mice with tumors expressing Susd2. Together, our findings provide evidence that SUSD2 may represent a promising therapeutic target for breast cancer.

Pathways to personalized medicine for breast and prostate cancers: emerging diagnostic methods and prognostic biomarkers.

Early and personal diagnosis to breast a prostate cancer is crucial for optimizing treatments leading to long-term patient survival. Once cancer metastasizes from the breast or prostate to other tissues of the body, therapies are limited, and there is no cure for the diseases. Currently used screening modalities for breast and prostate cancers have limitations. Routine screening for breast cancer includes clinical breast exams and mammograms. Improvements in imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance, ultrasound, digital breast tomosynthesis and ductography are being explored as adjuncts to mammography. A new approach to breast cancer screening involves the detection of abnormalities at the cellular level and uses various means to collect cellular material from the ductal system, including nipple aspirate fluid, breast ductal lavage, fiberoptic ductoscopy and random periareolar fine needle aspiration. Current screening methods for prostate cancer include digital rectal exam and serum PSA levels. However, these methods offer low sensitivity and specificity and do not allow differentiation between significant- and minimal-risk cancers. New approaches to prostate cancer screening involve different calculations using PSA, as well as molecular urine tests. With the recent advances in microarray technologies and whole-genome sequencing of tumors, the identification of specific biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis, as well as new therapeutic targets, is quickly paving the way for personalized medicine. In the future, routine patient care will include using the molecular signature of a patient's disease to guide treatment.