Discharge Opioid Prescription and Consumption Following Surgery: The POPCORN Observational Study.

Background: Few studies have evaluated opioid consumption after various inpatient surgical procedures. Objectives: To describe opioid prescription patterns and to characterize patient-reported use of opioids after surgery. Methods: This single-centre prospective observational study was conducted between February and October 2021 at the Jewish General Hospital in Montréal, Quebec. Patients 18 years of age or older who underwent a surgical procedure, were hospitalized for 24 hours or longer after the procedure, and had an opioid prescription at the time of discharge were included. Data were collected for the quantity of opioids prescribed, as documented in hospital records, and the quantity consumed, as reported by participants. Various potential predictors of opioid consumption were explored, and data were also collected on patients' use of non-opioid coanalgesia, scores on the Numeric Rating Scale for pain, opioid renewal requests, and proper opioid disposal during the 30-day follow-up period. Results: A total of 150 participants completed the study. The median dose prescribed was 10 opioid pills (75.0 morphine milligram equivalents). By the end of the follow-up period, a median of 1 pill (7.5 morphine milligram equivalents) had been consumed from the total amount in the discharge prescription. Overall, 66 participants (44.0%) did not consume any of the opioids prescribed at discharge. Of the total number of pills prescribed, 58.2% (1193/2050) were unused, and 7.0% (5/71) of participants with unused pills disposed of them properly. Conclusions: Following discharge from hospital, postoperative patients consumed a median proportion of only 10% of prescribed opioid pills. More than half of all prescribed pills were unused. Protocols implementing specific prescribing strategies warrant further investigation to evaluate their potential impact on opioid prescription and consumption.

Contexte: Peu d'études ont évalué la consommation d'opioïdes après diverses interventions chirurgicales en milieu hospitalier. Objectifs: Décrire les schémas de prescription d'opioïdes et caractériser leur utilisation déclarée par les patients après une intervention chirurgicale. Méthodologie: Cette étude observationnelle prospective monocentrique a été menée entre février et octobre 2021 à l'Hôpital général juif de Montréal, au Québec. Les patients d'au moins 18 ans ayant subi une intervention chirurgicale, ayant été hospitalisés pendant au moins 24 heures après l'intervention et qui avaient une prescription d'opioïdes au moment de leur congé ont été inclus dans l'étude. Des données ont été recueillies sur la quantité d'opioïdes prescrite, telle que documentée dans les dossiers de l'hôpital, et sur la quantité consommée, telle que déclarée par les participants. Divers prédicteurs potentiels de la consommation d'opioïdes ont été étudiés et des données ont aussi été recueillies, sur une période de suivi de 30 jours, sur l'utilisation de coanalgésie non opioïde par les patients, leurs scores sur l'échelle d'évaluation numérique de la douleur, les demandes de renouvellement d'opioïdes et l'élimination appropriée de ces dernières. Résultats: Au total, 150 participants ont complété l'étude. La dose médiane prescrite était de 10 comprimés d'opioïdes (75,0 équivalents en milligrammes de morphine). À la fin de la période de suivi, une moyenne de 1 comprimé (7,5 équivalents en milligrammes de morphine) avait été consommée sur la quantité totale indiquée dans l'ordonnance remise au moment du congé. Dans l'ensemble, 66 participants (44,0 %) n'ont consommé aucun des opioïdes prescrits au moment du congé. Sur le nombre total de comprimés prescrits, 58,2 % (1193/2050) n'ont pas été utilisés et 7,0 % (5/71) des participants ayant des comprimés inutilisés s'en sont débarrassés correctement. Conclusions: Suite au congé de l'hôpital, les patients postopératoires ne consommaient qu'une proportion médiane de 10 % des comprimés d'opioïde prescrits. Plus de la moitié de tous les comprimés prescrits n'ont pas été utilisés. Les protocoles mettant en oeuvre des stratégies de prescription spécifiques justifient des recherches plus approfondies pour évaluer leur incidence potentielle sur la prescription et la consommation d'opioïdes.

The PROMISING Project: A Pilot Study to Improve Geriatric Care Through a Pharmacist-Led Psychotropic Stewardship Program.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Psychotropic medications are frequently prescribed during acute care, even in older patients. They represent a risk for inappropriate long-term use and increase the overall risk of morbidity and mortality in this population. Our project aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a psychotropic medication stewardship program led by pharmacists. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational pilot study in patients aged 75 years and older, admitted to a surgical unit with at least one active prescription of a psychotropic medication (antipsychotic, benzodiazepine or non-benzodiazepine receptor agonist). Each psychotropic medication was assessed for potential deprescription, and if eligible, a recommendation from the stewardship pharmacist was made to the medical team. RESULTS: Among 183 patients, 93.4% were eligible for a potential deprescription. A total of 298 prescriptions were evaluated by the stewardship pharmacists, of which 57.7% were antipsychotics, 22.8% were benzodiazepines and 19.5% were non-benzodiazepine receptor agonists. Most of the assessed prescriptions were started during current hospitalization (62.7%). The median time required for the intervention per patient was 17 min 30 s. The stewardship pharmacists made 192 suggestions for 258 eligible prescriptions, with 69.8% being deprescription recommendations. Of all the deprescription suggestions, 75.4% were accepted by the medical team and 84.8% of those accepted persisted at discharge. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a pharmacist-led psychotropic medication stewardship program on surgical units in our hospital is feasible and is a promising approach to improve geriatric care.

Assessing cardiometabolic parameter monitoring in inpatients taking a second-generation antipsychotic: The CAMI-SGA study - a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the proportion of initial cardiometabolic assessment and its predicting factors in adults with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or other related diagnoses for whom a second-generation antipsychotic was prescribed in the hospital setting. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: The psychiatry unit of a Canadian tertiary care teaching hospital in Montreal, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: 402 patients with aforementioned disorders who initiated, restarted or switched to one of the following antipsychotics: clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, paliperidone or quetiapine, between 2013 and 2016. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed the proportion of cardiometabolic parameters monitored. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We identified predictors that influence the monitoring of cardiometabolic parameters and we assessed the proportion of adequate interventions following the screening of uncontrolled blood pressure and fasting glucose or glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) results. RESULTS: Only 37.3% of patients received monitoring for at least three cardiometabolic parameters. Blood pressure was assessed in 99.8% of patients; lipid profile in 24.4%; fasting glucose or HbA1c in 33.3% and weight or body mass index in 97.8% of patients while waist circumference was assessed in 4.5% of patients. For patients with abnormal blood pressure and glycaemic values, 42.3% and 41.2% subsequent interventions were done, respectively. The study highlighted the psychiatric diagnosis (substance induced disorder OR 0.06 95% CI 0.00 to 0.44), the presence of a court-ordered treatment (OR 0.79 95% CI 0.35 to 1.79) and the treating psychiatrist (up to OR 34.0 95% CI 16.2 to 140.7) as predictors of cardiometabolic monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports suboptimal baseline cardiometabolic monitoring of patients taking an antipsychotic in a Canadian hospital. Optimising collaboration within a multidisciplinary team may increase cardiometabolic monitoring.

Anticoagulation management services in community pharmacy: Feasibility of implementing a quality improvement programme through a practice-based research network.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The literature has reported suboptimal real-world use of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Anticoagulation management services (AMSs) in community pharmacy have rarely been evaluated, and no formal process is available to enable pharmacists to evaluate and improve their clinical practices. Our objective was to assess the feasibility of implementing, through a practice-based research network (PBRN), a quality improvement programme on AMSs by community pharmacists for AF patients and explore its impact on the quality of clinical practices and pharmacists' knowledge. METHODS: An uncontrolled pre/post-pilot study was conducted through a PBRN. Pharmacists identified 5-20 AF patients on oral anticoagulants per pharmacy and completed questionnaires at baseline (T0) and after 6 months (T6). Clinical practices were evaluated using a set of quality indicators (QIs). QI scores ranged from 0% (no QI achieved) to 100% (all QIs achieved). The programme included an audit and feedback based on QIs and a personalized training programme (including online videos). Participation rates and satisfaction were documented. Mean changes (T6-T0), with 95% confidence interval (CI), in QIs and knowledge scores were computed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 37 pharmacies (50 pharmacists) identified 222 patients who had received either vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), or both. All pharmacies received their baseline quality report (audit), and facilitators contacted by phone 97% of pharmacies (feedback). Each of the six online videos was completed by at least 48% of pharmacists. Baseline mean global QI scores for VKAs and DOACs were 39.1% (95% CI: 35.7%-42.4%) and 12.3% (7.8%-16.8%), respectively. Over a 6-month period, they increased by 12.5% points (7.5%-17.5%) and 9.9% points (3.8%-16.1%), respectively. Baseline mean global knowledge score was 68.7% (65.4%-72.0%) and increased by 4.3% points (1.2%-7.4%). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Implementing a quality improvement programme for AMS in community pharmacy is relevant and feasible and may improve pharmacists' practices and knowledge.

Evaluation of a continuous quality improvement program in anticoagulant therapy: Feasibility, satisfaction and perception.

BACKGROUND: The ACO Program (Programme ACO), a continuous quality improvement program (CQIP) in anticoagulation therapy, was offered in community pharmacies as a pilot project. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the participants' appreciation for the various activities of the program. METHODS: Participants had access to training activities, including an audit with feedback, online training activities (OTA), clinical tools and support from facilitators. Cognitive behavioural learning determinants were evaluated before and 5 months after the beginning of the program. Participants' satisfaction and perception were documented via online questionnaires and a semistructured interview. RESULTS: Of the 52 pharmacists in the ACO Program, 47 participated in this evaluation. Seventy-seven percent of the participants completed at least 1 OTA and 6% published on the forum. The feeling of personal effectiveness rose from 8.01 (7.67-8.35) to 8.62 (8.24-8.99). The audit and feedback, as well as the high-quality OTA and their lecturers, were the most appreciated elements. DISCUSSION: There was a high OTA participation rate. The facilitators seemed to play a key role in the CQIP. The low level of participation in the forum reflects the known phenomenon of social loafing. Technical difficulties affecting the platform and data collection for the audit with feedback constituted limitations. CONCLUSION: The CQIP in anticoagulation therapy is appreciated by community pharmacists and is associated with an improved feeling of personal effectiveness.