Thymosin beta4 inhibits ADF/cofilin stimulated F-actin cycling and hela cell migration: reversal by active Arp2/3 complex.

F-actin treadmilling plays a key part in cell locomotion. Because immunofluorescence showed colocalisation of thymosin beta4 (Tß4) with cofilin-1 and Arp2/3 complex in lamellipodia, we analyzed combinations of these proteins on F-actin-adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-hydrolysis, which provides a measure of actin treadmilling. Actin depolymerising factor (ADF)/cofilin stimulated treadmilling, while Tß4 decreased treadmilling, presumably by sequestering monomers. Tß4 added together with ADF/cofilin also inhibited the treadmilling, relative to cofilin alone, but both the rate and extent of depolymerization were markedly enhanced in the presence of both these proteins. Arp2/3 complex reversed the sequestering activity of Tß4 when equimolar to actin, but not in the additional presence of cofilin-1 or ADF. Transfection experiments to explore the effects of changing the intracellular concentration of Tß4 in HeLa cells showed that an increase in Tß4 resulted in reduced actin filaments bundles and narrower lamellipodia, and a conspicuous decrease of cell migration as seen by two different assays. In contrast, cells transfected with a vector leading to Tß4 knockdown by small interfering RNA (siRNA) displayed prominent actin filament networks within the lamellipodia and the leading lamella and enhanced migration. The experiments reported here demonstrate the importance of the interplay of these different classes of actin-binding proteins on cell behaviour.

Modulation of actin filament dynamics by actin-binding proteins residing in lamellipodia.

Lamellipodial extension depends essentially on the polymerisation cycle of actin. In this cellular compartment the rate and extent of actin polymerisation is tightly regulated by a large number of actin-binding proteins. The main regulators comprise proteins of the actin-depolymerising factor (ADF)/cofilin family, which stimulate actin cycling, but there are also minor constituents like gelsolin and certain variants of tropomyosin that have so far not been considered to be lamellipodial constituents. A number of cell lines express ADF and cofilin simultaneously as shown here for the fibroblastic normal rat kidney (NRK) cell line. Both proteins co-localise in the lamellipodial region. We furthermore demonstrate the presence of gelsolin in lamellipodia by immunostaining with anti-gelsolin antibodies and transfection with EGFP-tagged gelsolin constructs. The presence of tropomyosins in lamellipodia has recently been reported (Hillberg et al., 2006. Tropomyosins are present in lamellipodia of motile cells. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 85, 399-409). In order to evaluate the effect of the simultaneous presence of ADF and cofilin together with tropomyosin and/or gelsolin on the polymerisation cycle of actin, we analysed their effect or combinations of these actin-binding proteins on the steady-state F-actin-ATPase activity in biochemical assays. Our results demonstrate stimulatory effects of ADF/cofilin on actin cycling and a further modulation of ADF/cofilin-stimulated F-actin-ATPase activity by gelsolin and tropomyosin in a complex manner.

Mapping the ADF/cofilin binding site on monomeric actin by competitive cross-linking and peptide array: evidence for a second binding site on monomeric actin.

The binding sites for actin depolymerising factor (ADF) and cofilin on G-actin have been mapped by competitive chemical cross-linking using deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I), gelsolin segment 1 (G1), thymosin beta4 (Tbeta4), and vitamin D-binding protein (DbP). To reduce ADF/cofilin induced actin oligomerisation we used ADP-ribosylated actin. Both vitamin D-binding protein and thymosin beta4 inhibit binding by ADF or cofilin, while cofilin or ADF and DNase I bind simultaneously. Competition was observed between ADF or cofilin and G1, supporting the hypothesis that cofilin preferentially binds in the cleft between sub-domains 1 and 3, similar to or overlapping the binding site of G1. Because the affinity of G1 is much higher than that of ADF or cofilin, even at a 20-fold excess of the latter, the complexes contained predominantly G1. Nevertheless, cross-linking studies using actin:G1 complexes and ADF or cofilin showed the presence of low concentrations of ternary complexes containing both ADF or cofilin and G1. Thus, even with monomeric actin, it is shown for the first time that binding sites for both G1 and ADF or cofilin can be occupied simultaneously, confirming the existence of two separate binding sites. Employing a peptide array with overlapping sequences of actin overlaid by cofilin, we have identified five sequence stretches of actin able to bind cofilin. These sequences are located within the regions of F-actin predicted to bind cofilin in the model derived from image reconstructions of electron microscopical images of cofilin-decorated filaments. Three of the peptides map to the cleft region between sub-domains 1 and 3 of the upper actin along the two-start long-pitch helix, while the other two are in the DNase I loop corresponding to the site of the lower actin in the helix. In the absence of any crystal structures of ADF or cofilin in complex with actin, these studies provide further information about the binding sites on F-actin for these important actin regulatory proteins.

Dual effects of staurosporine on A431 and NRK cells: microfilament disassembly and uncoordinated lamellipodial activity followed by cell death.

The general protein kinase inhibitor staurosporine (STS) has dual effects on human epidermoid cancer cells (A431) and normal rat kidney fibroblasts (NRK). It almost immediately stimulated increased lamellipodial activity of both cell lines and after 2 h induced typical signs of apoptosis, including cytoplasmic condensation, nuclear fragmentation, caspase-3 activation and DNA degradation. In the early phase we observed disruption of actin-containing stress fibres and accumulation of monomeric actin in the perinuclear region and cell nucleus. Increased lamellipodial-like extensions were observed particularly in A431 cells as demonstrated by co-localisation of actin and Arp2/3 complex, whereas NRK cells shrunk and exhibited numerous thin long extensions. These extensions exhibited uncoordinated centrifugal motile activity that appeared to tear the cells apart. Both cofilin and ADF were translocated from perinuclear regions to the cell cortex and, as expected in the presence of a kinase inhibitor, all the cofilin was dephosphorylated. Myosin II was absent from the extensions, and a reduction of phosphorylated myosin light chains was observed within the cytoplasm indicating myosin inactivation. Microtubules and intermediate filaments retained their characteristic filamentous organisation after STS exposure even when the cells became rounded and disorganised. Simultaneous treatment of NRK cells with STS and the caspase inhibitor zVAD did not inhibit the morphological and cytoskeletal changes. However, the cells underwent cell death as verified by positive annexin-V-staining. Thus it seems likely that cell death induced by STS may not only be a consequence of the activation of caspase, instead the disruption of the many motile processes involving the actin cytoskeleton may by itself suffice to induce caspase-independent cell death.

Activated cofilin colocalises with Arp2/3 complex in apoptotic blebs during programmed cell death.

Etoposide inhibits topoisomerase II and induces apoptosis in human epidermoid cancer cells (A431) and normal rat fibroblasts (NRK) as verified by apoptotic morphology and chromatin degradation. Here we examine changes in the localisation of actin, cofilin and the Arp2/3 complex during the apoptotic process in response to etoposide. Twenty-four hours after etoposide addition, a large number of cells of both lines exhibited nuclear and cytoplasmic fragmentation with the formation of numerous blebs typical of apoptosis. Etoposide exposure induces dissolution of stress fibres and an increase in actin and cofilin in membrane patches and apoptotic blebs. The actin is more peripherally located than the cofilin, similar to that reported for lamellipodia of highly motile keratocytes. By contrast, in control cells, cofilin is evenly distributed throughout the cytoplasm, though often enriched around the nucleus. The active form is inferred to be more peripherally localised and to be present in apoptotic blebs, since an antibody specific for phosphorylated cofilin did not stain the cell periphery nor apoptotic blebs. Although immunoblots of 2D gels demonstrate that the ratio of de-phosphorylated to phosphorylated cofilin does not change after etoposide treatment, this does not mean that there are no changes in the turnover of the active and inactive forms. Transfection of both cell lines with EGFP-containing constructs of wild-type cofilin and mutants resembling its activated (S3A) and inactivated (S3D) forms shows that the active form has a more peripheral localisation and is also present in the membrane blebs with a strong colocalisation with actin. We further show that Arp2/3 also localises in apoptotic blebs and discuss the role of these proteins in apoptosis by analogy with actin-based protrusive motility in lamellipodia.

Solution structure of human cofilin: actin binding, pH sensitivity, and relationship to actin-depolymerizing factor.

Human actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF) and cofilin are pH-sensitive, actin-depolymerizing proteins. Although 72% identical in sequence, ADF has a much higher depolymerizing activity than cofilin at pH 8. To understand this, we solved the structure of human cofilin using nuclear magnetic resonance and compared it with human ADF. Important sequence differences between vertebrate ADF/cofilins were correlated with unique structural determinants in the F-actin-binding site to account for differences in biochemical activities of the two proteins. Cofilin has a short beta-strand at the C terminus, not found in ADF, which packs against strands beta3/beta4, changing the environment around Lys96, a residue essential for F-actin binding. A salt bridge involving His133 and Asp98 (Glu98 in ADF) may explain the pH sensitivity of human cofilin and ADF; these two residues are fully conserved in vertebrate ADF/cofilins. Chemical shift perturbations identified residues that (i) differ in their chemical environments between wild type cofilin and mutants S3D, which has greatly reduced G-actin binding, and K96Q, which does not bind F-actin; (ii) are affected when G-actin binds cofilin; and (iii) are affected by pH change from 6 to 8. Many residues affected by G-actin binding also show perturbation in the mutants or in response to pH. Our evidence suggests the involvement of residues 133-138 of strand beta5 in all of the activities examined. Because residues in beta5 are perturbed by mutations that affect both G-actin and F-actin binding, this strand forms a "boundary" or "bridge" between the proposed F- and G-actin-binding sites.

Gelsolin domains 4-6 in active, actin-free conformation identifies sites of regulatory calcium ions.

Structural analysis of gelsolin domains 4-6 demonstrates that the two highest-affinity calcium ions that activate the molecule are in domains 5 and 6, one in each. An additional calcium site in domain 4 depends on subsequent actin binding and is seen only in the complex. The uncomplexed structure is primed to bind actin. Since the disposition of the three domains is similar in different crystal environments, either free or in complex with actin, the conformation in calcium is intrinsic to active gelsolin itself. Thus the actin-free structure shows that the structure with an actin monomer is a good model for an actin filament cap. The last 13 residues of domain 6 have been proposed to be a calcium-activated latch that, in the inhibited form only, links two halves of gelsolin. Comparison with the active structure shows that loosening of the latch contributes but is not central to activation. Calcium binding in domain 6 invokes a cascade of swapped ion-pairs. A basic residue swaps acidic binding partners to stabilise a straightened form of a helix that is kinked in inhibited gelsolin. The other end of the helix is connected by a loop to an edge beta-strand. In active gelsolin, an acidic residue in this helix breaks with its loop partner to form a new intrahelical ion-pairing, resulting in the breakage of the continuous sheet between domains 4 and 6, which is central to the inhibited conformation. A structural alignment of domain sequences provides a rationale to understand why the two calcium sites found here have the highest affinity amongst the five different candidate sites found in other gelsolin structures.

Latrunculin B or ATP depletion induces cofilin-dependent translocation of actin into nuclei of mast cells.

Increasing cellular G-actin, using latrunculin B, in either intact or permeabilized rat peritoneal mast cells, caused translocation of both actin and an actin regulatory protein, cofilin, into the nuclei. The effect was not associated with an increase in the proportion of apoptotic cells. The major part of the nuclear actin was not stained by rhodamine-phalloidin but could be visualized with an actin antibody, indicating its monomeric or a conformationally distinct state, e.g. cofilin-decorated filaments. Introduction of anti-cofilin into permeabilized cells inhibited nuclear actin accumulation, implying that an active, cofilin-dependent, import exists in this system. Nuclear actin was localized outside the ethidium bromide-stained region, in the extrachromosomal nuclear domain. In permeabilized cells, the appearance of nuclear actin and cofilin was not significantly affected by increasing [Ca(2+)] and/or adding guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate), but was greatly promoted when ATP was withdrawn. Similarly, ATP depletion in intact cells also induced nuclear actin accumulation. In contrast to the effects of latrunculin B, ATP depletion was associated with an increase in cortical F-actin. Our results suggest that the presence of actin in the nucleus may be required for certain stress-induced responses and that cofilin is essential for the nuclear import of actin.

The two ADF-H domains of twinfilin play functionally distinct roles in interactions with actin monomers.

Twinfilin is a ubiquitous and abundant actin monomer-binding protein that is composed of two ADF-H domains. To elucidate the role of twinfilin in actin dynamics, we examined the interactions of mouse twinfilin and its isolated ADF-H domains with G-actin. Wild-type twinfilin binds ADP-G-actin with higher affinity (K(D) = 0.05 microM) than ATP-G-actin (K(D) = 0.47 microM) under physiological ionic conditions and forms a relatively stable (k(off) = 1.8 s(-1)) complex with ADP-G-actin. Data from native PAGE and size exclusion chromatography coupled with light scattering suggest that twinfilin competes with ADF/cofilin for the high-affinity binding site on actin monomers, although at higher concentrations, twinfilin, cofilin, and actin may also form a ternary complex. By systematic deletion analysis, we show that the actin-binding activity is located entirely in the two ADF-H domains of twinfilin. Individually, these domains compete for the same binding site on actin, but the C-terminal ADF-H domain, which has >10-fold higher affinity for ADP-G-actin, is almost entirely responsible for the ability of twinfilin to increase the amount of monomeric actin in cosedimentation assays. Isolated ADF-H domains associate with ADP-G-actin with rapid second-order kinetics, whereas the association of wild-type twinfilin with G-actin exhibits kinetics consistent with a two-step binding process. These data suggest that the association with an actin monomer induces a first-order conformational change within the twinfilin molecule. On the basis of these results, we propose a kinetic model for the role of twinfilin in actin dynamics and its possible function in cells.

Regulation of the pollen-specific actin-depolymerizing factor LlADF1.

Pollen tube growth is dependent on a dynamic actin cytoskeleton, suggesting that actin-regulating proteins are involved. We have examined the regulation of the lily pollen-specific actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF) LlADF1. Its actin binding and depolymerizing activity is pH sensitive, inhibited by certain phosphoinositides, but not controlled by phosphorylation. Compared with its F-actin binding properties, its low activity in depolymerization assays has been used to explain why pollen ADF decorates F-actin in pollen grains. This low activity is incompatible with a role in increasing actin dynamics necessary to promote pollen tube growth. We have identified a plant homolog of actin-interacting protein, AIP1, which enhances the depolymerization of F-actin in the presence of LlADF1 by approximately 60%. Both pollen ADF and pollen AIP1 bind F-actin in pollen grains but are mainly cytoplasmic in pollen tubes. Our results suggest that together these proteins remodel actin filaments as pollen grains enter and exit dormancy.

Determining the differences in actin binding by human ADF and cofilin.

The actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin family of proteins play an essential role in actin dynamics and cytoskeletal re-organization. Human tissues express two isoforms in the same cells, ADF and cofilin, and these two proteins are more than 70% identical in amino acid sequence. We show that ADF is a much more potent actin-depolymerizing agent than cofilin: the maximum level of depolymerization at pH 8 by ADF is about 20 microM compared to 5 microM for cofilin, but little depolymerization occurs at pH 6.5 with either protein. However, we find little difference between the two proteins in their binding to filaments, their severing activities or their activation of subunit release from the pointed ends of filaments. Likewise, they show no significant differences in their affinities for monomeric actin: both bind 15-fold more tightly to actin.ADP than to actin.ATP. Complexes between actin.ADP and ADF or cofilin associate with both barbed and pointed ends of filaments at similar rates (close to those of actin.ATP and much higher than those of actin.ADP). This explains why high concentrations of both proteins reverse the activation of subunit release at pointed ends. The major difference between the two proteins is that the nucleating activity of cofilin-actin.ADP complexes is twice that of ADF-actin.ADP complexes and this, in turn, is twice that of actin.ATP alone. It is this weaker nucleating potential of ADF-actin.ADP that accounts for the much higher steady-state depolymerizing activity. The pH-sensitivity is due to the nucleating activity of complexes being greater at pH 6.5 than at pH 8. Sequence analysis of mammalian and avian isoforms shows a consistent pattern of charge differences in regions of the protein associated with F-actin-binding that may account for the differences in activity between ADF and cofilin.