Necrotizing fasciitis: an update on epidemiology, diagnostic methods, and treatment.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review is to discuss the latest evidence of epidemiology, diagnostic methods, and treatment of necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) with a particular focus on necrotizing fasciitis (NF). RECENT FINDINGS: NSTIs have been historically referred to as NF but encompass a broader range of infections, with variable rates ranging from 0.86 to 32.64 per 100 000 person-years, influenced by factors such as climate and seasonal variations. They have diverse microbiological profiles categorized into different types based on the involved pathogens, including polymicrobial or monomicrobial infections caused by organisms such as group A streptococcus (GAS), Staphylococcus aureus , some Gram-negative pathogens, and filamentous fungi following trauma and natural disasters. Diagnosis relies on clinical symptoms and signs, laboratory markers, and imaging. However, the gold standard for diagnosis remains intraoperative tissue culture. Treatment involves repeated surgical debridement of necrotic tissues in addition to intravenous antibiotics. Adjuvant therapies with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) might have a role. Soft tissue reconstruction may be necessary following surgery. SUMMARY: Prompt diagnosis and proper medical and surgical management of NSTI will improve outcomes.

Infective Endocarditis after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Challenges in the Diagnosis and Management.

Although initially conceived for high-risk patients who are ineligible for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now recommended in a wider spectrum of indications, including among young patients. However, similar to SAVR, TAVR is also associated with a risk of infectious complications, namely, prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). As the number of performed TAVR procedures increases, and despite the low incidence of PVE post-TAVR, clinicians should be familiar with its associated risk factors and clinical presentation. Whereas the diagnosis of native valve endocarditis can be achieved straightforwardly by applying the modified Duke criteria, the diagnosis of PVE is more challenging given its atypical symptoms, the lower sensitivity of the criteria involved, and the low diagnostic yield of conventional echocardiography. Delay in proper management can be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Therefore, clinicians should have a high index of suspicion and initiate proper work-up according to the severity of the illness, the underlying host, and the local epidemiology of the causative organisms. The most common causative pathogens are Gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Enterococcus spp., and Streptococcus spp. (particularly the viridans group), while less-likely causative pathogens include Gram-negative and fungal pathogens. The high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance complicates the choice of therapy. There remain controversies regarding the optimal management strategies including indications for surgical interventions. Surgical assessment is recommended early in the course of illness and surgical intervention should be considered in selected patients. As in other PVE, the duration of therapy depends on the isolated pathogen, the host, and the clinical response. Since TAVR is a relatively new procedure, the outcome of TAVR-PVE is yet to be fully understood.