IL-6 receptor blockade does not slow ß cell loss in new-onset type 1 diabetes.

BackgroundIL-6 receptor (IL-6R) signaling drives development of T cell populations important to type 1 diabetes pathogenesis. We evaluated whether blockade of IL-6R with monoclonal antibody tocilizumab would slow loss of residual ß cell function in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes patients.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial with tocilizumab in new-onset type 1 diabetes. Participants were screened within 100 days of diagnosis. Eligible participants were randomized 2:1 to receive 7 monthly doses of tocilizumab or placebo. The primary outcome was the change from screening in the mean AUC of C-peptide collected during the first 2 hours of a mixed meal tolerance test at week 52 in pediatric participants (ages 6-17 years).ResultsThere was no statistical difference in the primary outcome between tocilizumab and placebo. Immunophenotyping showed reductions in downstream signaling of the IL-6R in T cells but no changes in CD4 memory subsets, Th17 cells, Tregs, or CD4+ T effector cell resistance to Treg suppression. A DC subset decreased during therapy but regressed to baseline once therapy stopped. Tocilizumab was well tolerated.ConclusionTocilizumab reduced T cell IL-6R signaling but did not modulate CD4+ T cell phenotypes or slow loss of residual ß cell function in newly diagnosed individuals with type 1 diabetes.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02293837.FundingNIH National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) UM1AI109565, UL1TR000004 from NIH/National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA), NIH/NIDDK P30DK036836, NIH/NIDDK U01DK103266, NIH/NIDDK U01DK103266, 1UL1TR000064 from NIH/NCRR CTSA, NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) UL1TR001878, UL1TR002537 from NIH/CTSA; National Health and Medical Research Council Practitioner Fellowship (APP1136735), NIH/NIDDK U01-DK085476, NIH/CTSA UL1-TR002494, Indiana Clinical and Translational Science Institute Award UL1TR002529, Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research UL1TR000445. NIH/NCATS UL1TR003142, NIH/CTSA program UL1-TR002494, Veteran Affairs Administration, and 1R01AI132774.

Alpha-1 antitrypsin treatment of new-onset type 1 diabetes: An open-label, phase I clinical trial (RETAIN) to assess safety and pharmacokinetics.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) in adults and children. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Short-term AAT treatment restores euglycemia in the non-obese mouse model of type 1 diabetes. A phase I multicenter study in 16 subjects with new-onset type 1 diabetes studied the safety and pharmacokinetics of Aralast NP (AAT). This open-label, dose-escalation study enrolled 8 adults aged 16 to 35 years and 8 children aged 8 to 15 years within 100 days of diagnosis, to receive 12 infusions of AAT: a low dose of 45 mg/kg weekly for 6 weeks, followed by a higher dose of 90 mg/kg for 6 weeks. RESULTS: C-peptide secretion during a mixed meal, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and insulin usage remained relatively stable during the treatment period. At 72 hours after infusion of 90 mg/kg, mean levels of AAT fell below 2.0 g/L for 7 of 15 subjects. To identify a plasma level of AAT likely to be therapeutic, pharmacodynamic ex vivo assays were performed on fresh whole blood from adult subjects. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses were performed on inhibitor of IKBKE, NOD1, TLR1, and TRAD gene expression, which are important for activation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and apoptosis pathways. AAT suppressed expression dose-dependently; 50% inhibition was achieved in the 2.5 to 5.0 mg/mL range. CONCLUSIONS: AAT was well tolerated and safe in subjects with new-onset type 1 diabetes. Weekly doses of AAT greater than 90 mg/kg may be necessary for an optimal therapeutic effect.

Patient-reported cognitive functioning and daily functioning in chronic dialysis patients.

Subjective cognitive impairment negatively affects daily functioning, health-related quality of life, and health care consumption, and is predictive of future cognitive decline in many patient populations. However, no subjective measures of multidimensional cognitive functioning have been evaluated for dialysis patients. Our purposes were to examine (1) the association between patient-reported (subjective) cognitive functioning and objective cognitive functioning and (2) the relationships between subjective and objective cognitive functioning and everyday functioning of dialysis patients. We used baseline data from an ongoing longitudinal observational study of trajectories in dialysis patients' multidimensional quality of life. One hundred thirty-five patients completed a telephone-based neuropsychological battery (Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone, a measure of objective cognitive functioning), a measure of subjective cognitive functioning (Patient's Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory), and measures of everyday functioning (Activities of Daily Living [ADL] and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living [IADL] scales). After controlling for age and education, there was a modest correlation (r = 0.33, P > 0.001) between subjective and objective cognitive functioning. Multivariate logistic regression models showed subjective, but not objective, cognitive functioning was a significant predictor of both ADLs and IADLs. The findings suggest the potential clinical value of subjective measures of cognitive functioning, not to replace objective measures or diagnostic tests, but rather to optimize the meaningfulness of clinical assessment and management.