Ethical behaviour of physicians and psychologists: similarities and differences.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the coping patterns of physicians and clinical psychologists when confronted with clinical ethical dilemmas and to explore consistency across different dilemmas. POPULATION: 88 clinical psychologists and 149 family physicians in Israel. METHOD: Six dilemmas representing different ethical domains were selected from the literature. Vignettes were composed for each dilemma, and seven possible behavioural responses for each were proposed, scaled from most to least ethical. The vignettes were presented to both family physicians and clinical psychologists. RESULTS: Psychologists' aggregated mean ethical intention score, as compared with the physicians, was found to be significantly higher (F(6, 232)=22.44, p<0.001, η2=0.37). Psychologists showed higher ethical intent for two dilemmas: issues of payment (they would continue treating a non-paying patient while physicians would not) and dual relationships (they would avoid treating the son of a colleague). In the other four vignettes, psychologists and physicians responded in much the same way. The highest ethical intent scores for both psychologists and physicians were for confidentiality and a colleague's inappropriate practice due to personal problems. CONCLUSIONS: Responses to the dilemmas by physicians and psychologists can be categorised into two groups: (1) similar behaviours on the part of both professions when confronting dilemmas concerning confidentiality, inappropriate practice due to personal problems, improper professional conduct and academic issues and (2) different behaviours when confronting either payment issues or dual relationships.

An anatomy of conflicts in primary care encounters: a multi-method study.

BACKGROUND: Medical consultations are replete with conflicts, particularly in the current era of explicit and implicit rationing practices in health care organizations. Although such conflicts may challenge the doctor-patient relationship, little is known about them or their consequences. AIMS: To systematically describe the nature of doctor-patient conflicts in medical encounters and the strategies physicians use when faced with conflicts. METHODS: Analysis of 291 videotaped routine encounters with 28 general practitioners, using a novel adaptation of the Roter interaction analysis system software, provided quantitative empirical data on the conflicts and on the communication process. Seven focus groups (56 GPs) provided qualitative insights and guided the analysis. RESULTS: Conflicts were identified in 40% of consultations; 21% of these were related to the rationing of health care resources. In conflictual encounters, both the opening and closing phases of the encounter were shorter than in non-conflictual encounters. In coping with resource rationing, the commonest strategy was to accept the dictates of the system without telling the patients about other options. When conflict of this type occurred, doctors showed more opposition to the patients rather than empathy. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors often face conflicts in their routine work, but resource-related conflicts are especially difficult and expose the dual loyalties of the doctor to the patient and to the system. Insights derived from this research can be used to design training interventions that improve doctors' efficacy in coping with conflicts and ultimately allow them to provide better patient care.

Prevention in Halakhah.

Preventive medicine is taking an increasingly central place in modern clinical practice, at least in primary care. What, if anything, does the Jewish rabbinic tradition have to say about keeping healthy? The delayed response of contemporary rabbis to the dangers of smoking, in particular, raises questions about the underlying principles that Halakhah employs to approach health promotion. As is often the case in Halakhah, we may detect different streams of thought in the classical sources, which may be felt in the way contemporary issues are handled. Three approaches will be discussed. First, Maimonides, famous for the practical preventive approach in his medical writings, makes his philosophy clear both in his halakhic works and in his Guide for the Perplexed. For him, a healthy body is a prerequisite for a healthy soul. We must be free of physical suffering in order to be able to do the work of perfecting our souls. Second, the view that health is the reward for goodness and illness a punishment for sin as expounded or implied in the writings of Nahmanides, and of Ibn Ezra: the way to good health is to lead a good life. Third, an early midrashic source picked up again much later by Rabbi Israel Meir Kagan (the Hafetz Hayim) gives the argument from custodianship--since the body is divine property we have a duty to look after it well. So for Maimonides there is a prior duty to keep healthy, while for Nahmanides the prior requirement is to repent of sin. For the Hafetz Hayim, keeping the body healthy is an independent duty in its own right. These then are the differences in basic approach that may affect the emphases that different rabbis today place on health maintenance and promotion.

Illness in context and families as teachers: a year-long project for medical students.

The authors describe a program for second-year students in Tel Aviv University's six-year medical school. The program's aim is to teach students the importance of context and interactions in patient care by exposing them to a real patient-family-doctor interaction using narrative-based methods to encourage reflective learning. Each student meets five times a year with a volunteer family, one of whose members suffers from a chronic disease. The program endorses a "patients as teachers" approach, as families are considered to be teachers for the students and not as objects of investigation and assessment. The students receive supervision in small groups, to enhance learning and reflection. To appraise the extent to which students had obtained the required knowledge, skills, and attitudes, the authors extracted reflections regarding the learning experience from students' essays. Major themes identified were becoming "family sensitive," building and improving communication skills, questioning intrusiveness, adopting a nonpatronizing and nonjudgmental attitude, developing reflective skills, creating a future professional model, and experiencing and appreciating continuity of care. The authors argue that learning to listen to patients' narratives, developing a reflective attitude, and being sensitive to patient-family-doctor interactions are of value to all doctors, and therefore programs similar to theirs should be established as part of general medical school education and not just in the context of family medicine.

Constitutively increased neutrophil surface expression of beta2-integrin in Yemenite Jews.

The aim of this study was to analyze surface expression of neutrophil adhesion molecules in Yemenite Jews as compared to other ethnic populations in Israel. The constitutive neutrophil expression of CD11b and L-selectin (LS), as well as their expression in response to an in vitro chemoattractant and growth factor stimulation were studied by flow cytometry. Mean surface expression of CD11b molecule was statistically significantly increased among the Yemenite Jews tested compared to the non-Yemenite Jews (327.1 +/- 129.2 vs. 237.0 +/- 133.1; p = 0.002), with no significant correlation to their absolute neutrophil count. LS expression was similar in the two study groups. In vitro analysis of CD11b and LS expression induced by chemoattractant and G-CSF showed no difference between neutrophils of Yemenite versus non-Yemenite Jews. The study results suggest that in Yemenite Jews, circulating neutrophils display significantly increased expression of beta2-integrin molecules on their surface compared to non-Yemenite Jews.

Attitude of general practitioners towards psychiatric consultation in primary care clinic.

Fifty general practitioners (GPs) were surveyed about their attitudes towards psychiatric liaison-consultation services. The questionnaire differentiated among GPs' attitudes towards the liason-consultation model and towards the various possible roles of the psychiatrist who visits the GP's practice. These attitudes were analyzed in relation to the level of post-graduate training of the GPs, and to their psychological sensitivity as measured by the PMI scale. GPs with specialist registration certificates in family medicine were more interested in working together with psychiatrists and rated themselves as more sensitive to psychological issues. The largest group (39%) among the GPs thought that the main task of the visiting psychiatrist is to advise them on psycho-social issues, while leaving clinical responsibility in their hands. Less frequent responses included: diagnosis and treatment within the primary care clinic (17%), facilitating referrals (15%), and update teaching of psychiatry (12%). The predominant attitude was consistent with the finding that 96% of the GPs thought that they had good abilities at recognizing patients in distress, and 92% rated their doctor-patient relationship skills as high.

With luck, good doctors make a difference.

The luckiest general practitioners work in an ideal environment with a perfect patient population, their clinical intuitions are always correct, they face difficulties with total equanimity, and they get on with all their patients. In the real world one needs a lot of luck for things to go right. This paper applies the philosophical concept of 'moral luck' to the world of general practice.

Comparison of blood pressure measurements on the bare arm, below a rolled-up sleeve, or over a sleeve.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the effect of measuring blood pressure below subjects' rolled-up sleeves, over the sleeve, or on the bare arm. This is an important day-to-day issue for the busy GP. METHODS: The sample consisted of 201 subjects in family practice clinics and residents of a senior citizens' home. A digital device was used in all cases. Each participant underwent three blood pressure measurements in each of the following conditions in random order: cuff on bare arm; cuff over the sleeve; and cuff below the rolled-up sleeve. Differences between measurements were plotted against the mean blood pressure. Confounding factors controlled for were age, sex, clothing pressure and skin-fold thickness. RESULTS: Differences in mean blood pressure readings between the clothed and bare arm were 0.5 mmHg (SD 7.5) for systolic pressure and 1 mmHg (SD 5) for diastolic pressure; neither difference was significant. However, in hypertensive subjects (>140 mmHg systolic), although the mean difference remained small (systolic pressure, 2 mmHg, SD 10), the range of difference for individual subjects was -32 mmHg to +22 mmHg. CONCLUSION: The degree of clothing under the sphygmomanometer cuff does not have a clinically important effect on the blood pressure measurement. In patients known or found to be hypertensive, measurement on the bare arm is recommended.